Does Perception of Discrimination Induce Mental Health Problems? Evidences From Students of Higher Education

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jitendra Kumar Kushwaha
1975 ◽  
Vol 13 (25) ◽  
pp. 99-100

Although most universities run a health service, students with important mental health problems are often seen by their general practitioner. There are a number of reasons for this; first, health services in the colleges of higher education outside universities are still patchy and incomplete. Second, students are on vacation for up to 24 weeks a year. Third, a student may choose to consult anyone, and may prefer someone unconnected with the university. Last, many students live at home and continue to see their general practitioner. This underlines the need for close liason between the general practitioner and student health services.


Legal Studies ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neville Harris

This paper examines the developing and complex legal relationship between universities and students, or would-be students, who have mental health problems. Discussion takes account of the wider social and policy contexts, including the extent of mental ill-health among the student population, the market for higher education, and government policies towards universities. It contends that the legal position of students with mental health problems demonstrates that there is a need for the relationship between students and universities to be conceptualised with reference to the citizenship ideal rather than the consumer paradigm with which it has tended to become associated in public policy terms.


1974 ◽  
Vol 125 (589) ◽  
pp. 595-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Lucas ◽  
Sidney Crown

Considering their potential contribution to the community, the growth of clinical services in relation to the specialized mental health problems of students in higher education has been haphazard. Although most universities have developed or are on the way to developing comprehensive health services on the lines recommended in the report of the Royal College of Physicians (1966), services in the non-university sector are often less than adequate. This report accepted as established that about 5 per cent of students have psychological disorders which cause serious distress, and a further 10 to 20 per cent have less severe though handicapping disorders. It was accepted that special provision would need to be made for these mental health problems, as part of the range of preventive and treatment activities relevant to a College community.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor Bell ◽  
Jia Pan ◽  
Christopher James Sampson ◽  
Priscila Radu

Background: Students in higher education often face mental health problems with inadequate treatment options. With COVID-19 only exacerbating the already high levels of mental health problems in the younger adult population, it is imperative policy makers have the relevant evidence to inform resource allocation and investment into student mental health services. Aim: We aim to identify and summarise economic evaluations of interventions that both prevent and treat student mental health within the UK. Method: We will conduct a review of all published economic evaluation literature relating to both students in higher education and interventions designed to prevent or treat student mental health. We will conduct a search in the following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, EconLit, PsycINFO and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Databases (NHS EED). The review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement guidelines 2019. A database of the literature compiled as part of this systematic literature review will be made available for transparency.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-217
Author(s):  
Lieve Carette ◽  
Elisabeth De Schauwer ◽  
Geert Van Hove

Psychological wellbeing has received attention from academics and policymakers worldwide. Initiatives to improve psychoeducation, campaigns to raise awareness, and charity projects have been established as part of efforts to change public attitudes and behaviors toward mental health problems. The common goal of these initiatives is the prevention of mental health problems in order to reduce the global burden of mental health disease. Some target groups have benefited from such initiatives. However, little attention has been paid to side effects—including harm—of widespread knowledge sharing that is not accompanied by appropriate action. Young adults may be less afraid than older adults to disclose mental health illness and share their lived experiences of mental health. Like older adults, students try to protect their autonomy and privacy in disclosing mental health problems and associated diagnoses. However, many young adults view self-disclosure as a request for help. Confronted with rising demand to support students’ psychological well-being, many higher education providers have launched initiatives to improve students’ knowledge about mental illness. Instead of making assumptions about what students need to know in order to improve their overall psychological wellbeing, we asked ‘Mad students’ (that is, students who identify as mentally ill) about their knowledge construction and management of mental illness. Analyzing this process highlights that mental health promotion is more complicated than sharing appropriate information or applying effective strategies. Knowledge sharing has improved public knowledge of mental illness. However, mental health promotion that omits simple communication about expectations and needs around mental health, to co-produce a shared knowledge base, may lead to misunderstanding and failure in meeting the needs of target groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document