Physical and Pharmacological Neuroprotection in Cardiac Surgery

2000 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-85
Author(s):  
Simon J. Mitchell ◽  
Timothy Willcox ◽  
F. Paget Milsom ◽  
Des F. Gorman

Stroke and neurocognitive deficits may follow cardiac surgery and have been linked to perioperative cerebral embolism. Alteration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) or surgical technique to reduce embolism is, therefore, a rational neuroprotective strategy. Pharmacological cerebral protection has been advocated as an ideal "back-stop" to such "physical" interventions. A series of relevant studies conducted at Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zeatand is described. Doppler ultra sound was used to monitor cerebral embolism during left heart valve surgery. Subsequently, salvaged CPB circuits were used to investigate several unexpected sources of emboli. The efficacy of a novel left heart deairing technique was audited using the Doppler de vice. Finally, a randomized double-blind trial of lidocaine in cerebral protection during cardiac surgery was con ducted. Most cerebral emboli were recorded after aortic declamping. However, cerebral emboli counts increased during stable CPB when the hard shell venous reservoir (HSVR) was operated at lower blood volumes and when air was seen in the venous return line. In vitro 2 HSVRs were found to generate bubbles when operated at blood volumes in excess of the manufacturer's recom mended minimum. Air in the venous return line was found to readily transit the CPB circuit and vacuum- assisted venous drainage markedly exacerbated this phenomenon. The novel deairing technique was mark edly superiorto conventional methods. Lidocaine admin istered in a standard antiarrhythmic dose for 48 hours from induction of anesthesia reduced the incidence of neuropsychological deficits at 10 days and 10 weeks postoperatively.

1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (04) ◽  
pp. 1064-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Cattaneo ◽  
Alan S Harris ◽  
Ulf Strömberg ◽  
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci

SummaryThe effect of desmopressin (DDAVP) on reducing postoperative blood loss after cardiac surgery has been studied in several randomized clinical trials, with conflicting outcomes. Since most trials had insufficient statistical power to detect true differences in blood loss, we performed a meta-analysis of data from relevant studies. Seventeen randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were analyzed, which included 1171 patients undergoing cardiac surgery for various indications; 579 of them were treated with desmopressin and 592 with placebo. Efficacy parameters were blood loss volumes and transfusion requirements. Desmopressin significantly reduced postoperative blood loss by 9%, but had no statistically significant effect on transfusion requirements. A subanalysis revealed that desmopressin had no protective effects in trials in which the mean blood loss in placebo-treated patients fell in the lower and middle thirds of distribution of blood losses (687-1108 ml/24 h). In contrast, in trials in which the mean blood loss in placebo-treated patients fell in the upper third of distribution (>1109 ml/24 h), desmopressin significantly decreased postoperative blood loss by 34%. Insufficient data were available to perform a sub-analysis on transfusion requirements. Therefore, desmopressin significantly reduces blood loss only in cardiac operations which induce excessive blood loss. Further studies are called to validate the results of this meta-analysis and to identify predictors of excessive blood loss after cardiac surgery.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Liu ◽  
Rayhan Tariq ◽  
Geoffrey Liu ◽  
Ling Yu

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Bilotta ◽  
Adrian W Gelb ◽  
Sulpicio G Soriano ◽  
Qiaoheng Wang ◽  
Francesca P Paoloni ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. e014629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Chen ◽  
Guangyou Duan ◽  
Zhuoxi Wu ◽  
Zhiyi Zuo ◽  
Hong Li

ObjectiveNeurological dysfunction remains a devastating postoperative complication in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and previous studies have shown that inhalation anaesthesia and total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) may produce different degrees of cerebral protection in these patients. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to compare the neuroprotective effects of inhalation anaesthesia and TIVA.DesignSearching in PubMed, EMBASE, Science Direct/Elsevier, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Cochrane Library up to August 2016, we selected related randomised controlled trials for this meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 1485 studies were identified. After eliminating duplicate articles and screening titles and abstracts, 445 studies were potentially eligible. After applying exclusion criteria (full texts reported as abstracts, review article, no control case, lack of outcome data and so on), 13 studies were selected for review. Our results demonstrated that the primary outcome related to S100B level in the inhalation anaesthesia group was significantly lower than in the TIVA group after CPB and 24 hours postoperatively (weighted mean difference (WMD); 95% CI (CI): −0.41(–0.81 to –0.01), −0.32 (−0.59 to −0.05), respectively). Among secondary outcome variables, mini-mental state examination scores of the inhalation anaesthesia group were significantly higher than those of the TIVA group 24 hours after operation (WMD (95% CI): 1.87 (0.82 to 2.92)), but no significant difference was found in arteriovenous oxygen content difference, cerebral oxygen extraction ratio and jugular bulb venous oxygen saturation, which were assessed at cooling and rewarming during CPB.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that anaesthesia with volatile agents appears to provide better cerebral protection than TIVA for patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB, suggesting that inhalation anaesthesia may be more suitable for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.


2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany S Ko ◽  
Constantine D Mavroudis ◽  
Wesley B Baker ◽  
Vincent C Morano ◽  
Kobina Mensah-Brown ◽  
...  

Management of deep hypothermic (DH) cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), a critical neuroprotective strategy, currently relies on non-invasive temperature to guide cerebral metabolic suppression during complex cardiac surgery in neonates. Considerable inter-subject variability in temperature response and residual metabolism may contribute to the persisting risk for postoperative neurological injury. To characterize and mitigate this variability, we assess the sufficiency of conventional nasopharyngeal temperature (NPT) guidance, and in the process, validate combined non-invasive frequency-domain diffuse optical spectroscopy (FD-DOS) and diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) for direct measurement of cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen ( CMRO2). During CPB, n = 8 neonatal swine underwent cooling from normothermia to 18℃, sustained DH perfusion for 40 min, and then rewarming to simulate cardiac surgery. Continuous non-invasive and invasive measurements of intracranial temperature (ICT) and CMRO2 were acquired. Significant hysteresis ( p < 0.001) between cooling and rewarming periods in the NPT versus ICT and NPT versus CMRO2 relationships were found. Resolution of this hysteresis in the ICT versus CMRO2 relationship identified a crucial insufficiency of conventional NPT guidance. Non-invasive CMRO2 temperature coefficients with respect to NPT ( Q10 = 2.0) and ICT ( Q10 = 2.5) are consistent with previous reports and provide further validation of FD-DOS/DCS CMRO2 monitoring during DH CPB to optimize management.


Perfusion ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 591-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoff G. Lockwood ◽  
Leilani Cabreros ◽  
Dorota Banach ◽  
Prakash P. Punjabi

Background: Continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral blockade has been used for analgesia after cardiac surgery, but its efficacy has never been formally tested. Method: Fifty adult patients were enrolled in a double-blind, randomised, controlled study of continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral infusion of 0.5% lidocaine (1 mg.kg-1.hr-1) for analgesia after coronary surgery. Control patients received a subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine at the same rate through catheters inserted at the same locations as the study group. The primary outcome was morphine consumption at 48 hours using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Secondary outcomes included pain, respiratory function, nausea and vomiting. Serum lidocaine concentrations were measured on the first two post-operative days. Results: There was no difference in morphine consumption or in any other outcome measure between the groups. Serum lidocaine concentrations increased during the study, with a maximum of 5.9 mg.l-1. There were no adverse events as a consequence of the study. Conclusion: Bilateral paravertebral infusion of lidocaine confers no advantage over systemic lidocaine infusion after cardiac surgery. Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN13424423 ( https://www.isrctn.com )


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document