X-chromosome reactivation: a concise review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Spaziano ◽  
Dr Irene Cantone
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Epigenetic Modifications ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Cell Divisions ◽  
Concise Review ◽  
Inactive X Chromosome ◽  
Silencing Pathways

Mammalian females (XX) silence transcription on one of the two X chromosomes to compensate the expression dosage with males (XY). This process — named X-chromosome inactivation — entails a variety of epigenetic modifications that act synergistically to maintain silencing and make it heritable through cell divisions. Genes along the inactive X chromosome are, indeed, refractory to reactivation. Nonetheless, X-chromosome reactivation can occur alongside with epigenome reprogramming or by perturbing multiple silencing pathways. Here we review the events associated with X-chromosome reactivation during in vivo and in vitro reprogramming and highlight recent efforts in inducing Xi reactivation by molecular perturbations. This provides us with a first understanding of the mechanisms underlying X-chromosome reactivation, which could be tackled for therapeutic purposes.

scholarly journals Escape from X Chromosome Inactivation and the Female Predominance in Autoimmune Diseases

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1114
Author(s):  
Ali Youness ◽  
Charles-Henry Miquel ◽  
Jean-Charles Guéry
Keyword(s):  
Autoimmune Diseases ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Gene Dosage ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Female Sex Hormones ◽  
Inactive X Chromosome ◽  
Immune Related Genes ◽  
Female Specific

Women represent 80% of people affected by autoimmune diseases. Although, many studies have demonstrated a role for sex hormone receptor signaling, particularly estrogens, in the direct regulation of innate and adaptive components of the immune system, recent data suggest that female sex hormones are not the only cause of the female predisposition to autoimmunity. Besides sex steroid hormones, growing evidence points towards the role of X-linked genetic factors. In female mammals, one of the two X chromosomes is randomly inactivated during embryonic development, resulting in a cellular mosaicism, where about one-half of the cells in a given tissue express either the maternal X chromosome or the paternal one. X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is however not complete and 15 to 23% of genes from the inactive X chromosome (Xi) escape XCI, thereby contributing to the emergence of a female-specific heterogeneous population of cells with bi-allelic expression of some X-linked genes. Although the direct contribution of this genetic mechanism in the female susceptibility to autoimmunity still remains to be established, the cellular mosaicism resulting from XCI escape is likely to create a unique functional plasticity within female immune cells. Here, we review recent findings identifying key immune related genes that escape XCI and the relationship between gene dosage imbalance and functional responsiveness in female cells.

scholarly journals Condensin DC spreads linearly and bidirectionally from recruitment sites to create loop-anchored TADs in C. elegans

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Sebastian Jimenez ◽  
Jun Kim ◽  
Bhavana Ragipani ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
Lena Annika Street ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Molecular Motors ◽  
Sequence Motif ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Eukaryotic Chromosome ◽  
Multiple Copies

AbstractCondensins are molecular motors that compact DNA for chromosome segregation and gene regulation. In vitro experiments have begun to elucidate the mechanics of condensin function but how condensin loading and translocation along DNA controls eukaryotic chromosome structure in vivo remains poorly understood. To address this question, we took advantage of a specialized condensin, which organizes the 3D conformation of X chromosomes to mediate dosage compensation (DC) in C. elegans. Condensin DC is recruited and spreads from a small number of recruitment elements on the X chromosome (rex). We found that ectopic insertion of rex sites on an autosome leads to bidirectional spreading of the complex over hundreds of kilobases. On the X chromosome, strong rex sites contain multiple copies of a 12-bp sequence motif and act as TAD borders. Inserting a strong rex and ectopically recruiting the complex on the X chromosome or an autosome creates a loop-anchored TAD. Unlike the CTCF system, which controls TAD formation by cohesin, direction of the 12-bp motif does not control the specificity of loops. In an X;V fusion chromosome, condensin DC linearly spreads into V and increases 3D DNA contacts, but fails to form TADs in the absence of rex sites. Finally, we provide in vivo evidence for the loop extrusion hypothesis by targeting multiple dCas9-Suntag complexes to an X chromosome repeat region. Consistent with linear translocation along DNA, condensin DC accumulates at the block site. Together, our results support a model whereby strong rex sites act as insulation elements through recruitment and bidirectional spreading of condensin DC molecules and form loop-anchored TADs.

scholarly journals Identification of Developmentally Specific Enhancers for Tsix in the Regulation of X Chromosome Inactivation

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 2757-2769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Stavropoulos ◽  
Rebecca K. Rowntree ◽  
Jeannie T. Lee
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Binary Switch ◽  
Inactive X Chromosome ◽  
The Future ◽  
Hypersensitive Sites ◽  
Mammalian Female

ABSTRACT X chromosome inactivation silences one of two X chromosomes in the mammalian female cell and is controlled by a binary switch that involves interactions between Xist and Tsix, a sense-antisense pair of noncoding genes. On the future active X chromosome, Tsix expression suppresses Xist upregulation, while on the future inactive X chromosome, Tsix repression is required for Xist-mediated chromosome silencing. Thus, understanding the binary switch mechanism depends on ascertaining how Tsix expression is regulated. Here we have taken an unbiased approach toward identifying Tsix regulatory elements within the X chromosome inactivation center. First, we defined the major Tsix promoter and found that it cannot fully recapitulate the developmental dynamics of Tsix expression, indicating a requirement for additional regulatory elements. We then delineated two enhancers, one classical enhancer mapping upstream of Tsix and a bipartite enhancer that flanks the major Tsix promoter. These experiments revealed the intergenic transcription element Xite as an enhancer of Tsix and the repeat element DXPas34 as a component of the bipartite enhancer. Each enhancer contains DNase I-hypersensitive sites and appears to confer developmental specificity to Tsix expression. Characterization of these enhancers will facilitate the identification of trans-acting regulatory factors for X chromosome counting and choice.

scholarly journals Impaired imprinted X chromosome inactivation is responsible for the skewed sex ratio following in vitro fertilization

2016 ◽  
Vol 113 (12) ◽  
pp. 3197-3202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Tan ◽  
Lei An ◽  
Kai Miao ◽  
Likun Ren ◽  
Zhuocheng Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Sex Ratio ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Epigenetic Modifications ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Preimplantation Stage

Dynamic epigenetic reprogramming occurs during normal embryonic development at the preimplantation stage. Erroneous epigenetic modifications due to environmental perturbations such as manipulation and culture of embryos during in vitro fertilization (IVF) are linked to various short- or long-term consequences. Among these, the skewed sex ratio, an indicator of reproductive hazards, was reported in bovine and porcine embryos and even human IVF newborns. However, since the first case of sex skewing reported in 1991, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We reported herein that sex ratio is skewed in mouse IVF offspring, and this was a result of female-biased peri-implantation developmental defects that were originated from impaired imprinted X chromosome inactivation (iXCI) through reduced ring finger protein 12 (Rnf12)/X-inactive specific transcript (Xist) expression. Compensation of impaired iXCI by overexpression of Rnf12 to up-regulate Xist significantly rescued female-biased developmental defects and corrected sex ratio in IVF offspring. Moreover, supplementation of an epigenetic modulator retinoic acid in embryo culture medium up-regulated Rnf12/Xist expression, improved iXCI, and successfully redeemed the skewed sex ratio to nearly 50% in mouse IVF offspring. Thus, our data show that iXCI is one of the major epigenetic barriers for the developmental competence of female embryos during preimplantation stage, and targeting erroneous epigenetic modifications may provide a potential approach for preventing IVF-associated complications.

scholarly journals Human X chromosome inactivation and reactivation: implications for cell reprogramming and disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1733) ◽  
pp. 20160358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene Cantone ◽  
Amanda G. Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fusion ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Es Cells ◽  
Human Fibroblasts ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is an exemplar of epigenetic regulation that is set up as pluripotent cells differentiate. Once established, XCI is stably propagated, but can be reversed in vivo or by pluripotent reprogramming in vitro . Although reprogramming provides a useful model for inactive X (Xi) reactivation in mouse, the relative instability and heterogeneity of human embryonic stem (ES) cells and induced pluripotent stem cells hampers comparable progress in human. Here we review studies aimed at reactivating the human Xi using different reprogramming strategies. We outline our recent results using mouse ES cells to reprogramme female human fibroblasts by cell–cell fusion. We show that pluripotent reprogramming induces widespread and rapid chromatin remodelling in which the human Xi loses XIST and H3K27m3 enrichment and selected Xi genes become reactivated, ahead of mitotic division. Using RNA sequencing to map the extent of human Xi reactivation, and chromatin-modifying drugs to potentiate reactivation, we outline how this approach could be used to better design strategies to re-express human X-linked loci. As cell fusion induces the expression of human pluripotency genes that represent both the ‘primed’ and ‘naive’ states, this approach may also offer a fresh opportunity to segregate human pluripotent states with distinct Xi expression profiles, using single-cell-based approaches. This article is part of the themed issue ‘X-chromosome inactivation: a tribute to Mary Lyon’.

scholarly journals Contribution of epigenetic changes to escape from X-chromosome inactivation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley P. Balaton ◽  
Carolyn J. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Cpg Islands ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Epigenetic Marks ◽  
Inactive X Chromosome ◽  
Gene Level ◽  
Allelic Differences

AbstractBackgroundX-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the epigenetic inactivation of one of two X chromosomes in XX eutherian mammals. The facultatively heterochromatic inactive X chromosome acquires many chromatin changes including DNA methylation and histone modifications. Despite these changes, some genes escape or variably escape from inactivation, and to the extent that they have been studied, epigenetic marks correlate with expression.ResultsWe downloaded data from the International Human Epigenome Consortium and compared previous XCI status calls to DNA methylation, H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K9me3, H3K27ac, H3K27me3 and H3K36me3. At genes subject to XCI we found heterochromatic marks enriched, and euchromatic marks depleted on the inactive X when compared to the active X. Similar results were seen for genes escaping XCI although with diminished effect with H3K27me3 being most enriched. Using sample-specific XCI status calls made using allelic expression or DNA methylation we also compared differences between samples with opposite XCI statuses at variably escaping genes. We found some marks significantly differed with XCI status, but which marks were significant was not consistent between genes. We trained a model to predict XCI status from these epigenetic marks and obtained over 75% accuracy for genes escaping and over 90% for genes subject to XCI. This model allowed us to make novel XCI status calls for genes without allelic differences or CpG islands required for other XCI status calling methods. Using these calls to examine a domain of variably escaping genes, we saw XCI status vary at the level of individual genes and not at the domain level.ConclusionHere we show that epigenetic marks differ between genes that are escaping and those subject to XCI, and that genes escaping XCI still differ between the active and inactive Xs. We show epigenetic differences at variably escaping genes, between samples escaping and those subject to XCI. Lastly we show gene-level regulation of variably escaping genes within a domain.

X-Chromosome Inactivation: A Crossroads Between Chromosome Architecture and Gene Regulation

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 535-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Galupa ◽  
Edith Heard
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Female Development ◽  
Barr Body ◽  
Chromosome Conformation ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Chromosome Architecture ◽  
Inactive X Chromosome

In somatic nuclei of female therian mammals, the two X chromosomes display very different chromatin states: One X is typically euchromatic and transcriptionally active, and the other is mostly silent and forms a cytologically detectable heterochromatic structure termed the Barr body. These differences, which arise during female development as a result of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), have been the focus of research for many decades. Initial approaches to define the structure of the inactive X chromosome (Xi) and its relationship to gene expression mainly involved microscopy-based approaches. More recently, with the advent of genomic techniques such as chromosome conformation capture, molecular details of the structure and expression of the Xi have been revealed. Here, we review our current knowledge of the 3D organization of the mammalian X-chromosome chromatin and discuss its relationship with gene activity in light of the initiation, spreading, and maintenance of XCI, as well as escape from gene silencing.

scholarly journals Species-specific differences in X chromosome inactivation in mammals

Reproduction ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 146 (4) ◽  
pp. R131-R139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Sado ◽  
Takehisa Sakaguchi
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Molecular Basis ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Inactive X Chromosome ◽  
Species Specific ◽  
Genetically Manipulated

In female mammals, the dosage difference in X-linked genes between XX females and XY males is compensated for by inactivating one of the two X chromosomes during early development. Since the discovery of the X inactive-specific transcript (XIST) gene in humans and its subsequent isolation of the mouse homolog, Xist, in the early 1990s, the molecular basis of X chromosome inactivation (X-inactivation) has been more fully elucidated using genetically manipulated mouse embryos and embryonic stem cells. Studies on X-inactivation in other mammals, although limited when compared with those in the mice, have revealed that, while their inactive X chromosome shares many features with those in the mice, there are marked differences in not only some epigenetic modifications of the inactive X chromosome but also when and how X-inactivation is initiated during early embryonic development. Such differences raise the issue about what extent of the molecular basis of X-inactivation in the mice is commonly shared among others. Recognizing similarities and differences in X-inactivation among mammals may provide further insight into our understanding of not only the evolutionary but also the molecular aspects for the mechanism of X-inactivation. Here, we reviewed species-specific differences in X-inactivation and discussed what these differences may reveal.

scholarly journals Mouse Polycomb Proteins Bind Differentially to Methylated Histone H3 and RNA and Are Enriched in Facultative Heterochromatin

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 2560-2569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Bernstein ◽  
Elizabeth M. Duncan ◽  
Osamu Masui ◽  
Jesus Gil ◽  
Edith Heard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Histone H3 ◽  
Facultative Heterochromatin ◽  
Rna Molecules ◽  
Polycomb Proteins ◽  
Inactive X Chromosome ◽  
Polycomb Protein ◽  
Preferential Binding

ABSTRACT The chromodomain (CD) of the Drosophila Polycomb protein exhibits preferential binding affinity for histone H3 when trimethylated at lysine 27. Here we have investigated the five mouse Polycomb homologs known as Cbx2, Cbx4, Cbx6, Cbx7, and Cbx8. Despite a high degree of conservation, the Cbx chromodomains display significant differences in binding preferences. Not all CDs bind preferentially to K27me3; rather, some display affinity towards both histone H3 trimethylated at K9 and H3K27me3, and one CD prefers K9me3. Cbx7, in particular, displays strong affinity for both H3K9me3 and H3K27me3 and is developmentally regulated in its association with chromatin. Cbx7 associates with facultative heterochromatin and, more specifically, is enriched on the inactive X chromosome. Finally, we find that, in vitro, the chromodomain of Cbx7 can bind RNA and that, in vivo, the interaction of Cbx7 with chromatin, and the inactive X chromosome in particular, depends partly on its association with RNA. We propose that the capacity of this mouse Polycomb homolog to associate with the inactive X chromosome, or any other region of chromatin, depends not only on its chromodomain but also on the combination of histone modifications and RNA molecules present at its target sites.

scholarly journals The Pluripotency Factor-Bound Intron 1 of Xist Is Dispensable for X Chromosome Inactivation and Reactivation In Vitro and In Vivo

Cell Reports ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 905-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alissa Minkovsky ◽  
Tahsin Stefan Barakat ◽  
Nadia Sellami ◽  
Mark Henry Chin ◽  
Nilhan Gunhanlar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Intron 1 ◽  
Pluripotency Factor
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document