scholarly journals The availability of health information to patients with newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica: results from the Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR) Cohort study

Author(s):  
Maatla Tshimologo ◽  
Toby Helliwell ◽  
Samantha Hider ◽  
Christian Mallen ◽  
Sara Muller

AbstractAimThe aim of this study was to assess the provision of information to, and seeking of information by, patients newly diagnosed with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) in primary care.BackgroundPMR is an inflammatory rheumatological condition of older people that can be treated with long-term oral glucocorticoids. Management usually requires the patient to understand the potential complications of treatment and the disease, as well as involvement in reducing treatment dose. This may be complex for patients to understand.MethodData are taken from the baseline phase of the PMR Cohort study, which recruited newly diagnosed patients with PMR from UK primary care. Participants provided information on their PMR symptoms, general health and sociodemographics. They also completed items regarding information provision by their doctor at diagnosis, its usefulness and their own search for information.FindingsA total of 652 people responded to the baseline survey. In all, 399 (62.7%) had received written information from their doctor; 237 (98%) found it useful; 265 (42.9%) would have liked more information; and 311 (48.4%) sought out more information. Those who were not given information and did not seek it out tended to be older and have poorer internet access.Information provided at diagnosis to patients with PMR is useful, but more than a third did not receive any. This is concerning when PMR requires self-management and vigilance for red flags. Doctors should make use of the resources already available to them to support patients and should specifically ensure that these are available to more elderly patients and those without internet access.

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e041715
Author(s):  
Aarent RT Brand ◽  
Eline Houben ◽  
Irene D Bezemer ◽  
Frank L J Visseren ◽  
Michiel L Bots ◽  
...  

ObjectivesPharmacological treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) comprises of antiplatelet therapy (APT), blood pressure control and cholesterol optimisation. Guidelines provide class-I recommendations on the prescription, but there are little data on the actual prescription practices. Our study provides insight into the prescription of medication among patients with PAD in the Netherlands and reports a ‘real-world’ patient journey through primary and secondary care.DesignWe conducted a cohort study among patients newly diagnosed with PAD between 2010 and 2014.SettingData were obtained from the PHARMO Database Network, a population-based network of electronic pharmacy, primary and secondary healthcare setting records in the Netherlands. The source population for this study comprised almost 1 million individuals.Participants‘Newly diagnosed’ was defined as a recorded International Classification of Primary Care code for PAD, a PAD-specific WCIA examination code or a diagnosis recorded as free text episode in the general practitioner records with no previous PAD diagnosis record and no prescription of P2Y12 inhibitors or aspirin the preceding year. The patient journey was defined by at least 1 year of database history and follow-up relative to the index date.ResultsBetween 2010 and 2014, we identified 3677 newly diagnosed patients with PAD. Most patients (91%) were diagnosed in primary care. Almost half of all patients (49%) had no APT dispensing record. Within this group, 33% received other anticoagulant therapy (vitamin K antagonist or direct oral anticoagulant). Mono-APT was dispensed as aspirin (40% of patients) or P2Y12 inhibitors (2.5% of patients). Dual APT combining aspirin with a P2Y12 inhibitor was dispensed to 8.5% of the study population.ConclusionHalf of all patients with newly diagnosed PAD are not treated conforming to (international) guideline recommendations on thromboembolism prevention through APT. At least 33% of all patients with newly diagnosed PAD do not receive any antithrombotic therapy. Evaluation and improvement of APT prescription and thereby improved prevention of (secondary) cardiovascular events is warranted.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-407
Author(s):  
Daphne M Stol ◽  
Monika Hollander ◽  
Ilse F Badenbroek ◽  
Mark M J Nielen ◽  
François G Schellevis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Early detection and treatment of cardiometabolic diseases (CMD) in high-risk patients is a promising preventive strategy to anticipate the increasing burden of CMD. The Dutch guideline ‘the prevention consultation’ provides a framework for stepwise CMD risk assessment and detection in primary care. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of this program in terms of newly diagnosed CMD. Methods A cohort study among 30 934 patients, aged 45–70 years without known CMD or CMD risk factors, who were invited for the CMD detection program within 37 general practices. Patients filled out a CMD risk score (step 1), were referred for additional risk profiling in case of high risk (step 2) and received lifestyle advice and (pharmacological) treatment if indicated (step 3). During 1-year follow-up newly diagnosed CMD, prescriptions and abnormal diagnostic tests were assessed. Results Twelve thousand seven hundred and thirty-eight patients filled out the risk score of which 865, 6665 and 5208 had a low, intermediate and high CMD risk, respectively. One thousand seven hundred and fifty-five high-risk patients consulted the general practitioner, in 346 of whom a new CMD was diagnosed. In an additional 422 patients a new prescription and/or abnormal diagnostic test were found. Conclusions Implementation of the CMD detection program resulted in a new CMD diagnosis in one-fifth of high-risk patients who attended the practice for completion of their risk profile. However, the potential yield of the program could be higher given the considerable number of additional risk factors—such as elevated glucose, blood pressure and cholesterol levels—found, requiring active follow-up and presumably treatment in the future.


2004 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 703
Author(s):  
S Bustacchini ◽  
G Mazzaglia ◽  
MC Sturkenboom ◽  
P Ruffo ◽  
LG Mantovani ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
J.A. Prior ◽  
S. Muller ◽  
T. Helliwell ◽  
S.L. Hider ◽  
K. Barraclough ◽  
...  

AbstractWe aimed to examine the association between pain, stiffness and fatigue in newly diagnosed polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) patients using baseline data from a prospective cohort study. Fatigue is a known, but often ignored symptom of PMR. Newly diagnosed PMR patients were recruited from general practice and mailed a baseline questionnaire. This included a numerical rating scale for pain and stiffness severity, manikins identifying locations of pain and stiffness and the FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire. A total of 652 PMR patients responded (88.5%). The mean age of responders was 72.6 years (SD 9.0) and the majority were female (62.0%). Manikin data demonstrated that bilateral shoulder and hip pain and stiffness were common. The mean fatigue score (FACIT) was 33.9 (SD 12.4). Adjusted regression analysis demonstrated that a higher number of pain sites (23–44 sites) and higher pain and stiffness severity were associated with greater levels of fatigue. In newly diagnosed PMR patients, fatigue was associated with PMR symptom severity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 100.2-100
Author(s):  
S. Fredslund-Andersen ◽  
P. Lage-Hansen ◽  
N. Svendsen ◽  
M. Jeppesen Rechnagel ◽  
U. Højberg ◽  
...  

Background:Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is the most common inflammatory rheumatic disease of people over 50 years in Scandinavian countries and people of northern European descent, characterized by proximal pain, stiffness, raised inflammatory markers and prompt response to steroids(1). Relapse free during tapering off prednisone, are common in approximately 50% of patients. Studies reported that up to 70% of PMR patients are successfully tapered of prednisone due to remission, within 1-2 years from treatment initiation (1). Telemedicine has found a wider application in a number of chronic diseases resulting in a decreased number of hospital visits; however, no telemedicine studies on PMR patients have been performed before (2).Objectives:To evaluate the use of telemedicine consultation in newly diagnosed PMR patients.Methods:Telemedicine consultations managed by rheumatic nurses for newly diagnosed PMR patients was established in 2017 at our department. Patients diagnosed with PMR by a rheumatologist received written information concerning the nature of the disease, a “follow-up” schedule and a prednisone treatment/tapering plan. Telephone consultations (TC) including relevant blood analysis was planned after 4, 16, 52 and 78 weeks from the time of diagnosis. TC was managed by 4 nurses specialized in rheumatic diseases, who received appropriate education of PMR prior to the establishment. A predefined questionnaire was used for every telephone consultation.All PMR patients were initially treated with 15 mg of prednisone daily, with slowly tapering to 5 mg daily at week 16 and reduced to zero at week 48. In the case of relapse symptoms, patients were instructed to contact the treating nurses. In that case, relevant biomarkers were taken and a rheumatologist evaluated the need for a physical consultation and potential treatment adjustment.Only patients with minimum disease duration of 3 months were included in the study.Results:In a period of two years, 76 patients were evaluated. The mean age was 73 years and the mean follow up period was 10, 67 ± standard deviation (SD) 5,2 months. At the time of diagnosis, all patients fulfilled the 2012 Classifications criteria for PMR (3). The Mean number of TC was 4.27(± SD 2, 3).In 45 cases (60%) no additional physical consultation was necessary. In patients examined physically due to relapse suspicion, the most common findings were PMR relapses (66%), followed by non-inflammatory muscle and joint pain (18,5%), arthritis (14%), while one patient was diagnosed with giant cell arteritis.Successfully prednisone tapering was achieved in 23 cases (30%) while 27 patients (35,5%) at the time of data evaluation were treated with only 2,5 mg of prednisone daily. The mean current daily prednisolone dosage was 3.95 mg (± SD 3.25) while disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs had been initiated in 6 patients.Conclusion:Telemedicine consultations in PMR diminish the need for physical consultations in this patient cohort. More than half of all patients were either out of- or received only a very low dose of prednisone at the time of evaluation of data.References:[1]Kermani TA, Warrington KJ. Polymyalgia rheumatica. Lancet. 2013 Jan 5;381(9860):63-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60680-1.[2]Matteo Piga et al. Telemedicine for patients with rheumatic diseases: Systematic review and proposal for research agenda. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Aug;47(1):121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.03.014. Epub 2017 Mar 22.[3]Dasgupta B, et al. 2012 Provisional classification criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica: A European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2012; 64: 943-54.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 328-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Barraclough ◽  
W. G Liddell ◽  
J. du Toit ◽  
C. Foy ◽  
B. Dasgupta ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 2093-2100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giampiero Mazzaglia ◽  
Lorenzo G Mantovani ◽  
Miriam CJM Sturkenboom ◽  
Alessandro Filippi ◽  
Gianluca Trifirò ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document