scholarly journals The Effect of Older Age on EMS Use for Transportation to an Emergency Department

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 261-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Courtney M.C. Jones ◽  
Erin B. Wasserman ◽  
Timmy Li ◽  
Ashley Amidon ◽  
Marissa Abbott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Independent Effect ◽  
Confounding Variables

AbstractIntroductionPrevious studies have found that older adults are more likely to use Emergency Medical Services (EMS) than younger adults, but the reasons for this remain understudied.Hypothesis/ProblemThis study aimed to determine if older age is associated with using EMS for transportation to an emergency department (ED) after controlling for confounding variables.MethodsA cross-sectional survey study was conducted at a large academic medical center. Data on previous medical history, chief complaint, self-perceived illness severity, demographic information, and mode of arrival to the ED were collected on all subjects. Those who arrived to the ED via EMS also were asked reasons why they opted to call an ambulance for their illness/injury. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify survey responses, and multivariable regression was used to assess the independent effect of age on mode of ED arrival.ResultsData from 1,058 subjects were analyzed, 449 (42%) of whom arrived to the ED via EMS. Compared to adults<55 years, the unadjusted prevalence ratio for the association between age and EMS use was 1.18 (95% CI, 0.96-1.45) for subjects 55-79 years and 1.54 (95% CI, 1.18-2.02) for subjects ≥80 years. After adjustment for confounding variables, age remained a statistically significant risk factor for EMS use (P<.05).ConclusionOlder age is an independent risk factor for transportation to the ED via ambulance; however, this effect is attenuated by number of chronic medical conditions and history of depression. Additional research is needed to account for confounders unmeasured in this study and to elucidate reasons for the increased frequency of EMS use among older adults.JonesCMC, WassermanEB, LiT, AmidonA, AbbottM, ShahMN. The effect of older age on EMS use for transportation to an emergency department. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(3):261–268.

scholarly journals Demographic and Risk Factor Differences between Children with “One-Time” and “Repeat” Visits to the Emergency Department for Asthma

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 486
Author(s):  
Pavani Rangachari ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Nishtha Ahuja ◽  
Anjeli Patel ◽  
Renuka Mehta
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Childhood Asthma ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Primary Research ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Individual

This retrospective study examines demographic and risk factor differences between children who visited the emergency department (ED) for asthma once (“one-time”) and more than once (“repeat”) over an 18-month period at an academic medical center. The purpose is to contribute to the literature on ED utilization for asthma and provide a foundation for future primary research on self-management effectiveness (SME) of childhood asthma. For the first round of analysis, an 18-month retrospective chart review was conducted on 252 children (0–17 years) who visited the ED for asthma in 2019–2020, to obtain data on demographics, risk factors, and ED visits for each child. Of these, 160 (63%) were “one-time” and 92 (37%) were “repeat” ED patients. Demographic and risk factor differences between “one-time” and “repeat” ED patients were assessed using contingency table and logistic regression analyses. A second round of analysis was conducted on patients in the age-group 8–17 years to match another retrospective asthma study recently completed in the outpatient clinics at the same (study) institution. The first-round analysis indicated that except age, none of the individual demographic or risk factors were statistically significant in predicting of “repeat” ED visits. More unequivocally, the second-round analysis revealed that none of the individual factors examined (including age, race, gender, insurance, and asthma severity, among others) were statistically significant in predicting “repeat” ED visits for childhood asthma. A key implication of the results therefore is that something other than the factors examined is driving “repeat” ED visits in children with asthma. In addition to contributing to the ED utilization literature, the results serve to corroborate findings from the recent outpatient study and bolster the impetus for future primary research on SME of childhood asthma.

scholarly journals Perceptions of Care Among Older Adults Identified as Fall Risk During a Hospital Stay

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 139-139
Author(s):  
Barbara King
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Older Adult ◽  
Fall Prevention ◽  
Fall Risk ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Common Strategy ◽  
Open Coding ◽  
Perceptions Of Care

Abstract In-hospital falls are a significant clinical, legal and regulatory problem. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid no longer reimburse hospitals for falls that result in injury, adding increase pressure on acute care settings to prevent falls. Additionally, evidence-based practice recommendations for fall prevention in hospitals do not exist, thus leaving administrators to create their own programs. One common strategy used by hospital providers to prevent falls is to restrict patient mobility. Little information on how older adult patients experience fall prevention during a hospital stay has been published. The purpose of this study was to understand perceptions of care among older adults identified as fall risk during a hospital stay. This qualitative study utilized inductive content analysis. Older adults (N=20) from a large academic medical center in the Midwest were recruited to participate in one-to one in-depth interviews. Open coding, categorization and abstraction was used to analyze the data. Three main categories were identified that summarized the older adult patient perception of hospitalization: Act of Caring, something they received from staff, provide to staff or provided to self; Being Restricted in movement resulting in either accepting or rejecting the restriction and Being Freed at discharge, often being told “just be careful”. Older adult identified as fall risk described being restricted in movement during a hospital stay. Many passively accepted this restriction even though they felt a lack of movement would be harmful to them. Additional research on the patient experience with fall prevention is needed.

scholarly journals 460. Point-of-Care, In-Home SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody Testing to Assess Seroprevalence in At-Risk Health Care Workers

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S297-S297
Author(s):  
Eric G Meissner ◽  
Christine Litwin ◽  
Tricia Crocker ◽  
Elizabeth Mack ◽  
Lauren Card
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Health Care Workers ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Documented Infection ◽  
Inconclusive Result ◽  
Care Workers

Abstract Background Health care workers are at significant risk for infection with the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Methods We utilized a point-of-care, lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 IgG immunoassay (RayBiotech) to conduct a seroprevalence study in a cohort of at-risk health care workers (n=339) and normal-risk controls (n=100) employed at an academic medical center. To minimize exposure risk while conducting the study, consents were performed electronically, tests were mailed and then self-administered at home using finger stick blood, and subjects uploaded a picture of the test result while answering an electronic questionnaire. We also validated the assay using de-identified serum samples from patients with PCR-proven SARS-CoV-2 infection. Results Between April 14th and May 6th 2020, 439 subjects were enrolled. Subjects were 68% female, 93% white, and most were physicians (38%) and nurses (27%). In addition, 37% had at least 1 respiratory symptom in the prior month, 34% had cared for a patient with known SARS-CoV-2 infection, 57% and 23% were worried about exposure at work or in the community, respectively, and 5 reported prior documented SARS-CoV-2 infection. On initial testing, 3 subjects had a positive IgG test, 336 had a negative test, and 87 had an inconclusive result. Of those with an inconclusive result who conducted a repeat test (85%), 96% had a negative result. All 3 positive IgG tests were in subjects reporting prior documented infection. Laboratory validation showed that of those with PCR-proven infection more than 13 days prior, 23/30 were IgG positive (76% sensitivity), whereas 1/26 with a negative prior PCR test were seropositive (95% specificity). Repeat longitudinal serologic testing every 30 days for up to 4 times is currently in progress. Conclusion We conducted a contact-free study in the setting of a pandemic to assess SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in an at-risk group of health care workers. The only subjects found to be IgG positive were those with prior documented infection, even though a substantial proportion of subjects reported significant potential occupational or community exposure and symptoms that were potentially compatible with SARS-COV-2 infection. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Using design and innovation principles to reduce avoidable emergency department visits among employees of a large academic medical center

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 100514
Author(s):  
Krisda H. Chaiyachati ◽  
Katy Mahraj ◽  
Carolina Garzon Mrad ◽  
Christina J. O'Malley ◽  
Marguerite Balasta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Academic Medical

scholarly journals 183. Optimization of an Outpatient Antimicrobial Stewardship Process for Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department at an Academic Medical Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S98-S98
Author(s):  
Hannah Kafisheh ◽  
Matthew Hinton ◽  
Amanda Binkley ◽  
Christo Cimino ◽  
Christopher Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Positive Culture ◽  
Culture Result ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Positive Culture Result ◽  
Therapy Modification

Abstract Background Suboptimal antimicrobial therapy has resulted in the emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms. The objective of this study was to optimize the time to antimicrobial therapy modification for patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) of an academic medical center through implementation of a pharmacist-driven outpatient antimicrobial stewardship initiative (ASI). Methods This was a pre-post, quasi-experimental study that evaluated the impact of a pharmacist-driven outpatient antimicrobial stewardship initiative at a single academic medical center. The pre-cohort was evaluated through manual electronic medical record (EMR) review, while the post-cohort involved a real-time notification alert system through an electronic clinical surveillance application. The difference in time from positive culture result to antimicrobial therapy optimization before and after implementation of the pharmacist-driven ASI was collected and analyzed. Results A total of 166 cultures were included in the analysis. Of these, 12/72 (16%) in the pre-cohort and 11/94 (12%) in the post-cohort required antimicrobial therapy modification, with a 21.9-hour reduction in median time from positive culture result to antimicrobial optimization in the post-cohort (43 h vs. 21.1 h; p &lt; 0.01). Similarly, the median time from positive culture result to review was reduced by 20 hours with pharmacist-driven intervention (21.1 h vs. 1.4 h; p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion The implementation of a pharmacist-driven outpatient antimicrobial stewardship initiative resulted in a significant reduction in time to positive culture review and therapy optimization for patients discharged from the ED of an academic medical center set in Philadelphia, PA. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract 301: Differential Outcomes for Geriatric Patients in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Compared to Medical Intensive Care Unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Ong ◽  
Albert Lui ◽  
John A Dodson ◽  
Jordan B Strom ◽  
Carlos Alviar
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Differential Outcomes ◽  
Medical Intensive Care ◽  
Cardiac Intensive Care

Background: The number of older adults admitted to cardiac intensive care units (CICU) have been increasing over the past decade, but it is not known if outcomes vary between CICU and medical intensive care units (MICU). We aimed to describe survival and length of stay (LOS) in older adults admitted to CICU and MICU. Methods: All patients admitted to the CICU or MICU at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2001-2012 were identified from MIMIC-III, a large single-center critical care database containing deidentified clinical data for 38,597 patients. Our primary outcomes were ICU mortality and ICU LOS. Regression analyses were performed adjusting for age, gender, ICU setting and Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score (OASIS), a severity score developed and validated in critically ill patients for ICU mortality. Results: We included 21,088 MICU patients (48.3% female) and 7,726 CICU patients (42% female). Unadjusted mortality was 13.7% in MICU and 12.5% in CICU (p=0.11). When adjusted for age, gender and OASIS, there was no difference in mortality between MICU and CICU (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.34-1.13, p=0.15). However, we found a significant interaction between older age and type of ICU with mortality (p=0.03) but not with ICU LOS (p=0.15). In patients >75 years (6,837 in MICU and 3,161 in CICU), each 5-year interval of older age was associated with higher mortality when adjusted for gender and OASIS in the CICU (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08 p=0.002), but not in the MICU (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.03, p=0.15, Figure). Conclusion: Older adults admitted to the CICU had higher adjusted mortality by age group after age 75, as opposed to older MICU patients in whom mortality was high but remained unchanged after age 75.

Care Coordination

2018 ◽  
pp. 163-167
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Care Coordination ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
General Medicine ◽  
Ethnically Diverse ◽  
Medicine Service ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Diverse Patient Population ◽  
Hospital Visits

This case focuses on improving care coordination for patients who have been discharged from the hospital by asking the question: Is it possible to reduce the rate of repeat emergency department and hospital visits after discharge by improving care coordination? The study group included adults admitted to the general medicine service of an urban, academic medical center that serves an “ethnically diverse patient population.” Patients were assigned to nurse discharge advocates who provided the patients with delineated services and assistance during the hospitalization The Project Reengineered Discharge (RED) program substantially reduced repeat emergency department and hospital visits by improving care coordination at the time of hospital discharge.

Behavioral Health Resource Utilization of Emergency Department Patients Presenting from Mass Gathering Events

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (s1) ◽  
pp. s105-s106
Author(s):  
Charles Hebert ◽  
Gary Peksa ◽  
Joshua DeMott
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Behavioral Health ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Mood Stabilizers ◽  
Health Staff ◽  
Mass Gathering ◽  
Physical Restraints

Introduction:Behavioral health needs of attendees at mass gathering events who require emergency department (ED) evaluation are poorly understood. Appropriate resource allocation of mental health staff and other behavioral interventions necessary to support this patient population are also unclear.Aim:To describe behavioral characteristics and psychiatric resource utilization of patients presenting to a tertiary academic medical center emergency department from mass gathering events.Methods:Single-center retrospective study evaluating attendees at mass gathering events who presented to a Chicago ED. Electronic medical records for patients presenting between October 13, 2013, and December 31, 2015, were reviewed and descriptive analyses performed.Results:209 distinct records were reviewed. Most patients presented from large outdoor concerts (n = 186, 89%). Forty-two (20.1%) reported a mental health complaint at presentation, including concerns related to pre-existing psychiatric disturbances or onset of new symptoms. Twenty-seven of the total cohort (12.9%) endorsed a prior psychiatric history. Thirty-five (16.7%) reported use of prescribed psychotropic medications, including antidepressants, stimulants, mood stabilizers, and others. Diagnostic testing among the total sample included serum ethanol measurement (31.1%), urinary toxicology (25.4%), acetaminophen (6.2%), aspirin (5.3%), and creatine kinase measurements (11%). Computed brain tomography was ordered for 20 patients (9.6%). Twelve patients (5.7%) received an anxiolytic (lorazepam) and 113 (54.1%) received intravenous fluids. An antipsychotic (olanzapine) was administered to one patient (0.5%). There were no reports of suicidal ideation, but physical restraints for agitation were employed in 13 patients (6.2%). Police consultation occurred in 10 cases (4.8%). No formal psychiatric consultations were requested by ED providers.Discussion:Patients presenting to the emergency department from mass gathering events frequently endorse behavioral complaints requiring directed use of diagnostic and other emergency department resources for their ailments. The need for physical restraints and limited use of anxiolytics and antipsychotics in our sample suggest that psychiatric consultation is underutilized.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document