Continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral blockade for analgesia after cardiac surgery: a randomised, controlled trial

Perfusion ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 591-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoff G. Lockwood ◽  
Leilani Cabreros ◽  
Dorota Banach ◽  
Prakash P. Punjabi
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Morphine Consumption ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Clinical Trial Registration ◽  
Subcutaneous Infusion ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Background: Continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral blockade has been used for analgesia after cardiac surgery, but its efficacy has never been formally tested. Method: Fifty adult patients were enrolled in a double-blind, randomised, controlled study of continuous bilateral thoracic paravertebral infusion of 0.5% lidocaine (1 mg.kg-1.hr-1) for analgesia after coronary surgery. Control patients received a subcutaneous infusion of lidocaine at the same rate through catheters inserted at the same locations as the study group. The primary outcome was morphine consumption at 48 hours using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Secondary outcomes included pain, respiratory function, nausea and vomiting. Serum lidocaine concentrations were measured on the first two post-operative days. Results: There was no difference in morphine consumption or in any other outcome measure between the groups. Serum lidocaine concentrations increased during the study, with a maximum of 5.9 mg.l-1. There were no adverse events as a consequence of the study. Conclusion: Bilateral paravertebral infusion of lidocaine confers no advantage over systemic lidocaine infusion after cardiac surgery. Clinical trial registration: ISRCTN13424423 ( https://www.isrctn.com )

Microcirculatory effects of landiolol: a double-blind, randomised, controlled study after cardiac surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaud Ferraris ◽  
Matthias Jacquet-Lagrèze ◽  
Laure Cazenave ◽  
William Fornier ◽  
Wajma Jalalzai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Randomised Controlled

A Controlled Trial of Home-Based Acute Psychiatric Services

1993 ◽  
Vol 163 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Burns ◽  
Alan Beadsmoore ◽  
Ashok V. Bhat ◽  
Andrew Oliver ◽  
Carola Mathers
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
One Year ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Clinical Measures ◽  
Experimental Group

While research has shown community-based psychiatric care to be as good as, or better than, hospital-based care, generalisation to clinical practice has been difficult. This prospective, randomised controlled study examined a community-based approach feasible within NHS conditions. Ninety-four patients were randomly allocated to experimental and 78 to control treatments and followed for one year. The groups were well matched apart from an excess of psychotic control patients. No differences in clinical or social functioning outcome were found. Both groups improved substantially on clinical measures in the first six weeks, with some slow consolidation thereafter. There were three suicides in the control group and one in the experimental group. Access to care was better in the experimental group (93% attended assessment) than in the control group (75% attended assessment).

scholarly journals PACMAN trial protocol, Perioperative Administration of Corticotherapy on Morbidity and mortality After Non-cardiac major surgery: a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, superiority study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e021262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Asehnoune ◽  
Emmanuel Futier ◽  
Fanny Feuillet ◽  
Antoine Roquilly
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Trial Protocol ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionPostoperative complications are major healthcare problems and are associated with a reduced short-term and long-term survival after surgery. An excessive postoperative inflammatory response participates to the development of postoperative infection and mortality. The aim of the Perioperative Administration of Corticotherapy on Morbidity and mortality After Non-cardiac surgery (PACMAN) study is to assess the effectiveness of perioperative administration of corticosteroid to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery.Methods and analysisThe PACMAN is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, double-blind, superiority, two-arm trial of 1222 high-risk patients aged 50 years or older undergoing major non-cardiac surgery at 32 acute care hospital in France. Patients are randomly assigned to dexamethasone (0.2 mg/kg at the end of the surgical procedure and at day +1, n=611) or to placebo (n=611). The primary outcome is a composite of predefined 14-day major pulmonary complications and mortality. Secondary outcomes are surgical complications, infections, organ failures, critical care-free days, length of hospital stay and all-cause mortality at 28 days.Ethics and disseminationThe PACMAN trial protocol has been approved by the ethics committee of Sud Mediterranée V, and will be carried out according to the Good Clinical Practice guidelines and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The PACMAN trial is a randomised controlled trial powered to investigate whether perioperative administration of corticosteroids in patients undergoing non-cardiac major surgery reduces postoperative complications. The results of this study will be disseminated through presentation at scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03218553; Pre-results.

scholarly journals Effects of nasal lavage with and without mupirocin after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: a randomised, controlled study

2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (12) ◽  
pp. 1059-1063
Author(s):  
B H K Ng ◽  
I P Tang ◽  
P Narayanan ◽  
R Raman ◽  
R L Carrau
Keyword(s):  
Skull Base ◽  
Skull Base Surgery ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Nasal Lavage ◽  
Nasal Endoscopy ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Skull Base Lesions ◽  
Randomised Controlled

AbstractBackgroundNasal lavage with mupirocin has the potential to reduce sinonasal morbidity in endoscopic endonasal approaches for skull base surgery.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of nasal lavage with and without mupirocin after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery.MethodsA pilot randomised, controlled trial was conducted on 20 adult patients who had undergone endoscopic endonasal approaches for skull base lesions. These patients were randomly assigned to cohorts using nasal lavages with mupirocin or without mupirocin. Patients were assessed in the out-patient clinic, one week and one month after surgery, using the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test questionnaire and nasal endoscopy.ResultsPatients in the mupirocin nasal lavage group had lower nasal endoscopy scores post-operatively, and a statistically significant larger difference in nasal endoscopy scores at one month compared to one week. The mupirocin nasal lavage group also showed better Sino-Nasal Outcome Test scores at one month compared to the group without mupirocin.ConclusionNasal lavage with mupirocin seems to yield better outcomes regarding patients’ symptoms and endoscopic findings.

scholarly journals Periarticular Injection with Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain Control in Total Knee Replacement: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varah Yuenyongviwat ◽  
Chaturong Pornrattanamaneewong ◽  
Thitima Chinachoti ◽  
Keerati Chareancholvanich
Keyword(s):  
Pain Control ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Morphine Consumption ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Periarticular Injection ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference

Background. Local periarticular injection with bupivacaine alone in TKA has not been studied. Thus, we aimed to examine the effectiveness of local periarticular injection with bupivacaine for post-operative pain control in TKA.Method. Sixty patients undergoing TKA by a single surgeon were randomly assigned into two groups in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In the injection group, patients received periarticular injections with 0.25% bupivacaine before wound closure; in the control group, patients received a 0.9% normal saline injection. Both groups received the same anesthetic procedure, post-operative pain control, and rehabilitation protocol.Results. There was a significant reduction in post-operative morphine consumption in the first six hours after the operation (mean 0.9 mg and 2.43 mg,P=0.01), but there was no significant difference in post-operative morphine consumption between six hours and ninety-six hours after the operation, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, morphine side effects during the first 96 hours, length of hospital stay, or complications from morphine consumption.Conclusion. Local periarticular injection with bupivacaine alone before wound closer was shown to be an effective method to improve pain control after TKA with a few complications and ease of use.

scholarly journals Diagnostic utility of flumazenil in coma with suspected poisoning: a double blind, randomised controlled study.

BMJ ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 301 (6764) ◽  
pp. 1308-1311 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Hojer ◽  
S Baehrendtz ◽  
G Matell ◽  
L L Gustafsson
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Study ◽  
Diagnostic Utility ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomised Controlled Study ◽  
Randomised Controlled
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document