Identification and Quantification of Topologically Close Packed Phases (TCP) in Alloy 22 Using Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) Analysis

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (S02) ◽  
pp. 960-961 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bassem S El-Dasher ◽  
Sharon G Torres ◽  
Tammy S Summers

Extended abstract of a paper presented at Microscopy and Microanalysis 2004 in Savannah, Georgia, USA, August 1–5, 2004.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Cavosie ◽  
Luigi Folco

Table S1: Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis conditions<br>


2010 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 493-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. M. Reddy ◽  
C. Clark ◽  
N. E. Timms ◽  
B. M. Eglington

AbstractElectron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis of monazite requires a comparison of empirically collected electron backscatter patterns (EBSPs) with theoretical diffraction data, or ‘match units’, derived from known crystallographic parameters. Published crystallographic data derived from compositionally varying natural and synthetic monazite are used to calculate ten different match units for monazite. These match units are used to systematically index EBSPs obtained from four natural monazite samples with different compositions. Analyses of EBSD data, derived from the indexing of five and six diffraction bands using each of the ten match units for 10,000 EBSPs from each of the four samples, indicate a large variation in the ability of the different match units to correctly index the different natural samples. However, the use of match units derived from either synthetic Gd or Eu monazite crystallographic data yield good results for three of the four analysed monazites. Comparison of sample composition with published monazite compositions indicates that these match units are likely to yield good results for the EBSD analysis of metamorphic monazite. The results provide a clear strategy for optimizing the acquisition and analysis of EBSD data from monazite but also indicate the need for the collection of new crystallographic structure data and the subsequent generation of more appropriate match units for natural monazite.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Cavosie ◽  
Luigi Folco

Table S1: Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis conditions<br>


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin M. MacRae ◽  
Anthony E. Hughes ◽  
James S. Laird ◽  
A. M. Glenn ◽  
Nicholas C. Wilson ◽  
...  

AbstractElectron and proton microprobes, along with electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) analysis were used to study the microstructure of the contemporary Al–Cu–Li alloy AA2099-T8. In electron probe microanalysis, wavelength and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry were used in parallel with soft X-ray emission spectroscopy (SXES) to characterize the microstructure of AA2099-T8. The electron microprobe was able to identify five unique compositions for constituent intermetallic (IM) particles containing combinations of Al, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn. A sixth IM type was found to be rich in Ti and B (suggesting TiB2), and a seventh IM type contained Si. EBSD patterns for the five constituent IM particles containing Al, Cu, Fe, Mn, and Zn indicated that they were isomorphous with four phases in the 2xxx series aluminium alloys including Al6(Fe, Mn), Al13(Fe, Mn)4 (two slightly different compositions), Al37Cu2Fe12 and Al7Cu2Fe. SXES revealed that Li was present in some constituent IM particles. Al SXES mapping revealed an Al-enriched (i.e., Cu, Li-depleted) zone in the grain boundary network. From the EBSD analysis, the kernel average misorientation map showed higher levels of localized misorientation in this region, suggesting greater deformation or stored energy. Proton-induced X-ray emission revealed banding of the TiB2 IM particles and Cu inter-band enrichment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document