Interprofessional health care services in primary care settings: Implications for the education and training of psychologists

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Spruill
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (4S) ◽  
pp. 193-207
Author(s):  
Chyke A. Doubeni ◽  
Tonya L Fancher ◽  
Paul Juarez ◽  
Christine Riedy ◽  
Stephen D. Persell ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
V. Voros ◽  
P. Osvath ◽  
S. Fekete

Introduction:Although suicide rates are decreasing in most European countries, suicide is still a major health concern. Despite of the fact, that the vast majority of suicidal patients contacted with health care services before the suicidal act, the doctor-patient meeting is a necessary, but sometimes not sufficient way enough to prevent suicide. Most patients, who commit or attempt suicide, are not regarded as being at high immediate risk at their final contact with health care services.Aims and methods:Based on reviewing the relevant literature and on our previous studies we developed a brief, practical, clinical guideline, which may aid general practitioners and primary care professionals to assess suicide risk and also to manage these patients.Results:We introduce a model for an integrated, regional suicide prevention strategy, which includes recognition, risk assessment and also intervention. The main steps of our model are to recognize warning signs, explore crisis situation and/or psychopathologic symptoms, assess protective and risk factors, estimate suicide risk, plan intervention strategies, and finally manage suicidal patients through the different levels of intervention.Conclusion:In the management of suicidal behaviour the complex stress-diathesis model has to be adjusted by considering biological markers (mental disorders, personality traits) and psycho-social factors (crisis, negative life events, interpersonal conflicts). Only after the assessment of these factors primary care professionals, as ‘gatekeepers’ can manage suicidal patients effectively by using adequate psychopharmacotherapeutic and psychotherapeutic facilities in the recognition, treatment and prevention of suicidal behaviour.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0257926
Author(s):  
Katrine Damgaard Skyrud ◽  
Kjersti Helene Hernæs ◽  
Kjetil Elias Telle ◽  
Karin Magnusson

Aim To explore the temporal impact of mild COVID-19 on need for primary and specialist health care services. Methods In all adults (≥20 years) tested for SARS-CoV-2 in Norway March 1st 2020 to February 1st 2021 (N = 1 401 922), we contrasted the monthly all-cause health care use before and up to 6 months after the test (% relative difference), for patients with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 (non-hospitalization, i.e. mild COVID-19) and patients with a negative test (no COVID-19). Results We found a substantial short-term elevation in primary care use in all age groups, with men generally having a higher relative increase (men 20–44 years: 522%, 95%CI = 509–535, 45–69 years: 439%, 95%CI = 426–452, ≥70 years: 199%, 95%CI = 180–218) than women (20–44 years: 342, 95%CI = 334–350, 45–69 years = 375, 95%CI = 365–385, ≥70 years: 156%, 95%CI = 141–171) at 1 month following positive test. At 2 months, this sex difference was less pronounced, with a (20–44 years: 21%, 95%CI = 13–29, 45–69 years = 38%, 95%CI = 30–46, ≥70 years: 15%, 95%CI = 3–28) increase in primary care use for men, and a (20–44 years: 30%, 95%CI = 24–36, 45–69 years = 57%, 95%CI = 50–64, ≥70 years: 14%, 95%CI = 4–24) increase for women. At 3 months after test, only women aged 45–70 years still had an increased primary care use (14%, 95%CI = 7–20). The increase was due to respiratory- and general/unspecified conditions. We observed no long-term (4–6 months) elevation in primary care use, and no elevation in specialist care use. Conclusion Mild COVID-19 gives an elevated need for primary care that vanishes 2–3 months after positive test. Middle-aged women had the most prolonged increased primary care use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document