State-Trait Anxiety Inventory—State Scale (Short Form)

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa M. Marteau ◽  
Hilary Bekker
2003 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akke K. van der Bij ◽  
Sabina de Weerd ◽  
Rolf J.L.M. Cikot ◽  
Eric A.P. Steegers ◽  
Jozé C.C. Braspenning

Author(s):  
Luciana Camargo de Oliveira Melo ◽  
Marina Cortez Pereira Bonelli ◽  
Rosa Vanessa Alves Lima ◽  
Flávia Azevedo Gomes-Sponholz ◽  
Juliana Cristina dos Santos Monteiro

Objective: to identify the levels of anxiety and breastfeeding self-efficacy in puerperal women at the intervals of 60, 120, and 180 days postpartum; and to verify the influence of anxiety on breastfeeding self-efficacy among these puerperal women. Method: an analytical, longitudinal and prospective study, conducted with 186 puerperal women, and which used a sociodemographic and obstetric characterization questionnaire, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form. The analyses were performed by means of descriptive statistics, and Fisher’s Exact Test was used. Results: most of the puerperal women presented low levels of trait anxiety (55.4%) and of state anxiety (66.2% at 60 days, 72.8% at 120 days, and 75.5% at 180 days), and a high level of self-efficacy (77.3% at 60 days, 75.3% at 120 days, and 72.1% at 180 days of puerperium). Low levels of trait anxiety and state anxiety were associated with high self-efficacy at 60 days (p=0.0142 and p=0.0159, respectively). Conclusion: it is necessary to pay greater attention to the mental health of puerperal women, considering that those who presented low levels of anxiety had higher levels of self-efficacy, a situation that can result in longer exclusive breastfeeding.


1983 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 536-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saskia Boeke ◽  
Benno Bonke ◽  
Hugo Duivenvoorden ◽  
Henk M. Van Der Ploeg

To measure the agreement between two modes of the state anxiety (A-State) scale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, 67 plastic or reconstructive surgery patients completed a Dutch version of the A-State scale (DY) twice, both pre- and postoperatively. The instructions were “How do you feel right now,” followed by “How do you feel today.” Inconsistencies were found between the “now” version and “today” version on both measuring occasions.


1978 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 633-634
Author(s):  
Robert Loo

The report noted that the use of high item-remainder coefficients as the sole criterion in the selection of items for short state-anxiety scales from full scales can lead to inaccurate interpretation of results. It was demonstrated that the use of a four-item state-anxiety scale from the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory A-State scale based on high item-remainder coefficients changed relationships in a previously reported study which used full-scale scores. It was proposed that such changes in relationships were the result of selecting four items which happen to load on only one of three dimensions of the A-State scale. The criterion of high item-remainder coefficients alone may be inadequate in the formation of short state-anxiety scales.


1999 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 869-872
Author(s):  
Alex I. Lichton ◽  
Charles A. Waehler

This study examined the possible influence of audio and video recording of personality assessment measures on anxiety. Undergraduate students in psychology were randomly assigned to Audiotape, Videotape, or Control conditions and given the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory and Rorschach Inkblot Method. A one-way multivariate analysis of variance indicated no significant differences among these conditions on the Spielberger, et al. State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, A-State scale, and five Rorschach measures of situational anxiety. Tape-recording itself did not seem to affect the anxiety indices of these frequently used personality assessments.


1987 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 767-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric J. Cooley

53 participants in a weekend tennis tournament completed the Competitive Short Form of the State Anxiety Inventory and questions about the specific situation (e.g., their chance of winning, presence of an audience) immediately before playing a tournament match. Immediately after the match participants completed outcome measures (e.g., win/loss, the impact of tension upon their performance). Two trait anxiety measures were given in a follow-up. Competitive trait anxiety from the Sport Competition Anxiety Test was the best predictor of state anxiety. Perceived chance of winning was the only situational factor which was significantly related to state anxiety. Match outcome was also more closely related to competitive trait anxiety than to state anxiety or generalized trait anxiety. The trait-anxiety measure which focused upon competition was a more useful predictor of state anxiety than the generalized measure, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document