Aptitude-treatment interaction as a framework for research on individual differences in psychotherapy.

1991 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard E. Snow
1978 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-154
Author(s):  
Phillip M. Eastman ◽  
Mohammed Salhab

Aptitude treatment interaction (ATI) studies essentially deal with two related questions: Can we adapt instruction to patterns of individual differences among students? If so, for which students is a particular method of instruction most effective? The general ATI problem as advanced by Cronbach (1957) is well known (e.g., Becker, 1970), and no further discussion of it is presented here.


Pedagogiek ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-124
Author(s):  
Jan Terwel

Abstract Individual differences and the common curriculum This article deals with the issue of individual differences and the common curriculum for 12-16 year old pupils. The central question is: is it possible to maintain high standards for all without reducing opportunities for brighter pupils to achieve educational results according to their individual potential? To answer this question, three research traditions are examined: research about the West-German comprehensive schools; research about class composition; research about effective teaching and Aptitude Treatment Interaction. The conclusion from this examination is that it is difficult to combine high standards for all and excellence for a few.


1979 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 359-363
Author(s):  
Hendrik Radatz

For some years individual differences in learners and teachers have played an important part in educational research in general and especially in research in mathematics education. There are a multitude of studies on the importance of abilities, demographic characteristics, and various cognitive, affective, and social factors to the learning of mathematics or, more precisely, to achievement in mathematics. Three developments in particular seem to have increased interest in individual differences: information-processing psychology. aptitude-treatment-interaction (ATI) research. and an increased awareness of the content- and situation-specificity of the learning process.


1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Sternberg ◽  
Elena L. Grigorenko ◽  
Michel Ferrari ◽  
Pamela Clinkenbeard

Summary: This article describes a triarchic analysis of an aptitude-treatment interaction in a college-level introductory-psychology course given to selected high-school students. Of the 326 total participants, 199 were selected to be high in analytical, creative, or practical abilities, or in all three abilities, or in none of the three abilities. The selected students were placed in a course that either well matched or did not match their pattern of analytical, creative, and practical abilities. All students were assessed for memory, analytical, creative, and practical achievement. The data showed an aptitude-treatment interaction between students' varied ability patterns and the match or mismatch of these abilities to the different instructional groups.


2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
Herlina '

This research intent to see how big influence of approaching aptitude treatment interaction (ATI) to mathematics concept grasp student brazes VIII SMP Country 25 Pekanbaru. This research constitute my research experiment attention. Subjec in observational it is student braze VIII4 as agglomerate as experiment by totals student 40 person and VIII3'S classes as agglomerate as controls by totals students 40. Base analisis data to pretes's score to know student startup ability on agglomerate experiment and control group. On student experiment group that will study by ATI'S approaching has average early learned result mathematics (pretes) as big as 17,15. Meanwhile on group controls student who will study by ordinary learning (conventional) have average early learned result mathematics (pretes) as big as 13,85. Analisis is data to postes's score on agglomerate learned student experiment with ATI'S approaching has average final learned result mathematics (postes) as big as 74,63. Meanwhile on group controls learned student with ordinary learning (conventional) have average final learned result mathematics (postes) as big as 62,93. Of quiz result distinctive both of average usufruct to study mathematics finals (postes) that points out that there is difference which signifikan among both of experiment class with control class.Keywords: aptitude treatment interaction (ATI), mathematics concept


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document