scholarly journals Relationship between oral health impacts and personality profiles among orthodontic patients treated with Invisalign clear aligners

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah A. Al Nazeh ◽  
Ibrahim Alshahrani ◽  
Serene A. Badran ◽  
Salem Almoammar ◽  
Abdulaziz Alshahrani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Health ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Health Impacts ◽  
Personality Profiles ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Neo Five Factor Inventory ◽  
Negative Impacts ◽  
Personality Features

AbstractThis within subject clinical experiment assessed oral health impacts before and after Invisalign orthodontic treatment and their relationships with personality characteristics. 50 patients (26 females and 24 males; mean age = 27.62 ± 8.25 years, SE = 1.17, 95% CI = 24.71–29.89 years) were assessed before and after treatment with Invisalign orthodontic treatment. Treatment clinical success was evaluated according defined clinical guidelines. Oral health impacts before and after Invisalign orthodontic treatment were measured via the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). Personality features were measured via the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Probability of α = .05 was utilized to identify significant findings. Females scored less OHIP scores after treatment (had less negative impacts) in comparison to baseline OHIP scores (t = 3.782, df = 25, P = .001, 95% CI of mean difference = 2.750–9.327). Among males, openness scores (R2 = .911, B = 5.235, 95% CI for B = 0.062–10.407, t = 2.601, P = .048) were able to predict OHIP scores before treatment; meanwhile, extraversion (R2 = .959, B = − 8.224, 95% CI for B = − 14.605–1.843, t = − 3.313, P = .021), openness (R2 = .959, B = 21.795, 95% CI for B = 10.737–32.853, t = 5.067, P = .004), and conscientiousness (R2 = .959, B = 10.293, 95% CI for B = 4.796–15.790, t = 4.813, P = .005) scores were useful to predict OHIP scores after treatment (R2 = .959, P < .05). NEO-FFI scores were not useful to predict OHIP scores before or after treatment among females (P > .05). These findings demonstrate that oral health impacts of Invisalign orthodontic treatment and personality profiles contribution to oral health impacts were different between genders.

Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS): a preliminary within-subject study of quality of life, oral health impacts and personality profiles

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 278-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud K. AL-Omiri ◽  
Jumana Karasneh ◽  
Mohannad M. Alhijawi ◽  
Abdalwhab M. A. Zwiri ◽  
Crispian Scully ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis ◽  
Aphthous Stomatitis ◽  
Health Impacts ◽  
Personality Profiles

scholarly journals Comparison of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) Values in Cancer Survivor Patients Treated Orthodontically with Either Rapid or Standard Duration Protocols of Treatment—A Prospective Case–Control Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (23) ◽  
pp. 9068
Author(s):  
Maria Mitus-Kenig ◽  
Marcin Derwich ◽  
Ewa Czochrowska ◽  
Elzbieta Pawlowska
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Oral Health Impact Profile ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Background: The aim of the study was to compare the oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) between cancer survivors: with rapid orthodontic treatment (TX) (up to 12 months) and standard TX (orthodontic treatment time longer than 16 months). Methods: There were 76 cancer survivors (48 women and 28 men) allocated into groups with rapid (36 people) or standard (40 people) duration of TX. OHRQoL was assessed on the basis of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) values, measured before TX, 2 weeks and 3 months after the onset of TX, and after the end of TX. A repeated ANOVA test was used to check the statistical significance between the scores. Results: There were no significant differences regarding the OHIP-14 values between the examined groups at all stages of the examination. Both groups presented significant (p < 0.001) improvement of the values of OHRQoL at the end of TX comparing to the values achieved before the onset of TX. Conclusions: Duration of orthodontic treatment by itself had no impact on oral-health-related quality of life.

scholarly journals Quality of Life in Orthodontic Cancer Survivor Patients—A Prospective Case–Control Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (16) ◽  
pp. 5824
Author(s):  
Maria Mitus-Kenig ◽  
Marcin Derwich ◽  
Ewa Czochrowska ◽  
Elzbieta Pawlowska
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Survivor ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Orthodontic Patients

Background: The aim of the study was to compare the quality of life (QoL) of cancer survivors with a control group of healthy subjects before, during, and after the orthodontic treatment. Methods: Consecutive cancer survivors (40 people) who were looking for orthodontic treatment between 2008 and 2015 were enrolled into the study. Healthy orthodontic patients matched for age (±4 years), sex, and malocclusion served as controls. The 14-item version of the Oral Health Impact Profile was used to assess the effect of orthodontic treatment on QoL before, during, and after the orthodontic treatment. Results: There were no significant differences between both groups regarding the cast model, cephalometric analysis, and photographic documentation analysis. There was a significant worsening of QoL after the onset of the orthodontic treatment with a significant improvement after the treatment. Male cancer survivor patients reported significantly lower QoL during the treatment time, which was not observed in the male control group. Conclusions: The outcome of orthodontic treatment in cancer survivors did not differ from the healthy orthodontic patients. The orthodontic treatment had an impact on the oral health quality of life both in the cancer and the control groups with a significantly higher impact in male cancer survivor patients.

scholarly journals Development of a conceptual model of oral health for malocclusion patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 1057-1063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohd Masood ◽  
Yaghma Masood ◽  
Tim Newton ◽  
Satu Lahti
Keyword(s):  
Oral Health ◽  
Conceptual Model ◽  
Direct Effect ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Goodness Of Fit ◽  
Functional Limitation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Oral Health Impact Profile

ABSTRACT Objectives:  To provide an empirical test of the applicability of Locker's conceptual model of oral health for malocclusion patients, and to suggest alternative models of the effect of malocclusion on well-being. Materials and Methods:  Data from a survey of 323 adolescents attending for orthodontic treatment were analyzed to develop a new oral health model for malocclusion patients. Oral health–related quality of life (OHRQoL) was measured using the 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile; malocclusion was measured using the Dental Health Component (DHC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN). Using structural equation modeling, the relationship between conceptual domains in Locker's model was explored and three models of their interrelationship tested for goodness of fit. Results:  Fit indexes for Locker's model indicated that it did not fit the data well. Therefore, a modified model was developed to incorporate additional paths between other levels to better fit the data. The best fit was provided by a model in which the direct effects of malocclusion on pain, discomfort, and handicapping—and the direct effect of pain on disability—were removed. A direct effect of functional limitation on disability was allowed. The modified Oral Health Impact Profile model proved to be a good fit to the data (root mean square error of approximation  =  0.069). Conclusion:  The pathways identified in Locker's (1988) conceptual model of oral health may not be appropriate for describing the relationships between OHRQoL constructs in individuals with malocclusion. An alternative model is proposed.

scholarly journals Quality of Life related to Eruption Hematoma in a Twenty Months Old Infant

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 763-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucianne Cople Maia ◽  
Andréa Laudares Marques ◽  
Nashalie Andrade de Alencar ◽  
Andréa Gonçalves Antonio
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Normal Diet ◽  
Brazilian Version ◽  
Impact Scale ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Oral Hygiene Instruction ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT Aim This paper describes a case of an eruption hematoma in a 20-month-old boy and the impact of this hematoma on the quality of life (QoL) related to oral health of this infant and his family. Background Eruption hematoma is a soft benign cyst that contains blood and overlie a tooth that are about to erupt. Oral health conditions can affect the QoL and bring psychological impacts. Case report The proposed treatment was based on oral hygiene instruction, normal diet and massage on the lesion area. A weekly follow-up visits up to the spontaneous regression at the 6 weeks of the lesion was conducted. The impact on QoL was assessed though the Brazilian version of the early childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (B-ECOHIS) questionnaire before and after 2 months of the hematoma regression. Conclusion The presence of eruption hematoma impacted, physically and emotionally, the QoL related to oral health of the child and his family, and this impact decreased when the eruption hematoma disappeared. Clinical significance It is important the knowledge of the dentists about eruption cyst/hematoma to make the correct decisions to improve the QoL of their patients and families. How to cite this article Marques AL, de Alencar NA, Maia LC, Antonio AG. Quality of Life related to Eruption Hematoma in a Twenty Months Old Infant. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(9): 763-767.

scholarly journals Longitudinal prospective evaluation of oral health-related quality of life in young patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment as part of a randomised trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Elhussein ◽  
Philip Benson
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

Abstract Background The objectives of this study were to investigate relationships between change in the aesthetic appearance before and after orthodontic treatment and patient-reported change in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), and to assess the responsiveness of two OHRQoL measures to any changes from orthodontic treatment. Methods Two hundred and ten participants in a multicentre (two teaching hospitals and four specialist orthodontic practices), single blinded, randomised clinical trial with 2 parallel groups, were administered one of two age-specific questionnaires, either the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ11-14-ISF-16) or the Psychosocial Impact of Dental Aesthetics Questionnaire (PIDAQ), before and after orthodontic treatment. Clinical photographs were assessed by two groups of laypeople and orthodontists using the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need Aesthetic Component (IOTN-AC). Results Two hundred and ten participants were randomised, and 197 completed the trial. Before and after OHRQoL data were successfully obtained from 110 participants. There was a mean reduction in the total CPQ11-14-ISF-16 scores of 3.9 (SD = 8.0), and a mean reduction of 34.2 (SD = 18.5) in the total PIDAQ score. CPQ11-14-ISF-16 demonstrated poor longitudinal construct validity (p = 0.155). Correlations between the change in total CPQ11-14-ISF-16 scores and change in IOTN-AC assessments were small for both orthodontists (r=-0.084; p = 0.516) and laypeople (r=-0.140; p = 0.225). There were higher associations between the improvement in the Social well-being (SWB) subdomain and improvement in IOTN-AC. Correlations between the changes in total PIDAQ scores and the IOTN-AC assessments, were higher in comparison to the correlations with CPQ11-14-ISF-16 (orthodontists; r = 0.223, laypeople; r = 0.025). There were no adverse effects. Conclusion CPQ11-14-ISF-16 and IOTN-AC measure different attributes. This demonstrated the role of SWB on children OHRQoL. Condition-specific measures (PIDAQ) are more responsive to change in self-reported OHRQoL than generic measures (CPQ11-14-ISF-16) after treatment. Trial Registration: The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01925924.

scholarly journals Translation and validation of the Croatian version of the Oral Impacts on Daily Performances (OIDP) scale

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (9) ◽  
pp. 811-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vlatka Lajnert ◽  
Renata Grzic ◽  
Natasa Radica ◽  
Damir Snjaric ◽  
Stjepan Spalj
Keyword(s):  
Oral Health ◽  
Construct Validity ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Internal Consistency ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Validity Testing ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Oral Impacts

Background/Aim. Among numerous sociodental indicators the Oral Impacts on Daily Performance (OIPD) is one of the most broadly applied. The aim of this study was to develop and test psychometric properties of a Croatian version of OIDP scale. Methods. The OIDP instrument was translated from English to Croatian in a forward-backward method. The Croatian version was tested for reliability, construct validity and responsiveness on a sample of 702 participants (255 men), aged 18-86 years. Results. Internal consistency of Croatian version of the OIDP was acceptable (alpha = 0.80) and 69.4% of the examinees had oral impacts relating to one or several performances. The most frequently affected performance was eating (53.7%). The test-retest reliability was high (r = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.97-0.99), the mean difference between the OIDP summary scores in two-week interval was not statistically significant. In construct validity testing there was statistically significant correlation between OIDP and self-assessed general and oral health, somatisation, depression and Oral Health Impact Profile ranging from 0.157 to 0.516. Responsiveness was confirmed by a significant reduction of oral impacts on daily performances in subjects before and after treatment of acute dental pain (p < 0.001). Conclusion. The Croatian OIDP index showed good psychometric properties in terms of construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and responsiveness confirming its appropriateness for use among Croatian population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document