Carbon Dioxide Capture Using Sorbent-Loaded Hollow-Fiber Modules with Integrated Heat Recovery

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (7) ◽  
pp. 2119-2127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Determan ◽  
Dhruv C. Hoysall ◽  
Srinivas Garimella ◽  
Richard Lenz ◽  
Daniel P. Leta
2014 ◽  
Vol 465 ◽  
pp. 49-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Liu ◽  
Edgar S. Sanders ◽  
Sudhir S. Kulkarni ◽  
David J. Hasse ◽  
William J. Koros

2018 ◽  
Vol 229 ◽  
pp. 900-909 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravinder K. Garlapalli ◽  
Michael W. Spencer ◽  
Khairul Alam ◽  
Jason P. Trembly

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Bachir El Fil ◽  
Dhruv C. Hoysall ◽  
Srinivas Garimella

Abstract The impact of post-combustion carbon dioxide capture on the performance of a power plant is evaluated. A model of a coal power plant with post-combustion temperature swing adsorption CO2 capture using sorbent-loaded hollow fibers is presented. The resulting performance and cost of carbon capture are compared with those of other adsorption-based technologies. A parametric analysis of the performance of the power plant with respect to key parameters in the hollow fiber module operation is presented. It is found that electrical energy consumption for the compression of CO2 is a major parasitic load common to all absorption technologies and accounts for almost half of the total parasitic load. The effect of source temperature, flue gas fan and coupling fluid pump flow rates on overall system performance is presented. The impacts of different carbon capture technologies on the same coal-fired power plant are compared. Hollow fiber modules had the lowest parasitic load on the power plant, followed by KS-2 based carbon capture.


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 215-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janusz Kotowicz ◽  
Marcin Job

Abstract This paper presents a gas turbine combined cycle plant with oxy-combustion and carbon dioxide capture. A gas turbine part of the unit with the operating parameters is presented. The methodology and results of optimization by the means of a genetic algorithm for the steam parts in three variants of the plant are shown. The variants of the plant differ by the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) construction: the singlepressure HRSG (1P), the double-pressure HRSG with reheating (2PR), and the triple-pressure HRSG with reheating (3PR). For obtained results in all variants an economic evaluation was performed. The break-even prices of electricity were determined and the sensitivity analysis to the most significant economic factors were performed.


2013 ◽  
Vol 221 ◽  
pp. 166-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Labreche ◽  
Ryan P. Lively ◽  
Fateme Rezaei ◽  
Grace Chen ◽  
Christopher W. Jones ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 225-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhruv C. Hoysall ◽  
Matthew D. Determan ◽  
Srinivas Garimella ◽  
Richard D. Lenz ◽  
Daniel P. Leta

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document