Regional anesthesia is a good alternative to general anesthesia in pediatric surgery: Experience in 1,554 children

2002 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 610-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sema Uguralp ◽  
Murat Mutus ◽  
Ahmet Koroglu ◽  
Necla Gurbuz ◽  
Ugur Koltuksuz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Pediatric Surgery ◽  
Good Alternative

scholarly journals Infographics in TIVA

2021 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 033-042
Author(s):  
Tushar M. Chokshi
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
Airway Device ◽  
Medical Field ◽  
Inhalational Anesthesia ◽  
Intravenous Anesthesia ◽  
Aerosol Generation ◽  
Anesthesia Technique ◽  
Simple Format

AbstractInfographics are a new way of visually communicating information in a colorful and concise manner. They are becoming very popular in medical field since the last decade. Through infographics, one can understand the subjects through text, graphics, and images. Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is a technique of general anesthesia (GA) given via intravenous (IV) route exclusively. In perspective of infographics, TIVA is far more understandable through its simple format. TIVA is also more advantageous than inhalational anesthesia. It avoids the deleterious effects of immunosuppressant and lacks any respiratory irritation, thus providing a good alternative anesthesia technique. Many peripheral surgeries can be done with the patient breathing spontaneously without any airway device, thus avoiding airway instrumentation, leading to droplet and aerosol generation. IV agents can be utilized to provide sedation during regional anesthesia (RA), which can easily be escalated to contain pain due to sparing of blocks or receding neuraxial anesthesia. The present narrative review focuses on the infographics in TIVA technique, providing highlights pertaining to its importance.

A Comparison of General Anesthesia and Regional Anesthesia as a Risk Factor for Deep Vein Thrombosis Following Hip Surgery: A Critical Review

1990 ◽  
Vol 64 (04) ◽  
pp. 497-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin H Prins ◽  
Jack Hirsh
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Lower Incidence ◽  
Hip Surgery ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Postoperative Thrombosis ◽  
High Level ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryWe evaluated the evidence in support of the suggestion that the risk of deep vein thrombosis after hip surgery is lower with regional than with general anesthesia. A literature search was performed to retrieve all articles which reported on the incidence of postoperative thrombosis in both fractured and elective hip surgery. Articles were included if the method of anesthesia used was reported and if they used mandatory venography. Based upon the quality of study design the level of evidence provided by a study was graded.In patients who did not receive prophylaxis there were high level studies in elective and fractured hip surgery. All studies showed a statistically significantly lower incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis with regional anesthesia (relative risk reductions of 46-55%). There were no direct comparative studies in patients who received prophylaxis. However, between study comparisons did not show even a trend towards to lower incidence of postoperative thrombosis with regional anesthesia.

Complications in Pediatric Regional Anesthesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 129 (4) ◽  
pp. 721-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Epidural Abscess ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Large Sample Size ◽  
Multiple Points ◽  
Additional Risk ◽  
Cutaneous Infections ◽  
Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity

Abstract Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background Complications in pediatric regional anesthesia are rare, so a large sample size is necessary to quantify risk. The Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network contains data on more than 100,000 blocks administered at more than 20 children’s hospitals. This study analyzed the risk of major complications associated with regional anesthesia in children. Methods This is a prospective, observational study of routine clinical practice. Data were collected on every regional block placed by an anesthesiologist at participating institutions and were uploaded to a secure database. The data were audited at multiple points for accuracy. Results There were no permanent neurologic deficits reported (95% CI, 0 to 0.4:10,000). The risk of transient neurologic deficit was 2.4:10,000 (95% CI, 1.6 to 3.6:10,000) and was not different between peripheral and neuraxial blocks. The risk of severe local anesthetic systemic toxicity was 0.76:10,000 (95% CI, 0.3 to 1.6:10,000); the majority of cases occurred in infants. There was one epidural abscess reported (0.76:10,000, 95% CI, 0 to 4.8:10,000). The incidence of cutaneous infections was 0.5% (53:10,000, 95% CI, 43 to 64:10,000). There were no hematomas associated with neuraxial catheters (95% CI, 0 to 3.5:10,000), but one epidural hematoma occurred with a paravertebral catheter. No additional risk was observed with placing blocks under general anesthesia. The most common adverse events were benign catheter-related failures (4%). Conclusions The data from this study demonstrate a level of safety in pediatric regional anesthesia that is comparable to adult practice and confirms the safety of placing blocks under general anesthesia in children.

scholarly journals Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 55-58
Author(s):  
SMA Taher ◽  
Jamil Raihan ◽  
M Abu Zahid ◽  
AK Azad ◽  
MI Alam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Gall Stone ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
First Time ◽  
Symptomatic Gall Stone

Laparascopic Cholecystectomy under regional anesthesia alone has been reported only with severe chronic obstructive airway disease1,2. In a randomised trial, epidural with general anesthesia have been found to be more effective in lessening postoperative pain compare with general anesthesia alone3. Regional anesthesia has been successfully used for laparascopic cholecystectomy in patient. Hamad and Ibrahim El-Khatter4 used spinal anesthesia for laparoscopic for the first time. We performing Laparascopic Cholecystectomy with carbondioxide pneumoperitoneum under spinal anesthesia alone of healthy patients with symptomatic gall stone disease5. We design a control randomized trial to compare spinal anesthesthesia with the Gold standard general anesthesia for elective Laparascopic Cholecystectomy in healty patients.TAJ 2012; 25: 55-58

scholarly journals Factors affecting general or regional anesthesia preference in patients with elective surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 570-574
Author(s):  
Esra Adıyeke ◽  
Levent Adıyeke
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Significant Positive Correlation ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Education Level ◽  
Foot Surgery ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Positive Correlation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
To Receive

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the factors that affect the preference of the anesthesia method in patients who were indicated for general or regional anesthesia. Material and Methods: A descriptive questionnaire was used to evaluate the opinions of 123 patients who were planned to undergo elective surgery in the orthopedics and traumatology outpatient clinic between January 2018 and June 2019. Results: 73 women (%59) and 50 men (%41) participated in the study. The mean age was 58.62±11 years. General anesthesia was preferred in 58% of the patients. The most common reason for rejection was that the patients who preferred general anesthesia did not want to receive visual and auditory stimuli during the surgical procedure. There was a significant positive correlation between education level and regional anesthesia preference rate. There was a significant positive correlation between the regional anesthesia preference rate of patients receiving hand and foot surgery indications. Conclusion: The preference of the majority of patients was found to be general anesthesia method. Additionally, the type of surgery and education level of the patients was found to be effective in preference of the anesthesia method.

scholarly journals Carotid Endarterectomy with Local Anesthesia and LMA/General Anesthesia

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hani Annabi ◽  
Charles Fleischer ◽  
Robert Taylor ◽  
Steven Gruendling ◽  
joe pergolizzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Carotid Endarterectomy ◽  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Anesthetic Technique ◽  
Hybrid Technique ◽  
Comorbid Conditions ◽  
Neurological Assessment ◽  
Left Neck ◽  
Artery Disease

There is no clear consensus as to the appropriate anesthetic technique for patients undergoing a carotid endarterectomy. Such patients may have comorbid conditions, such as coronary artery disease, hyperlipidemia, and others. The two main anesthetic approaches are general anesthesia, including an endotracheal tube, with neurological monitoring and regional anesthesia that allows for an awake patient to be assessed neurologically. The objective of our study was to evaluate a novel anesthetic technique that combined general anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) plus regional anesthesia in the form of bupivacaine injected into the surgical site. Anesthesia was maintained with desflurane 4%, so the patient emerged rapidly for neurological assessment at the conclusion of surgery. We report on a case of a 55-year-old patient who underwent a successful carotid endarterectomy using this hybrid technique of general anesthesia with LMA plus regional anesthesia. This technique was safe and effective and the patient experienced no complications other than a hematoma on the left neck that was likely the result of long-term use of aspirin and Plavix. While further study is warranted, this hybrid technique of general anesthesia with LMA plus regional anesthesia holds promise for carotid endarterectomy patients.

Outcomes After Receipt of Neuraxial or Regional Anesthesia Instead of General Anesthesia for Lower Limb Revascularization Surgery: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Roberts ◽  
Hannah Dreksler ◽  
Sudhir K. Nagpal ◽  
Allen Li ◽  
Jeanna Parsons Leigh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Regional Anesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Revascularization Surgery

BACKGROUND Patients undergoing lower limb revascularization surgery for peripheral artery disease (PAD) have a high-risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality and often have long hospital stays. Use of neuraxial or regional anesthesia instead of general anesthesia may represent one approach to improving outcomes and reducing resource use among these patients. OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether receipt of neuraxial or regional anesthesia instead of general anesthesia in adults undergoing lower limb revascularization surgery for PAD results in improved health outcomes and costs and a shorter length of hospitalization. METHODS We will search electronic bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the seven databases in Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews), review articles identified during the search, and included article bibliographies. We will include randomized and non-randomized studies comparing use of neuraxial or regional anesthesia instead of general anesthesia in adults undergoing lower limb revascularization surgery for PAD. Two investigators will independently evaluate risk of bias. The primary outcome will be short-term mortality (in-hospital or 30-day). Secondary outcomes will include longer-term mortality; major adverse cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal events; delirium; deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism; major adverse limb events; neuraxial or regional anesthesia-related complications; graft-related outcomes; length of operation and hospital stay; costs; and patient-reported or functional outcomes. We will calculate summary odds ratios and standardized mean differences using random-effects models. Heterogeneity will be explored using stratified meta-analyses and meta-regression. We will assess for publication bias using Begg’s and Egger’s tests and use the trim-and-fill method to estimate the potential influence of this bias on summary estimates. Finally, we will use Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to make an overall rating of the quality of evidence in our effect estimates. RESULTS The protocol was registered in PROSPERO, the international register of systematic reviews. CONCLUSIONS This study will synthesize existing evidence regarding whether receipt of neuraxial or regional anesthesia instead of general anesthesia in adults undergoing lower limb revascularization surgery for PAD results in improved health outcomes, graft patency, and costs, and a shorter length of hospital stay. Study results will be used to inform practice and future research, including creation of a pilot and then multicenter randomized controlled trial. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO CRD42021237060.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document