How next of kin experience palliative care of relatives at home

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. BROBÄCK ◽  
C. BERTERÖ
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6503-6503
Author(s):  
Carlisle E. W. Topping ◽  
Madeleine Elyze ◽  
Rachel Plotke ◽  
Lauren Heuer ◽  
Charu Vyas ◽  
...  

6503 Background: Many patients with advanced cancer maintain misperceptions of their prognosis and are thus unprepared to make difficult decisions regarding their end-of-life (EOL) care. However, studies examining the associations between patients’ perceptions of their prognosis and their EOL outcomes are limited. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis using longitudinal data from a randomized controlled trial of a palliative care intervention for patients with newly diagnosed incurable lung and non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancer. We administered the Prognosis and Treatment Perceptions Questionnaire to assess patients’ perceptions of their prognosis at baseline, week-12, and week-24, using the final assessment closest to death. We used multivariate logistic and linear regression models, adjusting for age, gender, marital status, cancer type, and randomization to the palliative care intervention, to examine the associations among patients’ perceptions of their prognosis with the following EOL care outcomes abstracted from the electronic health record: 1) hospice utilization and length-of-stay (LOS); 2) hospitalizations in the last 30 days of life; 3) receipt of chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life; and 4) location of death. Results: We enrolled 350 patients in the parent trial, of which 80.5% (281/350) died during the study period and were included in this analysis. Overall, 59.4% (164/276) of patients reported that they were terminally ill, and 66.1% (154/233) reported that their cancer was likely curable at the assessment closest to death. In multivariate analyses, patients who reported that their cancer was likely curable were less likely to utilize hospice (OR = 0.25, 95%CI 0.10-0.61, P = 0.002) or die at home (OR = 0.56, 95%CI 0.32-0.98, P = 0.043), and more likely to be hospitalized in the last 30 days of life (OR = 2.28, 95%CI 1.20-4.32, P = 0.011). In contrast, patients’ report that they were terminally ill was only associated with lower likelihood of hospitalizations in the last 30 days of life (OR = 0.52, 95%CI 0.29-0.92, P = 0.025). Patients’ perceptions of their prognosis were not associated with hospice LOS or chemotherapy administration in the last 30 days of life. Conclusions: Patients’ perceptions of their prognosis are associated with important EOL outcomes including hospice utilization, hospitalizations at the EOL, and death at home. Interventions are needed to enhance patients’ perceptions of their prognosis in order to optimize their EOL care.


2008 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. PCRT.S1058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Matzo ◽  
Kamal Hijjazi

Objective This study sought to document Oklahomans knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding palliative care; this paper focuses on subjects stated preferences for where they would choose to die. Design Quantitative study used a random state-wide telephone sample of Oklahoma residents. Subjects Data from 804 residents in the State of Oklahoma between November and December (2005). Results An overwhelming majority of the respondents (80%) reported preference to die at home in the event that they suffer a terminal illness. The proportion of respondents under the age of 65 who preferred to die at home (80.9%) was slightly higher than those aged 65 and over (74.8%). Also, while 81.4% of the female respondents reported preference for dying at home, 75.8% of the male respondents shared such preference (P < 0.05). More married respondents (82.7%) than non-married respondents (74.7%) reported preference for dying at home (P < 0.01). A significant association (P < 0.05) between income level and preference for dying at home was noted. While 84.3% of those with income level at $21,000 or more reported reference for dying at home, 76.4% of those with income below $21,000 reported the same preference. Conclusions This paper offers insight into factors that influence Oklahoman's stated preferences for site of death that can assist the statewide agenda in the planning and provision of palliative care. This information can be adapted in other states or countries to determine palliative care needs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 342-351
Author(s):  
Panita Krongyuth ◽  
Pimpan Silpasuwan ◽  
Chukiat Viwatwongkasem ◽  
Cathy Campbell

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the needs of people with cancer in advanced stages and to analyze factors that influence them. Design/methodology/approach A concurrent mixed-method design was used. Descriptive design was conducted in Ubon Ratchathani Province, Thailand. Data were collected from a convenience sample of patients with advanced cancer of any tissue or organ. Questionnaires were completed by 110 patients aged 60 years and above (response rate 110/130=84.6 percent). In-depth interviews were conducted with a total of eight patients. Content analysis of semi-structured interviews of a sub-sample was subsequently performed to better understand the real needs of patients with advanced stages of cancer at home setting. Findings The majority (77.5 percent) reported a preference to spend their final days at home. The four most common palliative care needs were more information about disease and medical treatment (98.2 percent), more treatment for pain (97.3 percent), health education for family caregivers (95.5 percent) and health volunteers visit at home (95.5 percent). Content analysis of the qualitative data suggested that patient needs health care providers to deliver open communication, pain management and provide psychosocial supports. Originality/value The result showed that patients-related variables are associated with the palliative care needs in patients with advanced stages of cancer. Communication skills and pain management are the key components to support the need for palliative care at home and to benefit the quality of life in terminally ill patients.


Author(s):  
Jelle van Gurp ◽  
Jeroen Hasselaar ◽  
Evert van Leeuwen ◽  
Martine van Selm ◽  
Kris Vissers
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 224-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger W. Hunt ◽  
Katina D’Onise ◽  
Anh-Minh Thi Nguyen ◽  
Kamalesh Venugopal

Aims:To describe changes in the place of death of patients with cancer from 1990 to 2012, and to identify issues for their end-of-life care.Materials and Methods:Population-based descriptive study, with analyses of place of death patterns, using the South Australian Cancer Registry records of 86 257 patients with cancer who died from 1990 to 2012.Results:From 1990 to 2012, the proportion of cancer deaths in hospital decreased from 63.4% to 50.9%, and in nursing homes increased from 8.2% to 22.5%. After the year 2000, the proportions in hospices and at home were both below 15%. Multivariate analyses showed that young patients with cancer were more likely to die in a hospice or at home, compared to elderly patients with cancer who were more likely to die in a nursing home; the likelihood of dying in a hospice increased with socioeconomic status; patients with a short survival time or a hematological malignancy were more likely to die in a metropolitan hospital.Conclusions:Compared to most other countries, the proportion of cancer deaths at home was low, and many patients would not have died at their preferred place. The trend for more cancer deaths to occur in nursing homes is likely to continue, but nursing homes generally lack the resources and skilled staff to provide quality palliative care. Models of palliative care delivery should take account of patient preferences, the growth of terminal cancer care in nursing homes, and apparent inequities.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simen A Steindal ◽  
Andréa Aparecida Goncalves Nes ◽  
Tove E. Godskesen ◽  
Susanne Lind ◽  
Alfhild Dhle ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND Due to the increasing number of people in need of palliative care services and the current health care professional workforce strain, providing equitable, quality palliative care has become a challenge. Telehealth could be an innovative approach to palliative care delivery, enabling patients to spend more time or even remain at home, if they wish, throughout the illness trajectory. However, no previous systematic mixed studies reviews have synthesized evidence on patients’ experiences of the advantages and challenges of telehealth for home-based palliative care. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic mixed studies review is to critically appraise and synthesize findings from studies that investigated patients’ use of telehealth in home-based palliative care with a focus on the advantages and challenges experienced by the patients. METHODS This article describes the protocol for a systematic mixed studies review with a convergent design. The reporting will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. A systematic search was performed in eight databases for studies published from January 2010 to June 2020. The search will be updated in 2021. Pairs of authors will independently assess eligibility, extract data and assess methodological quality. The data will then be analyzed using thematic synthesis. RESULTS We described the rationale and design of a systematic mixed studies review. The database searches were performed on June 25, 2020. Assessment of eligibility and further steps have not yet been performed. Results are anticipated by August 2021. CONCLUSIONS Following the ethos of patient-centered palliative care, this systematic mixed studies review could contribute recommendations for practice and policy enabling the development of telehealth applications and services that align with patients’ preferences and needs when using telehealth applications and services at home.


Author(s):  
Nita Arisanti ◽  
Dany Hilmanto ◽  
Elsa Pudji Setiawati ◽  
Veranita Pandia

.................... The access to palliative care in ends of life is one of the patients’ rights. Therefore it should be delivered into every level of health care for patients and family members. In some countries, palliative care is more frequent delivered in hospitals compare to primary health care, even though primary health care has a significant role in providing palliative care. Most families prefer to care for patients at home rather than in the hospital................................... The implementation of palliative care in Indonesia is still very limited to certain hospitals, even though doctors in primary care have great potential to offer such care to people in the community. Some of the factors contributing to the implementation are cultural and socioeconomic factors, patient and family perceptions, attitudes of service providers, lack of trained personnel, distribution of palliative care units, lack of consolidation and limited funds. As a result, patients with end-stage disease die in hospitals without receiving palliative care or dying at home with inadequate support................


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 163
Author(s):  
Bente Bjørsland ◽  
Reidun Hov

Health services are constantly met by greater demands on offering the best treatment and care based on quality and research. For that reason health workers and teachers in health care institutions and universities are working evidence-based. Hedmark University College and Hamar municipality have collaborated in two projects. The aim of this article is to illuminate the students’ learning outcomes in palliative care after participated in two evidence-based projects. Different written guides for conversations with patients, next of kin and staff, a log-book and an evaluation form were developed. Results show that the students learned about the significance of continuity in patients’ pain relief, spiritual and existential needs, and about palliative care in the municipality. The students concluded that they in some areas experienced greater learning outcomes from working with evidence-based practice than in their ordinary practice in the municipality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document