Chemical and biological investigations of Manuka honey

Planta Medica ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Bäcker ◽  
K Wende ◽  
U Meyer ◽  
U Lindequist
Keyword(s):  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aled E. L. Roberts ◽  
Lydia C. Powell ◽  
Manon F. Pritchard ◽  
David W. Thomas ◽  
Rowena E. Jenkins

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 154-157
Author(s):  
Jeanine Harrison
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 67 (39) ◽  
pp. 10853-10862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoji Kato ◽  
Masaki Kawai ◽  
Shota Kawai ◽  
Yayako Okano ◽  
Natsumi Rokkaku ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1237-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Cooper ◽  
L. Jenkins ◽  
A. F. M. Henriques ◽  
R. S. Duggan ◽  
N. F. Burton

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ka-Kit Tsang ◽  
Enid Wai-Yung Kwong ◽  
Tony Shing-Shun To ◽  
Joanne Wai-Yee Chung ◽  
Thomas Kwok-Shing Wong

Nanocrystalline silver (nAg) and Manuka honey (MH) dressing have increasing popularity for treating diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). This study was an open-label randomized controlled trial with three parallel groups’ design in examining the preliminary effectiveness of nAg against MH and conventional dressing in healing DFU in terms of ulcer healing, ulcer infection, and inflammation. 31 participants (11 in the nAg group, 10 in the MH group, and 10 in the convention group) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes were enrolled. Wound cleaning, debridement, and topical dressing application were performed according to the group allocation in each visit at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. The results found that the proportions of complete ulcer healing were 81.8%, 50%, and 40% in the nAg, MH, and conventional groups, respectively. The ulcer size reduction rate was potentially higher in the nAg group (97.45%) than the MH group (86.21%) and the conventional group (75.17%). In bacteriology, nAg showed a greater rate of microorganism reduction although it was not significant. To conclude, nAg alginate was potentially superior to MH and conventional dressing in healing diabetic foot ulcer in terms of ulcer size reduction rate.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruby Harsent ◽  
Paul Smith ◽  
James Arthur Blaxland ◽  
Neil Rushmere

Abstract BackgroundUsers of prosthetic devices face the accumulation of potentially drug-resistant pathogenic bacteria on the skin/prosthesis interface. In this study, we took surface swabs of the skin/prosthesis interface of eleven disabled athletes to identify microorganisms present. In addition to determining their antimicrobial resistance profile, we assessed their sensitivity to Manuka honey and Garlic extract (allicin) MethodsEleven volunteers were directed to swab the skin at the skin/prosthesis interface. After initial isolation of microorganisms we employed the following general microbiological methods; Gram stain, Catalase test, Oxidase test, lactose fermenting capability, haemolytic capability, Staphaurex, mannitol fermenting capability, Streptex; API Staph, 20E, Candida, and BBL crystal identification system tests. Once identified, isolates were analysed for their sensitivity to penicillin, erythromycin. ampicillin, vancomycin, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and colistin-sulphate. Isolates were also analysed for their sensitivity to allicin (Garlic Extract (GE)) and Manuka honey (Medihoney™) (MH). ResultsEleven isolates were identified, Bacillus cereus, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus luteus, Pseudomonas oryzihabitans, Micrococcus spp., Bacillus subtilis, Group D Streptococcus, Pantoea spp., Enterobacter cloacae and Bergyella zoohelcum. All Gram-positive organisms were resistant to 1.5 units of penicillin and 10 μg of ampicillin, and two Gram-negatives Pseudomonas oryzihabitans and Bergyella zoohelcum were resistant to 10 μg ceftazidime, whilst Bergyella zoohelcum, was also resistant to 10 μg of gentamicin. In comparison, all organisms were sensitive to Manuka honey and nine sensitive to Allicin. ConclusionsThis study highlights the prevalence of uncommon drug resistant microorganisms on the skin within a vulnerable population, highlighting the potential for MH or GE intervention.


2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Moniruzzaman ◽  
Siti Amrah Sulaiman ◽  
Md Ibrahim Khalil ◽  
Siew Hua Gan

2016 ◽  
Vol 509 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 59-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marika Tenci ◽  
Silvia Rossi ◽  
Maria Cristina Bonferoni ◽  
Giuseppina Sandri ◽  
Cinzia Boselli ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document