scholarly journals Arthroscopic Management of Intra-articular Ligament Lesions on Distal Radius Fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (01) ◽  
pp. 024-036
Author(s):  
Marcio Aurelio Aita ◽  
Ricardo Kaempf ◽  
Bruno Gianordoli Biondi ◽  
Gary Alan Montano ◽  
Fernando Towata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Return To Work ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Joint Surface ◽  
Wrist Arthroscopy ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Mean

AbstractArticular distal radius fractures (DRFs) have increased in incidence in recent years, especially among the economically active population. Most of the treatment approaches are based on plain X- rays, and do not give us any information on how to treat these fractures. In the search for solutions with greater precision in diagnosis, in reducing the joint surface of the fracture, and envolving minimally-invasive techniques, we found arthroscopy as the main tool for these patients. Therefore, an enhanced understanding of the biomechanics of the different types of fracture associated with ligamentous lesions should facilitate the right decision regarding the treatment. The present paper aims at providing a management-oriented concept to diagnose and treat ligamentous lesions associated with intra-articular DRFs based on a arthroscopy-assisted procedure, and showing the objective and patient-reported outcomes and a new classification. The objective and patient-reported outcomes were: the mean range of motion (ROM) was of 94.80% on the non-affected side; the mean score on the abbreviated version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) was of 3.6 (range: 1 to 12). The score on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) was of 1.66 (range: 1 to 3). Complications were observed in 2 (13.33%) patients: extensor tendon synovitis in 1 patient, and a limitation (stiffness) in ROM in 1 patient, both treated with wrist arthroscopy release. The mean time until the return to work was of 6.4 weeks. In patients with unstable intra-articular DRFs associated with ligamentous lesions, the fixation of specific osseous-ligamentous fragments and ligamentous repair/reconstruction by wrist arthroscopy prove to be a safe and reliable treatment. The clinical and functional results predict that the patients can return to work more quickly.

scholarly journals Polytrauma and High-energy Injury Mechanisms are Associated with Worse Patient-reported Outcomes After Distal Radius Fractures

2019 ◽  
Vol 477 (10) ◽  
pp. 2267-2275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. M. J. van der Vliet ◽  
A. A. R. Sweet ◽  
A. R. Bhashyam ◽  
S. Ferree ◽  
M. van Heijl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Injury Mechanisms ◽  
Patient Reported

scholarly journals The CAST study protocol: a cluster randomized trial assessing the effect of circumferential casting versus plaster splinting on fracture redisplacement in reduced distal radius fractures in adults

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Britt Barvelink ◽  
◽  
Max Reijman ◽  
Niels W. L. Schep ◽  
Vanessa Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Closed Reduction ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Abstract Background There is no consensus concerning the optimal casting technique for displaced distal radius fractures (DRFs) following closed reduction. This study evaluates whether a splint or a circumferential cast is most optimal to prevent fracture redisplacement in adult patients with a reduced DRF. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of both cast types will be calculated. Methods/design This multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial will compare initial immobilization with a circumferential below-elbow cast versus a below-elbow plaster splint in reduced DRFs. Randomization will take place on hospital-level (cluster, n = 10) with a cross-over point halfway the inclusion of the needed number of patients per hospital. Inclusion criteria comprise adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a primary displaced DRF which is treated conservatively after closed reduction. Multiple trauma patients (Injury Severity Score ≥ 16), concomitant ulnar fractures (except styloid process fractures) and patients with concomitant injury on the ipsilateral arm or inability to complete study forms will be excluded. Primary study outcome is fracture redisplacement of the initial reduced DRF. Secondary outcomes are patient-reported outcomes assessed with the Disability Arm Shoulder Hand score (DASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score (PRWE), comfort of the cast, quality of life assessed with the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, analgesics use, cost-effectiveness and (serious) adverse events occurence. In total, 560 patients will be included and followed for 1 year. The estimated time required for inclusion will be 18 months. Discussion The CAST study will provide evidence whether the type of cast immobilization is of influence on fracture redisplacement in distal radius fractures. Extensive follow-up during one year concerning radiographic, functional and patient reported outcomes will give a broad view on DRF recovery. Trial registration Registered in the Dutch Trial Registry on January 14th 2020. Registration number: NL8311.

scholarly journals Ability of a Risk Prediction Tool to Stratify Quality and Cost for Older Patients With Operative Distal Radius Fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932199963
Author(s):  
Abidemi Adenikinju ◽  
Rachel Ranson ◽  
Samantha A. Rettig ◽  
Kenneth A. Egol ◽  
Sanjit R. Konda
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Prediction Tool ◽  
Middle Aged ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Moderate Risk ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Trauma Triage

Introduction: Distal radius fractures are the second most common fracture in the elderly population. The incidence of these fractures has increased over time, and is projected to continue to do so. The aim of this study is to utilize a validated trauma risk prediction tool to stratify middle-aged and geriatric patients with operative distal radius fractures as well as compare hospital quality metrics and inpatient hospitalization costs among the risk groups. Materials and Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled in an orthopedic trauma registry. The Score for Trauma Triage in Geriatric and Middle Aged (STTGMA) was calculated using patient demographics, injury severity, and functional status. Patients were then stratified into minimal-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk cohorts based on their scores. Length of stay, need for escalation of care, complications, mortality, discharge location, 1-year patient reported outcomes, and index admission costs were evaluated. Results: Ninety-two patients met inclusion criteria. Sixty-three (68.5%) patients were managed with outpatient surgery. The mean inpatient length of stay for the high-risk cohort was 2.9x and 2.2x higher than the minimal and moderate-risk cohorts, respectively (2.0 + 2.9 days vs. 0.7 + 0.9 and 0.9 + 1.1 days, P = .019). There were no complications or mortality in any of the risk groups. No patients required intensive care and all patients were discharged home. There was no difference in readmission rates, inpatient cost, or 1-year patient reported outcomes among the risk cohorts. Discussion/Conclusions: The Score for Trauma Triage in Geriatric and Middle-Aged is able to risk-stratify patients that undergo operative intervention of distal radius fractures. Middle aged and elderly patients with isolated closed distal radius fractures can be safely managed on an outpatient basis regardless of risk. Standardized pathways can be created in the management of these injuries, thereby optimizing value-based care. Level of evidence: Prognostic Level III

scholarly journals Fixation Strength in Full and Limited Fixation of Osteoporotic Distal Radius Fractures

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 461-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Kaveh Mansuripur ◽  
Joseph A. Gil ◽  
Dale Cassidy ◽  
Patrick Kane ◽  
Augusta Kluk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Peak Load ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Volar Plate ◽  
Fixation Strength ◽  
Joint Surface ◽  
Clinical Failure ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Yield Load ◽  
Load Peak

Background: The purpose of this investigation is to determine whether osteoporotic intra-articular distal radius fractures surgically treated by filling all 7 distal screws of a volar plate will have a higher load to failure than those treated by filling only 4 distal screws. Methods: Ten matched pairs of fresh frozen cadaveric forearms were randomized within each pair to be treated by using either all 7 of the distal holes of a volar plate or only 4 distal screws. The distal radius fixation was performed with unicortical screws going to but not through the dorsal cortex, and the most distal screws were placed within 4 mm of the joint surface. An AO C2 type fracture was then created. All specimens were tested cyclically, with an axial load of 60 N, at 3 Hz for 1000 cycles to simulate early postoperative motion. All specimens were subsequently tested to mechanical failure. Results: There were no failures in either group during cyclic testing. There was no difference detected between groups for mean stiffness, yield load, peak load, or load to clinical failure. In both groups, the yield load, peak load, and load to clinical failure were higher than the 60- to 100-N forces encountered during postoperative rehabilitation. Conclusions: There was no difference detected between osteoporotic intra-articular distal radius fractures treated by utilizing all 7 of the distal screws of a volar plate compared with those treated with only 4 distal screws.

The correlation of initial radiographic characteristics of distal radius fractures and injuries of the triangular fibrocartilage complex

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 516-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Kasapinova ◽  
V. Kamiloski
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius Fracture ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Radius Fracture ◽  
Wrist Arthroscopy ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Triangular Fibrocartilage ◽  
A Prospective Study

Our purpose was to determine the correlation of initial radiographic parameters of a distal radius fracture with an injury of the triangular fibrocartilage complex. In a prospective study, 85 patients with surgically treated distal radius fractures were included. Wrist arthroscopy was used to identify and classify triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions. The initial radial length and angulation, dorsal angulation, ulnar variance and distal radioulnar distance were measured. Wrist arthroscopy identified a triangular fibrocartilage complex lesion in 45 patients. Statistical analysis did not identify a correlation with any single radiographic parameter of the distal radius fractures with the associated triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries. The initial radiograph of a distal radius fracture does not predict a triangular fibrocartilage complex injury. Level of evidence: III

Interobserver Agreement and Intraobserver Reproducibility of Barzullah Working Classification of Distal End Radius Fractures among Orthopaedic Residents

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (01) ◽  
pp. 24-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Younis Kamal ◽  
Hayat Ahmad Khan ◽  
Naseem UI Gani ◽  
Munir Farooq ◽  
Adil Bashir Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Interobserver Agreement ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Substantial Agreement ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Intraobserver Reproducibility ◽  
Moderate Agreement ◽  
Kappa Value ◽  
The Mean

Background: The purpose of this study is to test the hypothesis of the new classification system of distal end radius fractures (Barzullah working classification) proposed by one of the author in a prospective cohort study, among the orthopaedic residents. Methods: The initial post-injury radiographs of 300 patients with distal radius fractures in a tertiary centre were classified by two junior residents (JR1 and JR2) and two senior residents (SR1 and SR2) in the emergency department over a period of two years. The collected data was analysed statistically by using Cohan's kappa for measuring Intraobserver reproducibility and Fleiss kappa for measuring Interobserver agreement. Results: The mean kappa value for Interobserver agreement was 0.53 (moderate agreement) at the end of one year and the mean kappa value at the end of study period was 0.64 (substantial agreement). The mean kappa value for Intraobserver reproducibility of JR1 was 0.45 (moderate agreement), JR2 was 0.39 (fair agreement), SR1 was 0.62 (substantial agreement) and SR2 was 0.67 (substantial agreement). Conclusions: Barzullah working classification of distal radius fractures presented in this study has good characteristics compared to those of already studied classification systems among orthopaedic residents.

Outcomes of Supplementary Spring Wire Fixation With Volar Plating for Volar Lunate Facet Fragments in Distal Radius Fractures

Hand ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 155894472097640
Author(s):  
Nathaniel Fogel ◽  
Lauren M. Shapiro ◽  
Allison Roe ◽  
Sahitya Denduluri ◽  
Marc J. Richard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Distal Radius ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Wrist Flexion ◽  
Volar Plating ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Locked Plating ◽  
Spring Wire ◽  
Flexion Extension ◽  
Wire Fixation ◽  
The Mean

Background Intra-articular distal radius fractures with small volar lunate facet fragments can be challenging to address with volar plate fixation alone. Volar locked plating with supplementary spring wire fixation has been previously described in a small series but has not been further described in the literature. We hypothesized that this technique can provide adequate fixation for volar lunate facet fragments smaller than 15 mm in length, which are at risk of displacement. Methods We completed a retrospective chart review (2015-2019) of patients who underwent volar locked plating with the addition of supplementary spring wire fixation for intra-articular distal radius fractures with a volar lunate facet fragment (<15 mm). Postoperative radiographs were assessed to evaluate union, evidence of hardware failure, escape of the volar lunate facet fragment, and postoperative volar tilt. Clinical outcome was assessed with wrist flexion/extension, arc of pronosupination, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score ( QuickDASH) scores. Results Fifteen patients were identified, of which all went on to fracture union. There were no hardware failures or escape of the volar lunate facet fragment at final follow-up. One patient underwent hardware removal for symptoms of flexor tendon irritation. The mean wrist flexion was 59°, wrist extension was 70°, pronation was 81°, and supination was 76°. The mean QuickDASH score was 18.5. The mean postoperative volar tilt was 3.6°. Conclusions Supplementary spring wire fixation with standard volar plating provides stable fixation for lunate facet fragments less than 15 mm. This technique is a safe and reliable alternative to commercially available fragment-specific implants.

Early Outcomes of Scapholunate Injuries With Concomitant Distal Radius Fractures

Hand ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 155894471989003
Author(s):  
Nicholas C. Duethman ◽  
William R. Aibinder ◽  
Nathaniel L. Robinson ◽  
Steven L. Moran ◽  
Sanjeev Kakar
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Wrist Arthroscopy ◽  
Scapholunate Ligament ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Functional Differences

Background: There is limited literature regarding the treatment of concomitant scapholunate ligament (SL) injuries in acute distal radius fractures (DRFs). We hypothesized that surgical treatment of SL injuries in adult patients with DRFs leads to improved functional outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review was made of 42 adult patients who underwent surgical treatment of a DRF with a SL injury between 2005 and 2013. In all, 39 of the 42 patients sustained an intra-articular DRF (AO B or C). SL injury was diagnosed by SL diastasis > 3 mm on posteroanterior (PA) radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, or with wrist arthroscopy. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 23 had a SL repair and were treated within 21 days of injury (acute), 8 underwent SL repair greater than 21 days from injury (subacute/chronic), and 11 did not undergo repair (non-operative). Median overall time to clinical follow-up was 5.1 years. Mayo Wrist Scores (MWS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were used to evaluate functional outcome. Results: Clinical outcomes measured by the MWS at final follow-up (6 months-12 years) showed no significant differences between the 3 groups. Of patients treated acutely, 17.3% had good to excellent MWS. MWS at 1-year follow-up was 68.4, 70, and 64 in the acute, subacute/chronic, and non-operative groups, respectively. DASH scores were 16.7, 14.3, and 11.8 in the acute, subacute/chronic, and nonoperative groups, respectively, at a mean of 7.8 years. Conclusions: At mid-term follow-up, all 3 treatment groups had similar DASH scores to the general population. There were no statistical functional differences between any of the groups based upon MWS or DASH scores.

COMPARISON OF RADIOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF INTERNAL FIXATION USING TWO DIFFERENT VOLAR PLATES FOR DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES

Hand Surgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 357-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chul-Hyun Cho ◽  
Si-Wook Lee ◽  
Gu-Hee Jung
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Distal Radius ◽  
Distal Radius Fractures ◽  
Implant Design ◽  
Radius Fractures ◽  
Radial Length ◽  
Type C ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of volar plating using two different implants for distal radius fractures. Fifty-two patients with AO type C fractures were placed in either of two groups: the AO LDRS group (26 patients) or the Acu-Loc group (26 patients). Radiological parameters including radial length, radial inclination, volar tilt, and intra-articular step-off were significantly improved after surgery. The mean Mayo Wrist Performance Score was 84.6 in the AO LDRS group and 81.1 in the Acu-Loc group. The mean Subjective Wrist Value was 86.7% in the AO LDRS group and 86.3% in the Acu-Loc group. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to both radiological and clinical outcomes at the final follow-up evaluation. Volar fixed-angle plating for unstable distal radius fractures had satisfactory radiological and clinical outcomes. The difference of implant design did not influence overall final outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document