Psychological perspectives on political change.

This contribution discusses recent debates on the adequate form of ‘critique’ with a meta-critical intention. Since the partisans of academic critique typically fail to account for the effects of their own institutional embeddedness, their methodological reflections neutralize oppositional demands and turn political struggle into a scholastic exercise. In an extension of this analysis, the article aims to show how the academic class over-estimates its potential for bringing about liberating political change, how it falsely generalizes its own conditions of existence, and how it really contributes to the justification of capitalist power structures. The suspicion that recent populist attacks on the ‘elite’ have a fundament in progressive-liberal coalitions thus finds support in the practice of progressive discourse.

Download Full-text

Kropotkin

10.3366/edinburgh/9780748642298.001.0001 ◽

2016 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Ruth Kinna

Keyword(s):

Political Theory ◽

Human Nature ◽

Political Change ◽

Direct Action ◽

The State ◽

Social Analysis ◽

Mutual Aid ◽

Special Character ◽

Revolutionary Politics

This book is designed to remove Peter Kropotkin from the framework of classical anarchism. By focusing attention on his theory of mutual aid, it argues that the classical framing distorts Kropotkin's political theory by associating it with a narrowly positivistic conception of science, a naively optimistic idea of human nature and a millenarian idea of revolution. Kropotkin's abiding concern with Russian revolutionary politics is the lens for this analysis. The argument is that his engagement with nihilism shaped his conception of science and that his expeditions in Siberia underpinned an approach to social analysis that was rooted in geography. Looking at Kropotkin's relationship with Elisée Reclus and Erico Malatesta and examining his critical appreciation of P-J. Proudhon, Michael Bakunin and Max Stirner, the study shows how he understood anarchist traditions and reveals the special character of his anarchist communism. His idea of the state as a colonising process and his contention that exploitation and oppression operate in global contexts is a key feature of this. Kropotkin's views about the role of theory in revolutionary practice show how he developed this critique of the state and capitalism to advance an idea of political change that combined the building of non-state alternatives through direct action and wilful disobedience. Against critics who argue that Kropotkin betrayed these principles in 1914, the book suggests that this controversial decision was consistent with his anarchism and that it reflected his judgment about the prospects of anarchistic revolution in Russia.

Download Full-text

Political Change, Revolution, and the Dialogue in the Two Koreas

Asian Survey ◽

10.1525/as.1989.29.11.01p0319t ◽

1989 ◽

Vol 29 (11) ◽

pp. 1033-1042 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Chong-Sik Lee

Keyword(s):

Political Change

Download Full-text

After October: Military Conflict and Political Change in the Middle East

Journal of Palestine Studies ◽

10.1525/jps.1974.3.4.00p0231e ◽

1974 ◽

Vol 3 (4) ◽

pp. 114-130 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Ghassan Tueni

Keyword(s):

Middle East ◽

Political Change ◽

Military Conflict

Download Full-text

You Say You Want a Reformation? Parsing the Ubiquitous Rhetoric of an “Islamic Reformation”

Comparative Islamic Studies ◽

10.1558/cis.v4i4.1-4.2.37 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 4 (1-2) ◽

pp. 37-73

Author(s):

Paul R. Powers

Keyword(s):

Present Article ◽

Political Change ◽

September 11 ◽

Terrorist Attacks ◽

Protestant Reformation ◽

Islamic World ◽

History Of

The ideas of an “Islamic Reformation” and a “Muslim Luther” have been much discussed, especially since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. This “Reformation” rhetoric, however, displays little consistency, encompassing moderate, liberalizing trends as well as their putative opposite, Islamist “fundamentalism.” The rhetoric and the diverse phenomena to which it refers have provoked both enthusiastic endorsement and vigorous rejection. After briefly surveying the history of “Islamic Reformation” rhetoric, the present article argues for a four-part typology to account for most recent instances of such rhetoric. The analysis reveals that few who employ the terminology of an “Islamic Reformation” consider the specific details of its implicit analogy to the Protestant Reformation, but rather use this language to add emotional weight to various prescriptive agendas. However, some examples demonstrate the potential power of the analogy to illuminate important aspects of religious, social, and political change in the modern Islamic world.

Download Full-text