scholarly journals Comparison of Simulation-Based versus Cadaveric-Tissue-Based Ocular Trauma Training on Novice Ophthalmologists: Repair of Corneal Laceration Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. e57-e65
Author(s):  
Boonkit Purt ◽  
Timothy Ducey ◽  
Sean Sykes ◽  
Joseph F. Pasternak ◽  
Denise S. Ryan ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the simulated tissue models may be used in place of animal-based model for corneal laceration repair for surgical skills acquisition. Design Prospective randomized controlled trial. Participants Seventy-nine military and civilian 2nd- and 3rd-year ophthalmology residents and 16 staff ophthalmologists participating in the Tri-Service Ocular Trauma Skills Laboratory at the Uniformed Services University (Bethesda, MD). Methods Resident ophthalmologists underwent preliminary evaluation of their ability to close a 5-mm linear, full-thickness corneal laceration involving the visual axis. They then were randomized to undergo 90 to 120 minutes of either simulator-based (SIM) or swine cadaveric-tissue-based (CADAVER) corneal laceration repair. The same evaluation was performed post training. On a more limited basis, the study was repeated for attending ophthalmologists to act as a pilot for future analysis and test efficacy for “refresher” training. Main Outcome Measures Successful wound closure with secondary outcomes of suture length, tension, depth, and orientation, as graded by attending ophthalmologists. Results No significant difference in CADAVER versus SIM groups in the primary outcome of watertight wound closure of the corneal laceration. CADAVER group performed better than SIM group for certain metrics (suture depth, p = 0.009; length, p = 0.003; and tension, p = 0.043) that are associated with poor wound closure and increased amount of induced corneal astigmatism. For attending ophthalmologists, six of the eight in each group (SIM and CADAVER) retained or improved their skills. Conclusions For resident ophthalmologists, SIM training is sufficient for achieving the primary outcome of watertight wound closure. However, CADAVER training is superior for wound metrics for the ideal closure. For attending ophthalmologists, SIM training may be useful for retention of skills.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pinping Zhou ◽  
Chao Zhang ◽  
Guijin Huang ◽  
Yuan Hu ◽  
Wenzhu Ma ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Dental procedures under general anesthesia (DGA) was found to improve the oral health-related quality of children's life. However, some parents and pediatricians expressed concern about the neurotoxicity of general anesthesia. The purpose of this trial was to investigate whether DGA in children has an adverse effect on neurodevelopment.Methods: In this prospective, assessor-masked, controlled, equivalence trial, we recruited 340 children younger than 7 years who were undergoing caries treatment between Feb 1, 2019, and Aug 31, 2019, without factors affecting neurodevelopment. They received either sevoflurane-based general anesthesia or awake-local anesthesia. The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth Edition was used to evaluate the neurodevelopment of children at six months after surgery, and the Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ) was selected as the primary outcome. Predefine the 95% CI of a difference in means within five (1/3 SD) as the equivalence margin.Results: The outcome data were obtained from 129 children in the general anesthesia group and 144 in the local anesthesia group. The median length of general anesthesia was 130 min (IQR 110 – 160). There was equivalence in means of FSIQ score between the general anesthesia group and the local anesthesia group (local minus general anesthesia 0.46, 95% CI -2.35 to 1.61). There was no significant difference in FSIQ scores between different age groups and different anesthesia durations. Only the mother's education could affect the primary outcome.Conclusions: In this trial, prolonged DGA with a sevoflurane-only anesthetic in preschool children, does not adversely affect neurodevelopment at six months after surgery compared with awake-local anesthesia. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800015216. Registered Mar 15 2018, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=24830.


PRILOZI ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 99-108
Author(s):  
Dafina Karadjova ◽  
Mirjana Shosholcheva ◽  
Еmilija Ivanov ◽  
Аtanas Sivevski ◽  
Ivo Kjaev ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Epidural analgesia is considered a gold standard in obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia. However, in situation when it is contraindicated, unwanted by the patient or simply unavailable, remifentanil can be an excellent alternative. The goal of our study is to analyse the side effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) with remifentanil compared with epidural analgesia during delivery. Material and methods: This study included 155 pregnant women in term for birth, divided into 2 groups: a remifentanil group (RG), and an epidural group (EG). Patients in the RG received intravenous PCA with remifentanil, while patients in the ЕG received epidural analgesia with programmed intermittent bolus dosing. Our primary outcome was maternal safety; the secondary outcome was neonatal safety. Results: The results present a significantly lower SaO2 value of the parturients in the RG (96.95 ± 1.4 vs 98.22 ± 0.6), and a significantly higher respiratory rate per minute in the EG at all time points after the onset of analgesia (20.85 ± 1.4 vs 18.67 ± 0.9). There was more frequent sedation, nausea and vomiting in the RG, while in the EG there was a more elevated temperature, itching and irregularities in the CTG record. Regarding the newborn, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the Apgar scores, pH, pCO2, pO2, and bicarbonate, while there was a significantly lower value of the base excess in the RG group. Conclusion: PCA with remifentanil is safe for the mother, foetus and the newborn, with minimal side effects. Continuous respiratory monitoring, oxygen supply and following of all consensus recommendations are mandatory.


Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe Paskins ◽  
Kieran Bromley ◽  
Martyn Lewis ◽  
Gemma Hughes ◽  
Emily Hughes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Evidence of the effectiveness of intra-articular corticosteroid injection for hip osteoarthritis (OA) is limited. The HIT trial compared the clinical and cost-effectiveness of an ultrasound-guided intra-articular hip injection (USGI) of 40mg triamcinolone acetonide and 4ml 1% lidocaine hydrochloride combined with best current treatment (BCT) with (i) BCT alone (primary objective) and (ii) an USGI of 5ml 1% lidocaine only combined with BCT (EudraCT:2014-003412-37). Methods This was a pragmatic, three-parallel arm, single-blind, randomised controlled trial in adults with moderate-severe painful hip OA recruited from community musculoskeletal services and primary care. Participants were randomised equally to: (1) BCT alone, (2) BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine, or (3) BCT plus USGI lidocaine only. Outcomes were collected postally at 2 weeks, 2, 4 and 6 months. The primary outcome was self-reported current hip pain intensity (0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)) over 6 months (repeated measures analysis). Secondary outcomes included function (WOMAC), and, for cost-utility analysis, general health (EQ-5D-5L) and healthcare utilisation. 204 participants were required to detect a minimum difference of 1 point in mean pain NRS score between arms (1) and (2) with 80% power (5% two-tailed significance level, 15% loss to follow-up). Analysis was by intention-to-treat. Results 199 participants were recruited (43% male, mean age 63 years), 67 to arm (1) and 66 each to arms (2) and (3). Primary outcome completion rates were 95% at 2 weeks, 94% at 2 months, 90% at 4 months, and 89% at 6 months. Greater mean improvement in hip pain intensity (0-10 NRS) over 6 months was seen with BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine compared with BCT alone: -1.43 (95%CI -2.15,-0.72). Greater mean improvement in pain intensity was seen at 2 weeks (-3.17; -4.06,-2.28) and 2 months (-1.81;-2.71,-0.92), but not at 4 (-0.86;-1.78,0.05) or 6 months (0.12; -0.80,1.04). Participants treated with BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine compared with BCT alone had greater mean improvement in function (WOMAC-F -5.47;(-9.41,-1.53)) over 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in hip pain intensity over 6 months between BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine compared with BCT plus USGI lidocaine (-0.52;-1.21,0.18). There was one possible treatment-related serious adverse event: a participant with no signs of infection at randomisation died from endocarditis four months after USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine. BCT plus USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine was less costly (mean cost difference per participant £-161.59) and associated with significantly higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) than BCT only over 6 months (mean difference 0.0477 (0.0257,0.0699). Conclusion USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine plus BCT leads to greater improvements in pain and function over 6 months in adults with hip OA than BCT alone, and was highly cost-effective. There was no significant difference in hip pain intensity between the groups receiving USGI triamcinolone/lidocaine and USGI lidocaine only, raising the possibility of a degree of placebo effect. Disclosures Z. Paskins None. K. Bromley None. M. Lewis None. G. Hughes None. E. Hughes None. A. Cherrington None. A. Hall None. M. Holden None. R. Oppong None. J. Kigozi None. K. Stevenson None. A. Menon None. P. Roberts None. G. Peat None. C. Jinks None. N.E. Foster None. C.D. Mallen None. E. Roddy None.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Suttasinee Petsakul ◽  
Sunthiti Morakul ◽  
Viratch Tangsujaritvijit ◽  
Parinya Kunawut ◽  
Pongsasit Singhatas ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Thiamine, an essential vitamin for aerobic metabolism and glutathione cycling, may decrease the effects of critical illnesses. The objective of this study was to determine whether intravenous thiamine administration can reduce vasopressor requirements in patients with septic shock. Methods This study was a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. We included adult patients with septic shock who required a vasopressor within 1–24 h after admission between March 2018 and January 2019 at a tertiary hospital in Thailand. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received 200 mg thiamine or those receiving a placebo every 12 h for 7 days or until hospital discharge. The primary outcome was the number of vasopressor-free days over 7 days. The pre-defined sample size was 31 patients per group, and the study was terminated early due to difficult recruitment. Results Sixty-two patients were screened and 50 patients were finally enrolled in the study, 25 in each group. There was no difference in the primary outcome of vasopressor-free days within the 7-day period between the thiamine and placebo groups (mean: 4.9 days (1.9) vs. 4.0 days (2.7), p = 0.197, mean difference − 0.9, 95% CI (− 2.9 to 0.5)). However, the reductions in lactate (p = 0.024) and in the vasopressor dependency index (p = 0.02) at 24 h were greater among subjects who received thiamine repletion vs. the placebo. No statistically significant difference was observed in SOFA scores within 7 days, vasopressor dependency index within 4 days and 7 days, or 28-day mortality. Conclusions Thiamine was not associated to a significant reduction in vasopressor-free days over 7-days in comparison to placebo in patients with septic shock. Administration of thiamine could be associated with a reduction in vasopressor dependency index and lactate level within 24 h. The study is limited by early stopping and low sample size. Trial registration TCTR, TCTR20180310001. Registered 8 March 2018, http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th/index.php?tp=regtrials&menu=trialsearch&smenu=fulltext&task=search&task2=view1&id=3330.


2018 ◽  
Vol 213 (1) ◽  
pp. 404-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrika Karlsson Stigsdotter ◽  
Sus Sola Corazon ◽  
Ulrik Sidenius ◽  
Patrik Karlsson Nyed ◽  
Helmer Bøving Larsen ◽  
...  

BackgroundStress-related illnesses are a major threat to public health, and there is increasing demand for validated treatments.AimsTo test the efficacy of nature-based therapy (NBT) for patients with stress-related illnesses.MethodRandomised controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT01849718) comparing Nacadia® NBT (NNBT) with the cognitive–behavioural therapy known as Specialised Treatment for Severe Bodily Distress Syndromes (STreSS). In total, 84 participants were randomly allocated to one of the two treatments. The primary outcome measure was the mean aggregate score on the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI).ResultsBoth treatments resulted in a significant increase in the PGWBI (primary outcome) and a decrease in burnout (the Shirom–Melamed Burnout Questionnaire, secondary outcome), which were both sustained 12 months later. No significant difference in efficacy was found between NNBT and STreSS for primary outcome and secondary outcomes.ConclusionsThe study showed no statistical evidence of a difference between NNBT and STreSS for treating patients with stress-related illnesses.Declaration of interestNone.


BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. e018355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyomi Shinohara ◽  
Takuya Aoki ◽  
Ryuhei So ◽  
Yasushi Tsujimoto ◽  
Aya M Suganuma ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo investigate whether overstatements in abstract conclusions influence primary care physicians’ evaluations when they read reports of randomised controlled trials (RCTs)DesignRCT setting: This study was a parallel-group randomised controlled survey, conducted online while masking the study hypothesis.ParticipantsVolunteers were recruited from members of the Japan Primary Care Association in January 2017. We sent email invitations to 7040 primary care physicians. Among the 787 individuals who accessed the website, 622 were eligible and automatically randomised into ‘without overstatement’ (n=307) and ‘with overstatement’ (n=315) groups.InterventionsWe selected five abstracts from published RCTs with at least one non-significant primary outcome and overstatement in the abstract conclusion. To construct a version without overstatement, we rewrote the conclusion sections. The methods and results sections were standardised to provide the necessary information of primary outcome information when it was missing in the original abstract. Participants were randomly assigned to read an abstract either with or without overstatements and asked to evaluate the benefit of the intervention.Outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the participants’ evaluation of the benefit of the intervention discussed in the abstract, on a scale from 0 to 10. A secondary outcome was the validity of the conclusion.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the groups with respect to their evaluation of the benefit of the intervention (mean difference: 0.07, 95% CI −0.28 to 0.42, p=0.69). Participants in the ‘without’ group considered the study conclusion to be more valid than those in the ‘with’ group (mean difference: 0.97, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.36, P<0.001).ConclusionThe overstatements in abstract conclusions did not significantly influence the primary care physicians’ evaluations of the intervention effect when necessary information about the primary outcomes was distinctly reported.Trial registration numberUMIN000025317; Pre-results.


2015 ◽  
Vol 206 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonie Calver ◽  
Vincent Drinkwater ◽  
Rahul Gupta ◽  
Colin B. Page ◽  
Geoffrey K. Isbister

BackgroundAgitation and aggression are significant problems in acute psychiatric units. There is little consensus on which drug is most effective and safest for sedation of these patients.AimsTo compare the effectiveness and safety of haloperidolv. droperidol for patients with agitation and aggression.MethodIn a masked, randomised controlled trial (ACTRN12611000565943) intramuscular droperidol (10 mg) was compared with intramuscular haloperidol (10 mg) for adult patients with acute behavioural disturbance in a psychiatric intensive care unit. The primary outcome was time to sedation within 120 min. Secondary outcomes were use of additional sedation, adverse events and staff injuries.ResultsFrom 584 patients, 110 were randomised to haloperidol and 118 to droperidol. Effective sedation occurred in 210 (92%) patients within 120 min. There was no significant difference in median time to sedation: 20 min (interquartile range 15–30, range 10–75) for haloperidolv. 25 min (IQR 15–30, range 10–115) for droperidol (P= 0.89). Additional sedation was used more often with haloperidol (13%v. 5%,P= 0.06), but adverse effects were less common with haloperidol (1%v. 5%,P= 0.12). There were 8 staff injuries.ConclusionsBoth haloperidol and droperidol were effective for sedation of patients with acute behavioural disturbance.


Author(s):  
QY Goh ◽  
SA Lie ◽  
Z Tan ◽  
PYB Tan ◽  
SY Ng ◽  
...  

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple guidelines have recommended the videolaryngoscope for tracheal intubation. However, there is no evidence that videolaryngoscope reduces time to tracheal intubation, which is important for COVID-19 patients with respiratory failure. Methods: To simulate intubation of COVID-19 patients, we randomised 28 elective surgical patients to be intubated with either the McGrath™ MAC videolaryngoscope or the direct laryngoscope by specialist anaesthetists donning 3M™ Jupiter™ powered air-purifying respirators (PAPR) and N95 masks. Primary outcome was time to intubation. Results: The median (IQR) times to intubation were 61s (37–63 s) and 41.5s (37–56 s) in the videolaryngoscope and direct laryngoscope groups respectively (p = 0.35). The closest mean (SD) distances between the anaesthetist and the patient during intubation were 21.6 cm (4.8 cm) and 17.6 cm (5.3 cm) in the videolaryngoscope and direct laryngoscope groups, respectively (p = 0.045). There were no significant differences in the median intubation difficulty scale scores, proportion of successful intubation at first laryngoscopic attempt and proportion of intubations requiring adjuncts. Intubations for all the patients were successful with no adverse event. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the time to intubation by specialist anaesthetists who were donned in PAPR and N95 masks on elective surgical patients with either the McGrath™ videolaryngoscope or direct laryngoscope. The distance between the anaesthetist and patient was significantly further with the videolaryngoscope. The direct laryngoscope could be an equal alternative to videolaryngoscope for specialist anaesthetists when resources are limited or disrupted due to the pandemic.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pinping Zhou ◽  
Chao Zhang ◽  
Guijin Huang ◽  
Yuan Hu ◽  
Wenzhu Ma ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Dental procedures under general anesthesia (DGA) was found to improve the oral health-related quality of children's life. However, some parents and pediatricians expressed concern about the neurotoxicity of general anesthesia. The purpose of this trial was to investigate whether DGA in children has an adverse effect on neurodevelopment. Methods In this prospective, assessor-masked, controlled, equivalence trial, we recruited 340 children younger than 7 years who were undergoing caries treatment between Feb 1, 2019, and Aug 31, 2019, without factors affecting neurodevelopment. They received either sevoflurane-based general anesthesia or awake-local anesthesia. The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Fourth Edition Chinese version was used to evaluate the neurodevelopment of children at six months after surgery, and the Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ) was selected as the primary outcome. Predefine the 95% CI of a difference in means within five (1/3 SD) as the equivalence margin. Results The outcome data were obtained from 129 children in the general anesthesia group and 144 in the local anesthesia group. The median length of general anesthesia was 130 min (IQR 110–160). There was equivalence in means of FSIQ score between the general anesthesia group and the local anesthesia group (local minus general anesthesia 0.46, 95% CI -2.35 to 1.61). There was no significant difference in FSIQ scores between different age groups and different anesthesia durations. Just the mother's education could affect the primary outcome. Conclusions In this trial, prolonged DGA with a sevoflurane-only anesthetic in preschool children, does not adversely affect neurodevelopment at six months after surgery compared with awake-local anesthesia. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800015216. Registered Mar 15 2018, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=24830.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 597-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Price ◽  
Jeffrey McCullough ◽  
Paul Ness ◽  
Ronald G. Strauss ◽  
Shelley M. Pulkrabek ◽  
...  

Abstract Bacterial and fungal infections continue to be a major problem in patients with prolonged severe neutropenia. Early controlled trials suggested that granulocyte transfusions were modestly effective in this setting, but the doses provided were later considered inadequate. Recent studies have shown that the dose can be increased substantially by administering G-CSF ± dexamethasone to granulocyte donors. Although these cells circulate in neutropenic recipients and appear to function normally, the evidence for clinical efficacy has been inconclusive. We report here the result of the RING study, a recently completed randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of high-dose granulocyte transfusion therapy, carried out as part of the NHLBI Transfusion Medicine/Hemostasis Clinical Trials Network. Fourteen clinical sites participated. Eligible subjects were those with neutropenia (ANC<500) and proven/probable/presumed bacterial or fungal infection. Subjects were randomized to receive either 1) standard antimicrobial therapy or 2) standard antimicrobial therapy plus daily granulocyte transfusions from normal donors stimulated with G-CSF (450µg) and dexamethasone (8mg). The primary end point was a composite one; survival plus a microbial response, both evaluated 42 days after randomization. Microbial response was determined by a blinded adjudication panel. The target sample size was 236 subjects, designed to provide 80% power to detect a 20% difference in success rates between treatment and control groups; however, only 114 subjects could be enrolled. Patient infections were 36% invasive fungal, 27% invasive bacterial, 11% fungemia, and 26% bacteremia. Subjects in both arms were well matched in terms of demographics, underlying disease, types and sites of infection, and severity of illness. Fifty six subjects were randomized to the granulocyte arm; 51 received at least one transfusion; the mean time from eligibility to the first transfusion was 2.3 +/- 1.2 days. Among these 51 subjects, the median number of transfusions was 5 (quartiles 3 and 9), given over a median of 6 days (quartiles 4 and 11). The median number of granulocytes administered per transfusion was 54.9 x109 (quartiles 26.1 x109, 72.5 x109). Fourteen percent of these patients had > Grade 3 hypoxemia develop during or within six hours after a granulocyte transfusion, requiring ventilation in one patient (2%). No deaths were attributed to adverse effects associated with the transfusions. Among subjects with sufficient data to determine the primary outcome, success rates were 42% (20/48) and 43% (21/49) for the granulocyte and control groups, respectively (p> 0.99) on Intention to Treat (ITT) analysis, and 49% (17/35) and 41% (16/39), respectively, for subjects who adhered to their assigned treatments (Per Protocol (PP) analysis)(p=0.64). There was also no significant difference between treatment groups in a model of the primary outcome that adjusted for baseline prognostic factors (e.g. ventilator use, high Zubrod score). Differences in primary end point success rates for granulocyte and control arms did not differ significantly for any infection type whether analyzed by ITT or PP. Outcomes for patients who received the first transfusion within 2 days of eligibility were similar to outcomes for patients who received the first transfusion later. For patients who received at least three granulocyte transfusions, those who received an average dose per transfusion of >50x109 granulocytes had a higher success rate (57.7%)(n=26) than those receiving <5x109 cells per transfusion (11.1%)(n=9)(p = 0.04); while supporting the hypothesis that dose is critical to the outcome, this result needs be interpreted with caution because of the low numbers and poor outcome of the low dose group. There was no significant difference between the granulocyte and control arms on overall survival to either 42 or 90 days after randomization. Because of incomplete patient enrollment, the power of this study to detect a 20% difference in overall success rates was reduced to approximately 40%. Thus it is possible that a true convincing favorable effect was missed, particularly, as suggested, in the subset of patients who received daily transfusions containing at least 50x109 granulocytes per transfusion. Disclosures Off Label Use: In the study being discussed, G-CSF is administered to normal blood donors. This is an off-label use of G-CSF. McCullough:Fresenius/Kabe: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ness:Terumo BCT: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document