Water stress and crop load effects on vegetative and fruit growth of ‘Elegant Lady’ peach [Prunus persica(L.) Batch] trees

Fruits ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mahhou ◽  
Theodore M. DeJong ◽  
Tiesen Cao ◽  
Ken S. Shackel
Fruits ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 407-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Mahhou ◽  
Theodore M. DeJong ◽  
Ken S. Shackel ◽  
Tiesen Cao

2019 ◽  
Vol 255 ◽  
pp. 103-107
Author(s):  
Gerardo Lopez ◽  
Gemma Echeverria ◽  
M. Hossein Behboudian ◽  
Jordi Marsal ◽  
Joan Girona

Trees ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1607-1622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom De Swaef ◽  
Carmen D. Mellisho ◽  
Annelies Baert ◽  
Veerle De Schepper ◽  
Arturo Torrecillas ◽  
...  

HortScience ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 516E-517
Author(s):  
Duane W. Greene

Chemical thinners can be classified as either blossom thinners or postbloom thinners. Blossom thinners act by inhibit further pollination, pollen germination, or pollen tube growth. At petal fall it is not possible to distinguish between fruit that have been injured by blossom thinners, and those that will persist and continue to grow. The receptacles of blossom thinned fruit do not grow, whereas fruit that has not been treated and that also contain viable seeds, resumes growth within 4 to 6 days, depending upon temperature. Abscission of fruit treated with postbloom thinners does not usually occur until 1.5 to 3 weeks after application. Frequently, it is possible to identify fruit that will abscise and to make an initial assessment of thinning efficacy, within 4 to 6 days following application by measuring fruit growth rate. A reduction in fruit growth by as little as 15% to 20% less than rapidly growing fruit is usually sufficient to assume that the fruit will abscise sometime during the June drop period. The effects of specific chemical thinners on fruit growth and subsequent thinning will be discussed.


HortScience ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 513c-513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin J. Bukovac ◽  
Jerome Hull ◽  
John C. Neilsen ◽  
Michael Schroeder ◽  
Georg Noga

NAA is used extensively for fruit thinning of apples to increase fruit size and to promote return bloom. In some cultivars, even if thinning is achieved, fruit size at harvest may be less than expected based on crop load. CPPU, N-(2-chloro-4-pyridinyl)-N.-phenylurea, has been shown to increase fruit growth in apples, grapes, and kiwi. We evaluated combinations of NAA and CPPU on thinning, fruit growth and return bloom in Redchief `Delicious', `Elstar', and `Gloster'. CPPU was applied at 5 mgμL–1 (based on 0 to 10 mgμL–1 response curve) in combination with 15 mgμL–1 NAA as high-volume sprays at 7 to 10 mm KFD. Yield and fruit size distribution (on total yield) were used as index of response. In `Delicious', CPPU (3-year study) increased % large (70 mm+) fruit, but in the presence of NAA % large fruit was reduced 2 of the 3 years. CPPU did not induce significant thinning. There were no significant effects on color or soluble solids; firmness was increased slightly and seed number reduced. The L/D ratio was increased and uneven lobe and carpel development was common. CPPU had no significant effect on return bloom in presence or absence of NAA, but NAA increased bloom in both the presence and absence of CPPU. With `Elstar' (2-year study) there was no significant thinning with either chemical, but CPPU increased mean fruit size and % large (70–80 mm) fruit over nonthinned, but not significantly greater than NAA alone. There were no significant differences in firmness, color, soluble solids or seed number. NAA + CPPU did not inhibit fruit growth or cause excessive uneven carpel development. Frost damage reduced crop load in `Gloster' where results were similar to `Elstar' except seed number was reduced by the NAA + CPPU combination.


1996 ◽  
Vol 121 (6) ◽  
pp. 1122-1131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Génard ◽  
Michel Souty

The edible quality of peaches (Prunus persica L. Batsch) to a great extent depends on their sweetness, which is related to sugar composition. Our objective was to develop a model to predict carbon partitioning within fruit flesh and to predict the sucrose, sorbitol, glucose, and fructose contents. The model is dynamic and deterministic and was designed to be driven by the flesh dry-weight growth curve, flesh water content, and temperature data. It uses differential equations where the state of the system is defined by variables that describe how much carbon is present as each form of sugar and as other compounds (acids and structural carbohydrates). The rates of change of these amounts of carbon depend on the current values of corresponding variables and on the transfer functions between them. These functions are defined by rate constants or by functions of degree-days after full bloom. The model was calibrated and tested using data sets from treatments that covered several leaf: fruit ratios. The predictions of the model were in fairly good agreement with experimental data. A sensitivity analysis was performed to identify the most influential transfer function parameters. Carbon flows between sugar forms were analyzed. Sucrose, which was the most abundant sugar, and fructose, which is the sweetest, contributed most to fruit sweetness. Simulations were performed to study the effects of changes in fruit growth-curve parameters on sugar contents and concentrations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document