scholarly journals A Novel Surfactant–Polymer/Alkaline–Surfactant–Polymer Formulation for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Processes

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 1230-1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geraldo A. R. Ramos ◽  
Lateef T. Akanji ◽  
Waheed Afzal
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Eor Processes ◽  
Alkaline Surfactant Polymer

scholarly journals Surfactant-Polymer Interactions in a Combined Enhanced Oil Recovery Flooding

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 6520
Author(s):  
Pablo Druetta ◽  
Francesco Picchioni
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Combined Processes ◽  
Sweep Efficiency ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Chemical Agents ◽  
Chemical Eor ◽  
Eor Processes ◽  
Adsorption Rates ◽  
Polymer Interaction

The traditional Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) processes allow improving the performance of mature oilfields after waterflooding projects. Chemical EOR processes modify different physical properties of the fluids and/or the rock in order to mobilize the oil that remains trapped. Furthermore, combined processes have been proposed to improve the performance, using the properties and synergy of the chemical agents. This paper presents a novel simulator developed for a combined surfactant/polymer flooding in EOR processes. It studies the flow of a two-phase, five-component system (aqueous and organic phases with water, petroleum, surfactant, polymer and salt) in porous media. Polymer and surfactant together affect each other’s interfacial and rheological properties as well as the adsorption rates. This is known in the industry as Surfactant-Polymer Interaction (SPI). The simulations showed that optimum results occur when both chemical agents are injected overlapped, with the polymer in the first place. This procedure decreases the surfactant’s adsorption rates, rendering higher recovery factors. The presence of the salt as fifth component slightly modifies the adsorption rates of both polymer and surfactant, but its influence on the phase behavior allows increasing the surfactant’s sweep efficiency.

scholarly journals Nanotechnology Applied to Thermal Enhanced Oil Recovery Processes: A Review

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (24) ◽  
pp. 4671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar E. Medina ◽  
Carol Olmos ◽  
Sergio H. Lopera ◽  
Farid B. Cortés ◽  
Camilo A. Franco
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Thermal Recovery ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Crude Oils ◽  
Recovery Processes ◽  
Heavy Crude ◽  
Eor Processes

The increasing demand for fossil fuels and the depleting of light crude oil in the next years generates the need to exploit heavy and unconventional crude oils. To face this challenge, the oil and gas industry has chosen the implementation of new technologies capable of improving the efficiency in the enhanced recovery oil (EOR) processes. In this context, the incorporation of nanotechnology through the development of nanoparticles and nanofluids to increase the productivity of heavy and extra-heavy crude oils has taken significant importance, mainly through thermal enhanced oil recovery (TEOR) processes. The main objective of this paper is to provide an overview of nanotechnology applied to oil recovery technologies with a focus on thermal methods, elaborating on the upgrading of the heavy and extra-heavy crude oils using nanomaterials from laboratory studies to field trial proposals. In detail, the introduction section contains general information about EOR processes, their weaknesses, and strengths, as well as an overview that promotes the application of nanotechnology. Besides, this review addresses the physicochemical properties of heavy and extra-heavy crude oils in Section 2. The interaction of nanoparticles with heavy fractions such as asphaltenes and resins, as well as the variables that can influence the adsorptive phenomenon are presented in detail in Section 3. This section also includes the effects of nanoparticles on the other relevant mechanisms in TEOR methods, such as viscosity changes, wettability alteration, and interfacial tension reduction. The catalytic effect influenced by the nanoparticles in the different thermal recovery processes is described in Sections 4, 5, 6, and 7. Finally, Sections 8 and 9 involve the description of an implementation plan of nanotechnology for the steam injection process, environmental impacts, and recent trends. Additionally, the review proposes critical stages in order to obtain a successful application of nanoparticles in thermal oil recovery processes.

scholarly journals Wettability alteration analysis of smart water/novel functionalized nanocomposites for enhanced oil recovery

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 1318-1328
Author(s):  
Sara Habibi ◽  
Arezou Jafari ◽  
Zahra Fakhroueian
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Ionic Composition ◽  
Water Flooding ◽  
Wettability Alteration ◽  
Core Flooding ◽  
Sulfate Ions ◽  
Smart Water ◽  
Eor Processes ◽  
Co Precipitation

Abstract Smart water flooding, as a popular method to change the wettability of carbonate rocks, is one of the interesting and challenging issues in reservoir engineering. In addition, the recent studies show that nanoparticles have a great potential for application in EOR processes. However, little research has been conducted on the use of smart water with nanoparticles in enhanced oil recovery. In this study, stability, contact angle and IFT measurements and multi-step core flooding tests were designed to investigate the effect of the ionic composition of smart water containing SO42− and Ca2+ ions in the presence of nanofluid on EOR processes. The amine/organosiloxane@Al2O3/SiO2 (AOAS) nanocomposite previously synthesized using co-precipitation-hydrothermal method has been used here. However, for the first time the application of this nanocomposite along with smart water has been studied in this research. Results show that by increasing the concentrations of calcium and sulfate ions in smart water, oil recovery is improved by 9% and 10%, respectively, compared to seawater. In addition, the use of smart water and nanofluids simultaneously is very effective on increasing oil recovery. Finally, the best performance was observed in smart water containing two times of sulfate ions concentration (SW2S) with nanofluids, showing increased efficiency of about 7.5%.

scholarly journals Gas Pressure Cycling (GPC) and Solvent-Assisted Gas Pressure Cycling (SA-GPC) Enhanced Oil Recovery Processes in a Thin Heavy Oil Reservoir

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 5047
Author(s):  
Olusegun Ojumoola ◽  
Hongze Ma ◽  
Yongan Gu
Keyword(s):  
Enhanced Oil Recovery ◽  
Oil Recovery ◽  
Heavy Oil ◽  
Gas Pressure ◽  
Oil Viscosity ◽  
Step Size ◽  
Foamy Oil ◽  
Pressure Cycling ◽  
Eor Processes ◽  
Solvent Trapping

In this paper, gas pressure cycling (GPC) and solvent-assisted gas pressure cycling (SA-GPC) were developed as two new and effective enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. Eight coreflood tests were conducted by using a 2-D rectangular sandpacked physical model with a one or two-well configuration. More specifically, two cyclic solvent injection (CSI), three GPC, and three SA-GPC tests were conducted after the primary production, whose pressure was declined in steps from Pi = 3.0 MPa to Pf = 0.2 MPa. It was found that the CSI tests had poor performances because of the known CSI technical shortcomings and an additional technical issue of solvent trapping found in this study. Quick heavy oil viscosity regainment resulted in the solvent-trapping zone. In contrast, C3H8-GPC test at a pressure depletion step size of ∆PEOR = 0.5 MPa and C3H8-SA-CO2-GPC test at ∆PEOR = 1.0 MPa had the highest total heavy oil recovery factors (RFs) of 41.9% and 36.6% of the original oil-in-place (OOIP) among the two respective series of GPC and SA-GPC tests. The better performances of these two tests than C3H8- or CO2-CSI test were attributed to the effective displacement of the foamy oil toward the producer in the two-well configuration. Thus the back-and-forth movements of the foamy oil in CSI test in the one-well configuration were eliminated in these GPC and SA-GPC tests. Furthermore, C3H8-GPC test outperformed C3H8-SA-CO2-GPC test in terms of the heavy oil RF and cumulative gas-oil ratio (cGOR) because of the formation of stronger foamy-oil flow and the absence of CO2, which reduced the solubility of C3H8 in the heavy oil in the latter test. In summary, different solvent-based EOR processes were ranked based on the heavy oil RFs as follows: C3H8-GPC > C3H8-SA-CO2-GPC > CO2-GPC > C3H8-CSI > CO2-CSI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document