Aldosterone and angiotensin II profiles in young black and white women using different hormonal contraceptives: the African-PREDICT study

Author(s):  
Johannes M. van Rooyen ◽  
Marko Poglitsch ◽  
Catharina M. C. Mels ◽  
Hugo W. Huisman ◽  
Lebo F. Gafane-Matemane ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 01 (4) ◽  
pp. 175-183
Author(s):  
Kate Wheeler ◽  
Cora E. Lewis ◽  
Dale Williams ◽  
Stephen Sidney ◽  
Catarina I. Kiefe ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 853.2-854
Author(s):  
M. Clowse ◽  
J. LI ◽  
M. Birru Talabi ◽  
A. Eudy ◽  
G. Schmajuk

Background:Several of the most commonly prescribed medications for women with rheumatic disease are teratogens, posing a risk for pregnancy loss and birth defects if taken in pregnancy. To prevent these life-altering complications, it is important that all women taking teratogenic medications avoid pregnancy through abstinence or contraception.Objectives:We sought to understand the accessibility to contraceptive data within the RISE Registry and to test whether, compared to other women, those prescribed a teratogen would be more likely to have documentation of contraceptive.Methods:Data were derived from Rheumatology Informatics System for Effectiveness (RISE), a national EHR-enabled rheumatology registry that passively collects data on all patients seen by participating practices. As of 2018, RISE held validated data from 1,113 clinicians in 226 practices, representing an estimated 32% of the U.S. clinical rheumatology workforce. Female patients between the ages 18-45 with an anti-rheumatic medication prescribed within the RISE system in 2018 were stratified into one of 3 groups: 1) Any teratogen (methotrexate, mycophenolate, mycophenolic acid, cyclophosphamide, leflunomide, thalidomide, lenalidomide); 2) Only pregnancy-compatible medications (hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, or a TNF-α inhibitors [TNFi]); and 3) Any medication with unknown teratogenicity (non-TNF biologics and new small molecule medications). We identified the most recent contraceptive medication or device reported in 2018 using structured fields in the EHR. Contraceptive effectiveness was classified as ‘highly effective’ (IUD, Nexplanon, and surgical) and ‘effective’ (oral contraceptives, depo-provera, patch, ring), and unknown (type not reported). Statistical significance was assessed using Stata SE 15.1.Results:In 2018, 110,359 women between the ages of 18-45 were prescribed an anti-rheumatic medication within the RISE Registry. Of these, 11,569 (10.5%) had a contraceptive documented at the last visit. The frequency of contraception documentation varied between practices, ranging from 0% to 28.7% (median 9.2%).Contraception was documented slightly less often in women receiving teratogens (9.8%) compared to women receiving only pregnancy-compatible medications (10.4%, p=0.04) and medications with unknown pregnancy risks (10.0%, p=0.67).The frequency of contraceptive documentation in women prescribed a teratogen varied significantly by race with white women having the highest rate (11.0%) compared to African-American women (7.4%, p<0.001), Hispanic women (5.5%, p<0.001), and Asian women (8.4%, p=0.08).The type of contraceptive documented did not vary significantly between medication group. Highly effective contraception was rarely documented (1.4-1.6%) and moderately-effective hormonal contraceptives were more frequently documented (6.3-8.2%).Conclusion:This study is limited to the analysis of structured fields within the RISE Registry, thereby missing contraceptive documentation within the clinician notes. Increased uniformity in documentation and/or analysis of visit notes will be essential to use the RISE Registry to study the implementation of published contraceptive guidelines. While the documentation of contraception identified in this analysis of the RISE Registry likely under-estimates actual contraceptive use, it reveals important gaps in care. Contrary to what was expected, women prescribed a teratogen were not more likely than other women to have a documented contraceptive. Additionally, important racial disparities in contraception documentation suggest that rheumatologists may not addressing reproductive health needs equally across patient populations.Acknowledgments Disclaimer:This data was supported by the ACR’s RISE Registry. However, the views expressed represent those of the authors, not necessarily those of the ACRDisclosure of Interests:Megan Clowse Grant/research support from: GSK, Pfizer, Consultant of: UCB, Astra-Zeneca, Speakers bureau: UCB, Jing Li: None declared, Mehret Birru Talabi: None declared, Amanda Eudy: None declared, Gabriela Schmajuk Grant/research support from: Pfizer


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2085-2097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Bermudez-Millan ◽  
Kristina P Schumann ◽  
Richard Feinn ◽  
Howard Tennen ◽  
Julie Wagner

2014 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire S. Philipp ◽  
Ambarina S. Faiz ◽  
Michele G. Beckman ◽  
Althea Grant ◽  
Paula L. Bockenstedt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12599-e12599
Author(s):  
Hyein Jeon ◽  
Myeong Lee ◽  
Mohammed Jaloudi

e12599 Background: Higher prevalence of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in black women with associated poor outcomes due to various disparities is well documented within a single state. We examine multiple states to better understand the state effect on such differences in incidence and prevalence of TNBC in black women. Methods: Female patients of ages 19 years old and above with breast cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program across 13 states (608 counties) from 2015 (n = 66,444) and 2016 (n = 66,122) were examined. The relationships between the proportion of black and white women and the rate of patients with different tumor subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, HR-HER2+, and triple negative) were examined at the county level using ordinary least-square regression models. In parallel, due to consideration of various state-specific healthcare policies, socio-cultural norms, and socio-economic disparities, multi-level regression models were applied to examine the nested, random effect of each state on TNBC prevalence in each county. Bonferroni correction was applied to reduce the Type I error caused by repeated use of the same variables in multiple tests. Results: The baseline breast cancer rates between black and white women were similar in the population (0.171% for black and 0.168% for white). Consistent to previous studies, we demonstrate a significant positive correlation (p < 0.001) in TNBC in black females in both years. Surprisingly, when accounted for the random effects on states, 38.2% (2015) and 34.3% (2016) increase in incidence of TNBC in black females were seen, suggestive of state-specific disparity affecting race-specific health. In 2015, other subtypes of breast cancer in both black and white females did not result in significant relationship. Interestingly, in 2016, there was a significant relationship seen between the TNBC rate in white females and the white female population rate only after adjusting for the state effect (p = 0.026). This indicates the impact of non-biological factors such as state-wide health policies. Additionally, HR-HER2+ black females had a significant relationship against respective population rate only after adjusting for the state effect as well (p = 0.0394). For luminal A white females, a 15% decrease in incidence was seen after adjusting for state effect (p = 0.0424). Conclusions: This is the first known across-state examination of breast cancer subtypes by race with random effects on state. This study shows the role of state-specific factors affecting incidence in black and white females and potentially indicates the importance of state-level management for breast cancer on health disparities in addition to race-driven effects. Further studies are needed to elucidate comparable differences between states affecting the rates of various subtypes of breast cancer and thus health outcomes.


Circulation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 135 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Zhang ◽  
Wanzhu Tu ◽  
Lesley Tinker ◽  
JoAnn E Manson ◽  
Simin Liu ◽  
...  

Background: Recent evidence suggests that racial differences in circulating levels of free or bioavailable 25(OH)D rather than total 25(OH)D may explain the apparent racial disparities in cardiovascular disease(CVD).However, few prospective studies have directly tested this hypothesis. Objective: Our study prospectively examined black white differences in the associations of total, free, and bioavailable 25(OH)D, vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels at baseline with incident CVD in a large, multi-ethnic, geographically diverse cohort of postmenopausal women. Method: We conducted a case-cohort study among 79,705 black and non-Hispanic white postmenopausal women aged 50 to 79 years and free of CVD at baseline in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study (WHI-OS). We included a randomly chosen subcohort of 1,300 black and 1,500 white noncases at baseline and a total of 550 black and 1,500 white women who developed incident CVD during the follow up. We directly measured circulating levels of total 25(OH)D, VDBP (monoclonal antibody assay), albumin, and PTH and calculated free and bioavailable vitamin D levels. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used while adjusting for known CVD risk factors. Results: At baseline, white women had higher mean levels of total 25(OH)D and VDBP and lower mean levels of free and bioavailable 25(OH)D and PTH than black women (all P values < 0.0001). White cases had lower levels of total 25(OH)D and VDBP and higher levels of PTH than white noncases, while black cases had higher levels of PTH than black noncases (all P values < 0.05). There was a trend toward an increased CVD risk associated with low total 25(OH)D and VDBP levels or elevated PTH levels in both US black and white women. In the multivariable analyses, the total, free, and bioavailable 25(OH)D, and VDBP were not significantly associated with CVD risk in black or white women. A statistically significant association between higher PTH levels and increased CVD risk persisted in white women, however. The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratios [HRs] comparing the extreme quartiles of PTH were 1.37 (95% CI: 1.06-1.77; P-trend=0.02) for white women and 1.12 (95% CI: 0.79-1.58; P-trend=0.37) for black women. This positive association among white women was also independent of total, free, and bioavailable 25(OH)D or VDBP. There were no significant interactions with other pre-specified factors, including BMI, season of blood draw, sunlight exposure, recreational physical activity, sitting time, or renal function. Interpretation: Findings from a large multiethnic case-cohort study of US black and white postmenopausal women do not support the notion that circulating levels of vitamin D biomarkers may explain black-white disparities in CVD but indicate that PTH excess may be an independent risk factor for CVD in white women.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document