scholarly journals Epidemiology and Estimated Cost of Surgeries for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Conducted by the Unified Health System in Brazil (2008–2016)

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (02) ◽  
pp. 086-093
Author(s):  
Marcelo José da Silva de Magalhães ◽  
Jeffet Lucas Silva Fernandes ◽  
Mateus Silva Alkmim ◽  
Evandro Barbosa dos Anjos

Objective To define the epidemiological aspects and estimated costs of surgeries performed by the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS, in the Portuguese acronym) for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in Brazil between 2008 and 2016. Materials and Methods Documentary study, with data from the Informatics Department of the SUS (DATASUS, in the Portuguese acronym), about the absolute number and incidence of admissions, the total and mean length of stay (in days), the total expenses, and the hospital and professional services expenses in the surgical treatment of CTS. Results During the period studied, there were 82,123 hospitalizations for surgery, with a 62% increase from 2008 to 2015, accompanied by an increase in the values of professional services. The incidence and the absolute number of procedures were higher in the South and Southeast regions. The North region presented the lowest expenses, absolute number, and incidence of admissions, as well as the longer mean length of stay. The mean length of stay decreased from 1.2 days in 2008 to 0.7 day in 2016. The expenses totaled BRL 29,463,148.80 during the period studied. After 2011, professional services became the largest portion of the total expenses. Hospital expenses corresponded to 52.49% of the expenditure in 2008, and to 36.24% in 2015, while professional expenses received the largest investment compared with the total amount expended in 2012. Conclusion The present study was not consistent with the international literature regarding epidemiological data and cost estimates. Brazil presented a disparity between absolute numbers and annual incidence of admissions and length of stay. Future researches can assess variables that have influenced these results, as well as contribute to public interventions aimed at the improvement of health care.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1870.1-1870
Author(s):  
I. García Hernández ◽  
L. Fernández de la Fuente Bursón ◽  
P. Muñoz Reinoso ◽  
D. V. Mendoza Mendoza ◽  
B. Hernández-Cruz ◽  
...  

Background:Musculoskeletal Diseases (MSKD) represent one of the main health problems burdens worldwide. They cause a significant functional, quality of life and socioeconomic impact. Knee and lumbar osteoarthritis are the most prevalent1. MSKD can be assessed by different kind of specialists: Orthopedic and Traumatology Surgery (OTS), Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, each of them focused at one of the distinct aspects of the same disease. It is the General Practitioner (GP) consultations that usually act as a gateway to specialized care. However, this derivation is carried out in non-standardized manners that leads to an evaluation from a sometimes wrong selected specialist or sometimes overlap management between several of them2. The result is an endless waiting list in an overburden health system that cannot solve people’s health issues. In 2018, only in our area, 32.894 patients with MSKD were referred from GP to the different medical consultations: OTS (65%), Rehabilitation (25%) and Rheumatology (10%). Furthermore, there are specialized consultations called“Primary Trauma”to which GP can refer which are managed indistinctly by any of the 3 specialists mentioned before.Objectives:The following study aims to assess by collecting data in one of these consultations, how these pathologies are referred to the different specialist and the role that the rheumatologist plays in its management.Methods:From January to March 2019, 300 consecutive patients´ medical records from the HUVM area that were sent to “Primary Trauma” consultations and attended by a rheumatologist have been reviewed. The reason for consultation, tests and referrals requested, diagnoses reached and procedures and other therapeutic actions performed were collected. Descriptive statistics with percentages and mean are showed.Results:The average age of the patients was 51 years [7-88], 57% (170) women and 43% (130) men. The most frequent reasons for referral were knee pain (26), foot pathology (23%), low back pain (12%) and carpal tunnel syndrome (6%). 68% (204 patients) attended the consultation with some test already performed request in primary care, mostly radiographs (61%) and MRI scan (34%). After the first assessment during consultation, only 31% required new studies. The diagnoses that were most frequently established are showed in table 1: degenerative knee pathology (29%) was the most prevalent. 60% of the patients assessed were given exercise tables and/or postural recommendations. 14% received an infiltration on the same day of the visit. Only 78 patients (26%) needed to be reviewed later in those consultations. Of the remaining 222 (74%), 81 (27%) were referred to other specialists. 56 of them (19%) went to OTS to a surgical evaluation, most frequently of the knee (32%), hand (27%) and foot (23%). 141 (47%) were discharged and referred to GP´s for follow ups.Table 1.Diagnoses.N%Degenerative knee pathology6729Plantar support alterations3415Lumbar osteoarthritis198Deformities of the feet177Mechanical metatarsalgia125Plantar fasciitis94Carpal tunnel syndrome94Conclusion:The prevalence of MSKD found in medical consultation coincides with the national registers. Most patients did not need to be referred to surgical units. The role of the Rheumatologist is to take a comprehensive care for the patient, focusing on giving an effective evaluation and quick solution to his MSKD. In short, if the most prevalent MSKD are not subsidiary of surgical treatment (at least initially), the specialist whom patients with MSKD should be referred would be the rheumatologist.References:[1]EPISER2016: Estudio de la prevalencia de las enfermedades reumáticas en población adulta en España. Sociedad Española de Reumatología. Madrid, 2018.[2]Conill EM et al. Waiting lists in public systems: from expanding supply to timely access? Reflections on Spain’s National Health System. Cien Saude Colet. 2011;16:2783–94.Disclosure of Interests:Isabel García Hernández: None declared, Lola Fernández de la Fuente Bursón: None declared, Paloma Muñoz Reinoso: None declared, Dolores V. Mendoza Mendoza: None declared, Blanca Hernández-Cruz Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Sanofi, BMS, STADA, Paz González Moreno: None declared, José Javier Pérez Venegas: None declared


2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (01) ◽  
pp. 001-006
Author(s):  
Marcelo Magalhães ◽  
Gabriella Bernardes ◽  
Aline Nunes ◽  
Denilson Castro ◽  
Luiza Oliveira ◽  
...  

Introduction Cubital tunnel syndrome (CTS) is responsible for one of the types of ulnar nerve neuropathy and is the second cause of compressive neuropathy of the upper limb, only surpassed by carpal tunnel syndrome. Objective To describe the epidemiological data of the ulnar nerve transposition surgical code in the treatment of CTS by the United Health System (SUS) from 2005 to 2015. Methodology This is a descriptive epidemiological study, in which data were obtained through consultation of the DATASUS database. Results/Discussion During this period, 774 procedures were performed and, despite the addition of 20.3 million people to the Brazilian population, the incidence was 0.33/1,000,000. National and international epidemiology point to a slightly higher prevalence of the procedure between men, in the fourth and fifth decades of life. Low permanence rate, as well as the absence of hospital deaths related to the procedure, infer that the procedure is safe, with low morbidity and mortality rates. Conclusion The annual incidence of the cubital syndrome submitted to surgical treatment at SUS in the Brazilian population was 1/7,670,833 in 2005 and ½,174,468 in 2015. The cost of each surgical procedure during the same period ranged from R$ 318.88 to R$ 539.74. The mean hospitalization time for CTS surgery was 1.85 days.


2015 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 287-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adham do Amaral e Castro ◽  
Thelma Larocca Skare ◽  
Paulo Afonso Nunes Nassif ◽  
Alexandre Kaue Sakuma ◽  
Wagner Haese Barros

AbstractObjective:To describe the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a sample of 200 healthy hospital workers, establishing the respective epidemiological associations.Materials and Methods:Two hundred individuals were submitted to wrist ultrasonography to measure the median nerve area. They were questioned and examined for epidemiological data, body mass index, carpal tunnel syndrome signs and symptoms, and submitted to the Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire (BCTQ) to evaluate the carpal tunnel syndrome severity. A median nerve area ≥ 9 mm2 was considered to be diagnostic of carpal tunnel syndrome.Results:Carpal tunnel syndrome was diagnosed by ultrasonography in 34% of the sample. It was observed the association of carpal tunnel syndrome with age (p < 0.0001), paresthesia (p < 0.0001), Tinel's test (p < 0.0001), Phalen's test (p< 0.0001), BCTQ score (p < 0.0001), and years of formal education (p < 0.0001). Years of formal education was the only variable identified as an independent risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome (95% CI = 1.03 to 1.24).Conclusion:The prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a population of hospital workers was of 34%. The number of years of formal education was the only independent risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome.


2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
James B. Talmage

Abstract Permanent impairment cannot be assessed until the patient is at maximum medical improvement (MMI), but the proper time to test following carpal tunnel release often is not clear. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) states: “Factors affecting nerve recovery in compression lesions include nerve fiber pathology, level of injury, duration of injury, and status of end organs,” but age is not prognostic. The AMA Guides clarifies: “High axonotmesis lesions may take 1 to 2 years for maximum recovery, whereas even lesions at the wrist may take 6 to 9 months for maximal recovery of nerve function.” The authors review 3 studies that followed patients’ long-term recovery of hand function after open carpal tunnel release surgery and found that estimates of MMI ranged from 25 weeks to 24 months (for “significant improvement”) to 18 to 24 months. The authors suggest that if the early results of surgery suggest a patient's improvement in the activities of daily living (ADL) and an examination shows few or no symptoms, the result can be assessed early. If major symptoms and ADL problems persist, the examiner should wait at least 6 to 12 months, until symptoms appear to stop improving. A patient with carpal tunnel syndrome who declines a release can be rated for impairment, and, as appropriate, the physician may wish to make a written note of this in the medical evaluation report.


2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 5-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Mark Melhorn

Abstract Medical evidence is drawn from observation, is multifactorial, and relies on the laws of probability rather than a single cause, but, in law, finding causation between a wrongful act and harm is essential to the attribution of legal responsibility. These different perspectives often result in dissatisfaction for litigants, uncertainty for judges, and friction between health care and legal professionals. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) provides an example: Popular notions suggest that CTS results from occupational arm or hand use, but medical factors range from congenital or acquired anatomic structure, age, sex, and body mass index, and perhaps also involving hormonal disorders, diabetes, pregnancy, and others. The law separately considers two separate components of causation: cause in fact (a cause-and-effect relationship exists) and proximate or legal cause (two events are so closely related that liability can be attached to the first event). Workers’ compensation systems are a genuine, no-fault form of insurance, and evaluators should be aware of the relevant thresholds and legal definitions for the jurisdiction in which they provide an opinion. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment contains a large number of specific references and outlines the methodology to evaluate CTS, including both occupational and nonoccupational risk factors and assigning one of four levels of evidence that supports the conclusion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document