Regeneration of Pristine HZSM-5 Extrudates during the Production of Deeply-Deoxygenated Bio-oil from Ex-Situ Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass in a Bench-Scale Fluidised-Bed Reactor

Author(s):  
Nuttapan Promsampao ◽  
Nuwong Chollacoop ◽  
Adisak Pattiya

Ex-situ catalytic fast pyrolysis (ex-CFP) of biomass applying ZSM-5 catalysts is an effective method for deoxygenating the pyrolysis vapour, thus producing low-oxygen bio-oil in a single step. The catalysts deactivate...

Fuel ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 207 ◽  
pp. 413-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristiina Iisa ◽  
Richard J. French ◽  
Kellene A. Orton ◽  
Abhijit Dutta ◽  
Joshua A. Schaidle

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismail Cem Kantarli ◽  
Stylianos D Stefanidis ◽  
Konstantinos G Kalogiannis ◽  
Angelos A Lappas

The objective of this study was to examine the potential of poultry wastes to be used as feedstock in non-catalytic and catalytic fast pyrolysis processes, which is a continuation of our previous research on their conversion into biofuel via slow pyrolysis and hydrothermal conversion. Both poultry meal and poultry litter were examined, initially in a fixed bed bench-scale reactor using ZSM-5 and MgO as catalysts. Pyrolysis of poultry meal yielded high amounts of bio-oil, while pyrolysis of poultry litter yielded high amounts of solid residue owing to its high ash content. MgO was found to be more effective for the deoxygenation of bio-oil and reduction of undesirable compounds, by converting mainly the acids in the pyrolysis vapours of poultry meal into aliphatic hydrocarbons. ZSM-5 favoured the formation of both aromatic compounds and undesirable nitrogenous compounds. Overall, all bio-oil samples from the pyrolysis of poultry wastes contained relatively high amounts of nitrogen compared with bio-oils from lignocellulosic biomass, ca. 9 wt.% in the case of poultry meal and ca. 5–8 wt.% in the case of poultry litter. This was attributed to the high nitrogen content of the poultry wastes, unlike that of lignocellulosic biomass. Poultry meal yielded the highest amount of bio-oil and was selected as optimum feedstock to be scaled-up in a semi-pilot scale fluidised bed biomass pyrolysis unit with the ZSM-5 catalyst. Pyrolysis in the fluidised bed reactor was more efficient for deoxygenation of the bio-oil vapours, as evidenced from the lower oxygen content of the bio-oil.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 2533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daya Shankar Pandey ◽  
Giannis Katsaros ◽  
Christian Lindfors ◽  
James J. Leahy ◽  
Savvas A. Tassou

Livestock production is among the most rapidly growing sectors of the agricultural economy driven primarily by growing demand for animal protein, but also posing significant waste disposal issues and environmental impacts. Moreover, opportunities exist for utilising animal waste at the farm level for heat and power generation (thermal conversion) which can contribute to economic sustainability and also provide a bio-fertiliser for soil amendment. The present study is focused on energy and nutrient recovery from poultry litter using a thermochemical conversion technology (fast pyrolysis). The formation of products (gases, biochar and bio-oil) during the fast pyrolysis of poultry litter was experimentally investigated in a laboratory-scale bubbling fluidised bed reactor. Pyrolytic gases accounted for 15–22 wt.% of the product. The carbon content in biochar increased from 47 to 48.5 wt.% with an increase in the pyrolysis temperature. Phosphorous and potassium recovery in the biochar were over 75%, suggesting that it could be used as an organic soil amendment. The high ash content in poultry litter (14.3 wt.%) resulted in low bio-oil and high biochar yield. The bio-oil yield was over 27 wt.% with a higher heating value of 32.17 MJ/kg (dry basis). The total acid number of the bio-oil decreased from 46.30 to 38.50 with an increase in temperature. The nitrogen content in the bio-oil produced from the poultry litter (>7 wt.%) was significantly higher compared to bio-oil produced from the wood (0.1 wt.%).


BioResources ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-Bo Zhang ◽  
Qiang Lu ◽  
Xiao-Ning Ye ◽  
Ling-Ping Xiao ◽  
Chang-Qing Dong ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
R H Liu ◽  
C J Shen ◽  
H J Wu ◽  
C J Deng ◽  
S Y Liu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document