Beneficial effects of endoscopic screening on gastric cancer and its optimal screening interval: a population-based study

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Qing Li ◽  
Xiang-Xiang Qin ◽  
Zhe-Xuan Li ◽  
Le-Hua Wang ◽  
Zong-Chao Liu ◽  
...  

Background and study aims: The effectiveness of endoscopic screening on gastric cancer (GC) is less investigated and screening interval of repeated screening is yet to be optimized in China. Patients and methods: In a population-based prospective study, we included 375,800 subjects based on the Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Early Detection Program in Linqu, a GC high-risk area in China, 14,670 of which underwent endoscopic screening(2012-2018). We assessed the associations of the risk of incident GC and GC-specific deaths with endoscopic screening and examined the changes in overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) of GCs by endoscopic screening. The optimal screening interval of repeated endoscopy for early detection of GC was explored. Results: Ever receiving endoscopic screening significantly decreased the risk of invasive GC(age and sex-adjusted RR=0.69, 95%CI:0.52-0.92) and GC-specific deaths(RR=0.33, 95%CI: 0.20-0.56), particularly for non-cardia GC. Repeated screening strengthened the beneficial effect on invasive GC-specific deaths by one-time screening. Among invasive GCs, screening-detected cases had significantly better OS(RR=0.18, 95%CI: 0.13-0.25) and DSS(RR=0.18, 95%CI: 0.13-0.25) than cases in the unscreened group, particularly for those receiving repeated endoscopy. For individuals with intestinal metaplasia or low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, repeated endoscopy at an interval of less than two years, particularly within one year, significantly enhanced the detection of early GC, compared with repeated screening after two years(P-trend=0.02). Conclusion: Endoscopic screening prevented GC occurrence and death and improved its prognosis in a population-based study. Repeated endoscopy enhanced the effectiveness, for which screening interval needs to be defined in conformity with the severity of gastric lesions.

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Sjomina ◽  
Jelizaveta Pavlova ◽  
Ilva Daugule ◽  
Pavel Janovic ◽  
Ilze Kikuste ◽  
...  

Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the rationale of blood pepsinogen (PG) testing in population based screening settings.Methods: Participants from a cross-sectional population-based study of cardiovascular risk factors in Latvia were invited to participate in the current study. Pepsinogen I and II were measured in blood samples taken during the initial study and at follow-up; upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed. There were three groups of patients: with moderately decreased (PG I< 70 ng/ml and PG I/PG II ratio < 3), with strongly decreased (PG I< 30 ng/ml and PG I/PG II ratio < 2), and with normal PG level. Biopsy with H. pylori detection was performed (updated Sydney system).Results: Results from 259 patients were analyzed. Pepsinogens were decreased in 133 (51.4%), H. pylori was positive in 177 (66.0%) cases. Mean age was significantly lower in patients with normal compared to strongly decreased PG level group (52.8 vs. 64.1 years, p<0.001). Prevalence of severe corpus atrophy was higher in the strongly decreased compared to the normal PG test group: 7.0% vs. 0%; the same tendency was noted in the distribution of OLGA stages III-IV – 10.5% and 0.0%, OLGIM stages III-IV – 3.5% and 0%, and low-grade dysplasia – 15.8% and 2.4% (p<0.05). Two cases of gastric cancer were found; both presented decreased PG levels. A strong association between H. pylori eradication and PG ratio dynamics was found (p<0.05).Conclusions: All high-risk lesions were found in the decreased PG test groups; two cancer cases were revealed.However, PG demonstrated low specificity and low value of repeated testing. The value of PG as a sole test for gastric cancer risk is limited.


Gut ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (9) ◽  
pp. 1598-1607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Guo ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Markus Gerhard ◽  
Juan-Juan Gao ◽  
Raquel Mejias-Luque ◽  
...  

ObjectiveGastrointestinal microbiota may be involved in Helicobacter pylori-associated gastric cancer development. The aim of this study was to explore the possible microbial mechanisms in gastric carcinogenesis and potential dysbiosis arising from H. pylori infection.DesignDeep sequencing of the microbial 16S ribosomal RNA gene was used to investigate alterations in paired gastric biopsies and stool samples in 58 subjects with successful and 57 subjects with failed anti-H. pylori treatment, relative to 49 H. pylori negative subjects.ResultsIn H. pylori positive subjects, richness and Shannon indexes increased significantly (both p<0.001) after successful eradication and showed no difference to those of negative subjects (p=0.493 for richness and p=0.420 for Shannon index). Differential taxa analysis identified 18 significantly altered gastric genera after eradication. The combination of these genera into a Microbial Dysbiosis Index revealed that the dysbiotic microbiota in H. pylori positive mucosa was associated with advanced gastric lesions (chronic atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia/dysplasia) and could be reversed by eradication. Strong coexcluding interactions between Helicobacter and Fusobacterium, Neisseria, Prevotella, Veillonella, Rothia were found only in advanced gastric lesion patients, and were absent in normal/superficial gastritis group. Changes in faecal microbiota included increased Bifidobacterium after successful H. pylori eradication and more upregulated drug-resistant functional orthologs after failed treatment.ConclusionH. pylori infection contributes significantly to gastric microbial dysbiosis that may be involved in carcinogenesis. Successful H. pylori eradication potentially restores gastric microbiota to a similar status as found in uninfected individuals, and shows beneficial effects on gut microbiota.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (23) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Jin ◽  
Seong Woo Jeon ◽  
Yonghwan Kwon ◽  
Su Youn Nam ◽  
Seong Jae Yeo ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. A1382
Author(s):  
Hector Cardona ◽  
Oscar Gutierrez ◽  
J. Becerra ◽  
William Otero ◽  
Antonia Sepulveda ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document