Spatial structure of chromatically opponent receptive fields in the human visual system

1995 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Girard ◽  
Maria Concetta Morrone
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Local Variation ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
Chromatic Contrast ◽  
Phase Discrimination ◽  
Human Color Vision ◽  
Contrast Thresholds ◽  
Contrast Response

AbstractThis study investigates the receptive-field structure of mechanisms operating in human color vision, by recording visual evoked potentials (VEPs) to multiharmonic gratings modulated either in luminance or color (red-green). Varying the Fourier phase of the harmonics from 0 deg to 90 deg produced a family of stimulus profiles that varied from lines to edges. The stimuli were contrast reversed to elicit steady-state VEPS, and also randomly jittered (at a higher temporal frequency than the contrast reversal) to ensure that the evoked response resulted from the polarity reversal, rather than from local variation of luminance or color. Reliable VEPs were recorded from both luminance and chromatic stimuli at all phases, suggesting that the mechanisms sensitive to chromatic contrast and those sensitive to luminance contrast have both symmetric and asymmetric receptive fields. Contrast thresholds estimated by extrapolation of the contrast response curves were very similar to psychophysical thresholds for phase discrimination, suggesting that the VEP response is generated by mechanisms mediating phase discrimination. The results support the idea that human color mechanisms have receptive fields with a variety of spatial symmetries (including odd- and even-symmetric fields) and that these mechanisms may contribute to phase discrimination of chromatic stimuli in a similar way to what has been suggested for luminance vision.

The Binocular Summation of Chromatic Contrast

Perception ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 145-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
D R Simmons ◽  
F A A Kingdom
Keyword(s):  
Contrast Sensitivity ◽  
Detection Threshold ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Binocular Summation ◽  
Chromatic Contrast ◽  
Probability Summation ◽  
Investigative Ophthalmology ◽  
Contrast Thresholds ◽  
Detection Mechanisms ◽  
Neural Summation

The level of binocularity possessed by mechanisms sensitive to chromatic contrast is still unclear. Recent studies of stereopsis and chromatic contrast have suggested that stereopsis is maintained at isoluminance, although the contrast sensitivity and disparity ranges of chromatic stereopsis mechanisms are reduced compared to luminance stereopsis mechanisms. Rose, Blake, and Halpern (1988 Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science29 283 – 290) hypothesised a link between binocular summation (ie the superiority of binocular detection over monocular detection) and stereopsis. Is this link maintained with heterochromatic isoluminant stimuli? To address this question, the binocular and monocular contrast thresholds for the detection of 0.5 cycle deg−1 Gabor patches were measured. The stimuli possessed different relative amounts of colour and luminance contrast ranging from isoluminance (red/green) to isochrominance (yellow/black) through intermediate values. It was found that, with these stimuli, binocular detection was well modelled by assuming independent mechanisms sensitive to chromatic contrast and luminance contrast. Furthermore, with isoluminant stimuli, levels of binocular summation were above those expected from probability summation between the eyes, thus providing evidence for binocular neural summation within chromatic detection mechanisms. Given that stereoscopic depth identification is impossible at contrast detection threshold with isoluminant heterochromatic stimuli, these results suggest that the link between stereopsis and levels of binocular neural summation may not be a particularly strong one. These results also provide clear evidence for the binocularity of chromatic detection mechanisms.

scholarly journals Coding of chromatic spatial contrast by macaque V1 neurons

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek De ◽  
Gregory D. Horwitz
Keyword(s):  
Color Image ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Chromatic Contrast ◽  
Simple Cells ◽  
Complex Cells ◽  
V1 Neurons ◽  
Full Color ◽  
Common Principle ◽  
Neural Selectivity

ABSTRACTColor perception relies on spatial comparisons of chromatic signals, but how the brain performs these comparisons is poorly understood. Here, we show that many V1 neurons compare signals across their receptive fields (RF) using a common principle. We estimated the spatial-chromatic RFs of each neuron, and then measured neural selectivity to customized colored edges that were sampled using a novel closed-loop technique. We found that many double-opponent (DO) cells, which have spatially and chromatically opponent RFs, responded to chromatic contrast as a weighted sum, akin to how simple cells respond to luminance contrast. Other neurons integrated chromatic signals non-linearly, confirming that linear signal integration is not an obligate property of V1 neurons. The functional similarity of DO and simple cells suggests a common underlying neural circuitry, promotes the construction of image-computable models for full-color image representation, and sheds new light on V1 complex cells.

Color and luminance increment thresholds in poor readers

2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
STEPHEN J. DAIN ◽  
RICHARD A. FLOYD ◽  
ROBERT T. ELLIOT
Keyword(s):  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Poor Readers ◽  
Chromatic Contrast ◽  
Colored Overlays ◽  
Visual Processes ◽  
Computer Based ◽  
Luminance Increment ◽  
Contrast Discrimination ◽  
Contrast Thresholds ◽  
Higher Sensitivity

The hypotheses of a visual basis to reading disabilities in some children have centered around deficits in the visual processes displaying more transient reponses to stimuli although hyperactivity in the visual processes displaying sustained reponses to stimuli has also been proposed as a mechanism. In addition, there is clear evidence that colored lenses and/or colored overlays and/or colored backgrounds can influence performance in reading and/or may assist in providing comfortable vision for reading and, as a consequence, the ability to maintain reading for longer. As a consequence, it is surprising that the color vision of poor readers is relatively little studied. We assessed luminance increment thresholds and equi-luminous red-green and blue-yellow increment thresholds using a computer based test in central vision and at 10° nasally employing the paradigm pioneered by King-Smith. We examined 35 poor readers (based on the Neale Analysis of Reading) and compared their performance with 35 normal readers matched for age and IQ. Poor readers produced similar luminance contrast thresholds for both foveal and peripheral presentation compared with normals. Similarly, chromatic contrast discrimination for the red/green stimuli was the same in normal and poor readers. However, poor readers had significantly lower thresholds/higher sensitivity for the blue/yellow stimuli, for both foveal and peripheral presentation, compared with normal readers. This hypersensitivity in blue-yellow discrimination may point to why colored lenses and overlays are often found to be effective in assisting many poor readers.

Responses to sinusoidal gratings of two types of very nonlinear retinal ganglion cells of cat

1989 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Troy ◽  
G. Einstein ◽  
R. P. Schuurmans ◽  
J. G. Robson ◽  
Ch. Enroth-Cugell
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Cell Model ◽  
Second Harmonic ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Spatial Frequencies ◽  
Low Pass

AbstractPerhaps 35% of all of the ganglion cells of the cat do not have classical center-surround organized receptive fields. This paper describes, quantitatively, the responses of two such cell types to stimulation with sinusoidal luminance gratings, whose spatial frequency, mean luminance, contrast, and temporal frequency were varied independently. The patterns were well-focused on the retina of the anesthetized and paralyzed cat. In one type of cell, the maintained discharge was depressed or completely suppressed when a contrast pattern was imaged onto the receptive field (suppressed-by-contrast cell). In the other type of cell, the introduction of a pattern elicited a burst of spikes (impressed-by-contrast cell).When stimulated with drifting gratings, the cell's mean rate of discharge was reduced (suppressed-by-contrast cell) or elevated (impressed-by-contrast cell) over a limited band of spatial frequencies. There was no significant modulated component of response. The reduction in mean rate of suppressed-by-contrast cells caused by drifting gratings had a monotonic dependence on contrast, a relatively low-pass temporal-frequency characteristic and was greater under photopic than mesopic illuminance. If gratings of spatial frequency, that when drifted evoked a response from these cells, were instead held stationary and contrast-reversed, the mean rate of a suppressed-by-contrast cell was also reduced and that of an impressed-by-contrast cell increased. But, for contrast-reversed gratings, the discharge contained substantial modulation at even harmonic frequencies, the largest being the second harmonic. The amplitude of this second harmonic did not depend on the spatial phase of the grating, and its dependence on spatial frequency, at least for suppressed-by-contrast cells, was similar to that of the reduction in mean rate of discharge. Our results suggest that the receptive fields of suppressed-by-contrast and impressed-by-contrast cells can be modeled with the general form of the nonlinear subunit components of Hochstein and Shapley's (1976) Y cell model.

scholarly journals Dependence of center radius on temporal frequency for the receptive fields of X retinal ganglion cells of cat.

1989 ◽  
Vol 94 (6) ◽  
pp. 987-995 ◽  
Author(s):  
J B Troy ◽  
C Enroth-Cugell
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Ganglion Cells ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Retinal Ganglion ◽  
Spatial Expansion ◽  
Neuronal Membranes ◽  
Inductive Elements ◽  
X Cells

We examined the dependence of the center radius of X cells on temporal frequency and found that at temporal frequencies above 40 Hz the radius increases in a monotonic fashion, reaching a size approximately 30% larger at 70 Hz. This kind of spatial expansion has been predicted with cable models of receptive fields where inductive elements are included in modeling the neuronal membranes. Hence, the expansion of the center radius is clearly important for modeling X cell receptive fields. On the other hand, we feel that it might be of only minor functional significance, since the responsivity of X cells is attenuated at these high temporal frequencies and the signal-to-noise ratio is considerably worse than at low and midrange temporal frequencies.

Processing of Kinetic Boundaries in Macaque V4

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 1864-1880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santosh G. Mysore ◽  
Rufin Vogels ◽  
Steve E. Raiguel ◽  
Guy A. Orban
Keyword(s):  
Relative Motion ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Shape Selectivity ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Motion Cues ◽  
Form Processing ◽  
Similar Shape ◽  
Shape Selective ◽  
Sizeable Fraction ◽  
V4 Neurons

We used gratings and shapes defined by relative motion to study selectivity for static kinetic boundaries in macaque V4 neurons. Kinetic gratings were generated by random pixels moving in opposite directions in the neighboring bars, either parallel to the orientation of the boundary (parallel kinetic grating) or perpendicular to the boundary (orthogonal kinetic grating). Neurons were also tested with static, luminance defined gratings to establish cue invariance. In addition, we used eight shapes defined either by relative motion or by luminance contrast, as used previously to test cue invariance in the infero-temporal (IT) cortex. A sizeable fraction (10–20%) of the V4 neurons responded selectively to kinetic patterns. Most neurons selective for kinetic contours had receptive fields (RFs) within the central 10° of the visual field. Neurons selective for the orientation of kinetic gratings were defined as having similar orientation preferences for the two types of kinetic gratings, and the vast majority of these neurons also retained the same orientation preference for luminance defined gratings. Also, kinetic shape selective neurons had similar shape preferences when the shape was defined by relative motion or by luminance contrast, showing a cue-invariant form processing in V4. Although shape selectivity was weaker in V4 than what has been reported in the IT cortex, cue invariance was similar in the two areas, suggesting that invariance for luminance and motion cues of IT originates in V4. The neurons selective for kinetic patterns tended to be clustered within dorsal V4.

scholarly journals Spatiotemporal Properties of Fast and Slow Neurons in the Pretectal Nucleus Lentiformis Mesencephali in Pigeons

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 2529-2540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas R. W. Wylie ◽  
Nathan A. Crowder
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Sine Wave ◽  
Accessory Optic System ◽  
Stimulus Velocity ◽  
Preferred Direction ◽  
Pretectal Nucleus ◽  
Contralateral Eye ◽  
Sine Wave Gratings ◽  
Self Motion

Neurons in the pretectal nucleus lentiformis mesencephali (LM) are involved in the analysis of optic flow that results from self-motion. Previous studies have shown that LM neurons have large receptive fields in the contralateral eye, are excited in response to largefield stimuli moving in a particular (preferred) direction, and are inhibited in response to motion in the opposite (anti-preferred) direction. We investigated the responses of LM neurons to sine wave gratings of varying spatial and temporal frequency drifting in the preferred and anti-preferred directions. The LM neurons fell into two categories. “Fast” neurons were maximally excited by gratings of low spatial [0.03–0.25 cycles/° (cpd)] and mid-high temporal frequencies (0.5–16 Hz). “Slow” neurons were maximally excited by gratings of high spatial (0.35–2 cpd) and low-mid temporal frequencies (0.125–2 Hz). Of the slow neurons, all but one preferred forward (temporal to nasal) motion. The fast group included neurons that preferred forward, backward, upward, and downward motion. For most cells (81%), the spatial and temporal frequency that elicited maximal excitation to motion in the preferred direction did not coincide with the spatial and temporal frequency that elicited maximal inhibition to gratings moving in the anti-preferred direction. With respect to motion in the anti-preferred direction, a substantial proportion of the LM neurons (32%) showed bi-directional responses. That is, the spatiotemporal plots contained domains of excitation in addition to the region of inhibition. Neurons tuned to stimulus velocity across different spatial frequency were rare (5%), but some neurons (39%) were tuned to temporal frequency. These results are discussed in relation to previous studies of the responses of neurons in the accessory optic system and pretectum to drifting gratings and other largefield stimuli.

scholarly journals The integration of local chromatic motion signals is sensitive to contrast polarity

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
SOPHIE M. WUERGER ◽  
ALEXA RUPPERTSBERG ◽  
STEPHANIE MALEK ◽  
MARCO BERTAMINI ◽  
JASNA MARTINOVIC
Keyword(s):  
Random Motion ◽  
Coherent Motion ◽  
Global Motion ◽  
Local Motion ◽  
Chromatic Contrast ◽  
Motion Direction ◽  
Contrast Polarity ◽  
Motion Integration ◽  
Integration Mechanisms ◽  
Contrast Thresholds

AbstractGlobal motion integration mechanisms can utilize signals defined by purely chromatic information. Is global motion integration sensitive to the polarity of such color signals? To answer this question, we employed isoluminant random dot kinematograms (RDKs) that contain a single chromatic contrast polarity or two different polarities. Single-polarity RDKs consisted of local motion signals with either a positive or a negative S or L–M component, while in the different-polarity RDKs, half the dots had a positive S or L–M component, and the other half had a negative S or L–M component. In all RDKs, the polarity and the motion direction of the local signals were uncorrelated. Observers discriminated between 50% coherent motion and random motion, and contrast thresholds were obtained for 81% correct responses. Contrast thresholds were obtained for three different dot densities (50, 100, and 200 dots). We report two main findings: (1) dependence on dot density is similar for both contrast polarities (+S vs. −S, +LM vs. −LM) but slightly steeper for S in comparison to LM and (2) thresholds for different-polarity RDKs are significantly higher than for single-polarity RDKs, which is inconsistent with a polarity-blind integration mechanism. We conclude that early motion integration mechanisms are sensitive to the polarity of the local motion signals and do not automatically integrate information across different polarities.

Perception of a Border Defined by Rapidly Reversing Luminance Contrast

1997 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 739-746
Author(s):  
Kyoungmin Lee ◽  
Joy Hirsch
Keyword(s):  
Visual Illusion ◽  
Temporal Frequency ◽  
Luminance Contrast ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Luminance Threshold

We report a new visual illusion of a perceptual boundary visible between two contiguous regions of equal luminance when the intensity is modulated with a temporal frequency that is higher than the critical fusion rate. Measurements of the luminance threshold of the perceptual border with various slopes of the luminance gradient yielded a function suggestive of the range of ocular instability. These findings raise the possibility that this new border illusion may be influenced by involuntary ocular motion during fixation.

scholarly journals Center/surround organization of retinal bipolar cells: High correlation of fundamental responses of center and surround to sinusoidal contrasts

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
DWIGHT A. BURKHARDT ◽  
THEODORE M. BARTOLETTI ◽  
WALLACE B. THORESON
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Maximum Amplitude ◽  
High Gain ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Ambystoma Tigrinum ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
On And Off Cells ◽  
Field Organization ◽  
Receptive Field Organization ◽  
Contrast Response

AbstractReceptive field organization of cone-driven bipolar cells was investigated by intracellular recording in the intact light-adapted retina of the tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum). Centered spots and concentric annuli of optimum dimensions were used to selectively stimulate the receptive field center and surround with sinusoidal modulations of contrast at 3 Hz. At low contrasts, responses of both the center and surround of both ON and OFF bipolar cells were linear, showing high gain and thus contrast enhancement relative to cones. The contrast/response curves for the fundamental response, measured by a Fast Fourier Transform, reached half maximum amplitude quickly at 13% contrast followed by saturation at high contrasts. The variation of the normalized amplitude of the center and surround responses was remarkably similar, showing linear regression over the entire response range with very high correlations, r2 = 0.97 for both ON and OFF cells. The contrast/response curves of both center and surround for both ON and OFF cells were well fit (r2 = 0.98) by an equation for single-site binding. In about half the cells studied, the nonlinear waveforms of center and surround could be brought into coincidence by scaling and shifting the surround response in time. This implies that a nonlinearity, common to both center and surround, occurs after polarity inversion at the cone feedback synapse. Evidence from paired whole-cell recordings between single cones and OFF bipolar cells suggests that substantial nonlinearity is not due to transmission at the cone synapse but instead arises from intrinsic bipolar cell and network mechanisms. When sinusoidal contrast modulations were applied to the center and surround simultaneously, clear additivity was observed for small responses in both ON and OFF cells, whereas the interaction was strikingly nonadditive for large responses. The contribution of the surround was then greatly reduced, suggesting attenuation at the cone feedback synapse.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document