scholarly journals Climate-smart agriculture practices influence weed density and diversity in cereal-based agri-food systems of western Indo-Gangetic plains

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanuman S. Jat ◽  
Virender Kumar ◽  
Suresh K. Kakraliya ◽  
Ahmed M. Abdallah ◽  
Ashim Datta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Weed Suppression ◽  
Subsurface Drip Irrigation ◽  
Weed Species ◽  
Flood Irrigation ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Weed Density ◽  
Smart Agriculture ◽  
Subsurface Drip

AbstractClimate-smart agriculture (CSA)-based management practices are getting popular across South-Asia as an alternative to the conventional system for particular weed suppression, resources conservation and environmental quality. An 8-year study (2012–2013 to 2019–2020) was conducted to understand the shift in weed density and diversity under different CSA-based management practices called scenarios (Sc). These Sc involved: Sc1, conventional tillage (CT)-based rice–wheat system with flood irrigation (farmers’ practice); Sc2, CT-rice, zero tillage (ZT)-wheat–mungbean with flood irrigation (partial CA-based); Sc3, ZT rice–wheat–mungbean with flood irrigation (partial CSA-based rice); Sc4, ZT maize–wheat–mungbean with flood irrigation (partial CSA-based maize); Sc5, ZT rice–wheat–mungbean with subsurface drip irrigation (full CSA-based rice); and Sc6, ZT maize–wheat–mungbean with subsurface drip irrigation (full CSA-based maize). The most abundant weed species were P. minor > A. arvensis > M. indicus > C. album and were favored by farmers’ practice. However, CSA-based management practices suppressed these species and favored S. nigrum and R. dentatus and the effect of CSAPs was more evident in the long-term. Maximum total weed density was observed for Sc1, while minimum value was recorded under full CSA-based maize systems, where seven weed-species vanished, and P. minor density declined to 0.33 instead of 25.93 plant m−2 after 8-years of continuous cultivation. Full CSA-based maize–wheat system could be a promising alternative for the conveniently managed rice–wheat system in weed suppression in north-west India.

Subsurface drip irrigation in raised bed tomato production. II. Soil acidification under current commercial practice

Soil Research ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 1305 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Stork ◽  
P. H. Jerie ◽  
A. P. L. Callinan
Keyword(s):  
Soil Ph ◽  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Soil Layer ◽  
Subsurface Drip Irrigation ◽  
Tomato Production ◽  
Commercial Practice ◽  
Murray Darling Basin ◽  
Subsurface Drip ◽  
Basin Region

The effects of ammonium-based fertilisers on the soil pH of vegetable beds that utilised subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) for commercial tomato production were investigated at field sites in the southern Murray–Darling Basin region (SMDB). The soils at these sites were Vertosols (sites 1, 3, 4, and 5) and a Chromosol (site 2). At site 1, rapid transport and hydrolysis of urea occurred within the 0–90 cm soil layer of vegetable beds after a 6-mm fertigation of 30 kg urea-N/ha during cropping. Soil pH decreased by 0.2–0.4 units in individual 15-cm soil layers up to 90 cm within 12 days after the fertigation. A longer study at site 1 showed that there was severe acidification in topsoil and subsoil by the second consecutive year of SDI cropping. The rate of acidification was highest, at 52 kmol H+/ha.year, immediately beneath the dripline, in the 15–30 cm soil layer. Topsoil and subsoil acidification was also evident in vegetable beds at sites 2, 3, 4, and 5 after 2 consecutive years of tomato cropping using SDI. The results from the 5 sites indicated that acidification under SDI production may be widespread. A survey of 21 other sites in the SMDB under similar production showed that one-third of the sites had soil pH ≤6.0 in their 0–30 cm soil layer. Several soil types were individually represented at acid and alkaline pH levels, by 2 or more sites. This indicated that management practices influenced the change in soil pH for a given soil type. Altogether, the combined results of these studies strongly indicated that surface and subsoil acidification can occur in soils used for intensive SDI production. This may diminish their productivity in the long term.

scholarly journals Subsurface Drip Irrigation (SDI) for Enhanced Water Distribution: SDI - Seepage Hybrid System

EDIS ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lincoln Zotarelli ◽  
Libby Rens ◽  
Charles Barrett ◽  
Daniel J. Cantliffe ◽  
Michael D. Dukes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Water Distribution ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Irrigation Management ◽  
Soil Surface ◽  
High Water ◽  
Subsurface Drip Irrigation ◽  
Irrigation Systems ◽  
Seepage Irrigation ◽  
Subsurface Drip

In terms of water use efficiency, the traditional seepage irrigation systems commonly used in areas with high water tables are one of the most inefficient methods of irrigation, though some irrigation management practices can contribute to better soil moisture uniformity. Subsurface drip irrigation systems apply water below the soil surface by microirrigation, improving the water distribution and time required to raise the water table for seepage irrigation. This 6-page fact sheet was written by Lincoln Zotarelli, Libby Rens, Charles Barrett, Daniel J. Cantliffe, Michael D. Dukes, Mark Clark, and Steven Lands, and published by the UF Department of Horticultural Sciences, March 2013. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/hs1217

scholarly journals A 2020 Vision of Subsurface Drip Irrigation in the U.S.

2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1319-1343
Author(s):  
Freddie R. Lamm ◽  
Paul D. Colaizzi ◽  
Ronald B. Sorensen ◽  
James P. Bordovsky ◽  
Mark Dougherty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Best Management Practices ◽  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Subsurface Drip Irrigation ◽  
List Type ◽  
Commercial Agriculture ◽  
Irrigation Systems ◽  
Subsurface Drip ◽  
The U.S ◽  
Alternative Irrigation

HighlightsSubsurface drip irrigation (SDI) has continued to expand in irrigation area within the U.S. during the last 15 years.Research with SDI continues for multiple crop types (fiber, grain and oilseed, horticultural, forage, and turf).SDI usage on many crops has matured through research and development of appropriate strategies and technologiesDespite some persistent challenges to successful use of SDI, important opportunities exist for further adoption.Abstract. Subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) offers several advantages over alternative irrigation systems when it is designed and installed correctly and when best management practices are adopted. These advantages include the ability to apply water and nutrients directly and efficiently within the crop root zone. Disadvantages of SDI in commercial agriculture relative to alternative irrigation systems include greater capital cost per unit land area (except for small land parcels), unfamiliar management and maintenance protocols that can exacerbate the potential for emitter clogging, the visibility of system attributes (components and design characteristics) and performance, and the susceptibility to damage (i.e., rodents and tillage) of the subsurface driplines. Despite these disadvantages, SDI continues to be adopted in commercial agriculture in the U.S., and research efforts to evaluate and develop SDI systems continue as well. This article summarizes recent progress in research (2010 to 2020) and the status of commercial adoption of SDI, along with a discussion of current challenges and future opportunities. Keywords: Drip Irrigation, Irrigation, Irrigation systems, Microirrigation, SDI, Water management.

scholarly journals Water-Saving Potential of Subsurface Drip Irrigation For Winter Wheat

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 2978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Umair ◽  
Tabassum Hussain ◽  
Hanbing Jiang ◽  
Ayesha Ahmad ◽  
Jiawei Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Water Use Efficiency ◽  
Water Use ◽  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Water Productivity ◽  
Subsurface Drip Irrigation ◽  
Flood Irrigation ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
Subsurface Drip ◽  
Surface Drip Irrigation

Groundwater plays a major role in agro-hydrological processes in the North China Plain (NCP). The NCP is facing a water deficit, due to a rapid decline in the water table because of the double cropping system. A two crop (maize and wheat) rotation is required to balance the food supply and demand, which leads to an imbalance between evapotranspiration (ET) and precipitation. Thus, there has been a decline of about 1.35 m yr−1 of groundwater (Luancheng Agroecosystem Experimental Station (LAES), NCP) during the last 10 years. Lysimeter experiments were conducted under different irrigation treatments (flood, surface drip, and subsurface drip) to account for ET in the selection of a suitable irrigation method. Subsurface drip irrigation reduced ET by 26% compared to flood irrigation, and 15% compared to surface drip irrigation, with significant grain yield and biomass formation due to decreased evaporation losses. Grain yield, yield components, and above ground biomass were similar in subsurface drip and flood irrigation. However, these biomass parameters were lower with surface drip irrigation. Furthermore, subsurface drip irrigation increased the crop water productivity (24.95%) and irrigation water productivity (19.59%) compared to flood irrigation. The subsurface irrigated plants showed an increase in net photosynthesis (~10%), higher intrinsic water use efficiency (~36%), lower transpiration rate (~22%), and saved 80 mm of water compared to flood irrigation. Our findings indicate that subsurface drip irrigation can be adopted in the NCP to increase water use efficiency, optimize grain yield, and minimize water loss in order to address scarcity.

Subsurface drip irrigation in raised bed tomato production. I. Nitrogen and phosphate losses under current commercial practice

Soil Research ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 1283 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. R. Stork ◽  
P. H. Jerie ◽  
A. P. L. Callinan
Keyword(s):  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Management Practices ◽  
Inorganic Nitrogen ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
Subsurface Drip Irrigation ◽  
Tomato Production ◽  
Post Harvest ◽  
Commercial Practice ◽  
Subsurface Drip ◽  
Fertiliser Use

The leaching of inorganic nitrogen and phosphate was studied at field sites that utilised subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) for commercial production of processing tomatoes. Irrigation expended for the establishment of crops, at emergence, accounted for 34% of the seasonal total in a Rochester clay (site 1) and 25% in a Binabbin clay (site 2). In the period after emergence and up to crop harvests, irrigation and rainfall amounted to 88% and 105% of calculated crop evapotranspiration for site 1 and site 2, respectively. Drainage between the commencement of irrigation and crop harvests amounted to 66 mm below 2 m at site 1 and 60 mm below 0.9 m at site 2. Total irrigation caused a 2- and 5-fold depletion of soil chloride at site 1 (within 2 m) and site 2 (within 0.9 m), respectively. The drainage and chloride depletion showed that irrigation regimes at these sites were conducive to the leaching of fertiliser inputs. It was calculated that ~32 kg NO–3-N + NH+4-N/ha and 7 kg HPO2–4-P/ha was leached below 2 m during irrigation at site 1. At site 2, ~75 kg NO–3-N + NH+4-N/ha was leached below 0.9 m during irrigation.Post harvest amounts of inorganic nitrogen and phosphate at site 1 and site 2 indicated that fertiliser applications exceeded total crop uptake of both compounds. Post harvest quantities of inorganic nitrogen and phosphate at several other commercial locations (sites 3, 4, 5, 6) showed that excessive fertiliser use was not restricted to site 1 and site 2. At site 1, between an early autumn harvest and early spring, when vegetable beds were fallow, the leaching losses of post harvest amounts of both compounds below 2 m were 137 kg NO–3-N + NH+4-N/ha and 11 kg HPO2–4-P/ha. The irrigation and fertiliser management practices at all sites were similar to those reported for studies of SDI production of other vegetable and grain crops. Altogether, these results indicated that the effects of SDI combined with excessive fertiliser inputs in current commercial practice may cause the leaching of significant amounts of nitrogen and phosphate to groundwater depths.

Subsurface Drip Irrigation and Fertigation of Broccoli

2002 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Thompson ◽  
Thomas A. Doerge ◽  
Ronald E. Godin
Keyword(s):  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Subsurface Drip Irrigation ◽  
Subsurface Drip

Behaviour of the fecal pollution indicators in a soil irrigated with treated wastewater under onsurface and subsurface drip irrigation

2000 ◽  
Vol 42 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 75-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Campos ◽  
G. Oron ◽  
M. Salgot ◽  
L. Gillerman
Keyword(s):  
Organic Matter ◽  
Drip Irrigation ◽  
Organic Matter Content ◽  
Fecal Pollution ◽  
Fecal Coliforms ◽  
Subsurface Drip Irrigation ◽  
Treated Wastewater ◽  
Reclaimed Wastewater ◽  
Pollution Indicators ◽  
Subsurface Drip

A critical objective for any wastewater reuse programme is to minimise health and environmental hazard. When applying wastewater to soil–plant systems, it is to be noted that the passage of water through the soil considerably reduces the number of microorganisms carried by the reclaimed wastewater. Factors that affect survival include number and type of microorganisms, soil organic matter content, temperature, moisture, pH, rainfall, sunlight, protection provided by foliage and antagonism by soil microflora. The purpose of this work was to examine the behaviour of fecal pollution indicators in a soil irrigated with treated wastewater under onsurface and subsurface drip irrigation. The experiment was conducted in a vineyard located at a commercial farm near the City of Arad (Israel). Wastewater and soil samples were monitored during the irrigation period and examined for fecal coliforms, somatic and F+ coliphages and helminth eggs. Physico-chemical parameters were controlled in order to determine their relationship with removal of microorganisms. The results showed high reduction of the concentration of microorganisms when wastewater moves through the soil; and a good correlation between the reduction of fecal pollution indicators and moisture content, organic matter concentration and pH. The application of secondary treated domestic wastewater in this specific soil and under these irrigation systems affect the survival of microorganisms, thus reducing the health and environmental risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document