Adhesion Forces of the Blood Plasma Proteins on Self-Assembled Monolayer Surfaces of Alkanethiolates with Different Functional Groups Measured by an Atomic Force Microscope

Langmuir ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (22) ◽  
pp. 7639-7646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoru Kidoaki ◽  
Takehisa Matsuda
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 531-539
Author(s):  
I. M. Larina ◽  
A. G. Brzhzovsky ◽  
A. M. Nosovsky ◽  
A. S. Kononikhin ◽  
O. I. Orlov

1946 ◽  
Vol 165 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.F. Deutsch ◽  
R.A. Alberty ◽  
L.J. Gosting

2016 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. S166
Author(s):  
Izabela Sadowska-Bartosz ◽  
Sabina Galiniak ◽  
Grzegorz Bartosz ◽  
Izabela Rozmiłowska ◽  
Damian Czyżewski ◽  
...  

1980 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. 431-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Z. Annenkova ◽  
N. G. Dianova ◽  
V. M. Annenkova ◽  
G. S. Ugryumova ◽  
M. G. Voronkov

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 413-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernardo R.A. Neves ◽  
Michael E. Salmon ◽  
Phillip E. Russell ◽  
E. Barry Troughton

Abstract: In this work, we show how field emission–scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) can be a useful tool for the study of self-assembled monolayer systems. We have carried out a comparative study using FE-SEM and atomic force microscopy (AFM) to assess the morphology and coverage of self-assembled monolayers (SAM) on different substrates. The results show that FE-SEM images present the same qualitative information obtained by AFM images when the SAM is deposited on a smooth substrate (e.g., mica). Further experiments with rough substrates (e.g., Al grains on glass) show that FE-SEM is capable of unambiguously identifying SAMs on any type of substrate, whereas AFM has significant difficulties in identifying SAMs on rough surfaces.


2017 ◽  
Vol 476 (1) ◽  
pp. 326-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. Kopylov ◽  
E. V. Ilgisonis ◽  
O. V. Tikhonova ◽  
T. E. Farafonova ◽  
S. E. Novikova ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document