Naftidrofuryl kann die Lebensqualität von Patienten mit Claudicatio intermittens verbessern

VASA ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spengel ◽  
Brown ◽  
Poth ◽  
Lehert
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Intermittent Claudication ◽  
Analysis Of Covariance ◽  
Walking Distance ◽  
Claudicatio Intermittens ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Specific Questionnaire ◽  
Disease Specific

Background: Using a disease specific questionnaire, the CLAU-S, we undertook a double blind, placebo controlled study in patients with intermittent claudication to determine whether the increase in the pain-free walking distance, previously demonstrated with naftidrofuryl, is reflected as an improvement in the patients’ quality of life. Patients and methods: 287 patients, with stable intermittent claudication for at least 3 months were entered into the study. Following an initial one month placebo run-in, patients were randomised to either naftidrofuryl, at a dosage of 200 mg three times daily, or matching placebo, for 6 months. All patients completed the self-administered CLAU-S questionnaire which is divided into 6 dimensions, before the start of treatment, at 3 and 6 months. Statistical analysis was undertaken on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis which included all patients know to have taken at least one dose of the drug and to have provided key data on at least one occasion after baseline. For each of the CLAU-S dimensions the two groups were compared with respect to difference between the initial and final values. Results: 255 patients (133 naftidrofuryl, 122 placebo) were eligible for the ITT analysis. Significant improvements, in favour of the active medication, were seen for the dimensions “daily living”, “pain”, “disease specific anxiety” and “mood”. A multivariate analysis of covariance, which took into account such factors as initial score, age and sex confirmed the global superiority of naftidrofuryl (p = 0.004). Conclusions: In this placebo controlled study, using a disease specific questionnaire, naftidrofuryl has been shown to significantly improve several aspects of the quality of life of patients with intermittent claudication.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for intermittent claudication: Medium-term outcomes from a double-blind randomised placebo-controlled pilot trial

Vascular ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 531-539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Luke Green ◽  
Amy Elizabeth Harwood ◽  
George Edward Smith ◽  
Tushar Das ◽  
Ali Raza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Intermittent Claudication ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Walking Distance ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy ◽  
Extracorporeal Shockwave ◽  
Shockwave Therapy

Objectives Peripheral arterial disease most commonly presents as intermittent claudication (IC). Early evidence has suggested that extracorporeal shockwave therapy is efficacious in the short term for the management of intermittent claudication. The objective of this pilot trial was to evaluate the medium-term efficacy of this treatment. Methods This double-blind randomised placebo-controlled pilot trial randomised patients with unilateral intermittent claudication in a 1:1 fashion to receive extracorporeal shockwave therapy or a sham treatment for three sessions per week over three weeks. Primary outcomes were maximum walking distance and intermittent claudication distance using a fixed-load treadmill test. Secondary outcomes included pre- and post-exertional ankle-brachial pressure indices, safety and quality of life assessed using generic (SF36, EQ-5D-3L) and disease-specific (vascular quality of life) measures. All outcome measures were assessed at 12 months post-treatment. Results Thirty participants were included in the study (extracorporeal shockwave therapy, n = 15; sham, n = 15), with 26 followed up and analysed at 12 months (extracorporeal shockwave therapy, n = 13; sham, n = 13). Intragroup analysis demonstrated significant improvements in maximum walking distance, intermittent claudication distance and post-exertional ankle-brachial pressure indices ( p < 0.05) in the active treatment group, with no improvements in pre-exertional ankle-brachial pressure indices. Significant improvements in quality of life were observed in 3 out of 19 domains assessed in the active group. A re-intervention rate of 26.7% was seen in both groups. Conclusions These findings suggest that extracorporeal shockwave therapy is effective in improving walking distances at 12 months. Although this study provides important pilot data, a larger study is needed to corroborate these findings and to investigate the actions of this treatment. ISRCTN: NCT02652078.

Treatment of Intermittent Claudication with Mesoglycan – A Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Study

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. 1181-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Gresele ◽  
Gianni Ferrari ◽  
Luigi Santoro ◽  
Francesco Gianese ◽  
Giuseppe Nenci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Intermittent Claudication ◽  
Geometric Mean ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Walking Distance ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Walking Capacity

Summary Objective: To assess the effect of treatment with mesoglycan, a sulphated polysaccharide compound, on the walking capacity of patients with stage II peripheral arterial disease. Methods: Non-diabetic out-patients with intermittent claudication, duplex ultrasound evidence of peripheral atherosclerosis, ankle/arm index <0.80, systolic ankle pressure >50 mmHg, and absolute walking distance (AWD) between 100 and 300 m (standardised treadmill test) were eligible. After a 5-week run-in on single-blind placebo, patients were randomised to double-blind treatment with mesoglycan, 30 mg/day intramuscularly for 3 weeks followed by 100 mg/day orally for 20 weeks, or matching placebo. All patients received low-dose aspirin and lifestyle instructions. Clinical response was defined as an AWD increase at Week 23 >50% over baseline. Health-related quality of life and ischaemic events were assessed as secondary efficacy variables. Results: 242 patients were randomised and 237 were assessed for clinical response. Patients achieving clinical response were 59/118 with mesoglycan (50.0%) and 31/119 with placebo (26.1%; p <0.001). Geometric mean AWD increased from 192 to 298 m with mesoglycan, and from 192 to 238 m with placebo (p <0.001). Pain-free walking distance showed a non-significant increase with mesoglycan (p = 0.057). Changes in quality of life scores were in favour of mesoglycan. The rate of ischaemic events was 1/120 on mesoglycan and 6/122 on placebo (p = 0.053). The rate of non-ischaemic adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation was 7/120 and 4/122, respectively. Conclusion: Treatment with mesoglycan improves the walking capacity of patients with intermittent claudication, and might confer additional antithrombotic protection over that of aspirin.

scholarly journals A cilostazol hatékony és biztonságos lehetőség a claudicatio intermittens kezelésére. A NOCLAUD vizsgálat eredményei

2017 ◽  
Vol 158 (4) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katalin Farkas ◽  
Zoltán Járai ◽  
Endre Kolossváry
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Intermittent Claudication ◽  
Walking Distance ◽  
Claudicatio Intermittens ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Walking Test ◽  
Efficacy Analysis

Abstract: Intermittent claudication can seriously impair the patients’ quality of life. Cilostazol was registered in Hungary in 2014. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cilostazol in patients with intermittent claudication. 1405 patients were enrolled to the 6 months, multicenter, non-interventional trial. From the 1331 patients, who completed the study, the data of 674 patients were subjected to efficacy analysis. Pain free and maximal walking distance and the 6 minute walking test improved significantly at 3 months (78.65%, 65.23%, 56.09%; respectively, p<0.001), and a further increase was observed after 6 months treatment (129.74%, 107.2, 80.38% respectively, p<0.001). Adverse events occured in 7.26% of the patients. The most frequent adverse events were headache, diarrhea, dizziness, tachycardia or palpitation. 24 patients (1.7%) stopped cilostazol treatment because of side effects. 6 month cilostazol treatment significantly increased the walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication, without important safety problems. Orv. Hetil., 2017, 158(4), 123–128.

ISA247: Quality of Life Results from a Phase II, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

2008 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 268-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya K. Gupta ◽  
Richard G. Langley ◽  
Charles Lynde ◽  
Kirk Barber ◽  
Wayne Gulliver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Skin Condition ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Plaque Type ◽  
Psoriasis Disability Index ◽  
Stable Plaque

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic skin condition that can negatively affect a patient's quality of life (QoL), often hindering social functioning. ISA247, a novel psoriatic agent, has shown clinical efficacy in moderate to severe psoriasis sufferers, but its effect on QoL is currently not reported. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of ISA247 on the QoL in patients with stable, plaque-type psoriasis. Methods: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study assessed the effects of ISA247 doses of 0.5 mg/kg/d ( n = 77) or 1.5 mg/kg/d ( n = 83) compared with placebo ( n = 41) for 12 weeks. QoL was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) scales. Results: ISA247 treatment (pooled groups) significantly improved QoL scores as assessed by both the DLQI and the PDI compared with those receiving placebo ( p < .05). Treatment with the higher dose of 1.5 mg/kg/d demonstrated a significantly greater response to many of the QoL scales compared with the 0.5 mg/kg/d group ( p < .05). Conclusions: ISA247 appears to improve the QoL while also providing effective treatment for chronic, moderate to severe, plaque-type psoriasis.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Lactobacillus paracasei HA-196 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 in Alleviating Symptoms of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS): A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 1159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin D. Lewis ◽  
Joseph M. Antony ◽  
David C. Crowley ◽  
Amanda Piano ◽  
Renu Bhardwaj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Irritable Bowel Syndrome ◽  
Bifidobacterium Longum ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Lactobacillus Paracasei ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Gi Symptoms ◽  
Irritable Bowel

Specific probiotic strains can alleviate the gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and psychiatric comorbidities of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, the efficacy of Lactobacillus paracasei HA-196 (L. paracasei) and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 (B. longum) in reducing the GI and psychological symptoms of IBS was evaluated in 251 adults with either constipation (IBS-C), diarrhea (IBS-D), or mixed-pattern (IBS-M). Following a 2-week run-in period, participants were randomized to one of three interventions: L. paracasei (n = 84), B. longum (n = 83) or placebo (n = 81). IBS symptoms, stool frequency and consistency and quality of life were assessed by questionnaires. The differences from baseline in the severity of IBS symptoms at 4 and 8 weeks were similar between groups. Participants in this study were classified, after randomization, into subtypes according to Rome III. Within the L. paracasei group, complete spontaneous and spontaneous bowel movement frequency increased in participants with IBS-C (n = 10) after 8 weeks of supplementation (both p < 0.05) and decreased in participants with IBS-D (n = 10, p = 0.013). Both L. paracasei and B. longum supplementation improved the quality of life in emotional well-being and social functioning compared with baseline (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, L. paracasei and B. longum may reduce GI symptom severity and improve the psychological well-being of individuals with certain IBS subtypes.

scholarly journals Evaluation of efficacy and safety of montelukast and levocetirizine FDC tablet compared to montelukast and levocetirizine tablet in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double blind, multicentre, phase III trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 83
Author(s):  
Sagar Panchal ◽  
Saiprasad Patil ◽  
Hanmant Barkate
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Global Evaluation ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Nasal Symptoms

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> To evaluate efficacy, safety and tolerability of Montelukast 10 mg+levocetirizine 5 mg  FDC compared to either montelukast 10 mg or levocetirizine 5 mg given alone in seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) patients.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Phase III, multicentre, randomized, double blind, parallel group, active controlled study was conducted in 279 SAR patients at 16 sites across India. Efficacy was assessed using daytime nasal symptoms score (Primary efficacy outcome), night-time symptoms score, daytime eye symptom score, patient's global evaluation, physician's global evaluation, rhino-conjunctivitis quality-of-life score.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> At end of treatment there was statistically significant evidence from the per protocol analysis that patients on FDC had a greater improvement in change from baseline in daytime nasal symptoms score than patients who received Montelukast (p=0.0266) or Levocetirizine (p=0.0409). These results were consistent with the Intent to treat analysis. Analysis of the secondary efficacy endpoints provided numerically greater improvement in the nighttime symptoms score, daytime eye symptoms score, and rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life scores in the FDC group as compared to the Montelukast group or Levocetirizine group. The FDC of Montelukast and Levocetirizine was found to be safe and generally well tolerated. The majority of adverse events were mild in severity, resolved without treatment and were unrelated to study medication.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Fixed dose combination of Montelukast and Levocetirizine was safe, generally well tolerated and superior on efficacy compared to Montelukast or Levocetirizine in patients of seasonal allergic rhinitis.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document