Third Trimester Umbilical Artery Doppler in Low-Risk Pregnancies and its Correlation to Estimated Fetal Weight and Birthweight

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Sirico ◽  
Anke Diemert ◽  
Peter Glosemeyer ◽  
Kurt Hecher
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Umbilical Artery ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Reference Ranges ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Z Scores ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Abstract Purpose This study investigated the correlation between the umbilical artery (UA) pulsatility index (PI) and the estimated fetal weight percentile and birthweight (BW) percentile, respectively. Materials and Methods We included low-risk pregnancies, in which UA Doppler investigations after 28 weeks were performed. Cases were allocated according to BW percentiles: small for gestational age (SGA) with BW < 10th percentile; appropriate for gestational age (AGA) and large for gestational age (LGA) with BW > 90th percentile. We analyzed differences in the mean UA-PI and UA-PI z-score for gestational age according to the three groups. Linear regression was performed to evaluate any relationship between Doppler indices and BW percentiles. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent association of UA-PI with LGA babies. In a second step, we considered data on estimated fetal weight (EFW) percentiles and performed the same analysis. Results We analyzed 14 554 pregnancies from 2004 to 2015. The mean UA-PI and mean UA-PI z-scores in the LGA group were lower than in the AGA and SGA groups (p < 0.001). UA-PI and UA-PI z-scores were linearly related to birthweight percentiles (p < 0.001) and to EFW percentiles (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that low UA-PI was independently associated with neonatal LGA (p < 0.001). Conclusion The higher the EFW and BW percentiles, the lower the UA-PI. However, reference ranges for UA Doppler are only based on gestation weeks. Further studies are needed to clarify whether customized reference ranges based on EFW percentiles are more appropriate for the evaluation of fetal wellbeing in the third trimester.

scholarly journals Relationship between Sonographic Umbilical cord Diameter and Gestational Age in Third Trimester of Pregnancy

2021 ◽  
pp. 20-27
Author(s):  
Sara Essam ALdabouly ◽  
Mohamed Mohsen El Namori ◽  
Mona Khaled Omar ◽  
Essmat Hamdy AboZeid
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Umbilical Cord ◽  
Fetal Growth ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Umbilical Vein ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Background: Throughout the fourth week of embryonic development the umbilical cord (UC) is formed, which corresponds to the fifth to the twelfth weeks of gestation. Fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) have leaner UCs than fetuses of appropriate gestational age do, and the caliber of the umbilical vein decreases significantly, resulting in a worsening of the Doppler parameters of the umbilical artery in the mother. The goal of this study was to evaluate the significance of sonographic UC diameter in determining gestational age in third trimester in pregnant women. Methods: We conducted a comparative cross-sectional research on 300 pregnant women aged range between (20-35) years, singleton gestation, gestational age (3rd) trimester estimated from antenatal mothers last menstrual period (LMP), viable fetus, presenting to obstetrics and gynecology department at Tanta university hospital. Results: Highly statistically significant positive correlation between UC diameter and gestational age, BPD, FL, AC, AFI, and estimated fetal weight was found. The increase in UC diameter was positively and significantly correlated with the increase in gestational age and estimated fetal weight, indicating that those who have prolonged gestational age and estimated fetal weight are more likely to have wider UC diameter. Conclusions: The UC diameter (UCD) has the potential to be a valuable indicator of fetal growth, well-being, and perinatal outcome. Sonographic measurement of UC diameter could be an efficient method of measuring fetal growth and predicting gestational age (GA), particularly between 28-40 weeks GA. It is possible that abnormal UC diameter can be a strong indicator to identify antenatal mothers at risk for IUFD and poor fetal outcomes.

scholarly journals Normal value of pulsatility index of umbilical artery in second and third trimester of pregnancy

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
MA Ferdous ◽  
MM Sharif ◽  
AS Mohiuddin ◽  
F Shegufta
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Pulsatility Index ◽  
Umbilical Artery ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Level Of Significance

This cross sectional study was carried out on 60 pregnant Bangladeshi women in the department of Radiology and Imaging, BIRDEM for measurement of Pulsatility Index (PI) of umbilical artery of their fetuses by duplex colour Doppler sonography during 2nd and 3rd trimester of pregnancies. Considering total 2nd and 3rd trimesters the mean PI value of umbilical artery was 1.24 (SD±0.27). While considering the gestational in separate trimesters, study showed that the value of PI in 2nd trimester was 1.33 (SD±0.29) and in 3rd trimester PI was 1.18 (SD±0.25). Paired t test shows there was a highly significant (t=35.79, df=59, Level of significance=0.001) difference between mean values of PI in different gestational ages. It was observed that there was gradual decrease of PI value with increase of gestational age (r= -0.207) but this decrease of PI was not statistically significant (p=0.113). Regression analysis between dependent PI value and independent gestational age showed linear negative relationship but this was not statistically significant (p=0.11). This study revealed that the Pulsatility index of umbilical artery was decreased with increase of gestational age from 2nd to 3rd trimester. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/bmrcb.v39i1.15809 Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2013; 39: 42-44

CORRELATION BETWEEN CEREBROPLACENTAL RATIO AND ADVERSE OUTCOMES IN INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RESTRICTION

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 82-89
Author(s):  
Tran Thao Nguyen Nguyen ◽  
Van Duc Vo ◽  
Ngoc Thanh Cao
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Intrauterine Growth Restriction ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Growth Restriction ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Intrauterine Growth ◽  
Cerebroplacental Ratio ◽  
Gestational Age At Delivery ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Objectives: To identify the values of CPR in intrauterine growth restriction and evaluate the correlation between cerebroplacental ratio and adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction. Material and methods: A prospective study was conducted on 74 cases of intrauterine growth restriction with an estimated fetal weight less than 10th percentile, at Departement of Obstetric and Gynecology of Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy from 05/2016 – 05/2017. CPR was calculated by PIMCA/PIUA.. The adverse outcomes included gestational age at delivery, methods used to delivery, APGAR score below 7 at 1 minutes and 5 minutes, admission at NICU, perinatal deaths, neonatals deaths. Results: The mean of CPR in group of early IUGR and late IUGR were 0.55 ± 0.14, 1.59 ± 0.69, respectively. The mean of CPR in group IUGR with an estimated fetal weight under the 3th percentile was 1.49 ± 0.76, lower than the mean of CPR in group IUGR with an estimated fetal weight from 3th percentile to 10th percentile. With cut – off at 1, CPR < 1 had the higher prevalence in group of early IUGR, in group IUGR with the estimated fetal weight below the 3th percentile, in group IUGR with hypoamniotic or oligohydramnios. The mean of gestational age at delivery of group IUGR with CPR < 1 and CPR >1 were 37.00 ± 3.18, and 38.59 ± 1.76, respectively. The rate of emergency cesarean section deliveries in the CPR < 1 and CPR > 1 group were 68.75% and 39.65%, respectively (p <0.05). Percentage of neonatal with APGAR ≤ 7 at 1 minute in the group with CPR < 1 and CPR > 1 were 56.25% and 22.41%, respectively. Rate of prenatal death was 12.5 in group IUGR with CPR < 1. Conclusion: There was a strong correlation between CPR and adverse outcomes in intrauterine growth restriction. Key words: intrauterine growth restriction, CPR ratio, middle cerebro artery, umbilical artery

scholarly journals Accuracy of Ultrasound Estimated Fetal Weight in Small for Gestational Age and Appropriate for Gestational Age Grown Periviable Neonates

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (08) ◽  
pp. 703-706
Author(s):  
Katherine Himes ◽  
Adriane Haragan
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Percentage Difference ◽  
Appropriate For Gestational Age ◽  
Absolute Percentage Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Objective Clinicians use estimated fetal weight (EFW) as a proxy for birth weight (BW) in the antenatal period. Our objective was to compare the accuracy of EFW obtained by ultrasound to BW among infants born during the periviable period and determine if accuracy of EFW varied among small for gestational age (SGA) versus appropriate for gestational age (AGA) grown neonates. Study Design We included women who delivered between 230/7 and 256/7 weeks' gestation and had an EFW within 7 days of delivery. Mean percentage difference and median absolute percentage difference between EFW and BW were calculated. Results Our cohort included 226 neonates with a mean gestational age of 241/7 ± 0.8 weeks and median BW of 653 g (interquartile range [IQR]: 580–750 g). The median absolute percentage difference between EFW and BW of fetal weight estimates was 9.2% (IQR: 3.6–17.2). EFW overestimated BW for 75% (n = 171) of the cohort. Among SGA infants, the mean percentage difference in EFW and BW was 16.2 ± 19.4% versus 6.9% ± 13.1% in AGA infants (p = 0.019). Conclusion EFW overestimated BW in this cohort. In addition, ultrasound was less accurate among infants born SGA. These data are important to consider when counseling families facing periviable delivery.

Sonographic Estimated Fetal Weight Within an Indian Cohort: Is the Hadlock Four Regression Model Appropriate or Does It Merit Adjustments?

2021 ◽  
pp. 875647932110466
Author(s):  
Upendra Kumar Joish ◽  
Tukaram Rathod ◽  
Prabhu S. Anitha
Keyword(s):  
Regression Model ◽  
Fetal Weight ◽  
Percentage Error ◽  
Third Trimester ◽  
Fetal Biometry ◽  
Pearson Coefficient ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Infant Birth ◽  
Strength Of Association ◽  
Estimated Fetal Weight

Objective: Sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) has an influence on the management of a pregnancy. The Hadlock 4 regression model (Hadlock-4), based on fetal biometry, is widely used. There are significant discrepancies noted between EFW, using Hadlock-4, compared to the actual infant birth weights (ABW) in the author’s clinical practice. The research objective was to compare the EFW, using Hadlock-4, with ABW and determine minor arithmetic modifications needed for this population. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was done enrolling women in the third trimester, who underwent sonography and delivered within a week of the examination. The sonographic cases were divided into class intervals by gestational age. The EFW were compared with the ABW, using a Pearson coefficient and mean percentage errors (MPE). The EFW values were increased or decreased, by a certain percentage, to keep the mean percentage error in an acceptable range. Results: The strength of association between the EFW and ABW was 0.69 ( p = .014). The EFW and the MPEs for women delivering at 36-40 weeks and beyond was significantly more (13.2 and 18.2%). The EFWs at 36-40 weeks and beyond 40 weeks were reduced by 3 and 8% respectively, which reduced the MPEs. After this modification 97.6% of ABWs fell within +/-2 standard deviations of the EFWs. Conclusion: A simple 3 and 8% reduction of EFWs, using the Hadlock-4, with those sonographic examinations at 36-40 weeks and beyond 40 weeks gestation respectively, is proposed to increase reliable in this Indian patient practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document