Modulation by Zn2+ of GABA responses in bipolar cells of the mouse retina

2000 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. KANEDA ◽  
B. ANDRÁSFALVY ◽  
A. KANEKO
Keyword(s):  
Axon Terminal ◽  
Inhibitory Action ◽  
Phosphinic Acid ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Induced Responses ◽  
Inhibitory Interaction ◽  
Cell Recording ◽  
Recording Conditions

The localization of endogenous Zn2+ in the mouse retina was examined histochemically and the inhibitory action of Zn2+ on GABA-induced responses was studied in bipolar cells isolated from the mouse retina. Accumulation of endogenous Zn2+ was detected in photoreceptors, bipolar, and/or amacrine cells by either the bromopyridylazo-diethylaminophenol method or the dithizone method. Under whole-cell recording conditions, GABA induced a Cl− current in isolated bipolar cells. The current consisted of two components. The first component was inhibited completely by application of 100 μM bicuculline, suggesting that this is a GABAA-receptor mediated current. The second component was inhibited completely by 100 μM 3-aminopropyl-(methyl)-phosphinic acid, suggesting that this is a GABAC-receptor mediated current. GABAC receptors were present at a higher density on the axon terminal than on dendrites. Zn2+ inhibited both GABAA and GABAC receptors. GABAC receptors were more susceptible to Zn2+; the IC50 for the GABAA receptor was 67.4 μM and that for the GABAC receptor was 1.9 μM. These results suggest that Zn2+ modulates the inhibitory interaction between amacrine and bipolar cells, particularly that mediated by the GABAC receptor.

Spontaneous Oscillatory Activity of Starburst Amacrine Cells in the Mouse Retina

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 1770-1780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome Petit-Jacques ◽  
Béla Völgyi ◽  
Bernardo Rudy ◽  
Stewart Bloomfield
Keyword(s):  
Feedback Inhibition ◽  
Glutamate Release ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Kainate Receptors ◽  
Oscillatory Activity ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells

Using patch-clamp techniques, we investigated the characteristics of the spontaneous oscillatory activity displayed by starburst amacrine cells in the mouse retina. At a holding potential of –70 mV, oscillations appeared as spontaneous, rhythmic inward currents with a frequency of ∼3.5 Hz and an average maximal amplitude of ∼120 pA. Application of TEA, a potassium channel blocker, increased the amplitude of oscillatory currents by >70% but reduced their frequency by ∼17%. The TEA effects did not appear to result from direct actions on starburst cells, but rather a modulation of their synaptic inputs. Oscillatory currents were inhibited by 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxalene-2,3-dione (CNQX), an antagonist of AMPA/kainate receptors, indicating that they were dependent on a periodic glutamatergic input likely from presynaptic bipolar cells. The oscillations were also inhibited by the calcium channel blockers cadmium and nifedipine, suggesting that the glutamate release was calcium dependent. Application of AP4, an agonist of mGluR6 receptors on on-center bipolar cells, blocked the oscillatory currents in starburst cells. However, application of TEA overcame the AP4 blockade, suggesting that the periodic glutamate release from bipolar cells is intrinsic to the inner plexiform layer in that, under experimental conditions, it can occur independent of photoreceptor input. The GABA receptor antagonists picrotoxin and bicuculline enhanced the amplitude of oscillations in starburst cells prestimulated with TEA. Our results suggest that this enhancement was due to a reduction of a GABAergic feedback inhibition from amacrine cells to bipolar cells and the resultant increased glutamate release. Finally, we found that some ganglion cells and other types of amacrine cell also displayed rhythmic activity, suggesting that oscillatory behavior is expressed by a number of inner retinal neurons.

scholarly journals Dark-adapted response threshold of OFF ganglion cells is not set by OFF bipolar cells in the mouse retina

2012 ◽  
Vol 107 (10) ◽  
pp. 2649-2659 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Cyrus Arman ◽  
Alapakkam P. Sampath
Keyword(s):  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Response Threshold ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Signal Flow ◽  
Visual Threshold ◽  
Aii Amacrine Cells ◽  
Aii Amacrine ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

The nervous system frequently integrates parallel streams of information to encode a broad range of stimulus strengths. In mammalian retina it is generally believed that signals generated by rod and cone photoreceptors converge onto cone bipolar cells prior to reaching the retinal output, the ganglion cells. Near absolute visual threshold a specialized mammalian retinal circuit, the rod bipolar pathway, pools signals from many rods and converges on depolarizing (AII) amacrine cells. However, whether subsequent signal flow to OFF ganglion cells requires OFF cone bipolar cells near visual threshold remains unclear. Glycinergic synapses between AII amacrine cells and OFF cone bipolar cells are believed to relay subsequently rod-driven signals to OFF ganglion cells. However, AII amacrine cells also make glycinergic synapses directly with OFF ganglion cells. To determine the route for signal flow near visual threshold, we measured the effect of the glycine receptor antagonist strychnine on response threshold in fully dark-adapted retinal cells. As shown previously, we found that response threshold for OFF ganglion cells was elevated by strychnine. Surprisingly, strychnine did not elevate response threshold in any subclass of OFF cone bipolar cell. Instead, in every OFF cone bipolar subclass strychnine suppressed tonic glycinergic inhibition without altering response threshold. Consistent with this lack of influence of strychnine, we found that the dominant input to OFF cone bipolar cells in darkness was excitatory and the response threshold of the excitatory input varied by subclass. Thus, in the dark-adapted mouse retina, the high absolute sensitivity of OFF ganglion cells cannot be explained by signal transmission through OFF cone bipolar cells.

Retinal bipolar cells receive negative feedback input from GABAergic amacrine cells

1988 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masao Tachibana ◽  
Akimichi Kaneko
Keyword(s):  
Negative Feedback ◽  
Axon Terminal ◽  
Plexiform Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Benzodiazepine Receptor ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
High Threshold ◽  
Inner Plexiform Layer ◽  
Membrane Hyperpolarization ◽  
Feedback Connections

AbstractBipolar cells make reciprocal synapses with amacrine cells in the inner plexiform layer; both feedforward connections and feedback connections are present. The physiological properties of the feedback synapse have not been well described. Since some amacrine cells are thought to be GABAergic, we examined bipolar cells for feedback input from γ-aminobtyric acid (GABA)ergic amacrine cells. Solitary bipolar cells were dissociated enzymatically from the goldfish retina. Cells were voltage clamped with a patch pipette and their GABA sensitivity was examined. GABA evoked responses in all bipolar cells with a large axon terminal, which were identified to be the rod dominant ON type, and in some bipolar cells with a small axon terminal. The highest GABA sensitivity was located at the axon terminal. The least effective dose was as low as 100 nM. A small insignificant response of high threshold was evoked when GABA was applied to the dendrite and soma. GABA increased the Cl conductance and caused membrane hyperpolarization. The bipolar cells had the GABAA receptor coupled with a benzodiazepine receptor. The GABA-evoked response was not susceptible to Co ions, which suppressed the GABA-induced responses in turtle cones by 50% at 5 fiM concentration. Incomplete desensitization was observed, suggesting that the GABAergic pathway seems capable of transmitting signals tonically. The present results strongly indicate that the rod-dominant ON-type bipolar cells and some bipolar cells with a small axon terminal receive negative feedback inputs from GABAergic amacrine cells.

Unique functional properties of the APB sensitive and insensitive rod pathways signaling light decrements in mouse retinal ganglion cells

2006 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 127-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
GUO-YONG WANG
Keyword(s):  
Functional Properties ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Clear Cut ◽  
Types Of Information ◽  
Rod Bipolar Cells ◽  
Rod Pathway ◽  
Cone Bipolar Cells

Light decrements are mediated by two distinct groups of rod pathways in the dark-adapted retina that can be differentiated on the basis of their sensitivity to the glutamate agonist DL-2-amino-phosphonobutyric (APB). By means of the APB sensitive pathway, rods transmit light decrementsviarod bipolar cells to AII amacrine cells, then to Off cone bipolar cells, which in turn innervate the dendrites of Off ganglion cells. APB hyperpolarizes rod bipolar cells, thus blocking this rod pathway. With APB insensitive pathways, rods either directly synapse onto Off cone bipolar cells, or rods pass light decrement signal to cones by gap junctions. In the present study, whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made from ganglion cells in the dark-adapted mouse retina to investigate the functional properties of APB sensitive and insensitive rod pathways. The results revealed several clear-cut differences between the APB sensitive and APB insensitive rod pathways. The latency of Off responses to a flashing spot of light was significantly shorter for the APB insensitive pathways than those for the APB sensitive pathway. Moreover, Off responses of the APB insensitive pathways were found to be capable of following substantially higher stimulus frequencies. Nitric oxide was found to selectively block Off responses in the APB sensitive rod pathway. Collectively, these results provide evidence that the APB sensitive and insensitive rod pathways can convey different types of information signaling light decrements in the dark-adapted retina.

scholarly journals Center-surround interactions underlie bipolar cell motion sensing in the mouse retina

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Strauss ◽  
Maria M Korympidou ◽  
Yanli Ran ◽  
Katrin Franke ◽  
Timm Schubert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Cell ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Motion Processing ◽  
Local Motion ◽  
Motion Sensing ◽  
Motion Sensitivity

Motion is a critical aspect of vision. We studied the representation of motion in mouse retinal bipolar cells and found, surprisingly, that some bipolar cells possess motion-sensing capabilities that rely on their center-surround receptive fields. Using a glutamate sensor, we directly observed motion-sensitive bipolar cell synaptic output, which was strongest for local motion and dependent on the motion's origin. We characterized bipolar cell receptive fields and found that there are motion and non-motion sensitive bipolar cell types, the majority being motion sensitive. Next, we used these bipolar cell receptive fields along with connectomics to design biophysical models of downstream cells. The models and experiments demonstrated that bipolar cells pass motion-sensitive excitation to starburst amacrine cells through direction-specific signals mediated by bipolar cells' center-surround receptive field structure. As bipolar cells provide excitation to most amacrine and ganglion cells, their motion sensitivity may contribute to motion processing throughout the visual system.

scholarly journals Receptive field properties of bipolar cell axon terminals in direction-selective sublaminas of the mouse retina

2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (8) ◽  
pp. 1950-1962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minggang Chen ◽  
Seunghoon Lee ◽  
Silvia J. H. Park ◽  
Loren L. Looger ◽  
Z. Jimmy Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Ganglion Cells ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Patch Clamp Recording ◽  
Axon Terminals ◽  
Starburst Amacrine Cells

Retinal bipolar cells (BCs) transmit visual signals in parallel channels from the outer to the inner retina, where they provide glutamatergic inputs to specific networks of amacrine and ganglion cells. Intricate network computation at BC axon terminals has been proposed as a mechanism for complex network computation, such as direction selectivity, but direct knowledge of the receptive field property and the synaptic connectivity of the axon terminals of various BC types is required in order to understand the role of axonal computation by BCs. The present study tested the essential assumptions of the presynaptic model of direction selectivity at axon terminals of three functionally distinct BC types that ramify in the direction-selective strata of the mouse retina. Results from two-photon Ca2+ imaging, optogenetic stimulation, and dual patch-clamp recording demonstrated that 1) CB5 cells do not receive fast GABAergic synaptic feedback from starburst amacrine cells (SACs); 2) light-evoked and spontaneous Ca2+ responses are well coordinated among various local regions of CB5 axon terminals; 3) CB5 axon terminals are not directionally selective; 4) CB5 cells consist of two novel functional subtypes with distinct receptive field structures; 5) CB7 cells provide direct excitatory synaptic inputs to, but receive no direct GABAergic synaptic feedback from, SACs; and 6) CB7 axon terminals are not directionally selective, either. These findings help to simplify models of direction selectivity by ruling out complex computation at BC terminals. They also show that CB5 comprises two functional subclasses of BCs.

scholarly journals LIM Homeobox 4 (lhx4) regulates retinal neural differentiation and visual function in zebrafish

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Guo ◽  
Kangkang Ge ◽  
Yuying Wang ◽  
Minxia Lu ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Function ◽  
Neural Differentiation ◽  
Light Stimulus ◽  
Outer Nuclear Layer ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Zebrafish Model ◽  
And Function

AbstractLIM homeobox 4 (LHX4) is expressed in the photoreceptors (PRs) of the outer nuclear layer (ONL) and bipolar cells (BCs) of the inner nuclear layer (INL) in mouse and chicken retina. It regulates the subtype-specific development of rod BCs and cone BCs in the mouse retina. However, no report has been published on its expression and function in the zebrafish retina. In this study, we assessed the expression of Lhx4 using in situ hybridization (ISH) technique and explored its role in zebrafish (Danio rerio) retinal development via morpholino (MO) technology. We found that the expression of lhx4 in the zebrafish retina begins 48 h post-fertilization (hpf) and is continuously expressed in the ONL and INL. A zebrafish model constructed with lhx4 knockdown in the eyes through vivo-MO revealed that: lhx4 knockdown inhibits the differentiation of Parvalbumin+ amacrine cells (ACs) and Rhodopsin+ rod photoreceptors (RPs), enhances the expression of visual system homeobox 2 (vsx2); and damages the responses of zebrafish to light stimulus, without affecting the differentiation of OFF-BCs and rod BCs, and apoptosis in the retina. These findings reveal that lhx4 regulates neural differentiation in the retina and visual function during zebrafish embryonic development.

scholarly journals Cross-synaptic synchrony and transmission of signal and noise across the mouse retina

eLife ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
William N Grimes ◽  
Mrinalini Hoon ◽  
Kevin L Briggman ◽  
Rachel O Wong ◽  
Fred Rieke
Keyword(s):  
Single Neuron ◽  
Amacrine Cells ◽  
Light Level ◽  
Bipolar Cells ◽  
Mouse Retina ◽  
Anatomical Connectivity ◽  
Physiological Conditions ◽  
Synaptic Noise ◽  
Mammalian Retina ◽  
Rod Bipolar Cells

Cross-synaptic synchrony—correlations in transmitter release across output synapses of a single neuron—is a key determinant of how signal and noise traverse neural circuits. The anatomical connectivity between rod bipolar and A17 amacrine cells in the mammalian retina, specifically that neighboring A17s often receive input from many of the same rod bipolar cells, provides a rare technical opportunity to measure cross-synaptic synchrony under physiological conditions. This approach reveals that synchronization of rod bipolar cell synapses is near perfect in the dark and decreases with increasing light level. Strong synaptic synchronization in the dark minimizes intrinsic synaptic noise and allows rod bipolar cells to faithfully transmit upstream signal and noise to downstream neurons. Desynchronization in steady light lowers the sensitivity of the rod bipolar output to upstream voltage fluctuations. This work reveals how cross-synaptic synchrony shapes retinal responses to physiological light inputs and, more generally, signaling in complex neural networks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document