scholarly journals Genetic homogeneity in the face of morphological heterogeneity in the harbor porpoise from the Black Sea and adjacent waters (Phocoena phocoena relicta)

Heredity ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 469-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yacine Ben Chehida ◽  
Julie Thumloup ◽  
Karina Vishnyakova ◽  
Pavel Gol’din ◽  
Michael C. Fontaine
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yacine Ben Chehida ◽  
Julie Thumloup ◽  
Karina Vishnyakova ◽  
Pavel Gol’din ◽  
Michael C. Fontaine

AbstractIsolated from North Atlantic populations, the Black Sea harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena relicta) is listed as Endangered due to the massive population decline triggered by historical hunting, and subsequently through fisheries bycatch, and other human activities. Of paramount importance for its conservation, is the characterization of the population structure. While morphological heterogeneity suggested population subdivision, previous genetic studies have failed to find any differences. Here, we investigated the population genetic structure of 144 harbor porpoises sampled opportunistically from across the entire subspecies range including the Aegean, Marmara, Black, and Azov Seas. Genetic variation of across one-fourth of the mitochondrial genome, in combination with the analysis of ten microsatellite loci revealed a nearly complete genetic homogeneity. While simulations show that this inability to reject panmixia does not stem from a lack of power (power to detect FST of 0.008). A genetic time-lag effect limiting our ability to detect population subdivision is also unlikely when effective population size is low, as is the case here. For now, genetic panmixia among porpoises of the Black Sea and adjacent waters cannot be rejected. Population subdivision may well exist, but conclusive evidence would require an improved sampling providing suitable contrasts (e.g., age, sex, season). Also, a genome scale study providing access to neutral and selected genetic variation may reveal cryptic differentiation indicative of ecologically subdivisions. As a precautionary approach, definition of management units should be based on evidence of population heterogeneity obtained from multidisciplinary approaches rather than just genetics.


2001 ◽  
Vol 42 (10) ◽  
pp. 905-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claude R Joiris ◽  
Ludo Holsbeek ◽  
Dorina Bolba ◽  
Caroline Gascard ◽  
Tzvetan Stanev ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 712-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinsuke Tanabe ◽  
Bathini Madhusree ◽  
Ayaka Amaha Öztürk ◽  
Ryo Tatsukawa ◽  
Nobuyuki Miyazaki ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Sara H. Lindheim

This chapter juxtaposes Ovid’s erotic and his exilic elegy. In Rome people could visit and examine Agrippa’s map; expansion and conquest sit hand in glove with powerful fantasies of imposing order, control, and hierarchy. In his early elegiac works Ovid contemplates feminine self-adornment. Luxury goods from foreign places flow to the capital, and the city’s female inhabitants seek out, then display on their bodies, the commodities of empire. Once the Ovidian women cloak themselves in the trappings of empire, however, they become one with their accoutrements. In the second part of the diptych, exilic Ovid, just like his adorned women before him, suffers in the face of absent fines. At the very margins of empire, in Tomis on the Black Sea, when he finds himself contemplating first-hand the permeable fines at the furthest edge of imperium, stable, fixed boundaries evaporate, and hybridization and melange take over. It becomes increasingly difficult to ascertain where imperium ends and the non-Roman world (not-yet-Roman world) begins. The Greeks, the Getans, the barbarians have already mixed together, and ultimately even the one Roman cannot sustain his Romanness.


Zootaxa ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4379 (3) ◽  
pp. 448
Author(s):  
SOPHIA M. SÁNCHEZ ◽  
LIAT Y. GOLDSTEIN ◽  
NORMAN O. DRONEN

Cobbold (1858) established Diphyllobothrium Cobbold, 1858 with the description of Diphyllobothrium stemmacephalum Cobbold, 1858 from the common harbor porpoise, Phocoena phocoena (Linnaeus) (Phocoenidae), from the North Sea off Scotland. Diphyllobothrium stemmacephalum typically has been reported from a number of Phocoenidae and Delphinidae hosts from a variety of localities: common harbor porpoise from the northern Atlantic Ocean, Baltic Sea and Black sea (e.g. Cobbold, 1858; Delyamure 1955; Delyamure 1968; Delyamure 1971; Delyamure et al. 1985; Anderson, 1987); bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus (Montagu), from the Gulf of Mexico (Ward & Collins 1959), the Black sea (Delyamure et al. 1985); common harbor porpoise off Newfoundland (Brattey & Stenson 1995), the Black Sea (Krivokhizin & Birkun 1994 [see Yera et al. 2008]), off Denmark (Herreras et al. 1997); long-finned pilot whale, Globicephala melas [Traill], North Atlantic off Faroe Island (Balbuena & Raga 1993); Atlantic white-sided dolphin, Lagenorhynchus acutus [Gray], off Massachusetts (Olson & Caira 1999). 


2004 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Das ◽  
Ludo Holsbeek ◽  
Julie Browning ◽  
Ursula Siebert ◽  
Alexei Birkun ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 338 ◽  
pp. 281-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
KA Viaud-Martínez ◽  
M Martínez Vergara ◽  
PE Gol’din ◽  
V Ridoux ◽  
AA Öztürk ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 338-347 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinsuke Tanabe ◽  
Bathini Madhusree ◽  
Ayaka Amaha Öztürk ◽  
Ryo Tatsukawa ◽  
Nobuyuki Miyazaki ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. E. Goldin ◽  
K. A. Vishnyakova

Abstract There are two porpoise stocks in the northern Black Sea: the north-western (Odessa Gulf) and northeastern (Crimean and Caucasian waters); in addition, another stock is in the Sea of Azov. The Azov porpoises are distinct in their body size and biology. This research was conducted on the skulls of stranded sexually mature porpoises from the north-eastern Black Sea, north-western Black Sea and the Sea of Azov. In the north-eastern Black Sea samples, both present-day and old-time, the sexual dimorphism of the skull size was not significant, whereas in the Sea of Azov the females were significantly larger than males. The Azov skulls were strongly different from those from the Black Sea: they were larger, proportionally wider and had the wider rostra; also, there was no significant chronological variation within the Black Sea. The Azov and Black Sea samples were classified with the 100 % success with four variables. The northwestern Black Sea skulls were somewhat intermediate in their characteristics between the Azov and northeastern Black Sea samples, but they were classify ed together with other Black Sea specimens. The difference between the Azov and Black Sea skulls was greater than between many North Atlantic populations, despite the extreme geographical proximity of the two stocks. The low variation within the Black Sea supports the earlier conclusions on the lack of genetic variation: all the Black Sea stocks are expected to be genetically similar sub-populations, whereas the Azov and Marmara stocks possibly represent the genetically distant populations. The porpoises from the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov equally show the traits which characterize the subspecies Phocoena phocoena relicta, but the Black Sea porpoises appear to be more paedomorphic in terms of ontogenetic trajectories.


1997 ◽  
Vol 359 (3) ◽  
pp. 244-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bathini Madhusree ◽  
S. Tanabe ◽  
Ayaka Amaha Öztürk ◽  
Ryo Tatsukawa ◽  
Nobuyuki Miyazaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document