Inhibitor Incidence in Previously Untreated Patients (PUP) with Hemophilia A and B - a 10-Year-Follow up of the Prospective Multicenter Study.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3983-3983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfhart Kreuz ◽  
Guenter K.H. Auerswald ◽  
Ulrich Budde ◽  
Harald Lenk

Abstract The development of neutralizing FVIII-antibodies is one of the most serious complication in the replacement therapy with FVIII and IX concentrates in hemophilia A and B patients. In order to observe different parameters with possible impact on inhibitor development in PUPs with hemophilia A and B a prospective study was started in 1993 by the GTH (German, Swiss and Austrian Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research). The study protocol provides frequent inhibitor testing particularly during the initial 200 exposure days (ED) according to the modified Bethesda method (central lab Prof. Budde, Hamburg) and correlates inhibitor development with age at first exposure, therapy regimen, dosage, mutation type, type of concentrate and further variables which may have an impact on inhibitor development. Until September 2003, 293 patients with hemophilia A and B have been enrolled in this ongoing study. 206 have been treated (176 hemophilia A, 30 hemophilia B) at least once with plasma derived (pd) or recombinant (r) factor (F) VIII or IX concentrates. Out of 176 hemophilia A patients 35 developed inhibitors (16 high titer >5 Bethesda Units/BU, 17 low titer >0.6–5 BU, 2 transient low titer inhibitors) after 12 exposure days (ED) in median (range 1–56) at the age of 0.9 years (median, range 0.25–10.8). Inhibitor development was predominantly observed in severe hemophilia A patients (31%) and to a lesser extent in moderate patients (7.7%). Inhibitor incidence was higher in patients receiving recombinant FVIII products than in those treated with plasma derived concentrates (p=0,14). No correlation between age at first exposure and inhibitor development was found. Early prophylaxis resulted in a lower inhibitor incidence than on-demand treatment (p=0.003). Out of 16 severely affected hemophilia B patients 2 developed inhibitors.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3082-3082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Escuriola Ettingshausen ◽  
Alexandra Zyschka ◽  
Inmaculada Martinez Saguer ◽  
Christine Heller ◽  
Thomas Klingebiel ◽  
...  

Abstract In order to assess the impact of age at first exposure to F VIII and therapy regimen on neutralizing FVIII-antibodies in previously untreated patients (PUP) with hemophilia A a prospective study was performed. Over a 23-years study period a total of 74 severely affected hemophilia A -PUPs have been consecutively recruited, treated with F VIII and investigated for inhibitor development. The patients were divided into two groups according to their treatment regimen: Group 1 (n=23) started prophylaxis at the age of 1 year (before or immediately after the first relevant bleed). Group 2 (n=43) was treated on-demand or prophylaxis was started after more than 2 bleeds. The following parameters were equally distributed among both groups: caucasian ethnicity, intron-22-inversion, age at 1st ED >0.5 years. Out of 74 hemophilia A patients 23 developed inhibitors (31%). Inhibitor incidence was 0% (1 transient inhibitor out of 23 patients) in those patients who received early prophylaxis (group 1) and 42% (18/43 patients) in case of delayed prophylaxis or on-demand treatment (group 2) (p=0.002). No linear correlation was found between the age at first exposure and inhibitor formation. However, patients treated before the age of 0.5 years showed a significantly higher inhibitor incidence (62%) than those treated at an more advanced age. Our data confirm that very early age at first exposure is a risk factor for inhibitor development in severe hemophilia A patients. Early prophylaxis might be protective against inhibitor development. To confirm the data a larger patient cohort has to be investigated.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4653-4653
Author(s):  
Mohsen Saleh Elalfy ◽  
Nancy Samir Elbarbary ◽  
Mohamed Soliman Eldebeiky

Abstract Abstract 4653 Background Circumcision is a cultural practice for males in the Middle-East during first weeks of life. All parents of hemophilics are eager to do circumcision to their sibs, however, it may carry a risk for development of factor VIII inhibitors as well as risk of excessive bleeding. Objective To evaluate post-circumcision bleeding and assess incidence and time of inhibitor development over 12 months follow-up period of minimally treated severe hemophilia A patients. Patients and methods This prospective analysis has been conducted on eighteen minimally treated patients with severe hemophilia A (age range 8–36 months) with a median age of 18 months, who underwent circumcision during 2009 and twenty four age matched non circumcised patients minimally treated severe hemophilia A. Both groups were followed up for12 months from study entry and all were treated on demand therapy with a single plasma-derived factor VIII product. Hemophilic patients who underwent circumcision were inhibitor negative except two with low- titer inhibitor(3.3 and 4.4 BU/ml) respectively. One hour before the operation, intravenous tranexamic acid (25 mg/ kg) and first dose of factor concentrate (25 unit / Kg) were given to the patients. After reaching a trough plasma factor level more than 90%, patients underwent circumcision using general anesthesia and same surgical technique for all. Bolus injections of factor VIII concentrate were repeated in a dose of (25 units / Kg ) twenty four hours after operation. However, the two patients with inhibitors were given factor VIII concentrate in a dose of (50 units /Kg) with an extra dose at forty-eight hours. Another dose of factor concentrate (25 units/ Kg) was given just before removal of gauze dressing at 5th −7th day post operative. Follow up for inhibitor development was assessed every 8 exposure days (EDs) for 12 months or 100 EDs whichever comes first. Results: Of the eighteen patients enrolled, only one of the 2 patients with low- titer inhibitor had postoperative bleeding at day 5 and 7 respectively. First attack responded to a single dose of factor administration (50 units/Kg), whereas haemostasis was achieved in the second episode after a single dose of Recombinant Factor VIIa (90 microgram/kg) and applying absorbable haemostatic agent (gelatin sponge) and binding. None of the other patients had any bleeding or infection at site of surgery. High -titer inhibitors developed in three patients (16.6 % ) during the follow-up; after 8, 16 and 40 EDs respectively in contrast to four patients (16.6 %) developed high titer inhibitor in the non circumcised group; after a median of 16 exposure days (range 8– 60 EDs). Conclusion: Our study has shown that bleeding following circumcision was absent except in low- titer inhibitor patient necessitating administration of Recombinant Factor VIIa. Moreover, circumcision was not a risk for development of inhibitor where the incidence of high- titer inhibitors during12 months follow up was low in this cohort of minimally treated patients and comparable to non circumcised group. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 327-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raina Liesner ◽  
Marina Abashidze ◽  
Olga Aleinikova ◽  
Carmen Altisent ◽  
Mark J. Belletrutti ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Studies have shown that the incidence of inhibitor development varies between FVIII concentrates, with some suggesting that recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) concentrates produced in hamster cell lines pose a greater risk of inhibitor development than plasma-derived (pd) von Willebrand factor (VWF)-containing FVIII (pdFVIII/VWF) products. In the SIPPET study, the cumulative incidence of high-titer inhibitorswith hamster-cell derived rFVIII products was 28.4% vs 18.6% for pdFVIII/VWF (Peyvandi F et al. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:2054-2064). These studies did not include new generation rFVIII products produced in human cell lines. Nuwiq® (Human-cl rFVIII) is the first and only new-generation rFVIII produced in human cells without chemical modification or protein fusion. The pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety of Nuwiq® have been examined in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A, and no inhibitors have been reported in 201 PTPs. The immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of Nuwiq® in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A is currently being assessed in the ongoing NuProtect study. Methods The NuProtect study was initiated in 2013 and is being conducted in 17 countries and 38 centers worldwide. One hundred evaluable (110 enrolled) male PUPs of all ages and ethnicities are being studied for 100 exposure days (EDs) or a maximum study participation of 5 years. The patients were to have received no treatment with FVIII concentrates or other blood products containing FVIII prior to study entry. The primary objective of the NuProtect study is to assess the immunogenicity of Nuwiq® by determining inhibitor activity (≥0.6 BU) using the Nijmegen modified Bethesda assay in a central laboratory. Intensive screening for inhibitors is scheduled every 3-4 EDs until 20 EDs, then every 10-12 EDs until 100 EDs, and every 3 months until study completion. Secondary endpoints include assessment of hemostatic efficacy in prophylaxis, in the treatment of bleeds and in surgical prophylaxis, as well as safety and tolerability. All patients undergo F8 gene mutation analysis. Results Data from 85 treated PUPs have been included in the first pre-planned interim analysis (May 2016) of which 66 PUPs had ≥20 EDs (by which time the majority of inhibitors are likely to have arisen). The median age at first treatment was 13 months (range: 3-135). Of the 59 patients with available F8 gene mutation analysis, 1 (1.7%) had no identifiable mutation, 44 (74.6%) had mutations conferring a high risk of inhibitor development and 47 (81.0%) had null mutations. Data analysis in May 2016 showed that only 8 of the 66 PUPs treated with Nuwiq® for ≥20 EDs had developed a high-titer inhibitor after a median of 11.5 EDs (range 6-24). Five of the 66 PUPs developed a low-titer inhibitor, 4 (80%) of which were transient. Only 2 patients developed an inhibitor (1 high-titer) after 20 EDs. The cumulative incidence of high-titer inhibitors in PUPs treated with Nuwiq® is 12.8% (95% CI: 4.49-21.15) (Figure 1). The cumulative incidence of low-titer inhibitors was 8.4% (95% CI: 1.28-15.59) and of all inhibitors was 20.8% (95% CI: 10.68-30.95). No patient developed an inhibitor after 25 EDs. The incidence has remained consistent since the start of the study in 2013. Twelve of 13 patients who developed inhibitors had the causative F8 gene mutation detected, all of which were null, and all but one were high-risk. Conclusions PUPs treated with Nuwiq® for ≥20 EDs had 12.8% cumulative incidence of high-titer inhibitorsat the time of interim analysis (8 of 66 PUPs) despite the fact that 81% of patients had gene mutations known to be associated with increased inhibitor risk (e.g. null mutations). These interim data support the low rate of inhibitor development in PUPs treated with Nuwiq® - a human-cell derived (not chemically modified or protein fused) recombinant FVIII. Final data from the NuProtect study are expected in 2018 and will provide further insights into the development of inhibitors in PUPs with severe hemophilia A. Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of inhibitor development Figure 1. Cumulative incidence of inhibitor development Disclosures Liesner: CSL Behring: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Biogen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SOBI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BPL: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Cangene: Research Funding; Baxalta Innovations GmbH, now a part of Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy, Honoraria. Altisent:Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding; Grifols: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy. Belletrutti:Shire Pharmaceuticals (formerly Baxalta): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support, Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Other: Travel support. Borel-Derlon:LFB: Other: Reference expert and national coordinator for VWD; Shire - Baxalta: Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Other: Expert for scientific committee. Ducore:CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biogen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; LFB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharama: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Baxalta (Shire): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sigaud:Shire - Baxalta: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.


1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (06) ◽  
pp. 600-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Sultan ◽  

SummaryA cooperative study between the 37 centers of the French Hemophilia Study Group was undertaken to establish the prevalence of inhibitor patients in the French hemophilia population. The prevalence reported in the literature varies widely from 3.6% to 17.5%. Some of the studies are dealing with a small number of patients and inhibitor patients are reported either to the total number of hemophiliacs or to the severely affected ones. The French study provided information concerning 3,435 hemophiliacs and showed a prevalence of 6.2% for the overall population. Prevalence of inhibitors was found to be 7% in the population of hemophilia A patients and 12.8% in the population of severely affected ones. The prevalence of inhibitors in the population of hemophilia B patients was 2% and 4% in the population of severely affected hemophilia B patients. The cooperative study also showed that 47.5% of inhibitors are detected before 10 years of age and that 82% of inhibitor patients are high responders. Analysis of inhibitor detection in patients under the age often showed that there was a peak in the population of 2 years old children. Although not comparable to the present study the high incidence of inhibitors with ultrapurified and recombinant FVIII reported in previously untransfused patient may be borne in mind.


Author(s):  
C. Escuriola Ettingshausen ◽  
A. Zyschka ◽  
J. Oldenburg ◽  
I. Martinez Saguer ◽  
S. Ehrenforth ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (12) ◽  
pp. 2922-2934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha C. Gouw ◽  
H. Marijke van den Berg ◽  
Johannes Oldenburg ◽  
Jan Astermark ◽  
Philip G. de Groot ◽  
...  

Abstract This systematic review was designed to provide more precise effect estimates of inhibitor development for the various types of F8 gene mutations in patients with severe hemophilia A. The primary outcome was inhibitor development and the secondary outcome was high-titer-inhibitor development. A systematic literature search was performed to include cohort studies published in peer-reviewed journals with data on inhibitor incidences in the various F8 gene mutation types and a mutation detection rate of at least 80%. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) of inhibitor development for different types of F8 gene mutations were calculated with intron 22 inversion as the reference. Data were included from 30 studies on 5383 patients, including 1029 inhibitor patients. The inhibitor risk in large deletions and nonsense mutations was higher than in intron 22 inversions (pooled OR = 3.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.3-5.7 and OR = 1.4, 95% CI, 1.1-1.8, respectively), the risk in intron 1 inversions and splice-site mutations was equal (pooled OR = 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5 and OR = 1.0; 95% CI, 0.6-1.5), and the risk in small deletions/insertions and missense mutations was lower (pooled OR = 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.6 and OR = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.4, respectively). The relative risks for developing high titer inhibitors were similar.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4004-4004
Author(s):  
Louis M. Aledort ◽  
Gilbert C. White ◽  
Georges E. Rivard

After contamination of factor concentrates with blood-borne viruses, U.S. FDA requirements for new product licensure was based on the safety and efficacy of new biologicals as determined in previously untreated patients (PUPs). While PUPs provided an excellent model for assessing contamination of new products HIV, hepatitis, and other blood-borne viruses, they were not a good model for risk of inhibitor development, since inhibitor development in one form or another was unpredictable and occurred in up to 30-35% of PUPs. More recently, the Factor VIII & IX Subcommittee of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis has recommended that inhibitor induction potential of new factor replacement products is best studied in previously treated patients (PTPs). At the conclusion of the five-year study of 73 PUPs on Recombinate (Baxter) [Bray GL, Gomperts ED, Courter SG et al. A multicenter study of recombinant factor VIII (recombinate): safety, efficacy, and inhibitor risk in previously untreated patients. Blood1994; 83: 2428–35.], the Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) independently initiated a five-year follow-up to determine how many new inhibitors occurred, and how many transient inhibitors recurred during this time. Data collection was a simple form to determine presence or absence of inhibitor yearly; if an inhibitor was reported to develop, did the subject remain on Recombinate or use other recombinant factor concentrate, and the inhibitor titer. Sixty-five of the original PUPs had data reported. For all 5 years, there were 21, for 4 years, 20, for 3 years, 5, for 2 years, 9, for 1 year, 10. For the 65 who have provided adequate data: Two subjects had a recurrence of their transient inhibitor with titers ranging from 0.78 to 1.3. They both stayed on Recombinate. They lost these inhibitors over the ensuing two years. Three subjects developed a new inhibitor. Their titers ranged from 0.9 to 4 Bethesda units. All stayed on Recombinate. None of these inhibitors were of high titer (>5.0 BU). These patients are PTPs, and on continued recombinant factor replacement, few new inhibitors occur, and those that did were low-titered, and some that disappear recur. Thus, five-year follow-up does not tell the whole story and continues to raise the issue of how many inhibitors are acceptable to regulatory agencies for licensure of a new product.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Halimeh ◽  
Christoph Bidlingmaier ◽  
Christine Heller ◽  
Sven Gutsche ◽  
Susanne Holzhauer ◽  
...  

Among the discussed risk factors for high-titre inhibitor (HRI) development in patients with hemophilia A (HA) are high dose FVIII replacement therapy and use of recombinant FVIII concentrates (rFVIII). The aim of this study was to evaluate the aforementioned risk factors for HRI development in children with hemophilia A ≤2%. About 288 ascertained PUPs (Israel and Germany) were followed after initial HA diagnosis over 200 exposure days. Inhibitor-free survival, hazard ratios (HR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Adjustment was performed for factor VIII concentrates, median single dose over the first three months of treatment, first FVIII administration before the age of three months, presence of risk HA gene mutations, “intensive treatment moments” and “year of birth” (proxy for different treatment periods). HRI occurred in 71/288 children (24.7%). In multivariate analysis adjusted for “year of birth”, underlying risk gene mutations (HR/CI: 2.37/1.40–3.99), FVIII dose, measured per one IU increase per kgbw (HR/CI: 1.05/1.04–1.07), and first FVIII administration before the age of three months showed a significant impact on HR development. The risk of HRI development was similar for recombinant or plasmatic FVIII products. Children at risk should be treated with carefully calculated lower dose regimens, adapted to individual bleeding situations.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (11) ◽  
pp. 4693-4697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha C. Gouw ◽  
Johanna G. van der Bom ◽  
Günter Auerswald ◽  
Carmen Escuriola Ettinghausen ◽  
Ulf Tedgård ◽  
...  

Abstract It has been suggested that plasma-derived factor VIII products induce fewer inhibitors than recombinant factor VIII products. We investigated the relationship of factor VIII product type and switching between factor VIII products with the risk to develop inhibitors. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 316 patients with severe hemophilia A born between 1990 and 2000. The outcome was clinically relevant inhibitor development, defined as the occurrence of at least 2 positive inhibitor titers with decreased recovery. The risk of inhibitor development was not clearly lower in plasma-derived compared with recombinant factor VIII products (relative risk [RR], 0.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-1.3). Among high-titer inhibitors, the possible reduction in risk was even less pronounced (RR, 0.9; CI, 0.5-1.5). Plasma-derived products with considerable quantities of von Willebrand factor (VWF) carried the same risk for inhibitor development as recombinant factor VIII products (RR, 1.0; CI, 0.6-1.6). Switching between factor VIII products did not increase the risk for inhibitors (RR, 1.1; CI, 0.6-1.8). In conclusion, our findings support neither the notion that plasma-derived factor VIII products with considerable concentrations of VWF confer a lower risk to develop inhibitory antibodies than recombinant factor VIII products, nor that switching between factor VIII product brands increases inhibitor risks in previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A.


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (24) ◽  
pp. 3147-3154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Lai ◽  
Christine Hough ◽  
Julie Tarrant ◽  
David Lillicrap

Abstract In hemophilia A, the most severe complication of factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy involves the formation of FVIII neutralizing antibodies, also known as inhibitors, in 25% to 30% of patients. This adverse event is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and economic burden, thus highlighting the need to identify methods to limit FVIII immunogenicity. Inhibitor development is regulated by a complex balance of genetic factors, such as FVIII genotype, and environmental variables, such as coexistent inflammation. One of the hypothesized risk factors of inhibitor development is the source of the FVIII concentrate, which could be either recombinant or plasma derived. Differential immunogenicity of these concentrates has been documented in several recent epidemiologic studies, thus generating significant debate within the hemophilia treatment community. To date, these discussions have been unable to reach a consensus regarding how these outcomes might be integrated into enhancing clinical care. Moreover, the biological mechanistic explanations for the observed differences are poorly understood. In this article, we complement the existing epidemiologic investigations with an overview of the range of possible biochemical and immunologic mechanisms that may contribute to the different immune outcomes observed with plasma-derived and recombinant FVIII products.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document