Stellenwert der C-11-Cholin-PET/CT für das LK-Staging bei Patienten mit high-risk Prostata-Karzinom bzw. Rezidiv - eine histologisch kontrollierte retrospektive Studie

Author(s):  
C Pfannenberg ◽  
NF Schwenzer ◽  
C Schraml ◽  
C Brendle ◽  
M Werner ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
C Pfannenberg ◽  
S Olthof ◽  
F Seith ◽  
C la Fougere ◽  
G Reischl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 6475-6480 ◽  
Author(s):  
SARA STRANDBERG ◽  
CAMILLA THELLENBERG KARLSSON ◽  
MATTIAS OGREN ◽  
JAN AXELSSON ◽  
KATRINE RIKLUND

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (7) ◽  
pp. 1575
Author(s):  
Lucia Zanoni ◽  
Riccardo Mei ◽  
Lorenzo Bianchi ◽  
Francesca Giunchi ◽  
Lorenzo Maltoni ◽  
...  

The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the role of [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT in the characterization of intra-prostatic lesions in high-risk primary PCa patients eligible for radical prostatectomy, in comparison with conventional [11C]Choline PET/CT and validated by prostatectomy pathologic examination. Secondary aims were to determine the performance of PET semi-quantitative parameters (SUVmax; target-to-background ratios [TBRs], using abdominal aorta, bone marrow and liver as backgrounds) for malignant lesion detection (and best cut-off values) and to search predictive factors of malignancy. A six sextants prostate template was created and used by PET readers and pathologists for data comparison and validation. PET visual and semi-quantitative analyses were performed: for instance, patient-based, blinded to histopathology; subsequently lesion-based, un-blinded, according to the pathology reference template. Among 19 patients included (mean age 63 years, 89% high and 11% very-high-risk, mean PSA 9.15 ng/mL), 45 malignant and 31 benign lesions were found and 19 healthy areas were selected (n = 95). For both tracers, the location of the “blinded” prostate SUVmax matched with the lobe of the lesion with the highest pGS in 17/19 cases (89%). There was direct correlation between [18F]Fluciclovine uptake values and pISUP. Overall, lesion-based (n = 95), the performance of PET semiquantitative parameters, with either [18F]Fluciclovine or [11C]Choline, in detecting either malignant/ISUP2-5/ISUP4-5 PCa lesions, was moderate and similar (AUCs ≥ 0.70) but still inadequate (AUCs ≤ 0.81) as a standalone staging procedure. A [18F]Fluciclovine TBR-L3 ≥ 1.5 would depict a clinical significant lesion with a sensitivity and specificity of 85% and 68% respectively; whereas a SUVmax cut-off value of 4 would be able to identify a ISUP 4-5 lesion in all cases (sensitivity 100%), although with low specificity (52%). TBRs (especially with threshold significantly higher than aorta and slightly higher than bone marrow), may be complementary to implement malignancy targeting.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lothar Weißbach ◽  
Christiane Roloff

ZusammenfassungDer Review von Fossati 2017 stellt den Wert der pLA im Rahmen der RP in Frage, weil sich aus den vorliegenden Studien kein onkologischer Nutzen ergibt. Nach wie vor ist die Beweislage wegen fehlender Evidenz dürftig. Unsere Feststellung, dass von metastasierten LK keine Streuung bisher nachgewiesen wurde, basiert auf Registerdaten, auf klinischen Studien ohne Nachweis eines pLA-Vorteils und auf Überlegungen zum genetischen Zusammenhang von LK- und Fernmetastasen. Der Verzicht auf die pLA bzw. auf die Bestrahlung eines Beckenfeldes wird durch die verbesserte Bildgebung mit dem 68Ga PSMA-PET-CT zum Nachweis von Metastasen erleichtert. Wenn LK nicht metastasieren, wird das Ergebnis der Bildgebung diagnostisch zur Therapieplanung ausreichen. Somit kann auf die pLA aus diagnostischen Gründen verzichtet werden. Komplikationen wären ausgeschlossen. Um die Frage zu klären, ob die pLA bzw. ein multimodales Behandlungskonzept intermediate- und high risk-Patienten nützen, wird ein RCT notwendig sein, in dem v. a. der nicht vollständig entfernte Primarius als Streuquelle berücksichtigt wird.


Author(s):  
Marianne Vogsen ◽  
Jeanette Dupont Jensen ◽  
Ivar Yannick Christensen ◽  
Oke Gerke ◽  
Anne Marie Bak Jylling ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 223
Author(s):  
Y. Benameur ◽  
O. Ait Sahel ◽  
S. Nabih Oueriagli ◽  
J. El Bekkali ◽  
A. Doudouh

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 26-26
Author(s):  
Jean-Baptiste Alberge ◽  
Bastien Jamet ◽  
Clement Bailly ◽  
Cyrille Touzeau ◽  
Jonathan Cruard ◽  
...  

Background Positron emission tomography (PET) using 18Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) provides independent prognostic informations in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients (Moreau et al, ASH 2019; Moreau et al, JCO 2017; Zamagni et al, Blood 2011). At baseline, FDG-PET/CT characteristics such as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), presence of extramedullary disease (EMD), and paramedullary disease (PMD) define high-risk NDMM patients. Similarly, the presence of negative FDG-PET/CT at baseline has been associated with favorable outcome in NDMM patients (Abe et al, EJNMMI 2019; Moreau et al, ASH 2019). The aim of the present study was to identify MM molecular features associated with these functional imaging biomarkers. Methods A group of 136 patients from CASSIOPET, a companion study of the CASSIOPEIA cohort (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02541383) were subjected to whole genome expression profiling using RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) on sorted bone marrow plasma cells in addition to FDG-PET/CT imaging at baseline. RNA-seq reads were aligned to hg38 reference genome with STAR and subjected to differential expression testing with DESeq2 with sample purity treated as a model covariate. High risk group with the GEP70 signature and classification from the seven molecular subgroups (CD-1, CD-2, HY, LB, MF, MS, and PR) were determined by weighted mean value of gene expression (Zhan et al, Blood 2006). Special attention was paid to genes associated with glucose metabolism and related to plasma cells proliferation. On FDG-PET/CT, SUVmax of areas of focally increased tracer uptake on bone was determined and the presence of EMD or PMD identified. Results FDG-PET/CT was positive in 108 patients out of 136 (79,4%), with 19 (14%) and 15 (11%) of them presenting PMD and EMD disease respectively. Expression level of glucose transporter GLUT1 was independent of these three imaging biomarkers (FDG-PET/CT positivity, EMD and PMD), while HK2 was downregulated in negative scans only (Fold Change = 2.1, padj=0.02). GLUT5 expression was associated with positive FDG-PET/CT (Fold Change = 3.5, padj = 8E-4). Both GLUT1 and HK2 weakly correlated with SUVmax (r=0.26 and 0.36, respectively). Of note, negative FDG-PET/CT were enriched for the LB group of patients, consistent with the lower incidence of MRI-defined bone lesions reported in this subgroup, and it remained independent of the GEP70 signature. Furthermore, high risk GEP70 signature was associated with a SUVmax ≥ 4, and correlated with the presence of PMD (OR=3.2, CI=[0.95-10.6], p=0.03), but not with EMD (p=0.7).Conversely, there was no patient from the LB group with detected PMD on imaging, but 25% (2/8) showed EMD, suggesting that different biological features support both disease patterns. Finally, positive PET/CT profiles seemed to display two distinct signatures with either high expression of proliferation genes (MKI67, PCNA, TOP2A, STMN1), or high expression of GLUT5 and lymphocyte antigens (CD19, CD30L, and CCR2), suggesting a different phenotype for this subgroup. This finding was independent of a high SUVmax. Conclusion Our study confirmed that negative FDG-PET/CT at baseline is associated with low HK2 expression while positive exams showed increased GLUT5 expression and proliferation markers. We describe a strong correlation between two imaging biomarkers (baseline SUVmax and PMD) and high risk signature and molecular subgroup with highly proliferative disease. On the contrary, EMD appeared independent of high risk signature or molecular subgroups. Additional studies will confirm and extend the correlation between imaging and clinical features of the disease and molecular characteristics of malignant plasma cells. Disclosures Touzeau: Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Moreau:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document