Ion exchange-precipitation for nutrient recovery from dilute wastewater

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (6) ◽  
pp. 832-838 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. T. Williams ◽  
D. H. Zitomer ◽  
B. K. Mayer

Regulated phosphorus (P) and nitrogen (N) discharges and the cost of fertilizer provide economic drivers for nutrient removal and recovery from wastewater.

1981 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Liberti ◽  
Gianfranco Boari ◽  
Domenico Petruzzelli ◽  
Roberto Passino

2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (18) ◽  
pp. 4317-4324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berta Galán ◽  
David Castañeda ◽  
Inmaculada Ortiz

2020 ◽  
pp. 102-138
Author(s):  
Dafne Crutchik Pedemonte ◽  
Nicola Frison ◽  
Carlota Tayà ◽  
Sergio Ponsa ◽  
Francesco Fatone

This chapter gives an overview on the main technologies for nutrient removal from industrial wastewater by focusing on principles and operational parameters of real applications. A plethora of technologies can achieve the nutrients removal from wastewater depending mainly on their concentration and forms; however, biological nitrification and denitrification and chemical precipitation are the most common processes used today to remove nitrogen and phosphorus, respectively. Stripping, adsorption and membrane based processes for nutrients recovery can be economically viable only when nitrogen concentration is higher than 1.5-2 gN/L. On the other hand, phosphorus recovery should always be pursued and struvite crystalization is the most common option that should be evaluated together with biological phosphorus accumulation in sludge or plants for the following post-processing and valorization.


2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathanial Cahill ◽  
Michael Popp ◽  
Charles West ◽  
Alexandre Rocateli ◽  
Amanda Ashworth ◽  
...  

This article analyzes economic tradeoffs among harvest date, fertilizer applied, nutrient removal, and switchgrass yield as they vary with respect to input and output prices. Economic sensitivity analyses suggest that higher biomass prices lead to earlier harvest. Optimal harvest time occurs beyond time of maximum yield because nutrient removal in the biomass is an important economic consideration. Switchgrass price premia that reflect the cost of non-optimal harvest time are driven by standing crop yield loss, nutrient removal, storage loss, and opportunity cost. These price premia could provide a mechanism to compensate producers for alternative harvest times and aid with logistics management.


2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaap H.J.M. van der Graaf

In the Netherlands, interest in advanced treatment is increasing now that almost all wastewater treatment plants apply full biological treatment and nutrient removal. The resulting effluents have an excellent quality which can be improved further by applying advanced treatment processes like flocculating filtration, membrane filtration, UV or activated carbon, and others. The treated effluent can be re-used for various purposes, as process water, household water, urban water, for groundwater suppletion and drinking water. Nowadays many applications are investigated. In order to confirm the applicability pilot test investigations are done at various WWTPs. The results are promising; the cost estimations show increasing prospects. This will finally lead to the maturity of the advanced treatment. It will certainly contribute to a more sustainable water cycle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document