THE SOCIETAL COSTS OF SEVERE TO PROFOUND HEARING LOSS IN THE UNITED STATES

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (04) ◽  
pp. 1120-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Penny E. Mohr ◽  
Jacob J. Feldman ◽  
Jennifer L. Dunbar ◽  
Amy McConkey-Robbins ◽  
John K. Niparko ◽  
...  
Elements ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine Koniares

Profound hearing loss affects thousands of people in the United States and the United Kingdom, with a higher incidence among people of low socioeconomic status. A cochlear implant is a surgically implanted device that has been demonstrated to improve communication and quality of life among profoundly hearing-impaired individuals. This review postulates that the rate of cochlear implantation among eligible candidates can be used to assess quality of healthcare, with a view toward examining disparities in healthcare services both in American free-market system and in the British National Health Service. A systematic literature search was performed for pertinent articles investigating socioeconomic status and cochlear implantation. Data from twenty-two sources were analyzed, and it was shown that-despite differences in the healthcare systems of the United States and England-similar trends are apparent in the two countries with regard to a lower rate of pediatric cochlear implantation surgery in children with profound hearing loss as familial socioeconomic status decreases.


2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (07) ◽  
pp. 410-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Van Vliet

The members of the profession of audiology often express concern that the services and products that have been developed to provide benefit to the hearing impaired are not sought after or delivered to the majority of those diagnosed with hearing loss. A critical look at the status quo of hearing care delivery in the United States is needed to verify this assumption and to develop strategies to improve the situation. A key concern is the lack of a comprehensive high-quality scientific database upon which to build continuous improvements in the effectiveness of the services and products that are provided to the hearing impaired.


2018 ◽  
Vol 144 (3) ◽  
pp. 273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madeline R. Sterling ◽  
Frank R. Lin ◽  
Deanna P. Jannat-Khah ◽  
Adele M. Goman ◽  
Sandra E. Echeverria ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 952-954
Author(s):  
Martin S. Robinette

The importance of early identification of hearing loss is summarized in the report issued by the United States (US) Department of Health and Human Services,1 entitled "Healthy People 2000." The goal is to reduce the average age at which children with significant hearing impairment are identified to no more than 12 months. The report states: The future of a child born with significant hearing impairment depends to a very large degree on early identification (ie, audiological diagnosis before 12 months of age) followed by immediate and appropriate intervention.


Author(s):  
Vinaya Manchaiah ◽  
Berth Danermark ◽  
Per Germundsson ◽  
Pierre Ratinaud

2019 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 490-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matt Lechner ◽  
Liam Sutton ◽  
Mark Ferguson ◽  
Yasmin Abbas ◽  
Jaswinder Sandhu ◽  
...  

Objective: To investigate the current practice of intratympanic steroid (ITS) injection for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) in the United Kingdom and link the data with data from the United States and continental Europe. Methods: A survey of 21 questions was distributed to members of the British Society of Otology using an online survey platform via ENT UK. Data obtained from UK otolaryngologists (n = 171) were integrated with previously published data from other countries, including the United States (n = 63) and continental Europe (n = 908). Results: In the United Kingdom, 62% of responding otolaryngologists use ITS injection for SSNHL, while 38% do not. Of those using ITS, 59% use it as first-line treatment, either using it in conjunction with oral steroids (51%) or using it as monotherapy (8%). Of those that use ITS, a majority (83%) use it as salvage therapy when primary treatment with systemic steroids has failed, and similar results are found in the continental Europe and US surveys. The most commonly used preparation is dexamethasone. Responses to questions regarding treatment regimes used are enlightening and show considerable variation in the treatment regimes used within and between countries. Conclusions: There is a wide variation in practice with regards to ITS for SSNHL hearing loss in the United Kingdom, United States, and continental Europe. In the absence of protocols or definitive guidance from published literature, knowledge of contemporary practice may help guide or encourage reevaluation of clinical practice and will help guide the design of future clinical trials.


2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather K. Schopper ◽  
Christopher F. D’Esposito ◽  
John S. Muus ◽  
Julie Kanter ◽  
Ted A. Meyer

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 1820-1822 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adele M. Goman ◽  
Frank R. Lin

Work ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy Kooser

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document