Who withdraws? Psychological individual differences and employee withdrawal behaviors.

2016 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan D. Zimmerman ◽  
Brian W. Swider ◽  
Sang Eun Woo ◽  
David G. Allen
2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 925
Author(s):  
Nicolas Aubert ◽  
Xavier Hollandts

The academic literature emphasizes that shared capitalism positively affects employees attitudes at work. This paper investigates that issue by testing the relationship between shared capitalism and withdrawal behaviors (turnover and absenteeism). Recent literature interprets shared capitalism as a gift exchange between employers and employees. This paper builds on that literature. The analysis, based on an econometric case study, focuses on a five-year panel dataset of more than 800 subsidiaries belonging to a unique French-listed company. Our results show that only long-term shared capitalism translates into better withdrawal behaviors.


1981 ◽  
Vol 1981 (1) ◽  
pp. 291-295
Author(s):  
Rabi S. Bhagat ◽  
Sara J. McQuaid ◽  
Hal Lindholm ◽  
James Segovis

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 109-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean A. Way ◽  
David P. Lepak ◽  
Charles H. Fay ◽  
James W. Thacker

Author(s):  
Manu Melwin Joy

The purpose of this chapter is to examine the effect of high involvement work processes on employee withdrawal behaviors in information technology sector in India. It draws from the structured questionnaire data from 300 software engineers working in Infosys, CTS, and HCL. Data was analyzed to find out details related to the relationship between high involvement work processes and employee withdrawal behaviors. It was found that high involvement work processes have a strong negative impact on withdrawal behaviors. The relationship was found to be stronger in the case of work withdrawal behaviors compared to that of job withdrawal behaviors.


2018 ◽  
Vol 41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin C. Ruisch ◽  
Rajen A. Anderson ◽  
David A. Pizarro

AbstractWe argue that existing data on folk-economic beliefs (FEBs) present challenges to Boyer & Petersen's model. Specifically, the widespread individual variation in endorsement of FEBs casts doubt on the claim that humans are evolutionarily predisposed towards particular economic beliefs. Additionally, the authors' model cannot account for the systematic covariance between certain FEBs, such as those observed in distinct political ideologies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Mundy

Abstract The stereotype of people with autism as unresponsive or uninterested in other people was prominent in the 1980s. However, this view of autism has steadily given way to recognition of important individual differences in the social-emotional development of affected people and a more precise understanding of the possible role social motivation has in their early development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document