Prevalence of Inhibitors in a Population of 3435 Hemophilia Patients in France

1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (06) ◽  
pp. 600-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Sultan ◽  

SummaryA cooperative study between the 37 centers of the French Hemophilia Study Group was undertaken to establish the prevalence of inhibitor patients in the French hemophilia population. The prevalence reported in the literature varies widely from 3.6% to 17.5%. Some of the studies are dealing with a small number of patients and inhibitor patients are reported either to the total number of hemophiliacs or to the severely affected ones. The French study provided information concerning 3,435 hemophiliacs and showed a prevalence of 6.2% for the overall population. Prevalence of inhibitors was found to be 7% in the population of hemophilia A patients and 12.8% in the population of severely affected ones. The prevalence of inhibitors in the population of hemophilia B patients was 2% and 4% in the population of severely affected hemophilia B patients. The cooperative study also showed that 47.5% of inhibitors are detected before 10 years of age and that 82% of inhibitor patients are high responders. Analysis of inhibitor detection in patients under the age often showed that there was a peak in the population of 2 years old children. Although not comparable to the present study the high incidence of inhibitors with ultrapurified and recombinant FVIII reported in previously untransfused patient may be borne in mind.

Blood ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. 3663-3671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Prescott ◽  
Hiroaki Nakai ◽  
Evgueni L. Saenko ◽  
Inge Scharrer ◽  
Inga Marie Nilsson ◽  
...  

Abstract Approximately 25% of hemophilia A patients infused with factor VIII (fVIII) mount an immune response, which leads to its inactivation. Anti-fVIII autoantibodies are also seen rarely in individuals with normal fVIII. We have previously demonstrated that some anti-A2 and anti-C2 domain antibodies are fVIII inhibitors and that many patients have additional inhibitors with a fVIII light chain (LCh) epitope outside C2. Because the contribution of the different antibodies to the plasma inhibitor titer had been examined in a limited number of patients (14), we report in this study a more extensive analysis of 55 plasmas. The dominant inhibitors in 62% (13 of 21) of autoantibody plasmas were directed only against C2 or A2, but not both, whereas this pattern was found in only 15% (5 of 34) of hemophilic plasmas. In addition, anti-A2 inhibitors were present in 71% (24 of 34) of hemophilic plasmas, but only 33% (7 of 21) of autoantibody plasmas. These results demonstrated that the inhibitor response in hemophiliacs was more complex and the epitope specificity was somewhat different. A comparison of hemophiliacs treated only with plasma fVIII or recombinant fVIII showed no significant differences in the complexity of the inhibitor response, as ≥ 2 different inhibitor antibodies were present in 78% (18 of 23) of the former and 82% (9 of 11) of the latter. In contrast, the major inhibitors in 35% (8 of 23) of hemophiliacs treated with plasma fVIII were directed against C2 and another LCh epitope within residues 1649-2137, but not A2, while none (0 of 11) treated with recombinant fVIII had this pattern.


Blood ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. 3663-3671 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Prescott ◽  
Hiroaki Nakai ◽  
Evgueni L. Saenko ◽  
Inge Scharrer ◽  
Inga Marie Nilsson ◽  
...  

Approximately 25% of hemophilia A patients infused with factor VIII (fVIII) mount an immune response, which leads to its inactivation. Anti-fVIII autoantibodies are also seen rarely in individuals with normal fVIII. We have previously demonstrated that some anti-A2 and anti-C2 domain antibodies are fVIII inhibitors and that many patients have additional inhibitors with a fVIII light chain (LCh) epitope outside C2. Because the contribution of the different antibodies to the plasma inhibitor titer had been examined in a limited number of patients (14), we report in this study a more extensive analysis of 55 plasmas. The dominant inhibitors in 62% (13 of 21) of autoantibody plasmas were directed only against C2 or A2, but not both, whereas this pattern was found in only 15% (5 of 34) of hemophilic plasmas. In addition, anti-A2 inhibitors were present in 71% (24 of 34) of hemophilic plasmas, but only 33% (7 of 21) of autoantibody plasmas. These results demonstrated that the inhibitor response in hemophiliacs was more complex and the epitope specificity was somewhat different. A comparison of hemophiliacs treated only with plasma fVIII or recombinant fVIII showed no significant differences in the complexity of the inhibitor response, as ≥ 2 different inhibitor antibodies were present in 78% (18 of 23) of the former and 82% (9 of 11) of the latter. In contrast, the major inhibitors in 35% (8 of 23) of hemophiliacs treated with plasma fVIII were directed against C2 and another LCh epitope within residues 1649-2137, but not A2, while none (0 of 11) treated with recombinant fVIII had this pattern.


Author(s):  
S.S. Shapiro ◽  
M.E. Eyster ◽  
J. Lewis

The Pennsylvania Hemophilia Program was initiated in March 1973, with the establishment of 9 Hemophilia Centers throughout the state. From an initial enrollment of 150, the number of patients has grown to 669 as of October 1976. Of these, 491 have Hemophilia A and 91 have Hemophilia B, a prevalence rate of 4.2 and 0.76 per 100,000, respectively in the total state population of some 11,800,000. A total of 210 patients (36%) with Hemophilia A or B are on home therapy programs. Two hundred fifty-five patients with Hemophilia A (52%) have severe disease, of whom 160 (63%) are on home therapy. Thirty-six patients with Hemophilia B (40%) have severe disease, of whom 22 (61%) are on home therapy. The remaining patients are treated in-center as necessary. Thirty-seven patients (7.5%) with Hemophilia A have inhibitors to Factor VIII, while only 1 of 91 patients with Hemophilia B has an inhibitor to Factor IX. Total Factor VIII and Factor IX usage for hemophiliacs in the past year was 15,040,000 and 1,282,000 biological units, respectively. At current prices, this represents $1.5 million for Factor VIII and approximately $150,000 for Factor IX. The average annual use of Factor VIII in severe Hemophilia A, excluding surgery, was 44,300 units/patient for patients on home therapy and 32,000 units/patient for patients on Center therapy. These figures are roughly comparable when corrected for patient age (14% of home therapy patients but 28% of Center therapy patients under the age of 10). These observations suggest that the actual prevalence rates of Hemophilia A and B are lower than previously quoted, that more patients with milder disease exist than expected and that home and Center therapy require equal product usage.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 30-31
Author(s):  
Anna Ter-Zakarian ◽  
Richard Barnes ◽  
Rebecca Kruse-Jarres ◽  
Doris Quon ◽  
Shannon Jackson ◽  
...  

Hemophilia is an X-linked bleeding disorder characterized by deficiencies of Factor VIII or IX. Hypertension in persons with hemophilia (PWH) appears to be more prevalent compared to the general population. A major complication of hemophilia remains the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against infused clotting factor. It tends to occur within the first 50 exposure days and therefore mostly in children with severe hemophilia. Since inhibitor development is associated with high mortality and morbidity, their eradication with high dose clotting factor concentrates is critical and successful in the majority of patients. Recently a cohort study showed a positive association between presence of inhibitors in elderly patients and cardiovascular disease, although a small number of patients with inhibitors were included in that study (Sood SL, Blood Advances 2018). To date, the link between a history of inhibitors and hypertension has not been established. The primary purpose of our study was to evaluate the relationship between hypertension in PWH and a history of inhibitors, with the additional goals of investigating the association between hypertension and hemophilia type and viral status. In a retrospective review, clinical records were extracted for PWH aged 18 to 79 between 2003 and 2014 from four Hemophilia Treatment Centers in North America: Los Angeles Orthopaedic Hospital, University of California San Diego, Tulane University and University of British Columbia. We extracted demographic information on age and ethnicity, weight, height, hemophilia type and severity, inhibitor history, Hepatitis C (HCV; by serology) and Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) status or reported history thereof and medication history. Primary outcomes were prevalence of hypertension stratified by inhibitor status, hemophilia type, and presence of viral coinfection. Blood pressure measurements were taken for the three clinic visits closest to the evaluation date. We fitted generalized additive models with a non-parametric spline function for age. The outcomes were hypertension (with a binary logit), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). The models were adjusted for logBMI, type of hemophilia, severity, race/ethnicity, HCV and HIV. We plotted standardized curves generated by the models to compare trends in each outcome. A total of 691 PWH were included. Forty-four (6%) had a history of inhibitors, 533 had hemophilia type A (77%) and 157 had hemophilia type B (23%). HCV was positive in 419 patients (61%) and HIV in 128 patients (19%). There was no difference in the risk of hypertension between patients with or without a history of inhibitors. SBPs and DBSs were only analyzed for patients not on anti-hypertensives, and were not associated with a history of inhibitors (Fig. 1A). However, risk of hypertension was considerably higher among patients with Hemophilia B compared to patients with Hemophilia A (Fig. 1B). Hemophilia B patients were more likely to be categorized as hypertensive because both SBPs and DBPs were higher, especially in patients between 40 and 60 years of age. Finally, risk of hypertension was higher among those coinfected with both HCV and HIV (Fig. 1C). This large-scale study found no evidence that inhibitor history influenced the risk for hypertension or elevated BPs in PWH. Interestingly, Hemophilia B was associated with a higher risk of hypertension and higher BPs, similar to prior studies showing Hemophilia B had 1.87-fold higher odds of hypertension compared to Hemophilia A (von Drygalski A, Hypertension, 2013). Inhibitor development in Hemophilia B is very rare, which provides additional support that factors other than inhibitors play a role. Finally, our study showed coinfection with HIV and HCV was associated with higher hypertension risk, adding clarity to inconsistent findings on the association between hypertension and blood transmitted viral diseases in PWH. While there was no evidence that patients with a history of inhibitors have a higher risk of hypertension, our observations add to the continued efforts to elucidate the etiology of the hypertension in hemophilia and confirm that patients with Hemophilia B and/or viral infections may be at higher risk. These findings continue to inform medical care and also pave the way for additional studies to address physiological factors inherent to hemostasis and vascular pathology. Disclosures Kruse-Jarres: NovoNordisk: Other; CSLBehring and Genentech/Roche: Research Funding; Biomarin, Chugai, CSLBehring, and Genentech/Roche: Consultancy. Quon:Orthopaedic Institute for Children: Current Employment; Bayer: Honoraria; Shire/Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Genentech, Inc./F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Honoraria; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Biomarin: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jackson:Octapharma, Takeda, Bayer, Roche and Pfizer: Honoraria; Bayer: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. von Drygalski:Hematherix Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Cofounder; superFVa; Joint Activity and Damage Examination (JADE) Ultrasound measurement tool: Patents & Royalties; Biomarin, Bioverativ/Sanofi-Genzyme, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Uniqure, Takeda: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2467-2467
Author(s):  
Lynn M. Malec ◽  
Gilbert C. White ◽  
Stacy E. Croteau ◽  
Dunlei Cheng ◽  
Margaret V. Ragni

Abstract Background: Use of prophylaxis is the evidence-based strategy to prevent joint bleeds and reduce arthropathy for patients with severe hemophilia however, prophylaxis has not been universally adopted in the United States. Amongst patients with severe hemophilia enrolled in the ATHNdataset, the largest database of patients with disorders of hemostasis and thrombosis in the United States, as of 2015, 37% of patients with hemophilia A, and 45% of patients with hemophilia B do not receive prophylaxis. With the approval of extended half-life (EHL) factor products, patients and providers have options for less treatment-intense and burdensome prophylaxis. With the changing landscape of available hemophilia products, we aimed to quantify the number of patients treated at U.S. HTCs on prophylaxis utilizing the ATHNdataset with the objective determining the impact of EHL products on the proportion of patients with severe hemophilia receiving prophylaxis and to characterize use of prophylaxis according to age, race and ethnicity, geographic region, and payer. Methods: The ATHNdataset, a HIPAA compliant limited dataset sponsored by the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network (ATHN), was accessed as of June 30, 2018. The proportion of subjects with severe hemophilia on prophylaxis were compared to those on demand by age cohort. The proportion of subjects on prophylaxis was analyzed by race, ethnicity, insurance status, and hemophilia treatment center region. For each group receiving prophylaxis, the product (EHL versus standard half-life (SHL)), dose and frequency of treatment was analyzed. Results: ATHNdataset included 6,160 severe hemophilia patients using factor replacements, 5,234 individuals with hemophilia A and 926 individuals with hemophilia B. Overall, 76.0% (n=4,864) of patients with severe hemophilia are on prophylaxis whereas 24.0% (n=1426) are on demand; this included a total of 76.6% of patients with severe hemophilia A and 72.9% of patients with severe hemophilia B on prophylaxis. Treatment type (prophylaxis or not) had significant associations with age (p-value <0.001), ethnicity (p<0.001), race (p=0.005), hemophilia treatment center (HTC) region (p<0.001), and hemophilia type (p=0.015) (Table 1). Prophylaxis was not significantly correlated with payer (p=0.847) with a similar number of patients with Medicare/Medicaid or private insurance receiving prophylaxis. Among patients on prophylaxis, 30.8% (n=1,462) are prescribed EHL products including 27.4% of patients with hemophilia A and 50.4% with hemophilia B. In terms of dosing frequency (n=758), 73.8% of hemophilia A patients on prophylaxis receive EHL two times per week while 73.7% (n=1,906) receive SHL every other day (Table 2). Of hemophilia B patients using EHL products, 63.3% of patients receive prophylaxis once weekly, 12.7% every 10 days, and 15.0% every 2 weeks (Table 2). Discussion: The ATHNdataset highlights increased use of prophylaxis over the past 3 years in the U.S. with 76.6% of patients with severe hemophilia A and 72.9% of patients with severe hemophilia B currently receiving prophylactic therapy as compared to 63% and 55% of patients, respectively, in 2015. Further, the majority (83.7%) of patients are beginning prophylaxis according to the World Federation of Haemophilia recommendation to initiate prophylaxis by three years of age. There has been an uptake of the use of EHL factor products including a majority of patients (50.4%) with severe hemophilia B. Although not captured in the ATHNdataset, a plausible reason for the increased uptake of EHL in the hemophilia B population includes the data that 91% of patients are able to dose between weekly or less frequently. As the hemophilia treatment landscape continues to evolve, it is important to continue to understand the adoption of these new products into practice and to examine their real-world impact. Disclosures Malec: Shire: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Bioverativ: Research Funding. White:Biomarin: Other: DSMB; Bioverativ: Other: DSMB; Bayer: Other: GRAC; Shire: Other: Physician Leadership Group; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Asklepios: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Invitrox: Other: Scientific Advisory Board; Pfizer: Equity Ownership. Croteau:Biomarin: Consultancy; Bioveritiv: Consultancy; Catalyst Biosciences: Consultancy; CSL-Behring: Consultancy; Genetech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Spark Therapeutics: Research Funding; Tremeau Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Baxalta/Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding. Ragni:Sangamo: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy, Research Funding; SPARK: Consultancy, Research Funding; Alnylam: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biomarin: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding; Shire: Research Funding; MOGAM: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3983-3983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfhart Kreuz ◽  
Guenter K.H. Auerswald ◽  
Ulrich Budde ◽  
Harald Lenk

Abstract The development of neutralizing FVIII-antibodies is one of the most serious complication in the replacement therapy with FVIII and IX concentrates in hemophilia A and B patients. In order to observe different parameters with possible impact on inhibitor development in PUPs with hemophilia A and B a prospective study was started in 1993 by the GTH (German, Swiss and Austrian Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research). The study protocol provides frequent inhibitor testing particularly during the initial 200 exposure days (ED) according to the modified Bethesda method (central lab Prof. Budde, Hamburg) and correlates inhibitor development with age at first exposure, therapy regimen, dosage, mutation type, type of concentrate and further variables which may have an impact on inhibitor development. Until September 2003, 293 patients with hemophilia A and B have been enrolled in this ongoing study. 206 have been treated (176 hemophilia A, 30 hemophilia B) at least once with plasma derived (pd) or recombinant (r) factor (F) VIII or IX concentrates. Out of 176 hemophilia A patients 35 developed inhibitors (16 high titer >5 Bethesda Units/BU, 17 low titer >0.6–5 BU, 2 transient low titer inhibitors) after 12 exposure days (ED) in median (range 1–56) at the age of 0.9 years (median, range 0.25–10.8). Inhibitor development was predominantly observed in severe hemophilia A patients (31%) and to a lesser extent in moderate patients (7.7%). Inhibitor incidence was higher in patients receiving recombinant FVIII products than in those treated with plasma derived concentrates (p=0,14). No correlation between age at first exposure and inhibitor development was found. Early prophylaxis resulted in a lower inhibitor incidence than on-demand treatment (p=0.003). Out of 16 severely affected hemophilia B patients 2 developed inhibitors.


1995 ◽  
Vol 74 (05) ◽  
pp. 1255-1258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaldo A Arbini ◽  
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci ◽  
Kenneth A Bauer

SummaryPatients with hemophilia A and B and factor levels less than 1 percent of normal bleed frequently with an average number of spontaneous bleeding episodes of 20–30 or more. However there are patients with equally low levels of factor VIII or factor IX who bleed once or twice per year or not at all. To examine whether the presence of a hereditary defect predisposing to hypercoagulability might play a role in amelio rating the hemorrhagic tendency in these so-called “mild severe” hemophiliacs, we determined the prevalence of prothrombotic defects in 17 patients with hemophilia A and four patients with hemophilia B selected from 295 and 76 individuals with these disorders, respectively, followed at a large Italian hemophilia center. We tested for the presence of the Factor V Leiden mutation by PCR-amplifying a fragment of the factor V gene which contains the mutation site and then digesting the product with the restriction enzyme Mnll. None of the patients with hemophilia A and only one patient with hemophilia B was heterozygous for Factor V Leiden. None of the 21 patients had hereditary deficiencies of antithrombin III, protein C, or protein S. Our results indicate that the milder bleeding diathesis that is occasionally seen among Italian hemophiliacs with factor levels that are less than 1 percent cannot be explained by the concomitant expression of a known prothrombotic defect.


1997 ◽  
Vol 78 (05) ◽  
pp. 1352-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emel Aygören-Pürsün ◽  
Inge Scharrer ◽  

SummaryIn this open multicenter study the safety and efficacy of recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) was assessed in 39 previously treated patients with hemophilia A (factor VIII basal activity ≤15%).Recombinant FVIII was administered for prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes and for surgical procedures. A total of 3679 infusions of rFVIII were given. Efficacy of rFVIII as assessed by subjective evaluation of response to infusion and mean annual consumption of rFVIII was comparable to that of plasma derived FVIII concentrates. The incremental recovery of FVIII (2.4 ± 0,83%/IU/kg, 2.12 ± 0.61%/IU/kg, resp.) was within the expected range. No clinical significant FVIII inhibitor was detected in this trial. Five of 16 susceptible patients showed a seroconversion for parvovirus B19. However, the results are ambiguous in two cases and might be explained otherwise in one further case. Thus, in two patients a reliable seroconversion for parvovirus B19 was observed.


2020 ◽  
pp. 54-59
Author(s):  
A. S. Molostova ◽  
N. S. Gladyshev ◽  
A. V. Svarval ◽  
R. S. Ferman ◽  
A. B. Karasyova ◽  
...  

(HP) infection was performed using invasive and non-invasive methods. The study group consisted of 95 patients with dyspepsia. HP infection was detected in 47 patients (49.4 %). The expediency of using a set of diagnostic methods for detecting HP (PCR, immunochromatographic, bacteriological and method for determining urease activity) is proved. Most often (100 %) in patients HP infection was detected in biopsies using the PCR method. Somewhat less frequently it was detected when examining biopsies with an invasive biochemical method (AMA RUT Reader) (82 %) and fecal immunochromatographic method (83 %). Despite the fact that helicobacteriosis was detected bacteriologically in a small number of patients (24 %), this method is of particular value, since it allows you to assess the sensitivity to antimicrobial drugs and probiotics, and does not give false positive results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document