Sheep production systems in the hills

1985 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 85-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. H. McClelland ◽  
R. H. Armstrong ◽  
J. R. Thompson ◽  
T. L. Powell

AbstractFollowing the evolution of the “Two Pasture System” of hill sheep management by the Hill Farming Research Organisation (HFRO) at their Sourhope and Lephinmore stations, the model was adopted by the Agricultural Development and Advisory Service at Redesdale experimental husbandry farm (EHF) and by the Scottish Agricultural Colleges at the West College Hill Farm of Kirkton in West Perthshire. At the time, the ADAS Pwllpeiran EHF in mid-Wales was engaged in an exercise based on the traditional Welsh management system in which ewes are kept on enclosed better grazings from tupping until after lambing and then ewes and lambs are summered on the hill.The paper describes the developments at Sourhope, Redesdale, Kirkton and Pwllpeiran from the mid/late 1960's until the present time (1980 for Kirkton). The four farms differ considerably in climate, topography, soil type, vegetation and size. In all cases, however, between 20-30% of the total resource was subjected to some degree of pasture improvement over the course of the development. In the case of Kirkton and Sourhope, 9% of the resource was reseeded, whilst at Redesdale the corresponding figure was 17%. At Pwllpeiran, most of the improvement involved surface treatment but of a fairly costly nature almost equal to that of reseeding.In all cases, the improved pasture was used to provide ewe and lamb grazing during lactation and ewe grazing around mating and lambing. Supplementary feed inputs per ewe during late pregnancy increased significantly on all farms. There was an increase in ewe numbers carried, being 99, 139, 42 and 3% greater for Sourhope, Redesdale, Kirkton and Pwllpeiran, respectively. Weaning percentages (lambs weaned per 100 ewes put to the ram) also increased, by 26, 48, 48 and 36% for Sourhope, Redesdale, Kirkton and Pwllpeiran, respectively. Taken together, there was a significant corresponding increase in the number of lambs weaned of the order of 121, 297, 129 and 47%.Lamb weaning weights were improved in all cases in spite of increased twinning. This weight increase was most significant at Pwllpeiran where a major effort had been made to change breed type with the specific purpose of producing a heavier lamb.Gross margin data were available for Sourhope, Redesdale and Kirkton and when plotted on a per ewe and per hectare basis follow remarkably similar pathways over the development for the three centres. The gross margin figures per ewe, when discounted to base, show no significant increase and in some cases were reduced up until the introduction of the EEC sheep meat regime in 1981, after which time significant real increases occurred for those developments still in progress (Sourhope and Redesdale). The real increase there occurred as a result of increased stocking rate. On Pwllpeiran, however, where stocking rate increase was low, it is still considered that the exercise was profitable as measured by Internal Rate of Return.The various increases confirm that investment in land improvement, coupled with an enlightened approach to sheep management, has improved the overall efficiency of pasture utilisation and economic viability.

1985 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 67-76
Author(s):  
L. R. Gurnett ◽  
A. Waterhouse

AbstractWith no supplementary feed to cow or calf, a suckler cow can produce a calf of 330 kg at 1 year old worth about £380. At 2.5 cows per ha on an upland farm, the system can be self-sufficient for grass and silage. Overall production can be 820 kg live-weight gain per ha with the use of 250 kg N per ha. This is technically an efficient enterprise. It is also profitable, with a gross margin per ha in excess of £800.Work at Liscombe, in parallel with other centres, has developed to establish minimum healthy diets for the suckler cow whilst producing healthy, fast growing calves. The cow must be fertile and have a long life, producing on average 10 calves. This involves the controlled management of the natural ability of the cow to put on weight quickly in the summer and take it off slowly in the winter.The winter diet of the cow can vary from (1) restricted silage alone, (2) silage plus untreated straw, (3) untreated straw plus concentrate supplement, or (4) treated straw alone. As a result, the enterprise is very flexible.On a hill farm, the cow has a major role to control pasture in a subordinate role to sheep. Because of her role in pasture control, a low margin per cow can be accepted as a direct contribution to sheep production.


1975 ◽  
Vol 15 (72) ◽  
pp. 38 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Hamilton

On annual pasture, ewes lambing in autumn and young steers grazed separately each at five stocking rates, and grazed together in a ratio of 4 : 1 at each of three stocking rates. Gross margin per hectare (GMH) from the sheep was greatest at the heaviest stocking rate that could be carried safely without supplementary feed, and from steers was greatest at the heaviest stocking rate at which a high proportion of carcases were first-grade, even in a year of poor pasture. Maximum GMH from the steers was obtained at a lighter equivalent stocking rate than that required for maximum GMH from the sheep. When the sheep and steers grazed together at a stocking rate where first-grade steer carcases were produced consistently, the loss in potential sheep GMH from reducing the sheep stocking rate to this level was greater than the value of any benefit from mixed stocking. This finding is discussed in relation to results from another environment where no difference was found between sheep and cattle in the stocking rate required for maximum GMH.


2018 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 118-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Bohan ◽  
L. Shalloo ◽  
P. Creighton ◽  
E. Earle ◽  
T.M. Boland ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
J.A. Milne ◽  
W.J. Hamilton ◽  
M. Lippert

The possibility of farming deer and goats as alternatives to other forms of ruminant livestock for meat production in the UK has been investigated only relatively recently. The collaborative research between the Rowett Research Institute and the Hill Farming Research Organisation on red deer (Cervus elaphus) was initiated in 1970 and serious consideration of goats as a source of meat has only taken place in the last 5 years. Consequently there is considerably more research information on the red deer than the goat and this is reflected in the length of the discussion on each species in this paper. Moreover the number of red deer being farmed commercially in the UK, estimated to be approximately 7000 animals, is currently greater than the number of goats being reared for meat production. Goat meat is mainly a by-product of the production of milk.Both species have the attributes of producing a lean carcass (5-10% fat), which is acceptable to the consumer, and of having the capability of being farmed over the whole spectrum of hill, upland and lowland swards. Systems of management are firstly described, followed by a discussion of the biological potential that could be exploited by further research and by a consideration of marketing and the economics of current production systems.


2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (7) ◽  
pp. 1253 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Dove ◽  
M. Freer ◽  
J. Z. Foot

This paper reports results from a study of ewes in pregnancy and lactation, during which times they grazed at a high versus medium stocking rate and either received or did not receive a pelleted supplement. We measured ewe liveweight, condition score and body composition; intakes by ewes of pasture and supplementary feed; milk production by ewes, and; birthweight, milk intake, liveweight gain and body composition of single and twin lambs. Ewes grazing at the medium stocking rate consumed more pasture in late pregnancy and the intake of supplement significantly reduced pasture intake. Nevertheless, total intakes of organic matter or digestible organic matter were unaffected by supplementation and were significantly higher at the medium stocking rate. Effects of stocking rate on intake persisted into early and mid-lactation, but supplement intake did not affect pasture intake in lactation. Pasture intakes in pregnancy were not markedly different between twin-bearing and single-bearing ewes, nor were pasture intakes in lactation affected by the number of lambs suckled. Ewes suckling twins produced much more milk. There were significant effects of birth type, ewe stocking rate and supplementation on lamb milk intake and liveweight gain. The data were reanalysed by regression, to explore the effects of actual herbage masses and ewe intakes, and the possible effects of non-treatment terms such as ewe age, condition score and dentition score at allocation. These analyses confirmed the above effects of treatment, but also demonstrated that ewes in better condition at the start of the experiment ate less pasture in both pregnancy and lactation, and produced significantly less milk. Ewe organic matter intakes in pregnancy were not related to dentition score at allocation, but in early and mid-lactation were reduced by ~170 g organic matter/day and 280–380 g organic matter/day, respectively, per unit increase in dentition score. There was no significant effect of ewe dentition score on lamb milk intake, but there was a significant penalty of ~19 g lamb liveweight gain/unit increase in ewe dentition score at allocation. Future studies of this kind thus need to include estimates of the condition score and dentition score of ewes when they commence the experiment.


1999 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 247 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Young ◽  
P. T. Doyle ◽  
P. Booth

We compared strip grazing (SG) as a means of controlling wool growth rate, reducing variation in fibre diameter along the staple, and of carrying more Merino sheep through winter on green annual pastures, with set stocking (SS) in 3 experiments. In experiments 1 and 2, SG involved grazing to a residual feed on offer (FOO) of 400 kg DM/ha with an estimated intake of about 0.8 kg DM/day for each sheep. Treatments commenced after pasture establishment in autumn–winter, with both treatments stocked at 20 wethers/ha until late spring. During spring, average liveweight changes were lower (P<0.01) under SG than SS (55 v. 153 g/day experiment 1; –16 v. 217 g/day experiment 2). Strip grazing, compared with SS, reduced (P<0.01) the variation in wool growth rate and fibre diameter along the staple leading to lower (P<0.01) clean wool weights (3.54 v. 3.94 and 2.97 v. 4.12 kg), but finer (P<0.01) (20.9 v. 22.0 and 19.5 v. 21.5 mm), stronger (P<0.01) (28.6 v. 25.3 and 39.9 v. 35.5 N/ktex) wool. However, there was also an increase in vegetable matter content of the wool. The effects on annual pastures were to increase grass (79 v. 48 and 59 v. 25%) and reduce legume (12 v. 36 and 22 v. 54%) content at the end of spring. In experiment 3, two strip grazing treatments were used: SGl with a residual FOO of about 400 kg DM/ha and a stocking rate of 28 wethers/ha; and SGh with a residual FOO of about 800 kg DM/ha and stocking rate of 14 wethers/ha. The stocking rate for SS was 12 wethers/ha. SGl, following an autumn deferment, enabled a stocking rate of 28 wethers/ha to be sustained through winter without supplementary feeding. This is substantially higher than the district average stocking rate of about 7 sheep/ha. Strip grazing reduced (P<0.01) liveweights at the completion of treatments (SGl 41.9 v. SGh 47.9 v. SS 60.3 kg), reduced (P<0.01) clean wool weights (3.40 v. 3.72 v. 4.54 kg) and mean fibre diameter (19.1 v. 19.0 v. 20.9 m), but increased staple strength (21.3 v. 19.0 v. 16.9 N/ktex). These results are discussed in relation to opportunities to utilise strip grazing in sheep production systems on annual pastures in south-western Australia.


1981 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 99-102
Author(s):  
A. R. Sibbald

At the Hill Farming Research Organization (HFRO), we have been modelling various components of sheep systems and we have also attempted to model, where a need was seen, whole sheep systems at different levels of organization. The sheep systems involved are of course pastoral grazing systems on hill or upland farms. The purpose of this paper is to briefly describe these models, to identify reasons for their existence and to outline some of the problems encountered in their construction.Models have been constructed at HFRO to satisfy particular needs. They cover a spectrum of interests. There are those which are concerned with resource allocation and economic evaluation, those which are built in an attempt to develop more precise operational management procedures and those which describe biological mechanisms and processes which may be conceptual but which provide a better understanding of particular components of an animal production system.The first model (Maxwell, Eadie and Sibbald, 1973) was built to provide answers to the economic questions “Is a particular level of investment in a hill sheep system a viable proposition in both the short and the long term?” and “How does the economic performance of this strategy compare with those of alternatives?”, alternatives being, for example, different levels and rates of flock build-up, with variations in the timing of investments. The model makes year-by-year calculations of cash flow and balance based on Gross Margin, taking account of capital invested, changes in variable costs, tax and interest rates. The Gross Margin is determined from price and cost data and from biological performance. The model also calculates overall economic performance, for a pre-selected project length, as Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return, taking account of increased stock valuation. These results are used to compare alternative schemes with different rates of investment.


1987 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
DH White ◽  
PJ Bowman

The financial wisdom of feeding energy-based supplements to ewes before mating to increase fecundity was evaluated using mathematical models of sheep production systems. It was concluded that, for a wool-producing enterprise in southern Australia, feeding supplements to ewes pre-mating is likely to be highly unprofitable. This is partly because relatively few ewes would have extra ova and also because multiple embryos and lambs have a lower probability of survival than single embryos and lambs. Further more, the extra lambs reared would be associated with an increase in grazing pressure which would necessitate a reduction in either stocking rate or in ewe liveweight at mating and thus fecundity in the subsequent season.


Author(s):  
J. Hodgson ◽  
T.J. Maxwell

Studies in the UK on continuously stocked swards dominated by perennial ryegrass show that both net herbage production and lamb output per hectare are maximised when herbage mass is maintained at 1200-I 500 kg OM/ha (3-5 cm surface height) during the main season of growth. The use of this information to define sward management objectives is outlined, and the incorporation of these objectives into the spring and summer phases of a grassland sheep enterprise is illustrated


2016 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 73-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.G. Scrimgeour

This paper provides a stocktake of the status of hill country farming in New Zealand and addresses the challenges which will determine its future state and performance. It arises out of the Hill Country Symposium, held in Rotorua, New Zealand, 12-13 April 2016. This paper surveys people, policy, business and change, farming systems for hill country, soil nutrients and the environment, plants for hill country, animals, animal feeding and productivity, and strategies for achieving sustainable outcomes in the hill country. This paper concludes by identifying approaches to: support current and future hill country farmers and service providers, to effectively and efficiently deal with change; link hill farming businesses to effective value chains and new markets to achieve sufficient and stable profitability; reward farmers for the careful management of natural resources on their farm; ensure that new technologies which improve the efficient use of input resources are developed; and strategies to achieve vibrant rural communities which strengthen hill country farming businesses and their service providers. Keywords: farming systems, hill country, people, policy, productivity, profitability, sustainability


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document