scholarly journals Past experiences with surprise medical bills drive issue knowledge, concern and attitudes toward federal policy intervention

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-34
Author(s):  
Timothy Callaghan ◽  
Simon F. Haeder ◽  
Steven Sylvester

Abstract Scholars and journalists have devoted considerable attention to understanding the circumstances in which Americans receive surprise medical bills. Previous research on this issue has focused on the scope of the problem, including the conditions that are most likely to lead to surprise bills. However, the existing literature has almost exclusively relied on claims data, limiting our understanding of consumer experiences and attitudes toward policy changes to address surprise billing. Using a survey administered to a nationally representative sample of 4998 Americans, we analyze consumer experiences with surprise billing, knowledge of the issue, how concerned Americans are about receiving surprise bills and how past experiences influence policy preferences toward federal action on surprise billing. Our analysis demonstrates that knowledge and concern about surprise billing are the highest among the educated and those who have previously received a surprise bill. These factors also predict support for federal policy action, with high levels of support for federal policy action across the population, including among both liberals and conservatives. However, more detailed federal policy proposals receive significantly less support among Americans, suggesting that stand-alone policy action may not be viable. Our results show bipartisan support among American consumers for federal action on surprise billing in the abstract but no consistent views on specific policy proposals.

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E. T. Swan

Abstract Background Contraceptive access is influenced by policy decisions, which can expand and constrict the contraceptive options available. This study explored the impact of recent US federal policy on contraceptive access. Methods Federal policy changes impacting contraceptive access over the past decade were identified in grey literature. These policy changes were organized into a timeline and analyzed according to Levesque et al.'s (2013) five dimensions of healthcare access (approachability, acceptability, availability/accommodation, affordability, and appropriateness), noting the most salient healthcare dimension impacted by the policy change and analyzing whether, according to this framework, the policy created a theoretical increase or decrease in contraceptive access. Results Of those policy changes coded as increasing (n = 42) and decreasing (n = 28) contraceptive access, most were related to the affordability (increasing n = 13; decreasing n = 12), physical availability (increasing n = 10; decreasing n = 7), and appropriateness (increasing n = 12; decreasing n = 4) of contraceptive care. Policy changes largely followed partisan divides, with contraceptive access increasing in years with a Democratic president and decreasing when a Republican president was in office. Many policy changes were related to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and Title X of the Public Health Services Act. The implementation of the ACA and subsequent updates to it have increased the affordability of contraception, whereas changes to Title X have decreased the availability and appropriateness of contraceptive care. Conclusions This study highlights recent policy changes impacting contraceptive access, organizing them according to the five dimensions of healthcare access. It outlines specific policy barriers to contraceptive access and provides suggestions for policy and practice action that will improve contraceptive access and reproductive autonomy. Opportunities to ensure contraceptive access for all Americans include promoting comprehensive sex education, extending the Community Health Center Fund, increasing contraceptive care options for people with employers who are exempted from the ACA contraceptive mandate, addressing discrimination and building trust in contraceptive care, and amplifying outreach efforts to combat misinformation and confusion created by continuous changes to key family planning policies. Continued research on the role of policy in determining reproductive autonomy is warranted, and practice and policy action is needed to improve contraceptive access.


1999 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-257
Author(s):  
Lauren LeRoy ◽  
Anne Schwartz

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S601-S601
Author(s):  
Andrew MacPherson

Abstract The Coalition to End Social Isolation and Loneliness convenes a diverse group of allied stakeholders, including consumer and patient groups, health plans, community-based organizations, private sector researchers and innovators, and others, to address the epidemic of social isolation and loneliness. The Coalition is developing and advocating for bipartisan federal policy solutions to provide individuals the support they need to be socially engaged. This session will describe the role of the Coalition in engaging stakeholders, promoting innovative research, and advocating for policy changes that combat the adverse consequences of social isolation and loneliness and advance approaches and practices that improve social connectedness for all Americans.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 94-94
Author(s):  
Michael T. Halpern ◽  
Janet S. de Moor ◽  
K Robin Yabroff

94 Background: Pain is frequently reported by individuals with cancer. While the adverse effects of pain on quality of life are well-established, it is unknown if pain is associated with patients’ concerns about employment and cancer costs. Methods: We used data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) 2016 Experiences with Cancer Supplement including cancer diagnosis, pain level over the past 7 days, employment changes, and cost concerns. Respondents diagnosed with cancer at age > 18 (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) with non-missing pain information were included. Sampling weights were used in analysis to provide nationally representative estimates. Results: Among 875 eligible respondents with cancer (weighted total of 1.3 million individuals), pain was reported by 57% (severe pain by 12%). The likelihood of pain was significantly associated with age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, cancer site, insurance, and time since treatment. Controlling for these factors, individuals reporting pain were significantly more likely to take time off from work (odds ratio [OR] 1.76); change to a less demanding or part time job (OR 1.91); not pursue promotions (OR 1.39); retire early (OR 3.06); and feel less productive (OR 2.35). Individuals with pain were significantly more likely to have uncovered medical expenses (OR 1.28); be in debt (OR 2.68); and be unable to cover medical bills (OR 1.46). These individuals were significantly more likely to worry about paying medical bills (OR 1.94); to delay medical treatment (OR 4.30), follow-up care (OR 2.20), and mental health care (OR 4.11); and were less likely to receive necessary medical care (OR 0.50). Despite these, concerns, they were significantly less likely to discuss out-of-pocket costs for cancer care (OR 0.86) or cancer treatments (OR 0.96) with a healthcare provider. Conclusions: Cancer pain is associated with increased cost and employment concerns but with a lower likelihood of discussing costs with healthcare provider. Interventions are needed to address financial hardship among this high-risk population.


2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (5) ◽  
pp. 427-437
Author(s):  
Scott D. Landes ◽  
Nikita Lillaney

Abstract The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) of 1987 was expected to reduce inappropriate residential placements of persons with intellectual disability (ID) in nursing homes. Utilizing the nationally representative 1977, 1985, 1995, and 2004 National Nursing Home Surveys (NNHS), we estimate trend change in the ID nursing home census pre- and post-OBRA. We find a marked decrease in number and percentage, and a shift in the age distribution of the ID nursing home census, most pronounced between 1985 and 1995. We contend that these trend changes, concurrent with growth in the overall nursing home population, provide empirical evidence that policy changes that occurred during the OBRA enactment period were successful in reducing inappropriate residential placements of persons with ID in nursing homes.


2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. S207-S211.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Dominic Panzera ◽  
Karen Castellanos-Brown ◽  
Courtney Paolicelli ◽  
Ruth Morgan ◽  
Anna Potter ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 200-210
Author(s):  
Robert Rattle

Internet and communication technologies (ICTs) are revolutionising how people communicate and connect. While these have catalyzed calls for increasing societal change, social messages, not the technologies, motivate these actions. This paper will use the case study of Canada and the application of ICTs to argue why they are no less likely to support social change in modern economies than any previous technology. Drawing on examples of federal policy changes in Canada, the paper will argue ICTs and social media can be used to suppress democracy, undermine science and expand social impacts, even where they are intended to specifically address those problems. The paper will then discuss the roles of values in social change to argue that ICTs and social media are influenced by larger societal forces and that these are often better predictors of outcomes than the application of any one technology for social change.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document