A point prevalence survey of antibiotic use in four acute-care teaching hospitals utilizing the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC) audit tool

2011 ◽  
Vol 140 (9) ◽  
pp. 1714-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. ALDEYAB ◽  
M. P. KEARNEY ◽  
J. C. McELNAY ◽  
F. A. MAGEE ◽  
G. CONLON ◽  
...  

SUMMARYThe objective of this research was to assess current patterns of hospital antibiotic prescribing in Northern Ireland and to determine targets for improving the quality of antibiotic prescribing. A point prevalence survey was conducted in four acute teaching hospitals. The most commonly used antibiotics were combinations of penicillins including β-lactamase inhibitors (33·6%), metronidazole (9·1%), and macrolides (8·1%). The indication for treatment was recorded in 84·3% of the prescribing episodes. A small fraction (3·9%) of the surgical prophylactic antibiotic prescriptions was for >24 h. The results showed that overall 52·4% of the prescribed antibiotics were in compliance with the hospital antibiotic guidelines. The findings identified the following indicators as targets for quality improvement: indication recorded in patient notes, the duration of surgical prophylaxis and compliance with hospital antibiotic guidelines. The results strongly suggest that antibiotic use could be improved by taking steps to address the identified targets for quality improvement.

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-399
Author(s):  
Yaser M. ◽  
Ahmad K. Aljabri ◽  
Faisal N. Alsaadi ◽  
Lamiaa M. Rizk ◽  
Renad Y. Alahmadi ◽  
...  

Purpose: To assess current patterns of antibiotic use by carrying out two point-prevalence surveys (PPS) in Madinah after the return of hajj pilgrims from Makkah and when Madinah is free from pilgrims. Methods: In September 2016 and November 2016, a prospective PPS was conducted on two separate dates (during the hajj pilgrims stay in Madinah and after they leave). Data on antibiotics use were generated during these two periods. This involved an audit from all the departments of two referral hospitals (King Fahad Hospital (KFH) - 425 beds, and Al Ansar Hospital - 100 beds) of inpatients records. Data were collected using standard forms adapted from the European Centre for Disease Control (ECDC). Results: A total of 675 inpatients were included in PPS; among them, 332 (49.18 %) patients were receiving antibiotic therapy. In September 2016, 168 patients were treated with antibiotics, with a prevalence rate of 50.60 %, whereas, in November 2016, the prevalence rate was 49.40 %. Overall, 198 patients were identified in surgical wards, of which 132 patients (66.6 %) were receiving antibiotic therapy; 121 patients in ICU of which 70 patients (57.8 %) received antibiotics; 13 patients in other wards of which 6 (46.1 %) received antibiotic treatment; and 343 patients in medical wards of which 126 patients (36.7 %) were treated with antibiotics. There was no significant difference in prevalence of antibiotic prescribing between the two surveys (Pearson Chi-square test, p = 0.56) and with regards to patient age between the two surveys (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.32). Conclusion: The results demonstrate that antibiotic use with adherence to hospital guidelines and PPS helps in identifying targets for quality improvement. Moreover, to escalate the prudent use of antibiotics in hospitals, PPS provides a useful tool. Furthermore, this survey provides a background to evaluate antibiotic use by a standardized methodology. Keywords: Point prevalence survey, Antibiotic use, Prescribing practices, Antibiotic resistance, Quality improvement, Antibiotic stewardship, Hajj, Pilgrims


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralalicia Limato ◽  
Erni J. Nelwan ◽  
Manzilina Mudia ◽  
Justin de Brabander ◽  
Helio Guterres ◽  
...  

SynopsisBackgroundAntibiotic misuse and overuse are a major driver of antimicrobial resistance, but systematic data in Indonesia are scarce.ObjectivesTo evaluate patterns and quality indicators of antibiotic prescribing in six acute-care hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia.MethodsWe conducted a hospital-wide point prevalence survey (PPS) between March and August 2019, using Global-PPS and WHO-PPS protocols. The analysis focused on antibacterials for systemic use (antibiotics).ResultsOf 1602 inpatients, 993 (62.0%) received ≥1 antimicrobials. Of 1666 antimicrobial prescriptions, 1273 (76.4%) were antibiotics. Most common reasons for prescribing were pneumonia (27.7%), skin and soft tissue infections (8.3%), gastrointestinal prophylaxis (7.9%), and gastrointestinal infections (5.4%). The most common indication was community-acquired infection (42.6%), followed by surgical prophylaxis (22.6%), hospital-acquired infection (18.5%), medical prophylaxis (9.6%), unknown (4.6%) and other indications (2.1%). The most prescribed antibiotic classes were third-generation cephalosporins (44.3%), fluoroquinolones (13.5%), carbapenems (7.4%), penicillins with B-lactamase inhibitor (6.8%) and aminoglycosides (6.0%). According to the WHO AWaRe classification, Watch antibiotics accounted for 67.4%, followed by 28.0% Access, 2.4% Reserve, and 2.2% Unclassified. Reason for prescribing, stop/review date and planned duration were poorly documented. Hospital antibiotic guidelines were not available for 28.1% of prescriptions, and guideline compliance was 52.2% (478/915). Parenteral administration was high (85.1%). Targeted (non-empirical) prescriptions comprised 8.1% (44/542) for community-acquired infections and 26.8% (63/235) for hospital-acquired infections.ConclusionsOur data indicate a high rate of parenteral, empiric use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in Indonesian hospitals, coupled with poor documentation and guideline adherence. The findings suggest important areas for antimicrobial stewardship interventions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S677-S677
Author(s):  
Mari Rose Aplasca De los Reyes ◽  
Maria Charmian M Hufano ◽  
Ines Pauwels ◽  
Ann Versporten ◽  
Herman Goossens

Abstract Background Pneumonia is the most common indication for prescription of antibiotics in hospitals in the Philippines. We describe the quality and quantity of antibiotic prescribing for hospitalized pneumonia patients in the Philippines in 2018 (www.global-PPS.com). Methods A point prevalence survey was performed from September to December 2018 in 28 public and private hospitals in Luzon, Mindanao, and Visayas regions. Ward- and patient-level data were collected using a standardized methodology and entered through a web-based application. We analyzed all antibiotic (ATC J01) prescriptions for inpatients with pneumonia. Results Of all hospitalized patients, 16.2% (n = 1516) received one or more antibiotic (J01) for treatment of pneumonia, majority (78.3%) of which were for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In adults, the most commonly used antibiotics were azithromycin (19.5%), ceftriaxone (19.0%), and piperacillin/enzyme inhibitor (13.2%) for CAP and meropenem (19.8%), piperacillin/enzyme inhibitor (18.9%), and levofloxacin (8.6%) for healthcare-associated pneumonia (HAP). In neonates and children, cefuroxime was used most often (20.1%) for treatment of CAP, followed by ampicillin (16.7%) and amikacin (15.3%). Children and neonates with HAP were most commonly treated with amikacin (18.7%), meropenem (15.7%), and ampicillin (10.4%). Overall, 16.0% of all antibiotic prescriptions for pneumonia were based on microbiological results, 11.3% for CAP and 33.9% for HAP. Microbiology-based prescriptions were most commonly targeted at ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (8.4%). Further analysis of quality indicators showed that up to 80.0% of all prescriptions for pneumonia were compliant to local guidelines and reason in notes was documented for 81.0% of prescriptions. However, the stop or review date of antibiotic treatment for pneumonia was less documented (27.8%). Conclusion Global-PPS data provided valuable insights into the quantity and quality of antibiotic prescribing for pneumonia inpatients. These results will be fedback to the Department of Health, medical societies, and hospitals for prioritization of targets and policies toward the improvement of the Philippine antimicrobial stewardship program. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2018 ◽  
Vol 146 (8) ◽  
pp. 985-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. M. Al-Taani ◽  
M. Scott ◽  
D. Farren ◽  
F. Gilmore ◽  
B. Mccullagh ◽  
...  

AbstractAntimicrobial resistance is a limiting factor for the success of the treatment of infectious diseases and is associated with increased morbidity and cost. The present study aims to evaluate prescribing patterns of antimicrobials and quantify progress in relation to targets for quality improvement in the prescription of antimicrobials in Northern Ireland's secondary care sector using three repetitive point prevalence surveys (PPS) over a 6-year period: the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC-PPS) in 2009 and 2011 and the Global-PPS on Antimicrobial Consumption and Resistance in 2015. Out of 3605 patients surveyed over the three time points, 1239 (34.4%) were treated with an antibiotic, the most frequently prescribed antibiotic groups were a combination of penicillins, including β-lactamase inhibitors. Compliance with hospital antibiotic policies in 2009, 2011 and 2015 were 54.5%, 71.5% and 79.9%, respectively. Likewise, an indication for treatment was recorded in patient notes 88.5%, 87.7% and 90.6% in 2009, 2011 and 2015, respectively, and surgical prophylactic antibiotic prescriptions for >24 h was 3.9%, 3.2% and 0.7% in 2009, 2011 and 2015, respectively. Treatment based on biomarker data was used in 61.5% of cases. In conclusion, a general trend in the improvement of key antimicrobial-related quality indicators was noted. The PPS tool provided a convenient, inexpensive surveillance system of antimicrobial consumption and should be considered an essential component to establish and maintain informed antibiotic stewardship in hospitals.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralalicia Limato ◽  
Erni J Nelwan ◽  
Manzilina Mudia ◽  
Justin de Brabander ◽  
Helio Guterres ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The global emergence of antimicrobial resistance is driven by antibiotic misuse and overuse. However, systematic data in Indonesian hospitals to adequately inform policy are scarce. Objectives To evaluate patterns and quality indicators of antibiotic prescribing in six general hospitals in Jakarta, Indonesia. Methods We conducted a hospital-wide point prevalence survey (PPS) between March and August 2019, using Global-PPS and WHO-PPS protocols. The analysis focused on antibacterials (antibiotics) for systemic use. Results Of 1602 inpatients, 993 (62.0%) received ≥1 antimicrobial. Of 1666 antimicrobial prescriptions, 1273 (76.4%) were antibiotics. Indications comprised community-acquired infections (42.6%), surgical prophylaxis (22.6%), hospital-acquired infections (18.5%), medical prophylaxis (9.6%), unknown (4.6%) and other (2.1%). The most common reasons for antibiotic prescribing were pneumonia (27.7%), skin and soft tissue infections (8.3%), and gastrointestinal prophylaxis (7.9%). The most prescribed antibiotic classes were third-generation cephalosporins (44.3%), fluoroquinolones (13.5%), carbapenems (7.4%), and penicillins with β-lactamase inhibitor (6.8%). According to the WHO AWaRe classification, Watch antibiotics accounted for 67.4%, followed by 28.0% Access and 2.4% Reserve. Hospital antibiotic guidelines were not available for 28.1% of prescriptions, and, where available, guideline compliance was 52.2%. Reason for the antibiotic prescription, stop/review date and planned duration were poorly documented. Culture-guided prescriptions comprised 8.1% of community-acquired infections and 26.8% of hospital-acquired infections. Conclusions Our data indicate a high rate of empirical use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in Indonesian hospitals, coupled with poor documentation and guideline adherence. The findings suggest important areas for antimicrobial stewardship interventions.


Author(s):  
Jaafer M. Kurmanji ◽  
Azmi Hassali ◽  
Ann Versporten ◽  
Manal Younus ◽  
Ines Pauwels ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S511-S511
Author(s):  
Christopher Evans ◽  
Raphaelle Beard ◽  
Zina Gugkaeva ◽  
Brooke Stayer ◽  
Candice Simpson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 280-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.K. Singh ◽  
S. Sengupta ◽  
R. Antony ◽  
S. Bhattacharya ◽  
C. Mukhopadhyay ◽  
...  

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 598
Author(s):  
Khawla Abu Hammour ◽  
Esraa AL-Heyari ◽  
Aya Allan ◽  
Ann Versporten ◽  
Herman Goossens ◽  
...  

Background: The Global Point Prevalence Survey (Global-PPS) provides a standardised method to conduct surveillance of antimicrobial prescribing and resistance at hospital level. The aim of the present study was to assess antimicrobial consumption and resistance in a Jordan teaching hospital as part of the Global-PPS network. Methods: Detailed antimicrobial prescription data were collected according to the Global Point Prevalence Survey protocol. The internet-based survey included all inpatients present at 8:00 am on a specific day in June–July 2018. Resistance data were based on microbiological results available on the day of the PPS. Results: Data were collected for 380 patients admitted to adult wards, 72 admitted children, and 36 admitted neonates. The overall prevalence of antimicrobial use in adult, paediatric, and neonatal wards was 45.3%, 30.6%, and 22.2% respectively. Overall, 36 patients (7.4%) were treated for at least one healthcare-associated infection (HAI). The most frequent reason for antimicrobial treatment was pneumonia. Cephalosporins and carbapenems were most frequent prescribed among adult (50.6%) and paediatric/neonatal wards (39.6%). Overall resistance rates among patients treated for a community or healthcare-associated infection was high (26.0%). Analysis of antibiotic quality indicators by activity revealed good adherence to treatment guidelines but poor documentation of the reason for prescription and a stop/review date in the notes. Conclusion: The present study has established baseline data in a teaching hospital regarding the quantity and quality of prescribed antibiotics in the hospital. The study should encourage the establishment of tailor-made antimicrobial stewardship interventions and support educational programs to enhance appropriate antibiotic prescribing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document