Terrestrial Coordinate Systems Solidly Connected with the Earth

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 133-159
Author(s):  
M. Bursa
Keyword(s):  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Coordinate Systems ◽  
Basic Definition ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Satellite Methods ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Actual Accuracy

AbstractThe principles and the suppositions for the basic definition of terrestrial coordinate systems solidly connected with the Earth are discussed: Problem of determining the position of the Earth’s center of mass (or of the centers of geodetic reference ellipsoids). Problem of defining the conventional geocentric and geodetic reference axes as well as axes of the principal terrestrial ellipsoid of inertia. Problem of determining directions of geodetic reference axes using geometrical satellite methods and the actual accuracy of the solution.

On the Adoption of a Terrestrial Reference Frame

1980 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 145-153
Author(s):  
Dennis D. McCarthy
Keyword(s):  
Reference Frame ◽  
Polar Motion ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Terrestrial Reference Frame ◽  
Fixed Frame ◽  
The Earth ◽  
International Polar ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Observational Techniques ◽  
Fixed System

AbstractThe report of the IAU Working Group on Nutation endorsed by Commissions 4, 8, 19 and 31 at the 1979 General Assembly points out that “… the complete theory of the general nutational motion of the Earth about its center of mass may be described by the sum of two components, astronomical nutation, commonly referred to as nutation, which is nutation with respect to a space-fixed coordinate system, and polar motion, which is nutation with respect to a body-fixed system …”. Unlike the situation for the space-fixed frame, there is not an adequate, formally accepted, body-fixed system for this purpose. The Conventional International Origin (CIO) as it is presently defined is no longer acceptable because of recent improvements in observational techniques. The effective lack of this type of terrestrial reference frame limits the complete description of the general nutational motion of the Earth. In the absence of a terrestrial reference frame suitable for specifying the orientation of the Earth, it is suggested that a body-fixed system could be represented formally in a manner analogous to that used to represent the space-fixed frame. This procedure would be quite similar to methods employed currently by the International Polar Motion Service and the Bureau International de l’Heure, and would allow for the use of observations from new techniques in the definition of a terrestrial reference frame to be used to specify the complete nutational motion of the Earth.

scholarly journals Origin and Scale of Coordinate Systems in Satellite Geodesy

1980 ◽  
Vol 56 ◽  
pp. 239-250
Author(s):  
J. B. Zieliński
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System ◽  
Inner Core ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Satellite Geodesy ◽  
Coordinate Systems ◽  
Scale Problem ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Geocenter Motion

AbstractThe center of mass of the Earth is commonly taken as origin for the coordinate systems used in satellite geodesy. In this paper the notion of the “geocenter” is discussed from the point of view of mechanics and geophysics. It is shown that processes in and above the crust have practically no impact on the position of the geocenter. It is possible however that motions of the inner core may cause variations of the geocenter of the order of 1 m. Nevertheless the geocenter is the best point for the origin of a coordinate system. Mather’s method of monitoring geocenter motion is discussed, and some other possibilities are mentioned. Concerning the scale problem, the role of the constant GM and time measurements in satellite net determinations are briefly discussed.

scholarly journals On the Absolute Orientation of the Selenodetic Reference Frame

1981 ◽  
Vol 63 ◽  
pp. 281-286
Author(s):  
V. S. Kislyuk
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
The Moon ◽  
Coordinate Systems ◽  
Inertial Coordinate System ◽  
Reference Coordinate System ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Principal Axes ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Selection Of

The selection of selenodetic reference coordinate system is an important problem in astronomy and selenodesy. For the purposes of reduction of observations, planning and executing space missions to the Moon, it is necessary, in any case, to know the orientation of the adopted selenodetic reference system in respect to the inertial coordinate system.Let us introduce the following coordinate systems: C(ξc, ηc, ζc), the Cassini system which is defined by the Cassini laws of the Moon rotation;D(ξd, ηd, ζd), the dynamical coordinate system, whose axes coincide with the principal axes of inertia of the Moon;Q(ξq, ηq, ζq), the quasi-dynamical coordinate system connected with the mean direction to the Earth, which is shifted by 254" West and 75" North from the longest axis of the dynamical system (Williams et al., 1973);S(ξs, ηs, ζs), the selenodetic coordinate system, which is practically realized by the positions of the points on the Moon surface given in Catalogues;I(X,Y,Z), the space-fixed (inertial) coordinate system. All the systems are selenocentric with the exception of S(ξs, ηs, ζs On the whole, the origin of this system does not coincide with the center of mass of the Moon.

Reference Coordinate System Requirements for Geophysics

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
P. L. Bender
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System ◽  
Polar Motion ◽  
Main Part ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Reference Points ◽  
Angular Motion ◽  
Coordinate Systems ◽  
Axis Of Rotation ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Fixed System

AbstractFive important geodynamical quantities which are closely linked are: 1) motions of points on the Earth’s surface; 2)polar motion; 3) changes in UT1-UTC; 4) nutation; and 5) motion of the geocenter. For each of these we expect to achieve measurements in the near future which have an accuracy of 1 to 3 cm or 0.3 to 1 milliarcsec.From a metrological point of view, one can say simply: “Measure each quantity against whichever coordinate system you can make the most accurate measurements with respect to”. I believe that this statement should serve as a guiding principle for the recommendations of the colloquium. However, it also is important that the coordinate systems help to provide a clear separation between the different phenomena of interest, and correspond closely to the conceptual definitions in terms of which geophysicists think about the phenomena.In any discussion of angular motion in space, both a “body-fixed” system and a “space-fixed” system are used. Some relevant types of coordinate systems, reference directions, or reference points which have been considered are: 1) celestial systems based on optical star catalogs, distant galaxies, radio source catalogs, or the Moon and inner planets; 2) the Earth’s axis of rotation, which defines a line through the Earth as well as a celestial reference direction; 3) the geocenter; and 4) “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate systems.When a geophysicists discusses UT1 and polar motion, he usually is thinking of the angular motion of the main part of the mantle with respect to an inertial frame and to the direction of the spin axis. Since the velocities of relative motion in most of the mantle are expectd to be extremely small, even if “substantial” deep convection is occurring, the conceptual “quasi-Earth-fixed” reference frame seems well defined. Methods for realizing a close approximation to this frame fortunately exist. Hopefully, this colloquium will recommend procedures for establishing and maintaining such a system for use in geodynamics. Motion of points on the Earth’s surface and of the geocenter can be measured against such a system with the full accuracy of the new techniques.The situation with respect to celestial reference frames is different. The various measurement techniques give changes in the orientation of the Earth, relative to different systems, so that we would like to know the relative motions of the systems in order to compare the results. However, there does not appear to be a need for defining any new system. Subjective figures of merit for the various system dependon both the accuracy with which measurements can be made against them and the degree to which they can be related to inertial systems.The main coordinate system requirement related to the 5 geodynamic quantities discussed in this talk is thus for the establishment and maintenance of a “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate system which closely approximates the motion of the main part of the mantle. Changes in the orientation of this system with respect to the various celestial systems can be determined by both the new and the conventional techniques, provided that some knowledge of changes in the local vertical is available. Changes in the axis of rotation and in the geocenter with respect to this system also can be obtained, as well as measurements of nutation.

2.2. Working Group 2: Conceptual Definitions of Reference Coordinate Systems for Earth Dynamics

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 21-26
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System ◽  
Working Group ◽  
General Character ◽  
Coordinate Systems ◽  
Reference Coordinate System ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Earth Dynamics

An ideal definition of a reference coordinate system should meet the following general requirements:1. It should be as conceptually simple as possible, so its philosophy is well understood by the users.2. It should imply as few physical assumptions as possible. Wherever they are necessary, such assumptions should be of a very general character and, in particular, they should not be dependent upon astronomical and geophysical detailed theories.3. It should suggest a materialization that is dynamically stable and is accessible to observations with the required accuracy.

Note on Selection of Coordinate Systems for Geodynamics

1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 395-407
Author(s):  
S. Henriksen
Keyword(s):  
Sea Level ◽  
The Other ◽  
Coordinate Systems ◽  
Mean Sea Level ◽  
The Earth ◽  
The One ◽  
Static Systems ◽  
Selection Of

The first question to be answered, in seeking coordinate systems for geodynamics, is: what is geodynamics? The answer is, of course, that geodynamics is that part of geophysics which is concerned with movements of the Earth, as opposed to geostatics which is the physics of the stationary Earth. But as far as we know, there is no stationary Earth – epur sic monere. So geodynamics is actually coextensive with geophysics, and coordinate systems suitable for the one should be suitable for the other. At the present time, there are not many coordinate systems, if any, that can be identified with a static Earth. Certainly the only coordinate of aeronomic (atmospheric) interest is the height, and this is usually either as geodynamic height or as pressure. In oceanology, the most important coordinate is depth, and this, like heights in the atmosphere, is expressed as metric depth from mean sea level, as geodynamic depth, or as pressure. Only for the earth do we find “static” systems in use, ana even here there is real question as to whether the systems are dynamic or static. So it would seem that our answer to the question, of what kind, of coordinate systems are we seeking, must be that we are looking for the same systems as are used in geophysics, and these systems are dynamic in nature already – that is, their definition involvestime.

MULTISTAGE ROCKET FLIGHT SIMULATION

2019 ◽  
pp. 105-107
Author(s):  
A. S. Busygin ◽  
А. V. Shumov
Keyword(s):  
State Vector ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
Flight Simulation ◽  
Continuous Change ◽  
Information Tools ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Piecewise Continuous ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Simulated Object

The paper considers a method for simulating the flight of a multistage rocket in Matlab using Simulink software for control and guidance. The model takes into account the anisotropy of the gravity of the Earth, changes in the pressure and density of the atmosphere, piecewise continuous change of the center of mass and the moment of inertia of the rocket during the flight. Also, the proposed model allows you to work out various targeting options using both onboard and ground‑based information tools, to load information from the ground‑based radar, with imitation of «non‑ideality» of incoming target designations as a result of changes in the accuracy of determining coordinates and speeds, as well as signal fluctuations. It is stipulated that the design is variable not only by the number of steps, but also by their types. The calculations are implemented in a matrix form, which allows parallel operations in each step of processing a multidimensional state vector of the simulated object.

scholarly journals The Celestial Reference System in Relativistic Framework

1990 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 99-110
Author(s):  
Han Chun-Hao ◽  
Huang Tian-Yi ◽  
Xu Bang-Xin
Keyword(s):  
Coordinate System ◽  
Reference Frame ◽  
Reference System ◽  
Light Deflection ◽  
Coordinate Systems ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Celestial Sphere ◽  
Celestial Reference System ◽  
Relativistic Framework

The concept of reference system, reference frame, coordinate system and celestial sphere in a relativistic framework are given. The problems on the choice of celestial coordinate systems and the definition of the light deflection are discussed. Our suggestions are listed in Sec. 5.

scholarly journals The Use of Terms and Definitions in the Study of Be Stars (Review Paper)

1987 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 3-21
Author(s):  
George W. Collins
Keyword(s):  
Review Paper ◽  
Be Stars ◽  
Basic Definition ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Incorrect Usage

AbstractIn this paper I shall examine the use and misuse of some astronomical terminology as it is commonly found in the literature. The incorrect usage of common terms, and sometimes the terms themselves, can lead to confusion by the reader and may well indicate misconceptions by the authors. A basic definition of the Be phenomena is suggested and other stellar characteristics whose interpretation may change when used for non-spherical stars, is discussed. Special attention is paid to a number of terms whose semantic nature is misleading when applied to the phenomena they are intended to represent. The use of model-dependent terms is discussed and some comments are offered which are intended to improve the clarity of communication within the subject.

scholarly journals Dynamics of Space Particles and Spacecrafts Passing by the Atmosphere of the Earth

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivian Martins Gomes ◽  
Antonio Fernando Bertachini de Almeida Prado ◽  
Justyna Golebiewska
Keyword(s):  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Center Of Mass ◽  
The Sun ◽  
Three Body Problem ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Three Body ◽  
Body Energy ◽  
Spacecraft Position

The present research studies the motion of a particle or a spacecraft that comes from an orbit around the Sun, which can be elliptic or hyperbolic, and that makes a passage close enough to the Earth such that it crosses its atmosphere. The idea is to measure the Sun-particle two-body energy before and after this passage in order to verify its variation as a function of the periapsis distance, angle of approach, and velocity at the periapsis of the particle. The full system is formed by the Sun, the Earth, and the particle or the spacecraft. The Sun and the Earth are in circular orbits around their center of mass and the motion is planar for all the bodies involved. The equations of motion consider the restricted circular planar three-body problem with the addition of the atmospheric drag. The initial conditions of the particle or spacecraft (position and velocity) are given at the periapsis of its trajectory around the Earth.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document