scholarly journals Wild whale faecal samples as a proxy of anthropogenic impact

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna Marangi ◽  
Sabina Airoldi ◽  
Luciano Beneduce ◽  
Claudio Zaccone
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Metals ◽  
Mediterranean Sea ◽  
Limit Of Detection ◽  
Sperm Whale ◽  
Anthropogenic Activity ◽  
Physeter Macrocephalus ◽  
Sperm Whales ◽  
Faecal Samples ◽  
Fin Whales ◽  
Free Ranging

AbstractThe occurrence of protozoan parasite, bacterial communities, organic pollutants and heavy metals was investigated in free-ranging species of fin (Balaenoptera physalus, n. 2) and sperm (Physeter macrocephalus, n. 2) whales from the Pelagos Sanctuary, Corsican-Ligurian Provencal Basin (Northern-Western Mediterranean Sea). Out of four faecal samples investigated, two from fin whales and one from sperm whale were found positive to Blastocystis sp. A higher number of sequences related to Synergistetes and Spirochaetae were found in sperm whales if compared with fin whales. Moreover, As, Co and Hg were found exclusively in sperm whale faecal samples, while Pb was found only in fin whale faecal samples. The concentration of both PAH and PCB was always below the limit of detection. This is the first report in which the presence of these opportunistic pathogens, bacteria and chemical pollutants have been investigated in faecal samples of free-ranging whale species and the first record of Blastocystis in fin and sperm whales. Thus, this study may provide baseline data on new anthropozoonotic parasite, bacterial records and heavy metals in free-ranging fin and sperm whales, probably as a result of an increasing anthropogenic activity. This survey calls for more integrated research to perform regular monitoring programs supported by national and/or international authorities responsible for preservation of these still vulnerable and threatened whale species in the Mediterranean Sea.

Occurrence of anthropozoonotic parasitic infections and faecal microbes in free-ranging sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) from the Mediterranean Sea

2018 ◽  
Vol 117 (8) ◽  
pp. 2531-2541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Hermosilla ◽  
J. Hirzmann ◽  
L. M. R. Silva ◽  
J. M. Brotons ◽  
M. Cerdà ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mediterranean Sea ◽  
Parasitic Infections ◽  
Physeter Macrocephalus ◽  
Sperm Whales ◽  
The Mediterranean ◽  
Free Ranging

SST fronts and the summer sperm whale distribution in the north-west Mediterranean Sea

2007 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Gannier ◽  
Emilie Praca
Keyword(s):  
Mediterranean Sea ◽  
Feeding Strategy ◽  
Sperm Whale ◽  
Western Mediterranean ◽  
Relative Distribution ◽  
Physeter Macrocephalus ◽  
Sperm Whales ◽  
The North ◽  
North Western ◽  
Sst Fronts

The relative distribution of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) and sea surface temperature (SST) fronts have been studied in summer in the north-western Mediterranean Sea. We used passive acoustic data (778 samples) obtained offshore during dedicated surveys between 1999 and 2004 and Pathfinder/Modis remote sensing data to compute front maps and to calculate mean distances from sperm whale detections (N=132) to SST-fronts. Mean distances from sperm whale acoustic detections to SST-fronts were significantly lower (10.4 km) than from other acoustic samples to those fronts (17.0 km). The same result was obtained when calculating distances from sperm whales to the North Balearic Front surface signature. If sperm whales are commonly observed along the continental slope, we showed that offshore individuals were located close to SST-fronts. This bimodal distribution in the north-western Mediterranean is linked to sperm whale feeding strategy, demonstrating ecological opportunistic behaviour in this high level predator.

Summer social distribution of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) in the Mediterranean Sea

2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 675-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Violaine Drouot ◽  
Alexandre Gannier ◽  
John C. Goold
Keyword(s):  
Mediterranean Sea ◽  
Sperm Whale ◽  
Northern Region ◽  
The Body ◽  
Southern Region ◽  
Physeter Macrocephalus ◽  
Sperm Whales ◽  
The North ◽  
Social Distribution ◽  
The Mediterranean

Sperm whale social distribution was investigated in the Mediterranean Sea, using data collected during summer surveys from 1997 to 2002. Variations in the size of sperm whale schools/underwater aggregations were assessed using both visual and acoustic data. Individual body lengths were estimated acoustically, using the click inter-pulse intervals. Regional comparisons were undertaken, taking the 41° parallel as a north/south boundary. In the southern region, schools of up to seven sperm whales were sighted and calves were relatively frequent. The animals ranged between 8·6 m and 13·1 m long. In the northern region, school sizes were significantly smaller, with a maximum of three whales sighted at the surface. However, the acoustic survey showed that sperm whales form loose aggregations of up to five animals in certain areas. Whales detected in the north were 12·6 m long on average, and the body size range was relatively small. This summer survey demonstrated a segregation of males, in the north, from larger schools including calves, which seemed to be confined to the southern region.

POPs in free-ranging pilot whales, sperm whales and fin whales from the Mediterranean Sea: Influence of biological and ecological factors

2015 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 185-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianna Pinzone ◽  
Hélène Budzinski ◽  
Aurélie Tasciotti ◽  
Denis Ody ◽  
Gilles Lepoint ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mediterranean Sea ◽  
Ecological Factors ◽  
Sperm Whales ◽  
The Mediterranean ◽  
Fin Whales ◽  
Pilot Whales ◽  
Free Ranging

scholarly journals A Preliminary Comparison on Faecal Microbiomes of Free-Ranging Large Baleen (Balaenoptera musculus, B. physalus, B. borealis) and Toothed (Physeter macrocephalus) Whales

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie P. Glaeser ◽  
Liliana M. R. Silva ◽  
Rui Prieto ◽  
Mónica A. Silva ◽  
Angel Franco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Physeter Macrocephalus ◽  
Large Mammals ◽  
Sperm Whales ◽  
Baleen Whales ◽  
Faecal Samples ◽  
The Family ◽  
High Contribution ◽  
Phylogenetic Composition ◽  
Free Ranging

AbstractLarge baleen and toothed whales play crucial ecological roles in oceans; nonetheless, very little is known about their intestinal microbiomes. Based on striking differences in natural history and thus in feeding behaviours, it can be expected that intestinal microbiomes of large baleen whales and toothed whales are different. To test this hypothesis, the phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiomes was investigated by a 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence–based approach for Bacteria and Archaea. Faecal samples from free-ranging large whales collected off the Azores Archipelago (Portugal) were used, comprising 13 individual baleen whales (one sei, two blue and ten fin whales) and four sperm whales. The phylogenetic composition of the Bacteria faecal microbiomes of baleen and toothed whales showed no significant differences at the phylum level. However, significant differences were detected at the family and genus levels. Most abundant phyla were Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Tenericutes and Spirochaeta. Few highly abundant bacterial genera were identified as key taxa with a high contribution to differences among baleen and toothed whales microbiomes. Only few archaeal sequences were detected, primarily Methanomassiliicoccales representing potential methanogenic Archaea. This is the first study that directly compares the faecal bacterial and archaeal microbiomes of free-ranging baleen and toothed whales which represent the two parvorders of Cetacea which members are fully aquatic large mammals which were evolutionary split millions of years ago.

scholarly journals Severity Scoring of Behavioral Responses of Sperm Whales (Physeter macrocephalus) to Novel Continuous versus Conventional Pulsed Active Sonar

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 444
Author(s):  
Charlotte Curé ◽  
Saana Isojunno ◽  
Marije L. Siemensma ◽  
Paul J. Wensveen ◽  
Célia Buisson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Responses ◽  
Physeter Macrocephalus ◽  
Vital Rates ◽  
Sperm Whales ◽  
Experimental Conditions ◽  
Active Sonar ◽  
Lower Amplitude ◽  
Pilot Whales ◽  
New Generation ◽  
Free Ranging

Controlled exposure experiments (CEEs) have demonstrated that naval pulsed active sonar (PAS) can induce costly behavioral responses in cetaceans similar to antipredator responses. New generation continuous active sonars (CAS) emit lower amplitude levels but more continuous signals. We conducted CEEs with PAS, CAS and no-sonar control on free-ranging sperm whales in Norway. Two panels blind to experimental conditions concurrently inspected acoustic-and-movement-tag data and visual observations of tagged whales and used an established severity scale (0–9) to assign scores to putative responses. Only half of the exposures elicited a response, indicating overall low responsiveness in sperm whales. Responding whales (10 of 12) showed more, and more severe responses to sonar compared to no-sonar. Moreover, the probability of response increased when whales were previously exposed to presence of predatory and/or competing killer or long-finned pilot whales. Various behavioral change types occurred over a broad range of severities (1–6) during CAS and PAS. When combining all behavioral types, the proportion of responses to CAS was significantly higher than no-sonar but not different from PAS. Responses potentially impacting vital rates i.e., with severity ≥4, were initiated at received cumulative sound exposure levels (dB re 1 μPa2 s) of 137–177 during CAS and 143–181 during PAS.

scholarly journals Estimated Abundances of Cetacean Species in the Northeast Atlantic from Norwegian Shipboard Surveys Conducted in 2014–2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deanna Leonard ◽  
Nils Øien
Keyword(s):  
Barents Sea ◽  
Humpback Whales ◽  
Physeter Macrocephalus ◽  
Sperm Whales ◽  
Target Species ◽  
Independent Observer ◽  
Southern Boundary ◽  
Norwegian Sea ◽  
Northeast Atlantic ◽  
Fin Whales

A ship-based mosaic survey of Northeast Atlantic cetaceans was conducted over a 5-year period between 2014–2018. The area surveyed extends from the North Sea in the south (southern boundary at 53oN), to the ice edge of the Barents Sea and the Greenland Sea. Survey vessels were equipped with 2 independent observer platforms that detected whales in passing mode and applied tracking procedures for the target species, common minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata acutorostrata). Here we present abundance estimates for all non-target species for which there were sufficient sightings. We estimate the abundance of fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) to be 11,387 (CV=0.17, 95% CI: 8,072–16,063), of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) to be 10,708 (CV=0.38, 95% CI: 4,906–23,370), of sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) to be 5,704 (CV=0.26, 95% CI: 3,374–9,643), of killer whales (Orcinus orca) to be 15,056 (CV=0.29, 95% CI: 8,423–26,914), of harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) to be 255,929 (CV=0.20, 95% CI: 172,742–379,175), dolphins of genus Lagenorhynchus to be 192,767 (CV=0.25, 95% CI: 114,033–325,863), and finally of northern bottlenose whales (Hyperoodon ampullatus) to be 7,800 (CV=0.28, 95% CI: 4,373–13,913). Additionally, our survey effort in the Norwegian Sea in 2015 contributed to the 6th North Atlantic Sightings Survey (NASS) and the survey was extended into the waters north and east of Iceland around Jan Mayen island. This NASS extension, along with our Norwegian Sea survey in 2015, was used to estimate the abundance of fin whales, humpback whales, and sperm whales. All estimates presented used mark-recapture distance sampling techniques and were thus corrected for perception bias. Our estimates do not account for additional variance due to distributional shifts between years or biases due to availability or responsive movement.

scholarly journals Architecture of the sperm whale forehead facilitates ramming combat

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e1895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Panagiotopoulou ◽  
Panagiotis Spyridis ◽  
Hyab Mehari Abraha ◽  
David R. Carrier ◽  
Todd C. Pataky
Keyword(s):  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Structural Engineering ◽  
Sperm Whale ◽  
Physeter Macrocephalus ◽  
Sperm Whales ◽  
Moby Dick ◽  
Unique Structure ◽  
Complex Structural ◽  
Von Mises ◽  
Von Mises Stresses

Herman Melville’s novelMoby Dickwas inspired by historical instances in which large sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus L.) sank 19th century whaling ships by ramming them with their foreheads. The immense forehead of sperm whales is possibly the largest, and one of the strangest, anatomical structures in the animal kingdom. It contains two large oil-filled compartments, known as the “spermaceti organ” and “junk,” that constitute up to one-quarter of body mass and extend one-third of the total length of the whale. Recognized as playing an important role in echolocation, previous studies have also attributed the complex structural configuration of the spermaceti organ and junk to acoustic sexual selection, acoustic prey debilitation, buoyancy control, and aggressive ramming. Of these additional suggested functions, ramming remains the most controversial, and the potential mechanical roles of the structural components of the spermaceti organ and junk in ramming remain untested. Here we explore the aggressive ramming hypothesis using a novel combination of structural engineering principles and probabilistic simulation to determine if the unique structure of the junk significantly reduces stress in the skull during quasi-static impact. Our analyses indicate that the connective tissue partitions in the junk reduce von Mises stresses across the skull and that the load-redistribution functionality of the former is insensitive to moderate variation in tissue material parameters, the thickness of the partitions, and variations in the location and angle of the applied load. Absence of the connective tissue partitions increases skull stresses, particularly in the rostral aspect of the upper jaw, further hinting of the important role the architecture of the junk may play in ramming events. Our study also found that impact loads on the spermaceti organ generate lower skull stresses than an impact on the junk. Nevertheless, whilst an impact on the spermaceti organ would reduce skull stresses, it would also cause high compressive stresses on the anterior aspect of the organ and the connective tissue case, possibly making these structures more prone to failure. This outcome, coupled with the facts that the spermaceti organ houses sensitive and essential sonar producing structures and the rostral portion of junk, rather than the spermaceti organ, is frequently a site of significant scarring in mature males suggest that whales avoid impact with the spermaceti organ. Although the unique structure of the junk certainly serves multiple functions, our results are consistent with the hypothesis that the structure also evolved to function as a massive battering ram during male-male competition.

Global mercury and selenium concentrations in skin from free-ranging sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus)

2013 ◽  
Vol 450-451 ◽  
pp. 59-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Savery ◽  
David C. Evers ◽  
Sandra S. Wise ◽  
Carolyne Falank ◽  
James Wise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physeter Macrocephalus ◽  
Sperm Whales ◽  
Free Ranging

scholarly journals Socially segregated, sympatric sperm whale clans in the Atlantic Ocean

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 160061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane Gero ◽  
Anne Bøttcher ◽  
Hal Whitehead ◽  
Peter Teglberg Madsen
Keyword(s):  
Social Interactions ◽  
Sperm Whale ◽  
Mantel Test ◽  
Good Evidence ◽  
Physeter Macrocephalus ◽  
Sperm Whales ◽  
Sympatric Populations ◽  
The Pacific ◽  
Matrix Correlation ◽  
Social Units

Sperm whales ( Physeter macrocephalus ) are unusual in that there is good evidence for sympatric populations with distinct culturally determined behaviour, including potential acoustic markers of the population division. In the Pacific, socially segregated, vocal clans with distinct dialects coexist; by contrast, geographical variation in vocal repertoire in the Atlantic has been attributed to drift. We examine networks of acoustic repertoire similarity and social interactions for 11 social units in the Eastern Caribbean. We find the presence of two socially segregated, sympatric vocal clans whose dialects differ significantly both in terms of categorical coda types produced by each clan (Mantel test between clans: matrix correlation = 0.256; p  ≤ 0.001) and when using classification-free similarity which ignores defined types (Mantel test between clans: matrix correlation = 0.180; p  ≤ 0.001). The more common of the two clans makes a characteristic 1 + 1 + 3 coda, while the other less often sighted clan makes predominantly regular codas. Units were only observed associating with other units within their vocal clan. This study demonstrates that sympatric vocal clans do exist in the Atlantic, that they define a higher order level of social organization as they do in the Pacific, and suggests that cultural identity at the clan level is probably important in this species worldwide.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document