Early assessment of minimal residual disease in AML by flow cytometry during aplasia identifies patients at increased risk of relapse

Leukemia ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-386 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Köhnke ◽  
D Sauter ◽  
K Ringel ◽  
E Hoster ◽  
R P Laubender ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merav Bar ◽  
Brent L. Wood ◽  
Jerald P. Radich ◽  
Kristine C. Doney ◽  
Ann E. Woolfrey ◽  
...  

In this retrospective study, we evaluated the impact of pre- and posttransplant minimal residual disease (MRD) detected by multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) on outcome in 160 patients with ALL who underwent myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). MRD was defined as detection of abnormal B or T cells by MFC with no evidence of leukemia by morphology (<5% blasts in marrow) and no evidence of extramedullary disease. Among 153 patients who had pre-HCT flow data within 50 days before transplant, MRD pre-HCT increased the risk of relapse (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.87–7.09; P=.0001) and mortality (HR = 2.39; 95% CI, 1.46–3.90, P=.0005). Three-year estimates of relapse were 17% and 38% and estimated 3-year OS was 68% and 40% for patients without and with MRD pre-HCT, respectively. 144 patients had at least one flow value post-HCT, and the risk of relapse among those with MRD was higher than that among those without MRD (HR = 7.47; 95% CI, 3.30–16.92, P<.0001). The risk of mortality was also increased (HR = 3.00; 95% CI, 1.44–6.28, P=.004). These data suggest that pre- or post-HCT MRD, as detected by MFC, is associated with an increased risk of relapse and death after myeloablative HCT for ALL.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. SCI-34-SCI-34
Author(s):  
Michael A. Pulsipher

In spite of an explosion of data regarding mutations associated with childhood ALL, to date these key genetic changes rarely have been the driver of therapy. Clinical parameters at presentation (WBC, age, T- vs. B-lineage, etc.) have dictated initial risk stratification and induction approaches, followed by risk-adapted therapy based upon leukemic response measured by minimal residual disease (MRD, either PCR- or flow cytometry-based). With minor variations, rapid disappearance of peripheral MRD, followed by significant clearance from the marrow after induction, and most importantly, the level of MRD after consolidation have allowed clear distinctions in outcomes that have driven intensification or de-intensification of therapy resulting in improved outcomes. Although specific gene mutations have been associated with risk, MRD has further identified better risk patients within genetic subgroups. For patients noted to be very high risk who are candidates for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), the presence of MRD both pre- and post-transplant has been associated with increased risk of relapse; the risk being modified by level of MRD, whether or not GVHD occurs after HCT, and timing after HCT when MRD is measured. In lower risk patients being treated with chemotherapy and higher risk patients eligible for HCT, more sensitive approaches to flow cytometry and PCR, as well as next-generation sequencing (NGS) MRD approaches (sensitive to 1/10^7 cells) are currently being tested. It is not clear yet whether NGS-MRD offers substantial improvements in patients treated with chemotherapy, as broad-based testing is underway; the latest comparative outcomes will be presented. There is evidence of a striking improvement in our ability to define patients who will do very will after transplant (not relapse), and preliminary evidence that post-HCT NGS MRD testing is more sensitive that other methodologies in defining risk of relapse after transplant. As the latest information about the ability of different approaches to MRD is shown in this session, we will also present how response to therapy based upon MRD interacts with various genetic subtypes (Ph+ ALL, extreme hypodiploidy, etc.). Even in subclasses that are considered very high risk based solely upon genetics, measurement of MRD can define higher and lower risk groups. Going forward, as more and different types of patients are subcategorized and treated with targeted agents based upon specific mutations, it is likely MRD response will continue to be important in mapping intensity of approach and defining children at highest risk of relapse who might benefit from HCT or other cellular therapeutic approaches. Disclosures Pulsipher: Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9554-9554
Author(s):  
Eloy Perez ◽  
Primo Cruz-Borja ◽  
Silvia Chavez-Gallegos

9554 Background: The presence of minimal residual disease (MDR) following therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been shown to be an important prognostic marker in many studies. MRD is typically detected either by polymerase chain reaction amplification or by flow cytometry. Flow-based MRD assessment has the potential for rapidly identifying patients at increased risk of relapsed, allowing for prompt changes in therapy, including earlier intensification. There are not many information about the response by MRD in countries with limited resources. Methods: The patients included were 90 ALL patients treated at the Hospital Infantil de Morelia from June 1, 2009 to January 5, 2012. MRD positivity (+) was defined as >0.01% of the gated population. Results: MRD was obtained in 90 patients, 38 males and 36 females. The median age was 7 years (10 months to 15 years). The levels of MRD were: <0.01, 74 (82.2%), 0.01-1%, 9 (10%), ≥1%, 7 (7.7%). There was not a statistically significant association between the most important ALL prognostic factors (Gender, Age at diagnosis, White blood cell count at diagnosis, Central Nervous System disease, Prednisone response, DNA Index, Immunophenotype). Conclusions: The good response found is similar to that reported by international groups, a situation which suggests that the response to chemotherapy is appropriate. However, cure rates are still not equal making it necessary to review institutional treatment protocols and social characteristics of the population to achieve cure rates reported by international groups.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1384-1384
Author(s):  
Karthik B.K Bommannan ◽  
Man Updesh Singh Sachdeva ◽  
Parveen Bose ◽  
Deepak Bansal ◽  
Ram Kumar Marwaha ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Minimal residual disease (MRD) has emerged as an independent prognostic factor for patients of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). There is a strong correlation between MRD levels in bone marrow and the risk of relapse in childhood & adult leukemias 1, 2. Bone marrow MRD (BM-MRD) level of ≥ 0.01% is considered as positive and a mid-induction MRD of ≥ 1% is associated with high risk of relapse 3. Recently, the concept of peripheral blood MRD (PB-MRD), as a replacement for BM-MRD, has hit the lime light. In pediatric B-ALL, presence of PB-MRD is associated with a high relapse rate in comparison to cases which are PB-MRD negative 4, 5. This study was aimed to compare the levels of mid-induction (day 15) MRD levels in bone marrow and peripheral blood of pediatric B-ALL patients with a hypothesis that PB-MRD levels correlate with BM-MRD levels, and thus can predict BM-MRD levels for further management of the patient. Methods Forty newly diagnosed CD19+CD10+CD34+/- pediatric B-ALL patients under Vincristine, L-Asparaginase and Dexamethasone, were assessed for MRD levels on their paired day 15 PB & BM samples using six colour flow cytometry. With informed consent, both the samples were collected in EDTA vacutainers and lyse-stain-wash technique was used to prepare a single six colour tube comprising of SYTO 13/ CD34PE/ CD20PerCP/ CD19 PECy7/ CD10APC/ CD45APCH7 for each sample. The processed samples were run on BD FACS Canto II with acquisition of 1 million events or till the tubes were empty. Analysis was done using BD FACS Diva software and MRD of ≥ 0.01% was considered positive. Results Among 40 pairs of day 15 PB and BM samples, 25 (62.5%) were BM-MRD positive. Sixteen pairs (40%) had PB-MRD and BM-MRD co-positivity, 9 pairs (22.5%) had isolated BM-MRD positivity and 15 pairs (37.5%) were MRD negative in both PB and BM samples. In other words, among the 25 BM-MRD positive cases, simultaneous PB-MRD was positive in 16 patients (64%) and none of the samples had isolated PB-MRD positivity. Overall analysis of MRD positive cases showed a direct correlation between PB-MRD and BM-MRD (ρ = +0.684, p < 0.000) and BM-MRD levels were 7 times higher than the PB-MRD. In addition, ROC analysis with PB-MRD of ≥ 0.01% as a cut-off, revealed that, the most likelihood of PB-MRD being positive was when BM-MRD was ≥ 0.31%. Conclusions In contrast to the sparsely available literature, our study shows a significant correlation between PB & BM-MRD levels in day 15 paired samples of B-ALL cases. The MRD levels were 7 times higher in BM as compared to PB and PB-MRD was mostly positive with BM-MRD of ≥0.31%. In other words, day 15 PB-MRD positivity indirectly indicates that there is a minimum BM-MRD of 0.31%. Since literature reports prognostic significance of mid-induction BM-MRD at levels ≥1%, on day 15, an assessment of peripheral blood MRD alone, might yield clinically relevant prognostic information. A paired analysis at different time points might also establish a similar correlation as seen in the present study, eliminating the need of BM-MRD during further follow ups of the patient. This will help in avoiding an invasive procedure and improve patient compliance. References 1. Irving J, Jesson J, Virgo P, Case M, Minto L, Eyre L, et al. Establishment and validation of a standard protocol for the detection of minimal residual disease in B lineage childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia by flow cytometry in a multi-center setting. haematologica. 2009;94(6):870-4. 2. Coustan-Smith E, Sancho J, Behm FG, Hancock ML, Razzouk BI, Ribeiro RC, et al. Prognostic importance of measuring early clearance of leukemic cells by flow cytometry in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2002;100(1):52-8. 3. Basso G, Veltroni M, Valsecchi MG, Dworzak MN, Ratei R, Silvestri D, et al. Risk of relapse of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia is predicted by flow cytometric measurement of residual disease on day 15 bone marrow. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27(31):5168-74. 4. Elain CS, Sancho J, Michael LH, Bassem. Use of peripheral blood instead of bone marrow to monitor residual disease in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2002;100 (7):2399-402. 5. Brisco MJ, Sykes PJ, Hughes E, Dolman G, Neoh SH, Peng LM, et al. Monitoring minimal residual disease in peripheral blood in B lineage acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. British journal of haematology. 1997;99(2):314-9. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. e5
Author(s):  
B. Paiva ◽  
M.B. Vidriales ◽  
N. Puig ◽  
M.A. Montaban ◽  
L. Cordón ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document