Body wave and surface wave analysis of large and great earthquakes along the Eastern Aleutian Arc, 1923-1993: Implications for future events

1994 ◽  
Vol 99 (B6) ◽  
pp. 11643-11662 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles H. Estabrook ◽  
Klaus H. Jacob ◽  
Lynn R. Sykes
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
Wave Analysis ◽  
Great Earthquakes ◽  
Aleutian Arc ◽  
Future Events

Investigation of the Crustal Structure in the Middle East from Body-Wave Analysis (POSTPRINT). Annual Report 2

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Gritto ◽  
Matthew S. Sibol ◽  
Pierre Caron ◽  
Hafidh A. Ghalib ◽  
Bakir S. Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Middle East ◽  
Crustal Structure ◽  
Annual Report ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
Wave Analysis

scholarly journals Imaging the subsurface using induced seismicity and ambient noise: 3-D tomographic Monte Carlo joint inversion of earthquake body wave traveltimes and surface wave dispersion

2020 ◽  
Vol 222 (3) ◽  
pp. 1639-1655
Author(s):  
Xin Zhang ◽  
Corinna Roy ◽  
Andrew Curtis ◽  
Andy Nowacki ◽  
Brian Baptie
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Ambient Noise ◽  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Joint Inversion ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Wave Dispersion ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
Surface Wave Dispersion ◽  
Wave Data

SUMMARY Seismic body wave traveltime tomography and surface wave dispersion tomography have been used widely to characterize earthquakes and to study the subsurface structure of the Earth. Since these types of problem are often significantly non-linear and have non-unique solutions, Markov chain Monte Carlo methods have been used to find probabilistic solutions. Body and surface wave data are usually inverted separately to produce independent velocity models. However, body wave tomography is generally sensitive to structure around the subvolume in which earthquakes occur and produces limited resolution in the shallower Earth, whereas surface wave tomography is often sensitive to shallower structure. To better estimate subsurface properties, we therefore jointly invert for the seismic velocity structure and earthquake locations using body and surface wave data simultaneously. We apply the new joint inversion method to a mining site in the United Kingdom at which induced seismicity occurred and was recorded on a small local network of stations, and where ambient noise recordings are available from the same stations. The ambient noise is processed to obtain inter-receiver surface wave dispersion measurements which are inverted jointly with body wave arrival times from local earthquakes. The results show that by using both types of data, the earthquake source parameters and the velocity structure can be better constrained than in independent inversions. To further understand and interpret the results, we conduct synthetic tests to compare the results from body wave inversion and joint inversion. The results show that trade-offs between source parameters and velocities appear to bias results if only body wave data are used, but this issue is largely resolved by using the joint inversion method. Thus the use of ambient seismic noise and our fully non-linear inversion provides a valuable, improved method to image the subsurface velocity and seismicity.

Determining hydrological and soil mechanical parameters from multichannel surface-wave analysis across the Alpine Fault at Inchbonnie, New Zealand

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 435-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.A. Konstantaki ◽  
S. Carpentier ◽  
F. Garofalo ◽  
P. Bergamo ◽  
L.V. Socco
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Surface Wave ◽  
Mechanical Parameters ◽  
Wave Analysis ◽  
Alpine Fault

Guided Surface Waves on an Elastic Half Space

1971 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 899-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. B. Freund
Keyword(s):  
Wave Propagation ◽  
Surface Wave ◽  
Surface Waves ◽  
Half Space ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Elastic Half Space ◽  
Normal Displacement ◽  
Rigid Barrier ◽  
Wave Disturbances

Three-dimensional wave propagation in an elastic half space is considered. The half space is traction free on half its boundary, while the remaining part of the boundary is free of shear traction and is constrained against normal displacement by a smooth, rigid barrier. A time-harmonic surface wave, traveling on the traction free part of the surface, is obliquely incident on the edge of the barrier. The amplitude and the phase of the resulting reflected surface wave are determined by means of Laplace transform methods and the Wiener-Hopf technique. Wave propagation in an elastic half space in contact with two rigid, smooth barriers is then considered. The barriers are arranged so that a strip on the surface of uniform width is traction free, which forms a wave guide for surface waves. Results of the surface wave reflection problem are then used to geometrically construct dispersion relations for the propagation of unattenuated guided surface waves in the guiding structure. The rate of decay of body wave disturbances, localized near the edges of the guide, is discussed.

Shallow crustal models in the Lisbon area from explosion data using body and surface wave analysis

1996 ◽  
Vol 258 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 171-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Teves-Costa ◽  
L. Matias ◽  
C.S. Oliveira ◽  
L.A. Mendes-Victor
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Wave Analysis

Errors Introduced in Estimation of Surface Wave Phase and Group Velocities Due to Wrong Assumptions: An Assessment Using a Simple Model For Love Wave

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akash Kharita ◽  
Sagarika Mukhopadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Surface Waves ◽  
Love Wave ◽  
Arrival Time ◽  
Epicentral Distance ◽  
Horizontal Distance ◽  
Wave Analysis ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Phase And Group Velocities ◽  
Group Velocities

<p>The surface wave phase and group velocities are estimated by dividing the epicentral distance by phase and group travel times respectively in all the available methods, this is based on the assumptions that (1) surface waves originate at the epicentre and (2) the travel time of the particular group or phase of the surface wave is equal to its arrival time to the station minus the origin time of the causative earthquake; However, both assumptions are wrong since surface waves generate at some horizontal distance away from the epicentre. We calculated the actual horizontal distance from the focus at which they generate and assessed the errors caused in the estimation of group and phase velocities by the aforementioned assumptions in a simple isotropic single layered homogeneous half space crustal model using the example of the fundamental mode Love wave. We took the receiver locations in the epicentral distance range of 100-1000 km, as used in the regional surface wave analysis, varied the source depth from 0 to 35 Km with a step size of 5 km and did the forward modelling to calculate the arrival time of Love wave phases at each receiver location. The phase and group velocities are then estimated using the above assumptions and are compared with the actual values of the velocities given by Love wave dispersion equation. We observed that the velocities are underestimated and the errors are found to be; decreasing linearly with focal depth, decreasing inversely with the epicentral distance and increasing parabolically with the time period. We also derived empirical formulas using MATLAB curve fitting toolbox that will give percentage errors for any realistic combination of epicentral distance, time period and depths of earthquake and thickness of layer in this model. The errors are found to be more than 5% for all epicentral distances lesser than 500 km, for all focal depths and time periods indicating that it is not safe to do regional surface wave analysis for epicentral distances lesser than 500 km without incurring significant errors. To the best of our knowledge, the study is first of its kind in assessing such errors.</p>

Focal mechanism and source depth of earthquakes from body- and surface-wave data

1971 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 1369-1379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nezihi Canitez ◽  
M. Nafi Toksöz
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
Source Parameters ◽  
Focal Depth ◽  
Spectral Ratio ◽  
The Body ◽  
Spectral Ratios ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Wave Data ◽  
Surface Wave Data

abstract The determination of focal depth and other source parameters by the use of first-motion data and surface-wave spectra is investigated. It is shown that the spectral ratio of Love to Rayleigh waves (L/R) is sensitive to all source parameters. The azimuthal variation of the L/R spectral ratios can be used to check the fault-plane solution as well as for focal depth determinations. Medium response, attenuation, and source finiteness seriously affect the absolute spectra and introduce uncertainty into the focal depth determinations. These effects are nearly canceled out when L/R amplitude ratios are used. Thus, the preferred procedure for source mechanism studies of shallow earthquakes is to use jointly the body-wave data, absolute spectra of surface waves, and the Love/Rayleigh spectral ratios. With this procedure, focal depths can be determined to an accuracy of a few kilometers.

Preliminary body-wave analysis of the St. Elias, Alaska earthquake of February 28, 1979

1980 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-436
Author(s):  
John Boatwright
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
The Body ◽  
Rupture Velocity ◽  
Wave Analysis ◽  
S Waves ◽  
Initial Event ◽  
Whole Space ◽  
A New Technique ◽  
Alaska Earthquake

abstract Employing a new technique for the body-wave analysis of shallow-focus earthquakes, we have made a preliminary analysis of the St. Elias, Alaska earthquake of February 28, 1979, using five long-period P and S waves recorded at three WWSSN stations and at Palisades, New York. Using a well determined focal mechanism and an average source depth of ≈ 11 km, the interference of the depth phases (i.e., pP and sP, or sS) has been deconvolved from the recorded pulse shapes to obtain velocity and displacement pulse shapes as they would appear if the earthquake had occurred within an infinite medium. These “approximate whole space” pulse shapes indicate that the rupture contained three distinct subevents as well as a small initial event which preceded this subevent sequence by about 7 sec. From the pulse rise times of the subevents, their rupture lengths are estimated as 12, 27, and 17 km, assuming that the subevent rupture velocity was 3 km/sec. Overall, the earthquake ruptured ≈ 60 km to the southeast with an average rupture velocity of 2.2 km/sec. The cumulative body-wave moment for the whole event, 1.2 × 1027 dyne-cm, is substantially smaller than the surface-wave moments reported by Lahr et al. (1979) of 5 × 1027 dyne-cm. The moments of the subevents are estimated to be 0.6, 3.2, and 7.5 × 1026 dyne-cm, respectively.

Effects of centroid location on determination of earthquake mechanisms using long-period surface waves

1990 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 1205-1231
Author(s):  
Jiajun Zhang ◽  
Thorne Lay
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Rayleigh Waves ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
Moment Tensor ◽  
Source Location ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Nodal Plane ◽  
Wave Source ◽  
Long Period

Abstract Determination of shallow earthquake source mechanisms by inversion of long-period (150 to 300 sec) Rayleigh waves requires epicentral locations with greater accuracy than that provided by routine source locations of the National Earthquake Information Center (NEIC) and International Seismological Centre (ISC). The effects of epicentral mislocation on such inversions are examined using synthetic calculations as well as actual data for three large Mexican earthquakes. For Rayleigh waves of 150-sec period, an epicentral mislocation of 30 km introduces observed source spectra phase errors of 0.6 radian for stations at opposing azimuths along the source mislocation vector. This is larger than the 0.5-radian azimuthal variation of the phase spectra at the same period for a thrust fault with 15° dip and 24-km depth. The typical landward mislocation of routinely determined epicenters of shallow subduction zone earthquakes causes source moment tensor inversions of long-period Rayleigh waves to predict larger fault dip than indicated by teleseismic P-wave first-motion data. For dip-slip earthquakes, inversions of long-period Rayleigh waves that use an erroneous source location in the down-dip or along-strike directions of a nodal plane, overestimate the strike, dip, and slip of that nodal plane. Inversions of strike-slip earthquakes that utilize an erroneous location along the strike of a nodal plane overestimate the slip of that nodal plane, causing the second nodal plane to dip incorrectly in the direction opposite to the mislocation vector. The effects of epicentral mislocation for earthquakes with 45° dip-slip fault mechanisms are more severe than for events with other fault mechanisms. Existing earth model propagation corrections do not appear to be sufficiently accurate to routinely determine the optimal surface-wave source location without constraints from body-wave information, unless extensive direct path (R1) data are available or empirical path calibrations are performed. However, independent surface-wave and body-wave solutions can be remarkably consistent when the effects of epicentral mislocation are accounted for. This will allow simultaneous unconstrained body-wave and surface-wave inversions to be performed despite the well known difficulties of extracting the complete moment tensor of shallow sources from fundamental modes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document