Surgical and Non-surgical Treatment of Vertebral Fractures in Elderly

2019 ◽  
Vol 157 (06) ◽  
pp. 654-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Chmielnicki ◽  
Axel Prokop ◽  
Frank Kandziora ◽  
Andreas Pingel

AbstractDemographic development in Germany has led to an aging of the population. Particularly for these patients, osteoporosis-induced vertebral fractures represent a significant decrease in quality of life and level of activity. According to current guidelines, the initial treatment of stable osteoporotic vertebral fractures is conservative management with analgesic, anti-osteoporotic, physical therapy, and orthotic measures as first line options. Personal experience, however, suggests that patients benefit from timely surgical treatment through rapid improvement of pain symptoms and thus, more rapid mobilization. The poor bone quality of elderly patients presents the treating spine surgeon a challenge in achieving stable spinal fusion with or without support, for example, through augmentation. Minimally invasive procedures have increasingly established themselves for such purposes in recent years. With over 1000 fracture treatments in the last 3.5 years, we have developed a differentiated treatment concept depending on patient age and fracture morphology, which we would like to introduce. Unstable fractures with posterior edge involvement are stabilized from posterior with a percutaneous fixator. Patients over 60 years were treated percutaneously with a polyaxial screw system. Increased stability was achieved by PMMA cement augmentation of the fenestrated screws. In elderly patients with Magerl A3 fractures without neurologic deficit, the index vertebra is supplementally treated with kyphoplasty (hybrid treatment). In acute, stable osteoporotic vertebral fractures with severe pain despite analgesics, we perform kyphoplasty, which is possible even in high thoracic fractures to T3 with smaller balloons and thinner trocars. Vertebroplasty is another option in the lumbar and lower thoracic spine. Because of invasiveness, extended posterior–anterior correction procedures are generally avoided in this population, which has frequent multiple comorbidities.

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shea Palmer ◽  
Sue Barnett ◽  
Mary Cramp ◽  
Alice Berry ◽  
Amanda Thomas ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822094803
Author(s):  
Barry Ting Sheen Kweh ◽  
Hui Qing Lee ◽  
Terence Tan ◽  
Joost Rutges ◽  
Travis Marion ◽  
...  

Study Design: Systematic review. Objective: Spinal orthoses have been generally used in the management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the elderly population with purported positive biomechanical and functional effects. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review of the literature examining the role of spinal orthoses in osteoporotic elderly patients who sustain low energy trauma vertebral fractures. Methods: A systematic literature review adherent to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted. Methodical searches utilizing MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Databases was performed. Results: Of the 2019 articles initially retrieved, 7 published articles (4 randomized controlled trials and 3 prospective cohort studies) satisfied the inclusion criteria. Five studies reported improvement in quantitative measurements of spinal column stability when either a rigid or semirigid orthosis was used, while 1 study was equivocal. The studies also showed the translation of biomechanical benefit into significant functional improvement as manifested by improved postural stability and reduced body sway. Subjective improvement in pain scores and quality of life was also noted with bracing. Conclusion: The use of spinal orthoses in neurologically intact elderly patients aged 60 years and older with osteoporotic compression vertebral fractures results in improved biomechanical vertebral stability, reduced kyphotic deformity, enhanced postural stability, greater muscular strength and superior functional outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Shingo Morishita ◽  
Toshitaka Yoshii ◽  
Atsushi Okawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Inose ◽  
Takashi Hirai ◽  
...  

Bone ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. S161 ◽  
Author(s):  
À. Martinez-Ferrer ◽  
J. Blasco ◽  
J.L. Carrasco ◽  
A. Monegal ◽  
J. Pomés ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 586-593
Author(s):  
Parisa Azimi ◽  
Taravat Yazdanian ◽  
Ali Montazeri

<sec><title>Study Design</title><p>Prospective clinical study.</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>To translate and validate the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (ECOS-16) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in Iran.</p></sec><sec><title>Overview of Literature</title><p>It is important to assess the psychometric properties of instruments measuring patient-reported outcomes.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>The translation was performed using the backward-forward translation method. The final version was generated by consensus among the translators. Every woman who had a T-score of &lt;−2.5 completed ECOS-16. Patients were divided into two study groups according to the World Health Organization's criteria: those with at least one vertebral fracture (surgery group) and those with no fractures (control group). They were asked to respond to the questionnaire at three points in time: preoperative and twice within 1-week interval after surgery assessments (6-month follow-up). The 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) also was completed. The psychometric properties of the questionnaire were assessed using internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and responsiveness.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Of 137 recruited women, 39 underwent surgery and 98 did not. Analysis of the ECOS-16 scales showed an appropriate reliability with Cronbach's alpha of &gt;0.70 for all scales. Test-retest reliability as indicated by intraclass correlation coefficient was found to be 0.85 (0.68–0.91). Additionally, the correlation of each item with its hypothesized domain of the ECOS-16 showed acceptable results, suggesting that the items had a substantial relationship with their own domains. Further analysis also indicated that the questionnaire was responsive to change (effect size, 0.85; standardized response mean, 0.93) (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001). Significant correlations existed between scores of similar subscales of ECOS-16 and SF-36 (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>ECOS-16 is an acceptable, reliable, valid, and responsive measure to assess the quality of life in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.</p></sec>


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shingo Morishita ◽  
Toshitaka Yoshii ◽  
Atsushi Okawa ◽  
Hiroyuki Inose ◽  
Takashi Hirai ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The surgical treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) is generally associated with a high risk of complications due to an aging population with osteoporosis; however, the detailed risk factors for systemic complications and mortality have not been clarified. We evaluated the risk factors for systemic complications and mortality in surgically treated OVF patients using a large national inpatient database. Methods Patients over 65 years old who were diagnosed with OVF and received either anterior fusion (AF) or posterior fusion (PF), from 2012 to 2016, were extracted from the diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) database. In each of the perioperative systemic complications (+) or (−) group, and the in-hospital death (+) or (−) group, we surveyed the various risk factors related to perioperative systemic complications and in-hospital death. Results The significant factors associated with systemic complications were older age (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.09–1.74), a lower activity of daily living score upon admission (OR 1.52, 95%CI 1.19–1.94), atrial fibrillation (OR 2.14, 95%CI 1.25–3.65), renal failure (OR 2.29, 95%CI 1.25–4.20), and surgical procedure (AF, OR 1.73, 95%CI 1.35–2.22). The significant explanatory variables for in-hospital death were revealed to be male sex (OR 3.26, 95%CI 1.20–8.87), a lower body mass index (OR 3.97, 95%CI 1.23–12.86), unscheduled admission (OR 3.52, 95%CI 1.17–10.63), atrial fibrillation (OR 8.31, 95%CI 2.25–30.70), renal failure (OR 7.15, 95%CI 1.32-38.77), and schizophrenia (OR 8.23, 95%CI 1.66–42.02). Conclusions Atrial fibrillation and renal failure as preoperative comorbidities were common factors between perioperative systemic complications and mortality in elderly patients for OVF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document