Children's Sleep Problems Can Lead to School Problems; African-American and Poor Children Fare Worse

2007 ◽  
SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A241-A242
Author(s):  
Jack Peltz ◽  
Ronald Rogge ◽  
Joseph Buckhalt ◽  
Lori Elmore-Staton

Abstract Introduction Approximately half of school-aged children (ages 5–18) get either insufficient sleep during school nights or barely meet the required amount of sleep expected for healthy functioning (National Sleep Foundation, 2014).This percentage increases as children develop into adolescents (National Sleep Foundation, 2006). Accordingly, sleep problems and insufficient sleep are so pervasive that they could be considered an epidemic due to their adverse impact on children’s mental and physical health (Owens, 2015; Shochat et al., 2014). Fundamental to children’s sleep health is their sleep environment (Billings et al., 2019; Spilsbury et al., 2005). Despite its importance, however, there remains a noticeable absence of valid and reliable assessments of this construct. The current study sought to develop a measure of children’s sleep environments to support research and clinical work on youth’s sleep health. Methods A total of 813 parents (Mage = 40.6, SD = 8.6; 72% female) completed an online survey regarding their child’s (Mage = 10.5, SD = 3.8; 45% female) sleep environment and sleep-related behavior. The majority of families identified as Caucasian (approximately 80%). Parents reported fairly high annual incomes (Median = $75,000), but 28.2% of families reported incomes less than $50,000. A total of 18 items (total scale score; alpha = .74) were selected from a pool of 38 items developed from previous research that examined aspects of the sleep environment and were entered into an exploratory factor analysis from which 4 factors emerged: general sleep environment (10 items, alpha = .91), sleeping alone vs. with siblings (2 items, alpha = .78), presence of electronic screens (4 items, alpha = .75), and emotional environment (2 items, alpha = .80). Results The subscales demonstrated distinct patterns of correlations with related constructs, and unique predictive variance in explaining children’s daytime sleepiness even after controlling for children’s sleep hygiene, behavior problems, and sleep problems. Conclusion The current study is one of the first to demonstrate a valid/reliable assessment of children’s sleep environments. Not only will this measure provide researchers with an assessment of a fundamental influence on children’s sleep, but it will also enable clinicians to better measure this construct and support effective sleep health recommendations. Support (if any):


SLEEP ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 44 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. A250-A250
Author(s):  
Solbi Kang ◽  
Seockhoon Chung ◽  
Sooyeon Suh

Abstract Introduction Asian cultures, including Korea, are known to have a higher proportion of parent-child co-sleeping than Western cultures. While recent studies have shown that bed-sharing increases the mother’s depression and causes sleep problems for children, there has never been a study in Asia on the sleep problems of parents and children caused by co-sleeping. Therefore, we aim to investigate the types of sleep problems in children and their mothers’ insomnia severity due to co-sleeping. Methods This study was conducted in 79 mothers (mean age 33.65 ±3.98 years) who reported having insomnia due to their children. All participants had children between 6 to 36 months old. Participants were asked to answer the survey includes demographics, sleep environment, child’s sleep problems, child’s health status items and the mother’s insomnia (measured by the Insomnia Severity Index; ISI). Children’s age was divided into 5 age groups (6 – 11, 12 - 17, 18 - 23, 24 - 29, and 30 to 36 months). Frequency analysis and independent t-test were conducted. Results Of the total respondents, 72.2% (n=57) reported co-sleeping with their children. The most reported sleep problem in children was waking up in the middle of the night 51.9% (n=41), followed by difficulty in sleep initiation 12.7% (n=10), looking for mother or an attachment object 12.7% (n=10), sleep-limiting problems 7.5% (n=6), multiple problems 12.7% (n=10), and none 2.5% (n=2). An independent t-test results for determining whether co-sleeping caused a difference in the severity of maternal insomnia was significant in the 6 to 11 months group only (t=-2.336, p<.05). The co-sleeping mother’s ISI average score (M=18.28) was significantly higher than mother who slept separate from her child (M=14.31). Conclusion Co-sleeping in Asian cultures is prevalent, and may require attention and intervention for mothers who report having insomnia due to their children’s sleep disturbance. Support (if any):


Sleep Health ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Bonuck ◽  
Beth L. Goodlin-Jones ◽  
Clyde Schechter ◽  
Judith Owens

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sae Ono ◽  
Hiroto Ogi ◽  
Masato Ogawa ◽  
Daisuke Nakamura ◽  
Teruhiko Nakamura ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Sleep problems in preschool children can stunt their health and growth. However, the factors that cause sleep problems in children are not well understood. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between parents’ health literacy (HL) and children’s sleep problems. The study was conducted at two kindergartens, two nursery schools, and a center for early childhood education in Chitose-city, Hokkaido, Japan. Method This study used a multicenter cross-sectional design. The sample comprised 354 preschoolers (aged 3–6 years) and their parents. In families with two or more children attending the same facility, only the oldest child was asked to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria included participants whose completed questionnaires had missing values. Children’s sleep problems were assessed using the Japanese version of the Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire (CSHQ-J). Parents’ HL was assessed using the 14-item Health Literacy Scale (HLS-14). The parents were classified into two groups (high HL group and low HL group). Multiple regression modelling was used to determine the association between HLS-14 and CSHQ-J scores. Results Of the 354 parents, 255 (72%) were in the high HL group and 99 (28%) in the low HL group. The mean CSHQ-J score was significantly lower in the high HL group than in the low HL group (45.3 ± 6.0 points vs. 46.8 ± 5.9 points, p = 0.043). In multiple regression analyses, parents’ HL was independently associated with their CSHQ-J score after adjusting for all confounding factors (adjusted R2 = 0.22, β = − 0.11; p = 0.043). Conclusions Parents’ HL appears to affect their children’s sleep problems. This finding suggests that parents’ HL may be a target for intervention to improve children’s sleep problems.


2021 ◽  
pp. 108705472110256
Author(s):  
Ronna Fried ◽  
Maura DiSalvo ◽  
Abigail Farrell ◽  
Joseph Biederman

Objective: ADHD affects 11% of children in the United States and is associated with significant levels of anxiety. Although the literature supports mindfulness-based interventions as a promising strategy for managing anxiety, it falls short in the feasibility of digital mindfulness interventions. Method: This study investigated the usefulness of the pediatric version of Headspace, a digital mindfulness program, for reducing stress in 18 children with ADHD. We conducted a 4-week pilot study to evaluate the Headspace digital mindfulness application for children ages 6 to 12 with ADHD. Parents completed the Beck Anxiety Inventory and the Children’s Sleep Habits Questionnaire at baseline and endpoint. Results: Participants had an average age of 9.2 years and were 78% male. The Headspace intervention significantly reduced anxiety and sleep problems in children with ADHD. Conclusion: Children with ADHD and comorbid anxiety and/or sleep problems could benefit from a digitally based meditation application. (J. of Att. Dis. XXXX; XX(X) XX-XX)


Author(s):  
Kjell Weyde ◽  
Norun Krog ◽  
Bente Oftedal ◽  
Jorunn Evandt ◽  
Per Magnus ◽  
...  

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A373-A373
Author(s):  
I Talker ◽  
J L Kaar ◽  
S L Simon

Abstract Introduction Empirically supported treatments for pediatric sleep problems exist but many families turn to other sources for help with their child’s sleep, such as smartphone applications (apps). Sleep apps are easy for families to access but little evidence exists regarding the validity of the services and information provided. The goal of this study was to examine the features and claims of sleep apps for children. Methods A search of the Apple iTunes store and Google Play Store was conducted using the terms “kids sleep” and “baby sleep”. 635 apps were initially identified. Apps were excluded if they were not specifically for children (n=163), not for sleep (n=152), or if they had <100,000 downloads (n=246). Content analyses were used to assess the apps functions, claims, and evidence base. Results A total of 74 apps were examined of which only 4% offered sleep improvement strategies. The majority were sound and light apps (77%) and 19% were bedtime games/stories. The apps were highly rated (average 4.4 out of 5) and most were free (54%); the price of paid apps ranged from $0.99 to $119.99 (annual subscription). Only 2 apps were identified as containing empirical evidence, and all of the apps featuring games and stories to be used as part of the bedtime routine are in opposition to the recommendation to avoid the melatonin-suppressing effect of electronics/bright light before bedtime. Despite this, many apps boasted claims that they will help children “fall asleep instantly,” “cry less and sleep better,” or improve child development. Conclusion A large variety of sleep applications exist aimed for use with children. Many boast claims that cannot be supported by empirical evidence, and indeed may be in opposition to research support. Collaboration between sleep researchers and technology developers may be beneficial for the creation of evidence-supported apps to help with children’s sleep. Support N/A


Author(s):  
Renatha El Rafihi-Ferreira ◽  
Maria Laura Nogueira Pires ◽  
Marco Fabio Mastroeni ◽  
Edwiges Ferreira de Mattos Silvares

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 2098-2106
Author(s):  
Dione Tyler ◽  
Caroline L. Donovan ◽  
Sarah Scupham ◽  
Amy L. Shiels ◽  
Shelly A. Weaver

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document