scholarly journals Disproportionate left atrial myopathy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among participants of the PROMIS-HFpEF study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi B. Patel ◽  
Carolyn S. P. Lam ◽  
Sara Svedlund ◽  
Antti Saraste ◽  
Camilla Hage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Systolic Pressure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Flow Reserve

AbstractImpaired left atrial (LA) function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with adverse outcomes. A subgroup of HFpEF may have LA myopathy out of proportion to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction; therefore, we sought to characterize HFpEF patients with disproportionate LA myopathy. In the prospective, multicenter, Prevalence of Microvascular Dysfunction in HFpEF study, we defined disproportionate LA myopathy based on degree of LA reservoir strain abnormality in relation to LV myopathy (LV global longitudinal strain [GLS]) by calculating the residuals from a linear regression of LA reservoir strain and LV GLS. We evaluated associations of disproportionate LA myopathy with hemodynamics and performed a plasma proteomic analysis to identify proteins associated with disproportionate LA myopathy; proteins were validated in an independent sample. Disproportionate LA myopathy correlated with better LV diastolic function but was associated with lower stroke volume reserve after passive leg raise independent of atrial fibrillation (AF). Additionally, disproportionate LA myopathy was associated with higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure, higher pulmonary vascular resistance, and lower coronary flow reserve. Of 248 proteins, we identified and validated 5 proteins (involved in cardiomyocyte stretch, extracellular matrix remodeling, and inflammation) that were associated with disproportionate LA myopathy independent of AF. In HFpEF, LA myopathy may exist out of proportion to LV myopathy. Disproportionate LA myopathy is a distinct HFpEF subtype associated with worse hemodynamics and a distinct proteomic signature, independent of AF.

Significance of the echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial myocardial strain for early diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Kardiologiia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 61 (8) ◽  
pp. 68-75
Author(s):  
E. K. Serezhina ◽  
A. G. Obrezan
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Myocardial Dysfunction ◽  
Systolic Dysfunction ◽  
Myocardial Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Echocardiographic Evaluation

This systematic review is based on 19 studies from Elsevier, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases, which were found by the following keywords: LA strain (left atrial strain), STE (speckle tracking echocardiography), HF (heart failure), and HFpEF (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction). The review focuses on results and conclusions of studies on using the 2D echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial (LA) myocardial strain for early diagnosis of HFpEF in routine clinical practice. Analysis of the studies included into this review showed a significant decline of all LA functions in patients with HFpEF. Also, multiple studies have reported associations between decreased indexes of LA strain and old age, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, left and right ventricular systolic dysfunction, and LV diastolic dysfunction. Thus, the review indicates significant possibilities of using indexes of LA strain in evaluation of early stages of both systolic and diastolic myocardial dysfunction. Notably, LA functional systolic and diastolic indexes are not sufficiently studied despite their growing significance for diagnosis and prognosis of patients with HFpEF. For this reason, in addition to existing models for risk stratification in this disease, including clinical characteristics and/or echocardiographic data, future studies should focus on these parameters. 

scholarly journals Clinical Significance of Mean and Pulse Pressure in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Hypertension ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang-Fei Wei ◽  
Yuzhong Wu ◽  
Ruicong Xue ◽  
Xiao Liu ◽  
Xin He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Pulse Pressure ◽  
Total Mortality ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

It remains debated whether pulse pressure is associated with left ventricular traits and adverse outcomes over and beyond mean arterial pressure (MAP) in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction. We investigated these associations in 3428 patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (51.5% women; mean age, 68.6 years) enrolled in the TOPCAT trial (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist). We computed association sizes and hazards ratios with 1-SD increase in MAP and pulse pressure. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, association sizes ( P ≤0.039) for MAP were 0.016 cm and 0.014 cm for septal and posterior wall thickness, −0.15 for E/A ratio, −0.66 for E/e′, and −0.64% for ejection fraction, independent of pulse pressure. With adjustment additionally applied for MAP, E/A ratio and longitudinal strain increased with higher pulse pressure with association sizes amounting to 0.067 ( P =0.026) and 0.40% ( P =0.023). In multivariable-adjusted analyses of both placebo and spironolactone groups, lower MAP and higher pulse pressure predicted the primary composite end point ( P ≤0.028) and hospitalized HF ( P ≤0.002), whereas MAP was also significantly associated with total mortality ( P ≤0.007). Sensitivity analyses stratified by sex, median age, and region generated confirmatory results with exception for the association of adverse outcomes with pulse pressure in patients with age ≥69 years. In conclusion, the clinical application of MAP and pulse pressure may refine risk estimates in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. This finding may help further investigation for the development of HF with preserved ejection fraction preventive strategies targeting pulsatility and blood pressure control.

scholarly journals Application of the current HFA-ESC consensus guidelines on diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction to a population referred for echocardiography

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Liang ◽  
R Hearse-Morgan ◽  
S Fairbairn ◽  
Y Ismail ◽  
AK Nightingale
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Function ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Diagnostic Algorithm ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Lv Function ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Consensus Guidelines

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND The recent Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) consensus guidelines on diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have developed a simple diagnostic algorithm for clinical use. PURPOSE To assess whether echocardiogram (echo) parameters needed to assess diastolic function are routinely collected in patients referred for assessment of heart failure symptoms. METHODS Retrospective analysis of echo referrals in January 2020 were assessed for parameters of diastolic function as per step 2 of the HF-PEFF diagnostic algorithm.  Echo images and clinical reports were reviewed. Electronic records were utilised to obtain clinical history, blood results (NT-proBNP) and demographic data. RESULTS 1330 patients underwent an echo in our department during January 2020. 83 patients were referred with symptoms of heart failure without prior history of cardiac disease; 20 patients found to have impaired left ventricular (LV) function were excluded from analysis. Of the 63 patients with possible HFpEF, HF-PEFF score was low in 18, intermediate in 33 and high in 12. Median age was 68 years (range 32 to 97 years); 25% had a BMI >30. There was a high prevalence of hypertension (52%), diabetes (19%) and atrial fibrillation (40%) (cf. Table 1). Body surface area (BSA) was documented in 65% of echo reports. Most echo parameters were recorded with the exception of global longitudinal strain (GLS) and indexed LV mass (cf. image 1). NT-proBNP was recorded in only 20 patients (31.7%). 12 patients with an intermediate HF-PEFF score could have been re-categorised to a high score depending on GLS and NT-proBNP (which were not recorded). CONCLUSION More than three quarters of echoes acquired in our department obtained the relevant parameters to assess diastolic function. The addition of BSA, and inclusion of NT-proBNP, and GLS would have been additive to a third of ‘intermediate’ patients to determine definite HFpEF. Our study demonstrates that the current HFA-ESC diagnostic algorithm and HF-PEFF scoring system are easy to use, highly relevant and applicable to current clinical practice. Age >70 years 29 (46.0%) Obesity (BMI >30) 16 (25.4%) Diabetes 12 (19%) Hypertension 33 (52.4%) Atrial Fibrillation 25 (39.7%) ECG abnormalities 18 (28.5%) Table 1. Prevalence of Clinical Risk Factors Abstract Figure. Image 1. HFPEFF score & echo parameters

P5261Feature tracking by CMR: left ventricular dysfunction predicts outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Kammerlander ◽  
J Kraiger ◽  
C Nitsche ◽  
C Dona ◽  
F Duca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Feature Tracking ◽  
Tissue Characterization ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Walking Distance ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prognostic Relevance

Abstract Objectives To investigate the association between global longitudinal strain (GLS) using feature tracking (FT) cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and prognosis in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Background Echocardiography-based studies have demonstrated that in HFpEF left ventricular (LV) strain analyses can detect impaired systolic function despite preserved ejection fraction and might also predict outcome. CMR also allows strain analysis using FT and is furthermore the gold standard for assessment of ventricular volumes and ejection fractions. In addition, T1-mapping allows non-invasive tissue characterization. However, the prognostic relevance of FT-CMR is unknown. In addition right ventricular (RV) FT-CMR is poorly investigated. Methods Consecutive patients with confirmed diagnosis of HFpEF underwent CMR on a 1.5T scanner. We used dedicated software (cvi42, Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc.) for global longitudinal left ventricular strain (LV-GLS) in a 3D and global longitudinal RV strain (RV-GLS) in a 2D model using feature tracking (FT). In addition, we performed uni- and multivariable Cox regression using a combined endpoint of heart failure hospitalizations, and cardiovascular death to determine the prognostic relevance of FT-CMR. Results We included a total of 131 HFpEF patients (70.4±8.6 years old, 70.2% female). Median LV-GLS by FT-CMR was −8% [IQR: −10% to 5%] and median RV-GLS was −11.9% [IQR: −16.57% to −12.23%]. LV and RV GLS values were significantly correlated with LV and RV ejection fractions (r=−0.463, p<0.001 for LV, and r=−0.306, p=0.001 and RV, respectively). 77 (58.8%) events were recorded during a follow-up of 42.0±31.4 months. Patients with an LV-GLS worse than the median (−8%) showed a significantly reduced event-free survival rate (log-rank, p=0.009).In a multivariable Cox-regression model correcting for the strongest clinical variables, including age (HR 1.018 [0.985–1.052], p=0.290), GFR (HR 0.987 [0.975–1.000], p=0.055), diabetes (HR 1.696 [1.028–2.799], p=0.039), and 6-min-walking distance (HR 0.997 [0.995–0.999)], p=0.014), LV-GLS remained significantly associated with outcome (HR 1.093 [1.039–1.150], p=0.001) while RV-GLS had no effect on outcome (p>0.05). Conclusions In patients with HFpEF, LV-GLS but not RV-GLS by FT-CMR is significantly associated with cardiovascular events.

scholarly journals Influence of polypharmacy on patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a retrospective analysis on adverse outcomes in the TOPCAT trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (702) ◽  
pp. e62-e70
Author(s):  
Yuzhong Wu ◽  
Wengen Zhu ◽  
Xin He ◽  
Ruicong Xue ◽  
Weihao Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Heart Function ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction

BackgroundPolypharmacy is common in heart failure (HF), whereas its effect on adverse outcomes in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unclear.AimTo evaluate the prevalence, prognostic impacts, and predictors of polypharmacy in HFpEF patients.Design and settingA retrospective analysis performed on patients in the Americas region (including the US, Canada, Argentina, and Brazil) with symptomatic HF and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45% in the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist) trial, an international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted during 2006–2013 in six countries.MethodPatients were categorised into four groups: controls (<5 medications), polypharmacy (5–9 medications), hyperpolypharmacy, (10–14 medications), and super hyperpolypharmacy (≥15 medications). The outcomes and predictors in all groups were assessed.ResultsOf 1761 participants, the median age was 72 years; 37.5% were polypharmacy, 35.9% were hyperpolypharmacy, and 19.6% were super hyperpolypharmacy, leaving 7.0% having a low medication burden. In multivariable regression models, three experimental groups with a high medication burden were all associated with a reduction in all-cause death, but increased risks of HF hospitalisation and all-cause hospitalisation. Furthermore, several comorbidities (dyslipidemia, thyroid diseases, diabetes mellitus, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), a history of angina pectoris, diastolic blood pressure <80 mmHg, and worse heart function (the New York Heart Association functional classification level III and IV) at baseline were independently associated with a high medication burden among patients with HFpEF.ConclusionA high prevalence of high medication burden at baseline was reported in patients with HFpEF. The high medication burden might increase the risk of hospital readmission, but not the mortality.

scholarly journals Prevalence and correlates of coronary microvascular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PROMIS-HFpEF

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (37) ◽  
pp. 3439-3450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjiv J Shah ◽  
Carolyn S P Lam ◽  
Sara Svedlund ◽  
Antti Saraste ◽  
Camilla Hage ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Endothelial Dysfunction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Microvascular Dysfunction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography ◽  
Flow Reserve

Abstract Aims To date, clinical evidence of microvascular dysfunction in patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been limited. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and its association with systemic endothelial dysfunction, HF severity, and myocardial dysfunction in a well defined, multi-centre HFpEF population. Methods and results This prospective multinational multi-centre observational study enrolled patients fulfilling strict criteria for HFpEF according to current guidelines. Those with known unrevascularized macrovascular coronary artery disease (CAD) were excluded. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) was measured with adenosine stress transthoracic Doppler echocardiography. Systemic endothelial function [reactive hyperaemia index (RHI)] was measured by peripheral arterial tonometry. Among 202 patients with HFpEF, 151 [75% (95% confidence interval 69–81%)] had CMD (defined as CFR <2.5). Patients with CMD had a higher prevalence of current or prior smoking (70% vs. 43%; P = 0.0006) and atrial fibrillation (58% vs. 25%; P = 0.004) compared with those without CMD. Worse CFR was associated with higher urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) and NTproBNP, and lower RHI, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and right ventricular (RV) free wall strain after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, revascularized CAD, smoking, left ventricular mass, and study site (P < 0.05 for all associations). Conclusions PROMIS-HFpEF is the first prospective multi-centre, multinational study to demonstrate a high prevalence of CMD in HFpEF in the absence of unrevascularized macrovascular CAD, and to show its association with systemic endothelial dysfunction (RHI, UACR) as well as markers of HF severity (NTproBNP and RV dysfunction). Microvascular dysfunction may be a promising therapeutic target in HFpEF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document