The Effect of Some Instruments for Prothrombin Time Testing on the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of Two Rabbit Tissue Thromboplastin Reagents

1989 ◽  
Vol 62 (03) ◽  
pp. 868-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Poggio ◽  
Antonius M H P van den Besselaar ◽  
Edo A van der Velde ◽  
Rogier M Bertina
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
World Health ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Optical Instruments ◽  
Rabbit Tissue ◽  
Reference Preparation ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryTwo commercial rabbit tissue thromboplastins were calibrated against the International Reference Preparation for rabbit thromboplastin (coded RBT/79) by one laboratory using the manual technique, a semi-automatic electro-mechanical coagulometer and three different automatic photo-optical instruments. The calibration of the two reagents was performed in three and two different exercises, respectively, and showed good reproducibility of the procedure. The purpose of calibration is providing a formula for the assessment of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) for patients receiving oral anticoagulants. The World Health Organization (WHO) model for thromboplastin calibration leads to the equation INR = RISI, in which R is the prothrombin time ratio and ISI the International Sensitivity Index of the calibrated thromboplastin/instrument system. This equation was adequate for one reagent, but not for the other when it was used in combination with the four instruments. At therapeutic intensities of anticoagulation, the deviation from the WHO-model observed for the second reagent was clinically insignificant. The WHO model was fully adequate when the second reagent was used with the manual technique. For both thromboplastins, there were statistically significant differences in ISI between the four instruments. The largest difference-amounting to approximately 10%-was observed between two photo-optical instruments. The order of instruments with increasing ISI was the same for the two reagents. It is recommended that thromboplastin manufacturers specify the instruments used for calibration of their reagent.

The Dependence of the International Sensitivity Index on the Coagulometer Used to Perform the Prothrombin Time

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (03) ◽  
pp. 424-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
M J Ray ◽  
I R Smith
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Calibration Procedure ◽  
World Health ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Optical Instruments ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Reference Preparation ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryThis study was designed to detect any effect that different types of coagulation instrument may have on the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of a thromboplastin.Manufacturers of commercial thromboplastins now calibrate their reagents against the World Health Organization international reference preparation to assign them an IST. This enables the prothrombin time (PT) estimated with that reagent to be expressed as an International Normalised Ratio (INR).One batch of Thromborel S was calibrated against the Australasian Reference Thromboplastin (ART). The Thromborel S was used on three photo-optical instruments, the Automated Coagulation Laboratory (ACL) (Instrumentation Laboratory), the Cobas Fibro (Roche), and the Coag-a-Pet (General Diagnostics). PTs using ART were performed manually using the reference method.The ISIs calibrated in our laboratory when the ACL and Cobas Fibro were used were not significantly different at the 95% level, being 1.102 ± 0.018 and 1.134 ± 0.022 respectively. The ISI with the Coag-a-Pet of 1.223 ± 0.023 was significantly different to that of the ACL and the Cobas Fibro at the 95% level.The flowcharts for a computer program to perform the necessary calculations are provided. The program allows for the entry and editing of data from the calibration procedure, and provides a mean normal PT and normal range, the ISI and 95% confidence limits of the calibration, and a chart for the conversion of the test PTs to INRs.The authors have made available an IBM compatible program for the calibration of thromboplastins.

Multi-Center Study of Thromboplastin Calibration Precision – Influence of Reagent Species, Composition, and International Sensitivity Index (ISI)

1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (01) ◽  
pp. 035-040 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M H P van den Besselaar ◽  
R M Bertina
Keyword(s):  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
The Other ◽  
World Health ◽  
Rabbit Brain ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Bovine Plasma ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryFour thromboplastin reagents were tested by 18 laboratories in Europe, North-America, and Australasia, according to a detailed protocol. One thromboplastin was the International Reference Preparation for ox brain thromboplastin combined with adsorbed bovine plasma (coded OBT/79), and the second was a certified reference material for rabbit brain thromboplastin, plain (coded CRM 149R). The other two thromboplastin reagents were another rabbit plain brain thromboplastin (RP) with a lower ISI than CRM 149R and a rabbit brain thromboplastin combined with adsorbed bovine plasma (RC). Calibration of the latter two reagents was performed according to methods recommended by the World Health Organization (W. H. O.).The purpose of this study was to answer the following questions: 1) Is the calibration of the RC reagent more precise against the bovine/combined (OBT/79) than against the rabbit/plain reagent (CRM 149R)? 2) Is the precision of calibration influenced by the magnitude of the International Sensitivity Index (ISI)?The lowest inter-laboratory variation of ISI was observed in the calibration of the rabbit/plain reagent (RP) against the other rabbit/plain reagent (CRM 149R) (CV 1.6%). The highest interlaboratory variation was obtained in the calibration of rabbit/plain (RP) against bovine/combined (OBT/79) (CV 5.1%). In the calibration of the rabbit/combined (RC) reagent, there was no difference in precision between OBT/79 (CV 4.3%) and CRM 149R (CV 4.2%). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the precision of the ISI of RC obtained with CRM 149R (ISI = 1.343) and the rabbit/plain (RP) reagent with ISI = 1.14. In conclusion, the calibration of RC could be performed with similar precision with either OBT/79 or CRM 149R, or RP.The mean ISI values calculated with OBT/79 and CRM 149R were practically identical, indicating that there is no bias in the ISI of these reference preparations and that these reference preparations have been stable since their original calibration studies in 1979 and 1987, respectively.International Normalized Ratio (INR) equivalents were calculated for a lyophilized control plasma derived from patients treated with oral anticoagulants. There were small but significant differences in the mean INR equivalents between the bovine and rabbit thromboplastins. There were no differences in the interlaboratory variation of the INR equivalents, when the four thromboplastins were compared.

Calibration of Reference Thromboplastins and Standardisation of the Prothrombin Time Ratio

1983 ◽  
Vol 49 (03) ◽  
pp. 238-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
T B L Kirkwood
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
World Health ◽  
Expert Committee ◽  
Calibration Model ◽  
Biological Standardization ◽  
Reference Preparation ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Practical Implications

SummaryThromboplastins vary in their sensitivity to the haemostatic defect induced by oral anticoagulants. To provide a means of standardising prothrombin time tests, the World Health Organization adopted in 1977 a scheme for calibrating thromboplastins in terms of an International Reference Preparation. Unfortunately, the model on which this scheme was based does not always hold. A revised calibration model has therefore been developed and this has been tested in a recent collaborative study. The revised model, which retains fundamentally the same principle for standardising prothrombin time tests, has proved suitable for calibrating thromboplastins of different species and types and, moreover, has certain statistical advantages over its predecessor. In September 1982, the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization adopted the revised model. This paper explains the nature and rationale of this change and considers its practical implications.

Reliability and Clinical Impact of the Normalization of the Prothrombin Times in Oral Anticoagulant Control

1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (01) ◽  
pp. 148-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Loeliger ◽  
A M H P van den Besselaar ◽  
S M Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
World Health ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Common Denominator ◽  
Reference Preparation ◽  
The Common ◽  
Health Organization ◽  
Low Sensitivity

SummaryIn 1983, the World Health Organization (WHO) published recommendations for normalization, in oral anticoagulant control, of the prothrombin time (PT). The common denominator is the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of a thromboplastin, obtained by means of thromboplastin calibration. The common scale is that of the International Normalized Ratio (INR). The INR is the PT ratio Patient PT/normal PT which would have been found normal PT with the WHO primary international reference preparation (IRP) 67/40. The reliability of the INR depends on the extent of calibration precision, patient-specific influences, as well as interlaboratory variation in the PT determination. Under well-controlled conditions the overall coefficient of variation (CV) of the INR is 11-13.5%, if thromboplastins of ISI ≃ 1 are used. For so-called low-sensitivity thromboplastins (ISI ≃ 2-2.5), the overall variation is larger due to a large between-laboratory variation of the measured PT-ratiosThe user of thromboplastin will be provided with a chart or graph enabling him to convert the conventional terms used for expressing PTs into INRs. For quality assurance, and to prepare his own calibration chart if necessary, he should check normalization by means of control plasmas to which INRs have been assigned.There is sufficient clinical evidence to express optimal therapeutic ranges in terms of INR. Manufacturers should revise and adapt their inserts where necessary in order to conform to these requirements.

scholarly journals Influence of Three Types of Automated Coagulometers on the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of Rabbit, Human, and Recombinant Human Tissue Factor Preparations

1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (01) ◽  
pp. 66-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. L. Houbouyan ◽  
M. F. Aillaud ◽  
K. W. E. Denson ◽  
M. Johnston ◽  
S. Kitchen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Factor ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
International Reference ◽  
Rabbit Tissue ◽  
Reference Preparation ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Automated Instruments ◽  
International Multicenter ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryFive tissue factor reagents and three types of automated instruments for prothrombin time (PT) determination were studied in an international multicenter collaborative exercise. The purpose of this work was to determine the international sensitivity index (ISI) for each combination of reagent and instrument against the international reference preparation RBT/90. Each type of instrument was used by 3 or 4 centers to assess the interlaboratory variation of the ISI. The interlaboratory variation of the ISI for each combination of reagent and instrument ranged between 0.4% and 7.8% coefficient of variation. For three reagents, the mean ISI values for ACL (nephelometric) and STA (mechanical) were practically identical, but the mean ISI values for MLA (photo-optical) were at least 10% higher. For two other reagents prepared from rabbit tissue, the mean ISI values increased in the order ACL, STA, MLA. The widest range of mean ISI values was noted with one rabbit tissue factor reagent: 1.68 for ACL and 2.00 for MLA. Exclusion of patient specimens with INR <1.5 and INR >4.5 determined by the international reference preparation resulted in a slight decrease of the mean ISI.The interlaboratory variation of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) was assessed from the results obtained with common lyophilized and deep-frozen plasmas. The use of instrument-specific ISI values resulted in reduced interlaboratory variation of the INR. It is recommended that thromboplastin manufacturers provide instrument-specific ISI values.

Questions and Answers on Prothrombin Time Standardisation in Oral Anticoagulant Control

1985 ◽  
Vol 54 (02) ◽  
pp. 515-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Loeliger ◽  
L Poller ◽  
M Samama ◽  
J M Thomson ◽  
A M H P Van den Besselaar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Sample ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
International Normalised Ratio ◽  
Questions And Answers ◽  
Reference Preparation ◽  
Tissue Thromboplastin ◽  
The Individual ◽  
International Sensitivity Index ◽  
New System

SummaryOne of the reasons why oral anticoagulants fell into disrepute is the absence of internationally accepted standardised procedures for controlling the level of anticoagulatiori. This deplorable situation resulted in over- and under-coagulation and uncertainty in the therapeutic range. International conformity can now be obtained by using an International Normalised Ratio (INR) which is derived from the individual result obtained in a given plasma sample and the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of the tissue thromboplastin reagent used. Any thromboplastin reagent can be calibrated against an international primary or secondary W.H.O. reference preparation, so as to obtain its International Sensitivity Index. The new system of reporting the level of anticoagulation was designed and can only safely be applied in patients taking oral anticoagulants.

In-house Calibration of the International Sensitivity Index or Calibration Curve for Determination of the International Normalized Ratio

2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-312
Author(s):  
William F. Brien ◽  
Linda Crawford ◽  
Anne Raby ◽  
Harold Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Calibration Curve ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Improve Performance ◽  
Accuracy And Precision ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Method Of Assessment ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

Abstract Context.—The international normalized ratio (INR) has been used since 1983 to standardize prothrombin time results for patients on oral anticoagulants. However, significant interlaboratory variations have been noted. Attempts have been made to address these differences with the use of instrument-specific International Sensitivity Index (ISI) values and in-house calibration of ISI values. Objective.—To assess the performance of laboratories using a calibration curve for INR testing. Design.—Attempts to improve performance of the INR include the use of instrument-specific ISI values, model-specific ISI values, in-house calibration of ISI values, and more recently, the preparation of a calibration curve. Several studies have shown an improvement in performance using these procedures. In this study of licensed laboratories performing routine coagulation testing in the Province of Ontario, Canada, the determination of the INR by a calibration curve was compared with the laboratories' usual method of assessment. These methods were subsequently analyzed by comparing the results to instrument-specific ISI, model-specific ISI, and in-house calibrators. International normalized ratios derived by both methods were analyzed for accuracy and precision. The stability of a calibration curve was also investigated. Results.—Performance of INR testing has improved with use of a calibration curve or in-house calibrators. Conclusion.—The results confirm that either in-house calibrators or the calibration curve improve performance of INR testing. The calibration curve may be easier to use and appears stable up to 4 months.

Assessment of the Influence of Citrate Concentration on the International Normalized Ratio (INR) Determined with Twelve Reagent-instrument Combinations

1998 ◽  
Vol 80 (08) ◽  
pp. 258-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veena Chantarangkul ◽  
Marigrazia Clerici ◽  
Barbara Negri ◽  
Pier Mannuccio Mannucci ◽  
Armando Tripodi
Keyword(s):  
External Quality Assessment ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Local System ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
External Quality ◽  
Citrate Concentration ◽  
Coagulation Tests ◽  
Reference Preparation ◽  
Anticoagulated Patients ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryCitrate concentration is one of the variables that can affect coagulation tests. However, few studies have so far been performed to assess the magnitude of this effect on coagulation tests in general and PT in particular. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of influence of citrate concentration on the PT test with results expressed as INR. Twelve reagent-instrument combinations (systems) were calibrated vs. the Reference Preparation BCT/441 using plasmas collected in either 105 mM or 129 mM citrate from normals and anticoagulated patients (OAT). PTs for plasmas collected in 129 mM citrate were longer than those collected in 105 mM both for normals and patients on OAT, but the ratios (patient-to-normal clotting times) for the two citrate concentrations were significantly different in many instances, implying that the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) is also different. ISIs for calibrations with plasmas collected in 105 mM were greater (up to 10%) than those with plasmas collected in 129 mM citrate. When PT ratios were transformed into INR using crossover ISIs (i.e., plasmas collected in 105 mM and ISI determined with plasmas collected in 129 mM citrate, or vice versa) we found that an INR of 4.5 could be up to 20% apart from the value that would have been obtained if the appropriate ISI was used. Moreover, if the ISI determined with the manual technique was used to convert PTs obtained with a particular instrument into INR, the effect of citrate concentration was even greater (INR difference up to 64%). Should these observations be valid for other systems, they might provide additional explanations for the frequent reports which document discrepancies in the INR determined with different systems to which incorrect ISI might have been applied. World-wide consensus on a single citrate concentration to collect patients’ as well as lyophilized plasmas to be used in External Quality Assessment Schemes and for local system calibration is therefore urgently needed.

Multicenter Evaluation of Lyophilized and Deep-frozen Plasmas for Assignment of the International Normalized Ratio

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (11) ◽  
pp. 1451-1455 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. L. Houbouyan-Reveillard ◽  
M. F. Aillaud ◽  
K. W. E. Denson ◽  
C. Droullé ◽  
M. Johnston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
External Quality Assessment ◽  
Calibration Procedure ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Local Calibration ◽  
External Quality ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Time Systems ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

SummaryThe interlaboratory variation of the International Normalized Ratio (INR) in various external quality assessment schemes is still relatively high. This is partly caused by inaccuracy of manufacturers’ stated International Sensitivity Index (ISI) and/or local instrumentation effects. The interlaboratory variation and accuracy of INR determinations may be improved by a local calibration procedure based on lyophilized plasmas with assigned INRs. The purpose of the present study was to determine INR values for different types of lyophilized plasmas to be used for local calibration. A total of 13 lyophilized plasmas (one normal, six from coumarin-treated patients, six artificially depleted) were analyzed by 10 laboratories, each using five calibrated prothrombin time (PT) systems. INRs were calculated for each plasma using each laboratory’s specific ISI and mean normal prothrombin time values. In the same way, five deep-frozen pooled plasmas from coumarin-treated patients were analyzed. There were significant INR differences for the lyophilized plasmas between the prothrombin time systems. The differences were relatively small for the deep-frozen coumarin plasmas (CV 2.6-3.3%) and three lyophilized coumarin plasmas from one manufacturer (CV 3.7-4.8%). Important INR differences were observed for three lyophilized coumarin plasmas from another manufacturer (CV 9.5-14.1%) and several artificially depleted plasmas (CV 5.3-12.8%). The citrate concentrations in the artificially depleted plasmas were lower than those in the normal and coumarin plasmas. These differences should be considered in the selection and certification of plasmas as calibrants for local calibration of PT systems. The lyophilized plasmas’ INR values obtained in the present study will be used for a field study of local PT calibration to assess their efficacy.

How to Generate a More Accurate Laboratory-Based International Normalized Ratio: Solutions to Obtaining or Verifying the Mean Normal Prothrombin Time and International Sensitivity Index

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (01) ◽  
pp. 010-021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Favaloro
Keyword(s):  
Prothrombin Time ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Clinical Importance ◽  
International Normalized Ratio ◽  
Secondary Process ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Thrombotic Risk ◽  
Laboratory Test Results ◽  
International Sensitivity Index

AbstractAlthough the landscape of anticoagulation therapy is evolving, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin remain an anticoagulant of choice for many clinicians and their patients. Nevertheless, management of VKA therapy remains challenging, largely because of patient variability and drug and food interactions; thus, VKA dosing has to be personalized. This is achieved by regular monitoring using a test called the prothrombin time (PT), mathematically converted to an international normalized ratio (INR). The INR system is meant to harmonize laboratory test results by taking into account reagent and instrumentation variability that is otherwise expected to give rise to variable PT values, but which should accordingly lead to less variable INR values. Of clinical importance, too low an INR is suggestive of increased thrombotic risk and typically means the VKA dose should be increased, whereas too high an INR is suggestive of increased bleeding risk and typically means the VKA dose should be temporarily withheld and/or decreased. However, evidence continues to show that variability in INR values between laboratories remains unacceptably high. Given that modern instrumentation provides for robust analytical values—meaning highly reproducible intralaboratory clotting times or PTs in this case—the most likely cause of high INR variability is inconsistency in the INR test components—meaning the MNPT (mean normal PT) and ISI (international sensitivity index) values used by laboratories to generate a given INR. In other words, there are doubts as to the accuracy of some INR values because there are corresponding doubts about the accuracy of MNPT and/or ISI values that have been assigned by some laboratories for their reagent/instrument combination. The current report is intended to provide some solutions around the problems of inaccurate INRs, ISIs, and MNPTs, thus aiming to drive laboratory INRs closer to “truth,” and thus promote better patient management. The novel strategies include a primary process of transference to obtain/verify MNPT and/or ISI values for a new reagent using an existing reagent as reference, and a secondary process whereby external quality assessment data can be used to correct bias or existing errors in assigned MNPT and/or ISI values.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document