Introduction. The function of root canal fillings is to seal the root canal
system. The important physical property necessary for sealers to achieve this
is low solubility. However, any therapeutic effect of calcium hydroxide-based
sealers is dependent on the calcium hydroxide being in ionized form, which
implies that the material must be at least partly soluble. Objective. The
objective of our study was to compare weight changes of Acroseal and Apexit,
conventional calcium hydroxide-based sealer and AH Plus, epoxy-amine resin
sealer in Hank?s solution at different exposure times. Methods. The
standardized samples of each material were weighed and immersed in the Hank?s
solution for 1 h, 24 h, 96 h, 14 days and 28 days. After these exposure
times, they were removed, dried, and weighed again. Mean weight changes were
determined and the differences between sealers were analysed statistically
using a one-way ANOVA. Results. The highest differences in mass were observed
in Apexit, 1.52%, and were significantly different from Acroseal, 0.93%
(p<0.05) and AH Plus, 0.45% (p<0.05). There were no significant differences
between Acroseal and AH Plus, except for 96 h period. Conclusion. Under the
conditions of our study, it may be concluded that the Acroseal sealer
presented the behaviour more like epoxy-based material, AH Plus, than calcium
hydroxide sealer, Apexit.