Postoperative septic complications and neoplastic progression in colorectal cancer

2000 ◽  
Vol 87 (7) ◽  
pp. 946-946
Author(s):  
A. Nespoli ◽  
M. Totis ◽  
V. Arsena ◽  
D. Mattarel ◽  
V. Corso ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 313
Author(s):  
Miroslav Levy ◽  
Ludmila Lipska ◽  
Ladislav Sojka ◽  
Jaromir Simsa ◽  
Vladimir Visokai

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mai Hashimoto ◽  
Noriyuki Uesugi ◽  
Mitsumasa Osaka ◽  
Naoki Yanagawa ◽  
Koki Otsuka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. Biological markers expressed in cancer cells and the surrounding cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) can be used for prediction of patient prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). Here, we used immunohistochemical techniques to evaluate cancer cells’ expression of specific biomarkers that are closely associated with neoplastic progression. Patients and Methods. Immunohistochemical markers included Ki-67, p53, β-catenin, MMP7, E-cadherin and HIF1-α. We also characterized microenvironmental markers expressed by CAF, including expression of α-smooth muscle actin, CD10, podoplanin, fibroblast specific protein 1, platelet derived growth factor β, fibroblast association protein, tenascin-C (TNC), ZEB1 and TWIST1. The study population consisted of 286 CRC patients with stage II and III disease. Stage II and III CRC were divided into a first and a second cohort (for validation). The CRCs were stratified using cluster analysis. To identify the utility of prognostic markers in stage II and III CRC, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in both cohorts. Results. Stage II and III CRCs were stratified into 3 subgroups. Specific subgroups were significantly correlated to disease-free survival using univariate and multivariate analyses in the first cohort. High expression of TNC was identified as a single prognostic marker in both cohorts by univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions. We suggest that the presence of a specific subgroup defined by multiple markers can be used for prediction of CRC outcome in stages II and III. In addition, we showed that high expression of TNC was correlated with a poorer prognosis in stages II and III of CRC.


2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 899-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziad Kanaan ◽  
Shesh N. Rai ◽  
M. Robert Eichenberger ◽  
Christopher Barnes ◽  
Amy M. Dworkin ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 2186-2193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus K. Muller ◽  
Simon Wrann ◽  
Jeannette Widmer ◽  
Jennifer Klasen ◽  
Markus Weber ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Witczak ◽  
Piotr Jurałowicz ◽  
Bogdan Modzelewski ◽  
Małgorzata Gawlik

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-278
Author(s):  
PJJ Herrod ◽  
M Cox ◽  
H Keevil ◽  
KJE Smith ◽  
JN Lund

Background and aims Late recognition of sepsis and consequent death remains a problem. To address this, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has published updated guidance recommending the use of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (Q-SOFA) score when assessing patients at risk of sepsis following the publication of the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock. The trauma from major surgery produces a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) postoperatively as part of its natural history, which may falsely trigger scoring systems. We aimed to assess the accuracy of Q-SOFA and SIRS criteria as recommended scores for early detection of sepsis and septic complications in the first 48hrs after colorectal cancer surgery. Methods We reviewed all elective major colorectal operations in a single centre during a 12-month period from prospectively maintained electronic records. Results One hundred and thirty nine patients were included in this study. In all, 29 patients developed postoperative infective complications in hospital. Nineteen patients triggered on SIRS without developing infective complications, while 42 patients triggered on Q-SOFA with no infective complications. The area under the ROC curve was 0.52 for Q-SOFA and 0.67 for SIRS. Discussion Q-SOFA appears to perform little better than a coin toss at identifying postoperative sepsis after colorectal cancer resection and is inferior to the SIRS criteria. More work is required to assess whether a combination of scoring criteria, biochemical markers and automated tools could increase accurate detection of postoperative infection and trigger early intervention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document